Hernias are a common medical condition characterized by the protrusion of organs or tissues through weakened muscle walls, affecting millions worldwide annually. Historically, from being treated with open surgeries using tension-free mesh repairs, the landscape of hernia repair has evolved significantly. This evolution has been marked by the advent and refinement of minimally invasive techniques, including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches, which offer reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery times, and improved patient outcomes compared to traditional methods. This comprehensive review aims to elucidate the evolution of hernia repair techniques, emphasizing the transition from conventional mesh repairs to advanced minimally invasive methodologies. By examining the historical progression and current state of hernia surgery, this review thoroughly analyzes the advancements in surgical techniques, materials, and technologies. Furthermore, it explores emerging trends such as biological meshes, ultrasound-guided procedures, and 3D printing applications in hernia repair. The clinical significance of these advancements lies in their potential to enhance the patient\'s quality of life, minimize complications, and optimize healthcare resource utilization. Insights gained from this review will inform clinicians and researchers about the efficacy, safety, and comparative effectiveness of various hernia repair approaches, guiding future directions in hernia management and fostering innovation in surgical practice.

Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is a surgical procedure performed to address various conditions such as hernias, incisional hernias, and complex abdominal wall defects. Mesh fixation plays a crucial role in providing mechanical reinforcement to the weakened abdominal wall during AWR. Traditionally, suturing has been the preferred method for mesh fixation; however, adhesion techniques using tissue adhesives or glues have gained attention as an alternative approach. This systematic review aims to compare suturing and adhesion techniques for mesh fixation in AWR and assess their effectiveness in preventing hernia recurrence. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across relevant databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that fulfilled the predetermined eligibility criteria were included. The primary outcome measure of interest was hernia recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, surgical site infections, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes. A risk of bias assessment was performed for the included studies, and data were synthesized qualitatively. Overall, the results of the included studies suggest that atraumatic mesh fixation with glue may have the potential to reduce chronic groin pain (CGP). However, there were significant variations in patient selection criteria, glue administration techniques, and hernia repair methods among the trials, which limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, the definitions of CGP and measurement scales for postoperative pain varied across studies, making it challenging to compare outcomes. The limitations of the review include the small sample sizes in some trials, relatively short follow-up durations, and the lack of standardized criteria for assessing variables such as foreign body sensation and groin compliance. Furthermore, the economic implications of using glue fixation compared to traditional suture fixation need to be considered.

Reinforcement of crural closure with synthetic resorbable mesh has been proposed to decrease recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair, but continues to be controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and intermediate-term results of using biosynthetic mesh to augment the hiatus.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis.
The systematic literature search found 520 articles, 101 of which were duplicates and 355 articles were determined to be unrelated to our study and excluded. The full text of the remaining 64 articles was thoroughly assessed. A total of 18 articles (1846 patients) were ultimately included for this review, describing hiatal hernia repair using three different biosynthetic meshes-BIO-A, Phasix ST, and polyglactin mesh. Mean operative time varied from 127 to 223 min. Mean follow up varied from 12 to 54 months. There were no mesh erosions or explants. One mesh-related complication of stenosis requiring reoperation was reported with BIO-A. Studies showed significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, as well as satisfaction with surgery. Recurrence was reported as radiologic or clinical recurrence. Overall, recurrence rate varied from 0.9 to 25%.
The use of biosynthetic mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair with low complications rates and high symptom resolution. The reported recurrence rates are highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in defining and evaluating recurrences. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up should be performed to better analyze outcomes and recurrence rates.

Incisional hernias are a common problem following major abdominal surgery. There are numerous surgical techniques described in the existing English scientific literature with different planes for mesh placement. The current review aims to compare onlay versus sublay repair in managing incisional hernias. A systematic literature search was conducted on Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Medline to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing onlay versus sublay mesh repair for incisional hernias. We identified six RCTs that included 986 patients, of whom 503 were in the onlay group and 485 were in the sublay group. There was no statistically significant difference in hernia recurrence between the onlay and sublay groups (odds ratio (OR): 1.3 (0.49-3.47), 95% confidence interval (CI), p=0.60). Seroma formation was significantly higher in the onlay group (OR: 2.85 (1.74-4.67), 95% CI, p<0.0001). There were 45 reported cases of surgical site infection (SSI). There was no significant difference between the two groups (OR: 1.46 (0.44-4.84), 95% CI, p=0.54). Haematomas were reported in 11 cases, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR: 2.13 (0.56-8.19), 95% CI, p=0.27). Four RCTs reported the length of the hospital stay. There was no significant difference between the two groups (mean difference (MD): 0.53 (-0.16-1.22), 95% CI, p=0.13). We failed to draw conclusive clinical recommendations due to the variability in the included RCTs. We recommend well-structured, large-volume RCTs to better compare these two surgical techniques.

Traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is a rare consequence of blunt abdominal trauma, usually in the setting of multitrauma, with little consensus or guidelines for management. We present a case series of patients with traumatic herniae over a 9-year period and a suggested management algorithm.
Retrospective review of all patients with TAWH from 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2019 at a Level 1 adult Major Trauma Centre. Clinical presentation, surgical intervention and complications and recurrence were analysed.
Forty-seven patients were found to have TAWH, 0.5% of all major trauma admissions. Thirty (63.8%) were repaired, 12 acutely, 11 semi-acute and 7 delayed. All but 1 (fall>3 m) were transport associated, with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 29. Follow-up data for operative cases were available for all but one (97%). Seven (23.3%) cases had a recurrence, more common in the acute repair group (33.3%) compared to semi-acute (18.2%), and elective group (14.3%).
TAWH is a rare but potentially serious consequence of blunt abdominal trauma. This series has favoured earlier repair for anterior TAWH, or all those undergoing a laparotomy for other reasons, and elective repair for lumbar or lateral TAWH that do not require a laparotomy for other conditions. We present our preferred algorithm for management, accepting that there are many available strategies in this heterogeneous group of injuries. Loss of follow up and recurrence are a concern, and clinicians are encouraged to develop processes to ensure that TAWH are not a \'forgotten hernia\'.

Sciatic hernia is a rare type of pelvic floor hernia. The herniated tissue can include the ureter, small and large bowel, and ovary, among other tissues. Only a few cases of laparoscopic treatment for a sciatic hernia with small-bowel incarceration have been reported. We report our experience using a laparoscopic approach for treatment of sciatic hernia in an 83-year-old woman and review the literature on sciatic hernias. The patient was referred to our hospital complaining of constipation and abdominal bloating. Computed tomography (CT) scanning showed a right sciatic hernia containing the small bowel. Laparoscopic repair of the sciatic hernia was performed using a self-fixating mesh. The patient was discharged after an uneventful postoperative course and has not developed abdominal bloating or constipation postoperatively. In conclusion, a sciatic hernia was successfully repaired using a laparoscopic trans-preperitoneal approach and ProGrip Self-Fixating Mesh.

The choice of how to repair inguinal hernias in adolescents has historically been a matter of experience and differed between pediatric surgeons who traditionally performed a high ligation of the sac and general surgeons who typically perform a repair using mesh. This up-to-date review thoroughly examines the subject and discusses the suitability of both types of repairs in this unique age group.
A 20-year Pub Med search was performed for the following terms: adolescent hernia repair including reports of mesh hernia repair in adolescents and postoperative complications including chronic inguinal pain and recurrences.
The evidence in the literature suggests that while there appears to be no difference between the two types of repairs with regards to recurrence and complications, changes in the pelvic floor physiology in adolescents suggest that a selective, individualized approach can be recommended depending on the size and nature of the presenting pathology.
A selective approach to the inguinal hernia in adolescent patients based on the size of the defect appears justified.

To identify and sum all available evidence pertaining to the management of Amyand\'s hernia (AH).
A systematic search of the MedLine, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was performed for studies published until January 2020.
In total, 111 studies incorporating 161 patients were identified, 96 (86.4%) being case reports, 11 (9.9%) case series, and 4 (3.7%) retrospective patient cohorts. Mean patient age was 58.5 ± 19.6 years with 136 (83.9%) being males and 25 (16.1%) females. Furthermore, 149 (92.5%) cases were right-sided hernias while 12 (7.5%) cases were left-sided. Overall, 62.3% of patients presented emergently and 77.3% of patients\' cohort were eventually diagnosed with incarcerated AH. Preoperative diagnosis of AH was established in 23.1% of patients and was achieved either by ultrasound (25%) or CT scan (75%). Operative findings consisted of normal appendix in 73 (45.4%) cases, uncomplicated appendicitis in 62 (38.5%) patients, and perforated appendix in 26 (16.1%). Regarding patients with appendicitis, mesh placement was reported for 17 (21.2%), herniorrhaphy was performed for 51 (63.7%) while 12 (15.1%) patients did not undergo hernia repair during the initial operation. Mesh utilization rates were significantly higher in patients with a normal appendix. Seven cases involved AH containing appendiceal neoplasms. Thirteen cases (8.6%) of postoperative complications were documented and a single case of postoperative death.
AH is a rare type of inguinal hernia usually complicated by appendicitis. Hernia reconstruction should be tailored to each patient individually according to the extent of inguinal canal inflammation.

To examine the updated evidence on safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of mesh versus suture elective umbilical hernia (UH) repair and to explore the timely tendency variations favouring one treatment over another.
MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases were consulted. A systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were conducted.
Six RCTs were included for a total of 742 patients. Overall, 383 (51.6%) underwent mesh, while 359 (48.4%) underwent suture repair. The estimated pooled postoperative recurrence RR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.53; p < 0.001). The TSA showed a statistically significant timely tendency in favour of mesh repair with a boundary cross curve (Z = 1.96) before reaching the information size. The estimated pooled seroma, haematoma, and wound infection RR were 1.45 (p = 0.368), 0.54 (p = 0.196), and 0.71 (p = 0.375), respectively. The TSA for wound-related complications showed partial, non-significant results.
Elective UH mesh repair seems to be associated with reduced risk of postoperative recurrence compared to simple suture repair with a statistically significant timely trend endorsed by the TSA. Definitive considerations concerning the cumulative effect for seroma, haematoma, and wound infection are premature. Further studies are warranted to endorse these results and deeply investigate the timely tendency variations.

BACKGROUND: Spigelian Hernia is an uncommon pathology of abdominal wall (0.12-2.4%), usually small sized and with vague symptoms. It rarely presents as Small Bowel Obstruction or reaches dimensions that becomes clinically remarkable.
METHODS: 84-year-old woman entered our Surgical Department for Small Bowel Obstruction due to a giant (8 × 7 cm) abdominal wall hernia, which was intraoperatively identified as Spigelian Hernia. We performed a minilaparotomy with reduction of viable small bowel and preperitoneal positioning of polypropilene mesh. Postoperative course was uneventfull.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to its small dimensions and infrequence, the diagnosis could be challenging even if the patient undergoes a CT scan. The presentation with clear signs of small bowel obstruction associated with a large abdominal hernia is rare and suggests a urgent surgical approach with mesh repair to avoid recurrences.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if rarely symptomatic, the Spigelian Hernia is an entity to consider in the differential diagnosis of small bowel obstruction in a virgin abdomen. Preoperative diagnosis, when available, is mandatory to guide a correct surgical approach.