International consensus supports the development of standardized protocols for measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) to facilitate the integration of mGFR testing in both clinical and research settings. To this end, the European Kidney Function Consortium convened an international group of experts with relevant experience in mGFR. The working group performed an extensive literature search to inform the development of recommendations for mGFR determination using 1-compartment plasma clearance models and iohexol as the exogenous filtration marker. Iohexol was selected as it is non-radio labeled, inexpensive, and safe, can be assayed at a central laboratory, and the other commonly used non-radio-labeled tracers have been (inulin) or are soon to be (iothalamate) discontinued. A plasma clearance model was selected over urine clearance as it requires no urine collection. A 1 compartment was preferred to 2 compartments as it requires fewer samples. The recommendations are based on published evidence complemented by expert opinion. The consensus paper covers practical advice for patients and health professionals, preparation, administration, and safety aspects of iohexol, laboratory analysis, blood sample collection and sampling times using both multiple and single-sample protocols, description of the mGFR mathematical calculations, as well as implementation strategies. Supplementary materials include patient and provider information sheets, standard operating procedures, a study protocol template, and support for mGFR calculation.

Autosomal polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic form of kidney failure, reflecting unmet needs in management. Prescription of the only approved treatment (tolvaptan) is limited to persons with rapidly progressing ADPKD. Rapid progression may be diagnosed by assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline, usually estimated (eGFR) from equations based on serum creatinine (eGFRcr) or cystatin-C (eGFRcys). We have assessed the concordance between eGFR decline and identification of rapid progression (rapid eGFR loss), and measured GFR (mGFR) declines (rapid mGFR loss) using iohexol clearance in 140 adults with ADPKD with ≥3 mGFR and eGFRcr assessments, of which 97 also had eGFRcys assessments. The agreement between mGFR and eGFR decline was poor: mean concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) between the method declines were low (0.661, range 0.628 to 0.713), and Bland and Altman limits of agreement between eGFR and mGFR declines were wide. CCC was lower for eGFRcys. From a practical point of view, creatinine-based formulas failed to detect rapid mGFR loss (-3 mL/min/y or faster) in around 37% of the cases. Moreover, formulas falsely indicated around 40% of the cases with moderate or stable decline as rapid progressors. The reliability of formulas in detecting real mGFR decline was lower in the non-rapid-progressors group with respect to that in rapid-progressor patients. The performance of eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys equations was even worse. In conclusion, eGFR decline may misrepresent mGFR decline in ADPKD in a significant percentage of patients, potentially misclassifying them as progressors or non-progressors and impacting decisions of initiation of tolvaptan therapy.

Accurate measurement of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for detecting renal insufficiency in living kidney donors. Iohexol is a \"near-ideal\" exogenous filtration marker for GFR measurement that has attracted increasing interest in clinical practice because it is non-toxic, non-radioactive, readily available, and easy to measure. In this chapter, we describe a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to measure iohexol in serum and to calculate GFR based on the rate of iohexol clearance. In this procedure, the contrast agent iohexol is administrated to the study subject in an outpatient setting, and three timed blood samples are collected. The serum proteins are precipitated, and the supernatant containing iohexol and the internal standard 2H5-iohexol is diluted prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. The LC-MS/MS method utilizes a Thermo Vanquish UHPLC coupled with TSQ Endura triple quadruple mass spectrometer, with a total run time of 2.5 min. The LC-MS/MS method has demonstrated good analytical performances, and the workflow can be used to reliably measure GFR in apparently healthy individuals without impaired renal function, such as living kidney donors.

UNASSIGNED: Proteinuria is a known risk factor for progression of chronic kidney disease. Proteinuria magnitude can be estimated by measuring spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (least accurate), 24-h urine collection for protein (24 P), or 24-h protein-creatinine ratio (24 PCR). The MDRD study found that 24 P measured at baseline was the strongest single predictor of the rate of GFR decline during study follow-up. However, predictive powers of 24 P and 24 PCR have not been compared in the literature. The current study addresses this question using the MDRD cohort data.
UNASSIGNED: The study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the MDRD cohort using simple and multiple regression models. Slope of measured GFR (mGFR) over time was used as the response and models that included baseline 24 PCR or 24 P were compared for the entire sample and for subgroups formed by restricting the values of 24-h creatinine and 24 P.
UNASSIGNED: Log 24 P and Log 24 PCR correlated almost equally with mGFR slope. However, in simple linear regression models and multivariable linear regression models adjusting for age and sex, the model with 24 PCR had a higher R 2 than the corresponding one that had 24 P except for the subgroup 24 P < 1 g.
UNASSIGNED: We observe that 24 PCR may be a better marker of proteinuria magnitude in predicting decline in kidney function compared to 24 P in particular for patients with 24 P ≥ 1. This finding needs validation in prospective clinical trials.

UNASSIGNED: Renal functional response (RFR) is the acute increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after a protein load. Low RFR is a marker of single nephron hyperfiltration. Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with reduced number of nephrons, lower kidney function, and smaller kidneys in adults. In the present study, we investigate the associations among LBW, kidney volume, and RFR.
UNASSIGNED: We studied adults aged 41 to 52 years born with either LBW (≤2300 g) or normal birth weight (NBW; 3500-4000 g). GFR was measured using plasma clearance of iohexol. A stimulated GFR (sGFR) was measured on a separate day after a protein load of 100 g using a commercially available protein powder, and RFR was calculated as delta GFR. Kidney volume was estimated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images using the ellipsoid formula.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 57 women and 48 men participated. The baseline mean ± SD GFR was 118 ± 17 ml/min for men and 98 ± 19 ml/min for women. The overall mean RFR was 8.2 ± 7.4 ml/min, with mean RFR of 8.3 ± 8.0 ml/min and 8.1 ± 6.9 ml/min in men and women, respectively (P = 0.5). No birth-related variables were associated with RFR. Larger kidney volume was associated with higher RFR, 1.9 ml/min per SD higher kidney volume (P = 0.009). Higher GFR per kidney volume was associated with a lower RFR, -3.3ml/min per SD (P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Larger kidney size and lower GFR per kidney volume were associated with higher RFR. Birth weight was not shown to associate with RFR in mainly healthy middle-aged men and women.

UNASSIGNED: Serum creatinine and cystatin C are used to estimate glomerular filtration rate, but creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr), cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys), and combined creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr-cys) are often divergent, particularly in older adults. We investigated which estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was more accurate and less biased compared with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR).
UNASSIGNED: A diagnostic test study from the Berlin Initiative Study.
UNASSIGNED: The study population included 657 individuals aged 70 years or older with iohexol plasma clearance (mGFR) and serum creatinine and cystatin C measurements: 567 community-dwelling participants and 90 with a serum creatinine of ≥1.5 mg/dL.
UNASSIGNED: We defined 3 groups on the basis of the difference eGFRcys - eGFRcr: whether < -5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (lower eGFRcys), within 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (reference), or ≥ 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (lower eGFRcr). eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcr-cys were compared to mGFR to assess bias and accuracy.
UNASSIGNED: Median bias (eGFR minus mGFR) with 95% CIs and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within ±30% of mGFR).
UNASSIGNED: The mean ± standard deviation age was 78 ± 6 years; the mean eGFRcys, eGFRcr, and eGFRcr-cys were 59 ± 23, 64 ± 20, and 61 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and the mean mGFR was 56 ± 19 mL/min. Half of the participants were in the lower eGFRcys group (n=337, 51%). Among them, the median bias for eGFRcys was the lowest (median bias, -2.7; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.9) compared with the other eGFR equations. Conversely, in the lower eGFRcr group (n=121, 18%), the median bias for eGFRcr was the lowest compared with those for eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys (2.9; [95% CI, 0.9-4.8] vs 13.8 [95% CI, 11.4-15.6] and 9.5 [95% CI, 7.7-11.0], respectively). Accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within ±30% of mGFR) was 93% for eGFRcr in the lower eGFRcr group and 92% for eGFRcys and 94% for eGFRcr-cys in the lower eGFRcys group.
UNASSIGNED: Untested generalizability in younger populations.
UNASSIGNED: Among older adults, the lower eGFR between eGFRcys and eGFRcr was a more accurate and less biased estimate of mGFR when comparing the groups.

A reliable assessment of renal function is of paramount importance in several clinical assets in order to tailor a personalized medical approach. CKD classification system, created in 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation-sponsored Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative and then implemented in the following years by the K-DIGO guidelines, offered clinicians a new strategy to better identify nephrological patients at low or high risk to develop renal insufficiency, in order to avoid the progression to end-stage renal disease. However, the criteria used to create this classification did not consider some important aspects related to renal histology and glomerular filtration rate measurement, resulting in a possible over- or underestimation of the real established renal damage. In this mini-review, we will summarize the most relevant shortcomings in the CKD classifications, which can create misleading diagnosis in daily clinical practice.

UNASSIGNED: Recent studies evaluated and proposed new race-neutral, creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equations. The performance of these equations in diverse potential living kidney donors requires study.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study.
UNASSIGNED: 637 potential living kidney donors from one tertiary hospital with serum creatinine concentration measurement and GFR measurement by iohexol plasma clearance between October 2016 and December 2020.
UNASSIGNED: Creatinine-based estimation of GFR by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (2009, CKDEPI09; 2021, CKDEPI21) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations with and without inclusion of race coefficient, where applicable.
UNASSIGNED: Equation bias, precision, accuracy, and accurate classification of GFR as equal to and above or below 80 mL/min/1.73 m2.
UNASSIGNED: GFR estimation equation performance compared to measured GFR (mGFR) by iohexol clearance.
UNASSIGNED: The median bias of the CKDEPI21 equation underestimated mGFR by 2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. The bias in the Black subgroup underestimated mGFR by 9.0 mL/min/1.73 m2. Compared to CKDEPI09 with and without race adjustment, the accuracy of CKDEPI21 increased across all subgroups. On average, 3.9% of individuals were misclassified by CKDEPI21 as having a GFR greater than, and 8.9% misclassified less than, 80 mL/min/1.73 m2, compared to 3.1% and 13.2% for CKDEPI09 with race adjustment, respectively. Total misclassification (either above or below 80 mL/min/1.73 m2) was 16.3% for CKDEPI21 and 16.0% for CKDEPI09 (with race adjustment).
UNASSIGNED: Limited sample of individuals identifying as Black. Lack of cystatin C data.
UNASSIGNED: In our potential living donor sample, GFR estimation by creatinine-based CKDEPI21 is less biased and more accurate than previous creatinine-based estimated GFR equations. When evaluated by race, this summative improvement remains in individuals identifying as Asian, Hispanic, or White. More external validation is needed to assess whether the new equation is an improvement over the previous CKDEPI equation with a race coefficient.

We aimed to test whether the endogenous filtration markers serum creatinine or cystatin C and equation-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on these markers appropriately reflect changes of measured GFR in patients with acute heart failure.
In this prospective cohort study of 50 hospitalized acute heart failure patients undergoing decongestive therapy, we applied an intravenous visible fluorescent injectate (VFI), consisting of a low molecular weight component to measure GFR and a high molecular weight component to correct for measured plasma volume. Thirty-eight patients had two sequential GFR measurements 48 h apart. The co-primary endpoints of the study were safety of VFI and plasma stability of the high molecular weight component. A key secondary endpoint was to compare changes in measured GFR (mGFR) to changes of serum creatinine, cystatin C and estimated GFR.
VFI-based GFR measurements were safe and consistent with plasma stability of the high molecular weight component and glomerular filtration of the low molecular weight component. Filtration marker-based point estimates of GFR, when compared with mGFR, provided only moderate correlation (Pearson\'s r, range 0.80-0.88, depending on equation used), precision (r2 , range 0.65-0.78) and accuracy (56%-74% of estimates scored within 30% of mGFR). Correlations of 48-h changes GFR estimates and changes of mGFR were significant (P < 0.05) but weak (Pearson\'s r, range 0.35-0.39). Observed decreases of eGFR by more than 15% had a low sensitivity (range 38%-46%, depending on equation used) in detecting true worsening mGFR, defined by a >15% decrease in mGFR.
In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, serum creatinine- and cystatin C-based predictions performed poorly in detecting actual changes of GFR. These data challenge current clinical strategies to evaluate dynamics of kidney function in acute heart failure.

Measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using iohexol plasma clearance has been proposed as the preferred way for GFR determination. The extended multiple-sample protocol is based on fitting the full concentration-time decay-curve, and from the obtained fit-parameters, the area under the curve (AUC) and GFR (the injected dose divided by the AUC) were calculated. The goal of the current study is to evaluate the impact of different fitting procedures on the precision of GFR-results obtained from the full concentration-time curve, and compare these results with those obtained with simplified multiple-samples and single-sample protocols.
The concentration-time curves of 8 samples at times 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 and 300 min after bolus injection of iohexol of 570 adults, aged 70+, from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), were analysed. The fit-parameters for the two-compartment model (double-exponential decay curve), and from these, the AUC and GFR were obtained with 8 different fitting procedures.
The two-compartmental non-linear least squares fitting procedure showed the best accuracy (541 out of 570 reported GFR-results were within 5% of the majority of the 8 fitting methods). The two-compartmental slope-intercept fitting procedure was not always applicable and the non-compartmental fitting procedures did not always allow to calculate the GFR. All correction formulas for the simplified late multiple-samples methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision with a preference for Ng\'s correction formula (Lin\'s CCC = 0.992, bias = 0.5 ± 2.5). Jacobsson\'s iterative method was the best one-sample method, with Lin\'s CCC = 0.983 and bias = - 0.6 ± 3.4.
The fitting procedure has an important impact on the precision of the calculated AUC and GFR. The simplified late-sample protocols and one-sample methods did not suffer from fitting problems and showed acceptable equivalence when compared to the full compartment GFR-results.
The \"Berlin Initiative Study\" is officially registered with the German Register for Clinical Studies (\"Deutschen Register Klinischer Studien\"(DRKS)) under registration number DRKS00017058 , since April 12, 2019, and it is also visible on the WHO clinical trials registry platform (within the next 4 weeks after the registration date).