major depression

严重抑郁症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析脊髓损伤(SCI)后重度抑郁症(MDD)的危险因素。
    选择2020年2月至2023年2月在我院就诊的SCI患者作为研究对象。根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分,将36~75分的患者纳入重度抑郁组,非重度抑郁组分为0~35分。一般社会学特征(年龄,性别,教育水平,居住地,家庭经济状况,医疗费用的支付方式,婚姻状况)和疾病相关特征(病程,受伤原因,神经损伤程度,损伤类型,收集所有患者的疼痛程度),选取差异项进行logistic回归分析,分析脊髓损伤患者发生重度抑郁的危险因素。
    共216名患者被纳入我们的研究,其中45例(18.98%)患有中重度抑郁症,175例(81.02%)患有非重度抑郁症.单因素分析显示性别(χ2=11.865,P<.001),病程(χ2=12.967,P<.001),家庭经济状况(χ2=8.610,P=0.003),受教育程度(χ2=15.287,P<.001),神经损伤程度(χ2=9.013,P=.003)和疼痛程度(χ2=16.673,P<.001)两组间差异均有统计学意义。多因素logistic回归分析显示,性别[比值比(OR)(95%CI)=3.986(1.743~9.116),P=.001],病程[OR(95%CI)=4.033(1.818~8.947),P=.001],家庭经济状况[OR(95%CI)=3.136(1.449~6.785),P=.004],教育水平[OR(95%CI)=4.332(1.998~9.388),P=.000],神经损伤程度[OR(95%CI)=2.848(1.414~5.734),P=.003],和疼痛水平[OR(95%CI)=5.767(2.309~14.404),P<.001]是SCI患者重度抑郁障碍的危险因素。
    性别,疾病持续时间,家庭经济状况,教育水平,神经损伤程度,疼痛程度可能是脊髓损伤患者发生MDD的独立危险因素。
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the risk factors of major depressive disorder (MDD) after spinal cord injury (SCI).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with SCI in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were selected as the study objects. According to the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, patients with 36~75 points were included in the major depression group, and 0~35 points were included in the non-major depression group. The general sociological characteristics (age, gender, educational level, place of residence, family economic status, payment method of medical expenses, marital status) and disease-related characteristics (course of disease, cause of injury, neurological level of injury, type of injury, degree of pain) of all patients were collected, and the items with differences were selected for logistic regression analysis to analyze the risk factors for major depression in patients with spinal cord injury.
    UNASSIGNED: Totally 216 patients were enrolled in our study, including 45 patients (18.98%) had moderate-to-severe depression and 175 patients (81.02%) had non-severe depression. Univariate analysis showed that gender (χ2 = 11.865, P < .001), course of disease (χ2 = 12.967, P < .001), family economic status (χ2 = 8.610, P = .003), educational level (χ2 =15.287, P < .001), neurological level of injury (χ2 = 9.013, P = .003) and pain level (χ2 = 16.673, P < .001) were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender [odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) = 3.986 (1.743~9.116), P = .001], course of disease [OR (95 % CI) = 4.033 (1.818~8.947), P = .001], family economic status [OR (95 % CI) = 3.136 (1.449~6.785), P = .004], educational level [OR (95 % CI) = 4.332 (1.998~9.388), P = .000], neurological level of injury [OR (95 % CI) = 2.848 (1.414~5.734), P = .003], and pain level [OR (95 % CI) = 5.767 (2.309~14.404), P < .001] were risk factors for major depressive disorder in SCI patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Gender, disease duration, family economic status, education level, level of nerve injury, and pain level may be the independent risk factors of MDD incidence in patients with spinal cord injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:解离症状既是暴露于心理创伤的病理结果,也是N-甲基-d-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂药物的副作用;因此,对这些症状进行准确有效的评估很重要。23项临床医生管理的分离状态量表(CADSS)的心理测量特性已在氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮文献中得到表征。这里,我们在有或没有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和心理创伤暴露史的样本中检查了其表现.
    方法:有心理创伤史的参与者(N=148)和没有(N=100)诊断为PTSD的参与者以及没有精神障碍或创伤史的健康参与者(N=28)通过23项CADSS和其他心理和神经心理学评估进行评估。进行分析以检查内部一致性,收敛效度和判别效度,要素结构,据报道,人群中的不同表现或多或少可能报告分离症状(例如,有和没有PTSD的患者),以及对暴露于与创伤相关的视觉和声音而产生的变化的敏感性。
    结果:发现23项CADSS具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach\'salpha0.91)和单因素结构。创伤暴露的PTSD参与者的CADSS总分高于无创伤暴露的PTSD参与者和非创伤非PTSD参与者。最后,与伊拉克战斗有关的PTSD的退伍军人在接触与战斗有关的幻灯片和声音后,CADSS总分显着提高。
    结论:23项CADSS,已经验证为测量与NMDA受体拮抗剂药物施用相关的解离的工具,以可靠和有效的方式评估受心理创伤的参与者的分离。
    OBJECTIVE: Dissociative symptoms are both a pathological consequence of exposure to psychological trauma as well as a side effect of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist medications; therefore, accurate and valid assessment of these symptoms is important. The psychometric properties of the 23-item Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) have been characterized in the ketamine and esketamine literatures. Here, we examine its performance in a sample with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a history of exposure to psychological trauma.
    METHODS: Participants with a history of psychological trauma with (N = 148) and without (N = 100) the diagnosis of PTSD and healthy participants without a psychiatric disorder or history of trauma (N = 28) were assessed with the 23-item CADSS and other psychometric and neuropsychological assessments. Analyses were performed to examine internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, factor structure, differential performance in populations reported to be more or less likely to report dissociative symptoms (e.g., patients with and without PTSD), and sensitivity to change resulting from exposure to trauma-related sights and sounds.
    RESULTS: The 23-item CADSS was found to have high internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha 0.91) and a single-factor structure. CADSS total scores in trauma-exposed participants with PTSD were higher than those in trauma-exposed participants without PTSD and non-traumatized non-PTSD participants. Finally, veterans with Iraq combat-related PTSD showed a significant increase in CADSS total score after exposure to combat-related slides and sounds.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 23-item CADSS, already validated as a tool to measure dissociation related to administration of NMDA receptor antagonist medication, performs in a reliable and valid manner in the assessment of dissociation in psychologically traumatized participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    方法:电惊厥疗法(ECT)是老年人严重精神疾病的常用治疗方法,包括80岁及以上的老年人口。然而,由于医疗合并症,有时可能不愿意用ECT治疗80岁以上的年龄组,脆弱,以及对认知的担忧。
    这个多站点,澳大利亚纵向研究旨在调查老年人与年轻年龄组相比ECT的有效性和安全性。在自然环境中收集了在三家参与医院接受ECT治疗抑郁症的310人的数据,2015年至2022年。
    方法:使用蒙哥马利-奥斯贝格抑郁量表(MADRS)进行ECT前和急性终末期ECT的临床评分。使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评估认知结果。
    结果:老年患者治疗后MADRS评分显著降低。与年轻年龄组相比,他们更有可能达到缓解标准。老年人也不太可能在ECT后表现出临床上显著的认知能力下降,与年轻年龄组相比,ECT后更有可能显示出临床上显著的认知改善。
    结论:ECT在治疗老年人的严重精神疾病方面非常有效。相对于年轻的年龄组,年龄较大的老年组更有可能接受ECT治疗,ECT后认知功能改善的比例更高.这些发现表明,ECT应被视为老年抑郁症患者的一种有价值且安全的治疗选择。
    METHODS: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a commonly used treatment for severe psychiatric illness in older adults, including in the \'older old\' population aged 80 years and above. However, there can sometimes be a reluctance to treat the 80+ year old age group with ECT due to medical comorbidities, frailty, and concerns about cognition.
    UNASSIGNED: This multi-site, longitudinal Australian study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ECT in older old people compared with younger age groups. Data from 310 people receiving ECT for depression at three participating hospitals was collected in a naturalistic setting, between 2015 and 2022.
    METHODS: Clinical ratings were conducted pre-ECT and end-acute ECT using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Cognitive outcomes were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
    RESULTS: Older old adults demonstrated a significant reduction MADRS scores at post-treatment. They were more likely to meet remission criteria compared with the younger age groups. Older old adults were also less likely to show clinically significant cognitive decline post-ECT, and were more likely to show clinically significant cognitive improvement post-ECT compared with younger age groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: ECT is highly effective in treating severe psychiatric illness in older old adults. Relative to the younger age groups, the older old group were more likely to remit with ECT and a greater proportion showed cognitive improvement post-ECT. These findings suggest that ECT should be considered as a valuable and safe treatment option for older old individuals with depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外泌体,含有生物活性分子(如脂质)的天然纳米囊泡,蛋白质,和核酸,从细胞释放到细胞外环境。然后它们充当自分泌,旁分泌,或通过将其货物传递到受体细胞并引起下游效应而在细胞之间进行通讯的内分泌介质。外泌体在miRNA中大量富集,它们是小的非编码RNA,既是细胞质转录后抑制因子,调节mRNA翻译成蛋白质,以及核转录基因激活剂。神经元外泌体miRNAs在中枢神经系统(CNS)中具有重要的生理功能,包括小区到小区的通信,突触可塑性,和神经发生,以及调节压力和炎症反应。应激诱导的外泌体功能变化包括对神经发生和神经炎症的影响,这可能导致各种神经精神疾病的出现,如精神分裂症,严重的抑郁症,双相情感障碍,和老年痴呆症和亨廷顿病。本文讨论了有关外来体在常见精神障碍病理生理学中的作用的最新知识。
    Exosomes, natural nanovesicles that contain a cargo of biologically active molecules such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, are released from cells to the extracellular environment. They then act as autocrine, paracrine, or endocrine mediators of communication between cells by delivering their cargo into recipient cells and causing downstream effects. Exosomes are greatly enriched in miRNAs, which are small non-coding RNAs that act both as cytoplasmic post-transcriptional repression agents, modulating the translation of mRNAs into proteins, as well as nuclear transcriptional gene activators. Neuronal exosomal miRNAs have important physiologic functions in the central nervous system (CNS), including cell-to-cell communication, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis, as well as modulating stress and inflammatory responses. Stress-induced changes in exosomal functions include effects on neurogenesis and neuroinflammation, which can lead to the appearance of various neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, major depression, bipolar disorder, and Alzheimer\'s and Huntington\'s diseases. The current knowledge regarding the roles of exosomes in the pathophysiology of common mental disorders is discussed in this review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们对同伴基因型如何影响健康(即,同伴社会遗传效应)。作者试图阐明同伴社会遗传对药物使用障碍风险的影响的性质,酒精使用障碍(AUD),严重的抑郁症,和焦虑症。
    Cox模型与来自基于人群的瑞典队列(N=655,327)的数据一起使用。结果是吸毒障碍,AUD,严重的抑郁症,17岁到30岁之间的焦虑症注册,罪犯,和药房登记处。作者将同伴社会遗传效应与同伴家庭遗传风险评分(FGRS)对相同疾病进行索引,这是从一级到五级亲属的诊断推断的遗传风险的个性化测量。
    跨越疾病,同行FGRS预测先证者登记的风险增加(危险比范围,1.01-1.59),对药物使用障碍和AUD的影响比对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的影响更强。同龄人的社会遗传效应对学校同学的影响比对地理上相近的同龄人更强,以及高中(16-19岁)的同龄人与初中(7-16岁)的同龄人。在对社会人口统计学混杂因素进行统计控制后,同伴社会遗传效应仍然显着,同龄人是否受到影响,和同龄人FGRS的教育程度。对于遗传风险较高的先证者,同伴社会遗传效应更为明显。
    青少年同龄人的遗传构成对吸毒障碍的风险具有深远的影响,AUD,严重的抑郁症,和焦虑症。具有高遗传风险的个体对社会遗传效应更敏感。替代假设,如社会人口分层,接触受影响的同龄人,和受教育程度的遗传倾向不能解释物质使用和精神疾病与同伴社会遗传效应相关的风险。
    UNASSIGNED: There is growing interest in how peers\' genotypes may influence health (i.e., peer social genetic effects). The authors sought to clarify the nature of peer social genetic effects on risk for drug use disorder, alcohol use disorder (AUD), major depression, and anxiety disorder.
    UNASSIGNED: Cox models were used with data from a population-based Swedish cohort (N=655,327). Outcomes were drug use disorder, AUD, major depression, and anxiety disorder registrations between ages 17 and 30 from medical, criminal, and pharmacy registries. The authors indexed peer social genetic effects with peers\' family genetic risk scores (FGRSs) for the same disorders, which are personalized measures of genetic risk inferred from diagnoses in first- to fifth-degree relatives.
    UNASSIGNED: Across disorders, peer FGRSs predicted increased risks of proband registration (hazard ratio range, 1.01-1.59), with stronger effects for drug use disorder and AUD than for major depression and anxiety disorder. Peer social genetic effects were stronger for school classmates than for geographically proximal peers, and for peers from upper secondary school (ages 16-19) versus peers from lower secondary school (ages 7-16). Peer social genetic effects remained significant following statistical control for sociodemographic confounders, whether peers were affected, and peers\' FGRS for educational attainment. Peer social genetic effects were more pronounced for probands at higher genetic risk.
    UNASSIGNED: The genetic makeup of adolescents\' peers has long-reaching consequences on risks for drug use disorder, AUD, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Individuals at high genetic risk are more sensitive to social genetic effects. Alternative hypotheses such as sociodemographic stratification, exposure to affected peers, and genetic predispositions for educational attainment did not explain the risk associated with peer social genetic effects for substance use and psychiatric disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脂肪变性肝病(SLD)的特征是肝脏中脂质的过度积累。它与肝脏和心脏代谢疾病的风险升高有关,以及抑郁症等精神障碍。先前的研究表明,SLD的灰质整体减少。为了研究抑郁症可能存在的共同神经生物学,我们检查了SLD中与肝脏脂肪相关的区域灰质改变及其最显著的临床亚组代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD).
    方法:我们分析了英国生物库29,051名参与者的脑MRI获得的区域皮质厚度和面积。肝脏脂肪量计算为来自肝脏MRI扫描的质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)。我们研究了大脑结构和PDFF之间的关系,适应社会人口统计学,物理,生活方式,和环境因素,以及酒精摄入量和一系列心脏代谢协变量。最后,我们使用先前发表的结果比较了SLD/MASLD和重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的脑改变模式.
    结果:PDFF相关的灰质改变是区域特异性的,涉及皮质厚度的增加和减少,皮质面积增加。在几个地区,PDFF对灰质的影响也可以归因于心脏代谢协变量。然而,PDFF始终与中,上颞区的皮质厚度较低有关,而与钙皮和右额极区的皮质厚度较高有关。SLD和MASLD组的PDFF相关改变与MDD中观察到的改变相关(Pearsonr=0.45-0.54,p<0.01)。
    结论:这些发现表明存在将MDD与SLD和MASLD联系起来的共同生物学机制。他们可能解释了这些人群中众所周知的抑郁症风险升高,并支持早期生活方式干预和代谢风险因素的治疗,以成功管理相互关联的疾病抑郁症和SLD/MASLD。
    BACKGROUND: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is characterized by excessive accumulation of lipids in the liver. It is associated with elevated risk of hepatic and cardiometabolic diseases, as well as mental disorders such as depression. Previous studies revealed global gray matter reduction in SLD. To investigate a possible shared neurobiology with depression, we examined liver fat-related regional gray matter alterations in SLD and its most significant clinical subgroup metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
    METHODS: We analyzed regional cortical thickness and area obtained from brain MRI in 29,051 participants in UK Biobank. Liver fat amount was computed as proton density fat fraction (PDFF) from liver MRI scans. We examined the relationship between brain structure and PDFF, adjusting for sociodemographic, physical, lifestyle, and environmental factors, as well as alcohol intake and a spectrum of cardiometabolic covariates. Finally, we compared patterns of brain alterations in SLD/MASLD and major depressive disorder (MDD) using previously published results.
    RESULTS: PDFF-related gray matter alterations were region-specific, involving both increases and decreases in cortical thickness, and increased cortical area. In several regions, PDFF effects on gray matter could also be attributed to cardiometabolic covariates. However, PDFF was consistently associated with lower cortical thickness in middle and superior temporal regions and higher cortical thickness in pericalcarine and right frontal pole regions. PDFF-related alterations for the SLD and the MASLD group correlated with those observed in MDD (Pearson r = 0.45-0.54, p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the presence of shared biological mechanisms linking MDD to SLD and MASLD. They might explain the well-known elevated risk of depression in these groups and support early lifestyle interventions and treatment of metabolic risk factors for the successful management of the interconnected diseases depression and SLD/MASLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于抑郁症,氯胺酮通过口服比通过静脉(iv)途径更方便地给药。口服氯胺酮与静脉注射氯胺酮的相对抗抑郁疗效未知。
    目的:评估开放标签口服氯胺酮与静脉注射氯胺酮在治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)门诊患者中的急性疗效和改善的持久性。
    方法:将患有TRD的成年人随机分为口服(N=30)或静脉(N=31)氯胺酮。口服氯胺酮在50毫升水中的剂量为150毫克,喝了15分钟。静脉注射氯胺酮剂量为0.5mg/kg,注入40分钟。氯胺酮疗程(总计,7)隔天给药2周。正在进行的抗抑郁药物继续保持不变。患者在基线时进行评估,第14天和第30天。主要结果是第14天的终点汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分。次要结果是Montgomery-Asberg抑郁量表的终点评分,贝克抑郁量表,和临床总体印象-疾病的严重程度和改善。
    结果:口服氯胺酮的总体退出率低于静脉注射氯胺酮(26.7%vs54.8%;P=0.03)。在第14天和第30天,两组在所有仪器上的抑郁等级以及反应和缓解率都没有差异。不良事件,如头痛(56.7%vs74.2%)和嗜睡(0.0%vs22.6%),口服氯胺酮较少见。
    结论:在综合医院接受治疗的TRD门诊患者中,口服氯胺酮可能比静脉注射氯胺酮更好地接受和耐受。由于静脉注射氯胺酮的脱失率高,因此无法得出有关相对疗效的结论。
    BACKGROUND: For depression, ketamine is more conveniently administered by oral than by intravenous (iv) routes. The relative antidepressant efficacy of oral vs iv ketamine is unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the acute efficacy and the persistence of improvement with open-label oral versus iv ketamine in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
    METHODS: Adults with TRD were randomized to oral (N=30) or IV (N=31) ketamine. Oral ketamine was dosed at 150 mg in 50 mL of water, sipped across 15 min. IV ketamine was dosed at 0.5 mg/kg, infused across 40 min. Ketamine sessions (total, 7) were administered on alternate days for 2 weeks. Ongoing antidepressant drugs were continued unchanged. Patients were assessed at baseline, day 14, and day 30. The primary outcome was the endpoint Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score on day 14. Secondary outcomes were endpoint scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness and Improvement.
    RESULTS: Overall dropout was lower with oral than with iv ketamine (26.7 % vs 54.8 %; P=0.03). The 2 groups did not differ in depression ratings and in response and remission rates on all instruments on both days 14 and 30. Adverse events such as headache (56.7 % vs 74.2 %) and drowsiness (0.0 % vs 22.6 %) were less common with oral ketamine.
    CONCLUSIONS: In TRD outpatients treated in general hospitals, oral ketamine maybe better accepted and tolerated than iv ketamine. Conclusions about relative efficacy cannot be drawn because of the high dropout rate with iv ketamine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重度抑郁症是全球面临的公共卫生问题。本研究旨在确定重度抑郁症的危险因素并阐明其因果关系。
    方法:数据来自国家健康和营养调查(NHANES)。采用多因素logistic回归分析计算各变量对重度抑郁的影响。进行亚组分析和相互作用测试以观察它们之间关联的稳定性。使用有限的三次样条图探索了非线性相关性。使用孟德尔随机化(MR)分析评估血清Klotho对重度抑郁症的因果影响。
    结果:共有8359人参与了这项研究。在调整所有协变量后,血清Klotho每升高一个单位,患重度抑郁症的风险就高1.47倍(OR=1.47,95%CI=1.07-2.02;P=0.0183).MR分析显示,血清Klotho水平与重度抑郁症的风险之间没有因果关系(OR=1.09,95%CI=0.91-1.30;P=0.4120)。灵敏度分析验证了结果的可靠性。
    结论:血清Klotho与美国人群患重度抑郁症的风险增加呈正相关,但MR分析未显示Klotho与欧洲血统个体重度抑郁症之间的遗传因果关系.根据目前的研究结果,没有迹象表明维持高水平的Klotho可能会增加重度抑郁症的风险.
    结论:本研究的主要局限性是横断面研究与MR人群的不一致。
    BACKGROUND: Major depression is a public health problem facing the world. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for major depression and clarify their causal effects.
    METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the effect of each variable on major depression. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were conducted to observe the stability of the association between them. Nonlinear correlations were explored using restricted cubic spline plots. The causal effects of serum Klotho on major depression were assessed using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 8359 participated in the study. After adjusting for all covariates, the risk of having major depression was 1.47 times higher for each unit rise in serum Klotho (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI = 1.07-2.02; P = 0.0183). MR analysis showed no causal relationship between serum Klotho levels and risk of major depression (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI = 0.91-1.30; P = 0.4120). Sensitivity analysis verified the reliability of the results.
    CONCLUSIONS: Serum Klotho is positively associated with an increased risk of major depression in the U.S. population, but MR analyses did not show genetic causality between Klotho and major depression in individuals of European ancestry. Based on the results of the current study, no indication maintaining high levels of Klotho may increase the risk of major depression.
    CONCLUSIONS: The main limitation of this study is the inconsistency of the cross-sectional study and the MR population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:童年创伤,包括情感上的忽视,情感虐待,身体虐待,还有性虐待,可能会导致边缘人格特征,如情感不稳定,身份问题,负关系,和自我伤害。这项研究旨在探讨不同类型的儿童创伤如何影响双相和单相抑郁症的这些特征。
    方法:我们纳入了荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)的839名参与者,终生诊断为重度抑郁障碍单次发作(MDDS;N=443),复发性重度抑郁症(MDD-R;N=331),或躁郁症(BD;N=65)。多因素回归用于分析来自儿童创伤访谈和边界特征(来自自我报告人格评估清单)的数据。
    结果:平均而言,参与者年龄为48.6岁(SD:12.6),69.2%是女性,50.3%的参与者对儿童创伤评估为阳性。调整后的分析显示,参与者诊断为BD,其次是MDD-R,表现出最高数量的边缘性格特征。此外,在整个群体中,发现童年创伤之间有很强的联系,尤其是情感上的忽视,以及边缘性格特征的存在。
    结论:考虑到儿童创伤的高患病率和边缘性人格特征,在有情绪障碍的个体中筛查这些因素是至关重要的。识别这些要素可以告知和加强对这些共存条件的经常波动和复杂性质的管理,导致更有效和量身定制的治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: Childhood trauma, including emotional neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse, may contribute to borderline personality features like affective instability, identity problems, negative relationships, and self-harm. This study aims to explore how different types of childhood trauma affect these features in bipolar versus unipolar depressive disorders.
    METHODS: We included 839 participants of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) with a lifetime diagnosis of major depressive disorder single episode (MDDS; N = 443), recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD-R; N = 331), or bipolar disorder (BD; N = 65). Multivariate regression was used to analyze data from the Childhood Trauma Interview and borderline features (from the self-report Personality Assessment Inventory).
    RESULTS: On average, participants were 48.6 years old (SD: 12.6), with 69.2 % being women, and 50.3 % of participants assessed positive for childhood trauma. Adjusted analyses revealed that participants diagnosed with BD, followed by MDD-R, exhibited the highest number of borderline personality features. Additionally, within the entire group, a strong association was found between childhood trauma, especially emotional neglect, and the presence of borderline personality features.
    CONCLUSIONS: Given the high prevalence of childhood trauma and borderline personality features, screening for these factors in individuals with mood disorders is crucial. Identifying these elements can inform and enhance the management of the often fluctuating and complex nature of these comorbid conditions, leading to more effective and tailored treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号