%0 Journal Article
%T A randomised, open-label, pragmatic pilot comparison of oral and intravenous ketamine in treatment-resistant depression.
%A Kumar PS
%A Menon V
%A Andrade C
%J Asian J Psychiatr
%V 99
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 23
%M 39068714
%F 13.89
%R 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104171
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>For depression, ketamine is more conveniently administered by oral than by intravenous (iv) routes. The relative antidepressant efficacy of oral vs iv ketamine is unknown.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To assess the acute efficacy and the persistence of improvement with open-label oral versus iv ketamine in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Adults with TRD were randomized to oral (N=30) or IV (N=31) ketamine. Oral ketamine was dosed at 150 mg in 50 mL of water, sipped across 15 min. IV ketamine was dosed at 0.5 mg/kg, infused across 40 min. Ketamine sessions (total, 7) were administered on alternate days for 2 weeks. Ongoing antidepressant drugs were continued unchanged. Patients were assessed at baseline, day 14, and day 30. The primary outcome was the endpoint Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score on day 14. Secondary outcomes were endpoint scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness and Improvement.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Overall dropout was lower with oral than with iv ketamine (26.7 % vs 54.8 %; P=0.03). The 2 groups did not differ in depression ratings and in response and remission rates on all instruments on both days 14 and 30. Adverse events such as headache (56.7 % vs 74.2 %) and drowsiness (0.0 % vs 22.6 %) were less common with oral ketamine.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>In TRD outpatients treated in general hospitals, oral ketamine maybe better accepted and tolerated than iv ketamine. Conclusions about relative efficacy cannot be drawn because of the high dropout rate with iv ketamine.