BACKGROUND: Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child.
METHODS: A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy.
RESULTS: Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Using low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is increasingly popular for resuscitating trauma patients. LTOWB is often RhD-positive, which might cause D-alloimmunization and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) if transfused to RhD-negative females of childbearing potential (FCP). This simulation determined the number of life years gained by the FCP and her future children if she was resuscitated with LTOWB compared with conventional component therapy (CCT).
METHODS: The model simulated 500,000 injured FCPs of each age between 0 and 49 years with LTOWB mortality relative reductions (MRRs) compared with components between 0.1% and 25%. For each surviving FCP, number of life years gained was calculated using her age at injury and average life expectancy for American women. The number of expected future pregnancies for FCPs that did not survive was also based on her age at injury; each future child was assigned the maximum lifespan unless they suffered perinatal mortality or serious neurological events from HDFN.
RESULTS: The LTOWB group with an MRR 25% compared with CCT had the largest total life years gained. The point of equivalence for RhD-positive LTOWB compared to CCT, where life years lost due to severe HDFN was equivalent to life years gained due to FCP survival/future childbearing, occurred at an MRR of approximately 0.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: In this model, RhD-positive LTOWB resulted in substantial gains in maternal and child life years compared with CCT. A >0.1% relative mortality reduction from LTOWB offset the life years lost to HDFN mortality and severe neurological events.

BACKGROUND: Military and prehospital medical organizations invest significant resources to advance the treatment of trauma patients aiming to reduce preventable deaths. Focus is on hemorrhage control and volume resuscitation with blood products, with adoption of Remote Damage Control Resuscitation (RDCR) guidelines. The Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) has been using tranexamic acid and freeze-dried plasma (FDP) as part of its RDCR protocol for more than a decade. In recent years, low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) has been integrated, on IDF evacuation helicopters and expanded to mobile ambulances, complementing FDP use in treating trauma patients in state of profound shock.
METHODS: During the war that erupted in October 2023, the IDF-MC made a decision to bring LTOWB forward, and to equip every combat brigade level mobile intensive care units with LTOWB, onboard armored vehicles. The goal was to make whole blood available as close as possible to the point of injury and within minutes from time of injury.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe the IDF-MCs\' efforts to bring LTOWB to the front lines and present four cases in which LTOWB was administered. All patients were young male, with significant blood loss following penetrating injuries. One patient died in the operating room, following hospital arrival and emergency thoracotomy. The others survived. Our initial experience with bringing LTOWB as close as possible to the point of injury during high intensity fighting is encouraging, showing patient benefit along with logistic feasibility. After action reports and data collection will continue.

BACKGROUND: Cold-stored low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) has become increasingly utilised in both prehospital and in-hospital settings for resuscitation of traumatic haemorrhage. However, implementing the use of LTOWB to ground medical teams has been limited due to logistic challenges.
METHODS: In 2022, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) started using LTOWB in ambulances for the first time in Israel. This report details the initial experience of this rollout and presents a case-series of the first patients treated with LTOWB.
RESULTS: Between January-December 2022, seven trauma patients received LTOWB administered by ground IDF intensive care ambulances after presenting with profound shock. Median time from injury to administration of LTOWB was 35 min. All patients had evidence of severe bleeding upon hospital arrival with six undergoing damage control laparotomy and all but one surviving to discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of LTOWB in ground medical units is in its early stages, but continued experience may demonstrate its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness in the prehospital setting. Further research is necessary to fully understand the indications, methodology, and benefits of LTOWB in resuscitating severely injured trauma patients in this setting.

UNASSIGNED: The introduction of low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) that contains potentially ABO-incompatible plasma and the increasing use of group A plasma, due to shortages of AB plasma, in trauma patients whose ABO group is unknown could put the recipients of incompatible plasma at risk of increased morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated civilian trauma patient outcomes following receipt of incompatible plasma.
UNASSIGNED: One trauma center\'s patient contributions to three multicenter studies of different trauma resuscitation strategies was analyzed; these patients were separated into two groups based on receipt of only compatible plasma versus receipt of any quantity of incompatible plasma. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if receipt of incompatible plasma was associated with 24-hour or 30-day mortality.
UNASSIGNED: There were 347 patients eligible for this secondary analysis with 167 recipients of only compatible plasma and 180 recipients of incompatible plasma. The two groups were well matched demographically and on both prehospital and hospital arrival vital signs. The median (IQR) volume of incompatible plasma received by these patients was 684 ml (342, 1229). There was not a significant difference between the groups in 24-hour and 30-day mortality, nor in in-hospital or intensive care unit lengths of stay. In the Cox proportional-hazards regression model for both 24-hour and 30-day survival, receipt of incompatible plasma was not independently predictive of either mortality endpoint.
UNASSIGNED: Receipt of incompatible plasma was not independently associated with increased mortality in trauma patients. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Demand for low-titer Group O whole blood (LTOWB) is increasing for trauma. The whole blood (WB) platelet-sparing (WB-SP) filter enables leukoreduction (LR) while retaining platelet quantity and function; however, in the United States WB must be filtered and placed in the cold within 8 h of collection. A longer processing window would facilitate improved logistics and supply of LR-WB to meet the growing medical need. This study evaluated the impact of increasing filtration timing from <8 h to <12 h on the quality of LR-WB.
Thirty WB units were collected from healthy donors. Control units were filtered within 8 h and test units within 12 h of collection. WB was tested throughout 21 days of storage. Hemolysis, WBC content, component recovery, and 25 additional markers of WB quality were tested including hematologic and metabolic markers, RBC morphology, aggregometry, thromboelastography, and p-selectin.
There were 0 failures for residual WBC content, hemolysis, or pH, and no differences in component recovery between arms. Few differences in metabolic parameters were observed, but the small effect size suggests these are not clinically significant. Trends throughout storage were similar and filtration timing did not impact hematological parameters, platelet activation and aggregation, or hemostatic capacity.
Our studies showed that extending filtration timing from 8 to 12 h from the collection does not significantly impact the quality of LR-WB. Characterization of the platelets demonstrated that storage lesions were not exacerbated. Extending the time from collection to filtration will improve LTOWB inventory in the United States.

暂无摘要。

The rapid provision of blood products is life-saving for patients with massive hemorrhage. Ideally, RhD-negative blood products would be supplied to a woman of childbearing potential whose Rh type is unknown due to the risk of D-alloimmunization and the potential for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn to occur if RhD-positive blood products are transfused. Therefore, there is a need for a test that rapidly determines her RhD type. This study compared the RhD type determined using a rapid ABO and RhD test to the RhD type determined by an immunohematology reference laboratory.
After receiving ethics review board approval, 200 random, unique, deidentified patient samples that had undergone routine pretransfusion testing in an immunohematology reference laboratory using column agglutination technology were collected and tested using a rapid ABO and RhD test (Eldoncard Home kit 2511). The RhD typing results from these two methods were compared to determine the accuracy of the rapid ABO and RhD test.
The rapid ABO and RhD test produced results that were concordant with the transfusion service\'s results in 199/200 (99.5%) of cases, with a negative predictive value of 98.2% and 99.3% sensitivity. The single outlier was likely an RhD variant due to its serological characteristics.
These data indicate that this rapid ABO and RhD test could be used for the rapid determination of a patient\'s RhD type, perhaps even in the emergency department, which could guide the selection of blood products provided during their resuscitation.

The D-alloimmunization rate in trauma patients does not appear to depend on the number of RhD-positive units transfused. The effect of the timing and pattern of RhD-positive transfusions has not been evaluated.
RhD-negative trauma patients who were transfused with RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) or low titer group O whole blood (collectively called RBCs) on at least two separate calendar days and who had antibody detection tests performed at least 14 days after the second RhD-positive RBC transfusion without receiving RhIg were included in the analysis. Patients whose anti-D was detected within 14 days of the index RhD-positive RBC transfusion were excluded. Patient demographics and the dates of RhD-positive RBC transfusions and results of antibody detection tests performed after the index transfusion were collected on eligible patients.
There were 44/61 (72.1%) patients in whom anti-D was not detected (non-alloimmunized) and 17/61 (27.9%) in whom anti-D was detected (alloimmunized). The patients had similar demographics with trends towards higher median admission heart rates and lower median admission Glasgow Coma Scale values in the alloimmunized group. Both groups received statistically identical median quantities of RhD-positive RBCs (non-alloimmunized 5 vs. alloimmunized 4 units, p = .53), however, the alloimmunized group received all their RhD-positive RBCs over a significantly shorter period of time compared to the non-alloimmunized (median 4 vs. 15 days, respectively, p = .01).
Receipt of all RhD-positive RBCs over a shorter period of time was associated with higher D-alloimmunization rates. These results need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Questions persist about the safety of switching non-group O recipients of group O uncrossmatched red blood cells (RBC) or low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) to ABO-identical RBCs during their resuscitation.
The database of an earlier nine-center study of transfusing incompatible plasma to trauma patients was reanalyzed. The patients were divided into three groups based on 24-h RBC transfusion: (1) group O patients who received group O RBC/LTOWB units (control group, n = 1203), (2) non-group O recipients who received only group O units (n = 646), (3) non-group O recipients who received at least one unit of group O and non-group O units (n = 562). Fixed marginal effect of receipt of non-O RBC units on 6- and 24-h and 30-day mortality was calculated.
The non-O patients who received only group O RBCs received fewer RBC/LTOWB units and had slightly but significantly lower injury severity score compared to control group; non-group O patients who received both group O and non-O units received significantly more RBC/LTOWB units and had a slightly but significantly higher injury severity score compared to control group. In the multivariate analysis, the non-O patients who received only group O RBCs had significantly higher mortality at 6-h compared to the controls; the non-group O recipients of O and non-O RBCs did not demonstrate higher mortality. At 24-h and 30-days, there were no differences in survival between the groups.
Providing non-group O RBCs to non-group O trauma patients who also received group O RBC units is not associated with higher mortality.