BACKGROUND: As evidence demonstrating the importance of early transfusions in trauma resuscitation accumulates, when RhD-negative products might not be available, it is important to understand the nature of the RhD-type of products provided to bleeding pediatric patients of potentially unknown RhD-type.
METHODS: A survey link was electronically sent to the transfusion service medical director and/or laboratory manager at American pediatric Level I and Level II hospitals inquiring about their practices for selecting RhD-type of uncrossmatched red blood cells (RBC) or low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for boys and girls.
RESULTS: There were 55/117 (47.0%) analyzable responses; 43/55 (78.2%) from Level I and 12/55 (21.8%) from Level II hospitals. For in hospital transfusions, 51/55 (92.7%) of centers use only RhD-negative blood products to resuscitate girls ≤18 years old while 30/55 (54.5%) of centers do the same for boys ≤18 years old. Most centers 41/55(74.5%) store RBCs and/or LTOWB in in-hospital remote refrigerators; 27 store only RhD-negative RBCs and 2 store only RhD-negative LTOWB units in these refrigerators. A total of 24/55 (43.6%) centers have RBCs and/or LTOWB available on road ambulances or helicopters for prehospital transfusion; 12 transport only RhD-negative RBCs and two transport only RhD-negative LTOWB. Most centers, 35/55 (63.6%), address the prophylaxis of an RhD-negative female recipient of RhD-positive transfusion on a case-by-case basis.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is some variability, most of the responding pediatric trauma centers routinely utilized RhD-negative RBCs for emergency transfusion for patients ≤18 years old of unknown RhD-type.

Low-titer group O whole-blood (LTOWB) is being used for children with life-threatening traumatic bleeding. A survey was conducted to determine current LTOWB utilization and interest in participation in a randomized control trial (RCT) of LTOWB versus standard blood component transfusion in this population.
Transfusion medicine (TM) directors and pediatric trauma directors at 36 US children\'s hospitals were surveyed by e-mail in June 2020. Hospitals were selected by participation in the Massive Transfusion Epidemiology and Outcomes in Children Study or being among the largest 30 children\'s hospitals by bed capacity per the Becker Hospital Review.
The response rate was 83.3% (30/36) from TM directors and 88.9% (32/36) from trauma directors. The median of massive transfusion protocol activations for traumatic bleeding was reported as 12 (IQR 5.8-20) per year by TM directors. LTOWB was used by 18.8% (6/32) of trauma directors. Survey responses indicate that 86.7% (26/30) of TM directors and 90.6% (29/32) of trauma directors either moderately or strongly agree that a LTOWB RCT is important to perform. About 83.3% (25/30) of TM directors and 93.8% (30/32) of trauma directors were willing to participate in the proposed trial. About 80% (24/30) of TM directors and 71.9% (23/32) of trauma directors would transfuse RhD+ LTOWB to male children, but fewer would transfuse Rh + LTOWB to females [20% (6/30) TM directors and 37.5% (12/32) of trauma directors].
A majority of respondents supported an RCT comparing LTOWB to component therapy in children with severe traumatic bleeding.

Low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is used as the initial resuscitative fluid in an increasing number of pediatric trauma and massive bleeding transfusion protocols. There is little data on adverse events following its transfusion in pediatric trauma patients.
Blood bank records were queried for pediatric recipients of at least one unit of red blood cells (RBCs) (component group) or LTOWB (LTOWB group) within 24 h of admission between May 2013 and August 2020. Subjects with early death (<72 h) were excluded. Propensity-score matching of LTOWB and component groups was performed. Adverse events were recorded, including transfusion reaction, thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and organ failure based on PELOD-2 score, along with hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) and ventilator days.
Thirty-six LTOWB recipients were matched to 36 conventional component recipients. Subjects were 52% male, with blunt injury mechanism (82%), median (IQR) injury severity score = 27 (21-35), and 26% in-hospital mortality. The groups were well matched in terms of demographics and injury characteristics. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in adverse outcomes including reported transfusion reaction, organ failure, acute kidney injury, sepsis/bacteremia, and venous thromboembolism. Hospital LOS, ventilator days, mortality, and functional disability at discharge were also not significantly different. The LTOWB group had significantly shorter ICU LOS compared to the component group.
LTOWB transfusion did not increase the risk of adverse events in children. However, larger studies are required to confirm these results.

Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is being increasingly transfused to injured patients. This study evaluated a range of clinical outcomes to determine if receipt of LTOWB predisposed recipients to worse outcomes compared to recipients of conventional component therapy (CCT).
A retrospective analysis of trauma patients who received at least 3 units of LTOWB (LTOWB group) versus those that received at least 3 units of RBCs, 1 unit of plasma and 1 unit of platelets but no LTOWB (CCT group) during the first 24 h of their admission was performed. Causal treatment effects were explored using propensity score matching (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM). Important clinical outcomes were evaluated.
There were 165 CCT and 155 LTOWB recipients eligible for matching. PSM and CEM reduced covariate imbalances between the CCT and LTOWB groups, with the exception that males remained over-represented in the LTOWB group due to the hospital\'s former resuscitation policy of not administering RhD-positive LTOWB to females <50. In both of the matched analyses, the LTOWB group received a median of 4 LTOWB units. There were no significant differences in 6-, 24-h mortality or 30-day mortality between groups, nor were there differences in the frequency of other clinical outcomes such as acute kidney injury, sepsis, venous/arterial thromboembolism; delta MODS was lower for the LTOWB recipients in the exact match group.
In both matched analyses, administration of a median of four LTOWB units did not result in a different frequency of major clinical outcomes including mortality.