household contact

家庭联系人
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们计算了日本SARS-CoV-2OmicronBA.2主导时期COVID-19患者家庭接触者的攻击率。在近期(<3个月)未接种疫苗的家庭接触者中,完全接种疫苗的接触者的攻击率低于未完全接种疫苗的接触者。证明间接疫苗的有效性。
    We calculated attack rates for household contacts of COVID-19 patients during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2-dominant period in Japan. Attack rates among household contacts without recent (<3 months) vaccination was lower for contacts of index patients with complete vaccination than for contacts of index patients without complete vaccination, demonstrating indirect vaccine effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估索引病例疫苗接种对SARS-CoV-2传播给家庭接触者的影响。在我们的流行病学队列研究(2022年5月至2023年11月)中,我们调查了接触者的注册索引病例疫苗接种状况和测试结果(第0天和第7天的阴性接触者的测试),并计算了二次发作率(SAR),即,新感染的接触者/易感者包括接触者。自变量的关联,指示病例COVID-19疫苗接种(是/否),使用校正比值比(aOR)及其95%置信区间(CI)确定家庭接触感染.我们记录了181个索引案例和314个联系人,其中250人同意参加;第0天检测呈阳性的16名联系人被排除在外。在包括的234个联系人中,49.1%是女性,平均(SD)年龄为51.9(19.8)岁。在两个接种指数病例的接触中,37.2%(87/234)的总体SAR较低(34.9%vs.63.2%;p=0.014)和既往有SARS-CoV-2感染史的指数病例(27.0%vs.46.3%;p=0.002)。索引病例疫苗接种对其家庭接触者具有预防感染的保护作用(aOR=0.21;95%CI:0.07,0.67)。Omicron变体流通时,家庭SAR很高。接种过的指数病例不太可能将SARS-CoV-2传播给他们的接触者。
    The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of index case vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 transmission to household contacts. In our epidemiological cohort study (May 2022-November 2023), we surveyed registered index case vaccination status and test results for contacts (testing on day 0, and on day 7 for negative contacts) and calculated the secondary attack rate (SAR), i.e., newly infected contacts/susceptible included contacts. The association of the independent variable, index case COVID-19 vaccination (yes/no), with household contact infection was determined using the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). We recorded 181 index cases and 314 contacts, of whom 250 agreed to participate; 16 contacts were excluded upon testing positive on day 0. Of the 234 included contacts, 49.1% were women, and the mean (SD) age was 51.9 (19.8) years. The overall SAR of 37.2% (87/234) was lower in the contacts of both vaccinated index cases (34.9% vs. 63.2%; p = 0.014) and index cases with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection history (27.0% vs. 46.3%; p = 0.002). Index case vaccination showed a protective effect against infection for their household contacts (aOR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.67). The household SAR was high when the Omicron variant circulated. Vaccinated index cases were less likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to their contacts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在印度尼西亚,结核病(TB)接触调查的实施是有限的,低检测率。我们报告了使用胸部X射线(CXR)筛查调查的家庭接触者(HHCs)的结核病和感染的产量和危险因素。从2018年至2022年,我们在日惹市和库隆普罗戈确定了年龄在5岁及以上的细菌学证实的指标病例。对所有HHC进行了结核病症状筛查;使用结核菌素皮肤测试或干扰素γ释放测定进行结核病感染测试;并推荐CXR。用XpertMTB/RIF测试了有症状或CXR提示TB的患者的痰。通过逻辑回归模型确定活动性结核病和潜伏性结核病感染(LTBI)的危险因素。我们在2020年6月至2022年12月期间对2857例HHC进行了结核病筛查,其中68例(2.4%)被诊断为活动性结核病。在符合LTBI调查资格的2621个HHC中,1083例(45.7%)被诊断为LTBI。与活动性结核病相关的因素是年龄,体重不足,糖尿病,城市生活,和索引案件睡在同一所房子里。与LTBI相关的因素是年龄增长和男性性别。结论:包括CXR和TST/IGRA在内的HHC筛查产生了中度的TB疾病和感染患病率。
    In Indonesia, the implementation of tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation is limited, with low detection rates. We report the yield of and risk factors for TB disease and infection for household contacts (HHCs) investigated using chest X-ray (CXR) screening. We identified HHCs aged five years and above of bacteriologically confirmed index cases from 2018 to 2022 in Yogyakarta City and Kulon Progo. All HHCs were offered screening for TB symptoms; TB infection testing with either tuberculin skin testing or interferon gamma release assay; and referral for CXR. Sputum from those with symptoms or CXR suggestive of TB was tested with Xpert MTB/RIF. Risk factors for active TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI) were identified by logistic regression models. We screened 2857 HHCs for TB between June 2020 and December 2022, with 68 (2.4%) diagnosed with active TB. Of 2621 HHCs eligible for LTBI investigation, 1083 (45.7%) were diagnosed with LTBI. The factors associated with active TB were age, being underweight, diabetes mellitus, urban living, and sleeping in the same house as an index case. Factors associated with LTBI were increasing age and male gender. Conclusions: Screening for HHC including CXR and TST/IGRA yielded a moderate prevalence of TB disease and infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内,COVID-19正从急性大流行阶段过渡到急性后阶段,此时应特别注意COVID-19控制策略。了解公众的知识和态度在控制COVID-19的传播中起着关键作用,并提供有关公众遵守预防和控制措施的信息。
    目的:本研究方案描述了一项调查的计划和管理,以调查有关COVID-19,疫苗接种,18岁及以上家庭接触者的非药物预防措施,在西班牙加泰罗尼亚和纳瓦拉大流行的急性期之后。次要目标包括调查家庭二次传播率,考虑到人口特征,临床表现,以及针对COVID-19的预防措施。
    方法:设计了一个电话问卷来评估知识的变化趋势,预防措施,和对COVID-19的态度分3轮(在确定为家庭接触者后,3个月后,6个月后)。问卷是经过广泛的文献综述,并通过与一个专家小组的讨论制定的,这些专家小组设计和评估了问卷的有效性,一致性,完整性,和清晰度。问卷由以下7个部分组成:社会和人口特征(即,性别,年龄,教育水平,和工作场所),合并症和危险因素(根据COVID-19疫苗接种策略的建议),流行病学数据(即,曝光时间,与索引案例的关系,和使用非药物预防措施的频率),COVID-19疫苗接种状况(即,收到的剂量数量和日期),对COVID-19的知识和态度(使用5点李克特量表评估-完全同意,同意,既不同意也不反对,不同意,并且完全不同意),和信息来源(包括传统大众媒体,社交媒体,和官方消息来源)。
    结果:2022年5月进行了一项试点研究,以评估22名家庭接触者的问卷。初步调查结果表明,问卷在一般人群中是可行和可接受的。平均反应时间为15分钟,年龄较大的参与者的反应差异更大。在试点研究之后,开始招募参与者,预计将于2023年底完成,之后最终结果将于2024年公布。
    结论:尽管SARS-CoV-2的传播水平较低,并且放松了控制措施,在急性期实施调查将为协助公共卫生决策和控制SARS-CoV-2和其他呼吸道病毒的传播提供宝贵的见解,从而在个体和群体水平上减轻COVID-19的负面影响。
    DERR1-10.2196/52114。
    BACKGROUND: Globally, COVID-19 is in transition from the acute pandemic phase into a postacute phase, and special attention should be paid at this time to COVID-19 control strategies. Understanding public knowledge and attitudes plays a pivotal role in controlling COVID-19\'s spread and provides information about the public\'s adherence to preventive and control measures.
    OBJECTIVE: This study protocol describes the planning and management of a survey to investigate the persistent or changing trends in knowledge and attitudes regarding COVID-19, vaccination, and nonpharmaceutical preventive measures among COVID-19 cases\' household contacts aged 18 years and older, after the acute phase of the pandemic in Catalonia and Navarre in Spain. The secondary objectives include investigating the rate of secondary transmission in households, taking into account the demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and preventive measures toward COVID-19.
    METHODS: A telephone questionnaire was designed to assess the changing trends in knowledge, preventive measures, and attitudes toward COVID-19 in 3 rounds (after identification as a household contact, 3 months later, and 6 months later). The questionnaire was developed following an extensive literature review and through discussions with a panel of experts who designed and assessed the validity of the questionnaire in terms of relevance, consistency, completeness, and clarity. The questionnaire consists of the following 7 sections: social and demographic characteristics (ie, gender, age, educational level, and workplace), comorbidities and risk factors (according to the recommendations from the COVID-19 vaccination strategy), epidemiological data (ie, exposure time, relationship with index cases, and frequency of use of nonpharmaceutical preventive measures), COVID-19 vaccination status (ie, the number and date of doses received), knowledge and attitudes toward COVID-19 (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale-totally agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, and totally disagree), and sources of information (including traditional mass media, social media, and official sources).
    RESULTS: A pilot study was performed in May 2022 to evaluate the questionnaire with 22 household contacts. Preliminary findings indicated that the questionnaire was feasible and acceptable in the general population. The average response time was 15 minutes, with greater variations in responses by older participants. After the pilot study, recruitment of participants began and is expected to be completed at the end of the year 2023, after which the final results will be available in 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low transmission levels of SARS-CoV-2 and the relaxation of containment measures, the implementation of the survey during the postacute phase will provide valuable insight to assist public health decision-making and control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses, thereby attenuating the negative effects of COVID-19 at individual and population level.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/52114.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和结核病(TB)之间的强烈流行病学联系可能使家庭结核病接触调查成为HIV筛查的有效策略,并发现血清不同伙伴关系中存在HIV风险的个体,并将其与HIV预防服务联系起来。我们旨在比较受结核病影响的家庭和坎帕拉普通人群中艾滋病毒血清不同的夫妇的比例,乌干达。
    方法:我们在坎帕拉以家庭为基础的结核病评估的背景下纳入了艾滋病毒咨询和检测(HCT)横断面试验的数据,2016-2017年乌干达。获得同意后,社区卫生工作者访问了结核病患者的家中,以筛查结核病接触者,并向≥15年的家庭成员提供HCT.我们将索引参与者及其配偶或父母定义为夫妻。如果通过自我报告的HIV状况或HIV检测结果确认,则将夫妻归类为血清差异。在2011年乌干达艾滋病指标调查(UAIS)中,我们使用了两个样本的比例测试来比较研究中夫妇之间HIV血清差异的频率与坎帕拉夫妇之间的患病率。
    结果:我们纳入了323名指标结核病参与者和507名年龄≥18岁的家庭接触者。大多数指数参与者(55%)是男性,而大多数(68%)成人接触者是女性。115/323(35.6%)家庭中有≥1对夫妇,大多数夫妇(98/115,85.2%),包括指数参与者和配偶。有艾滋病毒血清反应不同的夫妇的家庭比例为18/323(5.6%),提供18户家庭的筛选所需数量。在试验中确定的夫妇之间的HIV血清差异比例显着高于UAIS中的夫妇(15.7%vs.8%,p=0.039)。18对血清不同的夫妇包括14对(77.8%),其中指数参与者患有艾滋病毒,而配偶是艾滋病毒阴性,和4(22.2%),其中索引伴侣是艾滋病毒阴性,而配偶是艾滋病毒携带者。
    结论:在受结核病影响的家庭中确定的夫妇中,HIV血清差异的频率高于普通人群。结核病家庭接触调查可能是确定大量接触艾滋病毒的人并将他们与艾滋病毒预防服务联系起来的有效策略。
    BACKGROUND: Strong epidemiological links between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) may make household TB contact investigation an efficient strategy for HIV screening and finding individuals in serodifferent partnerships at risk of HIV and linking them to HIV prevention services. We aimed to compare the proportions of HIV serodifferent couples in TB-affected households and in the general population of Kampala, Uganda.
    METHODS: We included data from a cross-sectional trial of HIV counselling and testing (HCT) in the context of home-based TB evaluation in Kampala, Uganda in 2016-2017. After obtaining consent, community health workers visited the homes of participants with TB to screen contacts for TB and offer HCT to household members ≥ 15 years. We defined index participants and their spouses or parents as couples. Couples were classified as serodifferent if confirmed by self-reported HIV status or by HIV testing results. We used a two-sample test of proportions to compare the frequency of HIV serodifference among couples in the study to its prevalence among couples in Kampala in the 2011 Uganda AIDS Indicator Survey (UAIS).
    RESULTS: We included 323 index TB participants and 507 household contacts aged ≥ 18 years. Most index participants (55%) were male, while most (68%) adult contacts were female. There was ≥ 1 couple in 115/323 (35.6%) households, with most couples (98/115, 85.2%) including the index participant and spouse. The proportion of households with HIV-serodifferent couples was 18/323 (5.6%), giving a number-needed-to-screen of 18 households. The proportion of HIV serodifference among couples identified in the trial was significantly higher than among couples in the UAIS (15.7% vs. 8%, p = 0.039). The 18 serodifferent couples included 14 (77.8%) where the index participant was living with HIV and the spouse was HIV-negative, and 4 (22.2%) where the index partner was HIV-negative, while the spouse was living with HIV.
    CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of HIV serodifference among couples identified in TB-affected households was higher than in the general population. TB household contact investigation may be an efficient strategy for identifying people with substantial exposure to HIV and linking them to HIV prevention services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,在全球范围内,感染病例的家庭(HH)接触者之间的COVID-19传播率高,血清阳性率从5.5%到57.2%不等。泰国HH接触者血清阳性率和与血清阳性相关因素的数据有限。
    确定COVID-19确诊病例的HH接触者血清阳性率和与抗SARS-CoV-2抗体相关的因素。
    2020年3月至2021年7月曼谷确诊COVID-19病例(主要病例)的数据是从城市疾病控制和预防研究所检索的。在测试呈阳性的14天内联系了主要病例,以允许通过电话联系其HH联系人。然后招募了HH联系人来完成关于人口统计的问卷,收集危险因素和血液并检测抗SARS-CoV-2尖峰S1蛋白的总免疫球蛋白抗体。采用logistic回归分析血清阳性相关因素。
    联系了曼谷452名感染病例的HH接触者。HH接触者血清阳性率为20.5%。多变量分析后与血清阳性相关的因素与索引病例有关(是索引病例的其他亲属(近亲/配偶除外)[aOR4.04,95%CI;1.15,14.14,p.029],并且是索引病例的同事[aOR0.16,95%CI;0.045,0.60,p.006]),始终与索引病例保持在同一房间[aOR5.64,95%CI;1.95,16.34,p.001],共享器具[OR0.25,95%CI;0.074,0.82,p.023],和参加休闲活动以及指数案例[aOR4.77,95%CI;1.47,15.51,p.009]。
    血清学研究可与其他分子技术结合用于检测COVID-19感染。它是研究人群血清阳性率以及疫苗接种运动后血清转化的有用工具。共享生活环境与HH联系人中的血清阳性相关。然而,个人实践可能会受到意识的影响,文化差异,和各国实施的控制措施。
    UNASSIGNED: High COVID-19 transmission among household (HH) contacts of infected cases were reported with seroprevalence varying from 5.5% to 57.2% worldwide. Data on seroprevalence among HH contacts and factors associated with seropositivity in Thailand are limited.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the seroprevalence and factors associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among HH contacts of COVID-19 confirmed cases.
    UNASSIGNED: Data on confirmed COVID-19 cases (primary cases) in Bangkok from March 2020-July 2021 were retrieved from Institute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention. Primary cases were contacted within 14 days of testing positive for permission to contact their HH contacts via telephone. HH contacts were then recruited to complete questionnaires about demographics, and risk factors and blood was collected and tested for total immunoglobulin antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein. Factors associated with seropositivity were analysed by logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible participants of 452 HH contacts of infected cases in Bangkok were contacted. Seroprevalence was 20.5% among HH contacts. Factors associated with seropositivity after multivariate analysis were relationship to index case (being other relatives to index case (other than close relatives/spouse) [aOR 4.04, 95% CI; 1.15, 14.14, p.029] and being a co-worker to index cases [aOR 0.16, 95% CI; 0.045, 0.60, p.006]), always staying in the same room with index case [aOR 5.64, 95% CI; 1.95, 16.34, p.001], sharing utensil [aOR 0.25, 95% CI; 0.074, 0.82, p.023], and participation in leisure activities together with index case [aOR 4.77, 95% CI; 1.47, 15.51, p.009].
    UNASSIGNED: Serological investigation can be used in detecting COVID-19 infection in conjunction with other molecular techniques. It is a useful tool for studies on seroprevalence in a population as well as seroconversion after a vaccination campaign. Sharing living environments are associated with seropositivity in HH contacts. Nevertheless, individual practices can be affected by awareness, cultural differences, and control measures implemented by each country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    巨噬细胞移动抑制因子(MIF)是多种疾病的炎症介质,包括结核病(TB)。然而,MIF在结核病各阶段的作用还有待进一步阐明.因此,本研究旨在分析活动性肺结核患者血浆MIF蛋白水平的差异,正负干扰素-γ释放测定(IGRA)家庭接触者(HHCs),和健康对照(HCs)。与新发肺结核(ATB)和HHCs患者相比,血浆MIF浓度显着升高(平均值±标准偏差:17.32±16.85、16.29±14.21和7.29±5.39ng/mL,分别为;P=0.002)。与ATB患者相比,血浆MIF浓度无统计学差异,IGRA阳性HHC(17.44±16.6ng/mL),IGRA阴性HCs(14.34±8.7ng/mL)(P=0.897)。总之,ATB患者,IGRA阳性HHC,和IGRA阴性的HHC具有比HC更高的MIF浓度。这表明MIF参与结核病的每个阶段,从结核暴露和感染开始,但没有症状,到了活跃的阶段。
    Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is an inflammatory mediator in several diseases, including tuberculosis (TB). However, the role of MIF in each stage of TB remains to be further elucidated. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the differences in plasma MIF protein levels in patients with active pulmonary TB, positive and negative interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) household contacts (HHCs), and healthy controls (HCs). Plasma MIF concentration was significantly higher in patients with active-new pulmonary tuberculosis (ATB) and HHCs compared with HCs (mean ± standard deviation: 17.32 ± 16.85, 16.29 ± 14.21, and 7.29 ± 5.39 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.002). The plasma MIF concentration was not statistically different when compared between patients with ATB, IGRA-positive HHCs (17.44 ± 16.6 ng/mL), and IGRA-negative HHCs (14.34 ± 8.7 ng/mL) (P = 0.897). In conclusion, ATB patients, IGRA-positive HHCs, and IGRA-negative HHCs have a higher MIF concentration than HCs. This shows the involvement of MIF in each stage of TB, starting from TB exposure and infection, but not symptomatic, to the active stage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:结核分枝杆菌复合体导致结核病,严重的公共卫生问题。患有活动性肺结核的人的密切接触者感染该病的风险更大。尽管撒哈拉以南非洲国家有大量的初步研究,目前尚无系统综述或荟萃分析来评估结核病患者家庭接触者(HHC)中结核病的合并患病率.因此,本研究旨在评估撒哈拉以南非洲地区一名家庭接触结核病患者的合并结核病患病率.
    UNASSIGNED:从电子数据库中系统地搜索了潜在的论文(PubMed,谷歌学者和科学网)。为了分析论文的质量,我们使用了乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评估方法。使用STATA版本16分析数据。
    未经评估:筛选373项研究后,最终分析包括来自十二个国家的20篇文章。家庭接触者中结核病的总体患病率为3.29%(95%CI;2.35%-4.23%)。5岁以下儿童活动性肺结核总患病率为2.60%(95%CI;1.81%-3.39%)。当指数患者年龄小于18岁时,HHC中活动性TB的合并患病率为2.64%(95%CI;1.46%-3.81%).结核病指数患者中HIV的合并比例为53.12%(95%CI,39.73%-66.51%)。家庭接触者中HIV的总体汇总患病率为7.75%(95%CI,4.21%-11.29%)。
    未经评估:我们的系统审查表明,在撒哈拉以南非洲国家,家庭接触者与他们的索引患者感染结核病的风险很高。根据这项研究,每30个家庭接触者中就有一个会患上活动性结核病。这证明了在家庭接触者中进行彻底的主动结核病病例追踪以定位失踪的结核病患者的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex causes tuberculosis, a severe public health problem. Close contacts of someone who has active pulmonary tuberculosis were at a greater risk of contracting the disease. Despite the large number of primary research available in Sub-Saharan African nations, there are no systematic reviews or meta-analyses that estimate the pooled prevalence of tuberculosis among tuberculosis patients\' household contacts (HHC). Thus, this study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of tuberculosis in a household contact of tuberculosis patients in the sub-Saharan African region.
    UNASSIGNED: Potential papers were systematically searched from electronic databases (PubMed, Google scholar and web of science). To analyze the quality of the papers featured, we used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal methods. Data were analyzed using STATA Version 16.
    UNASSIGNED: After screening 373 studies, the final analysis includes 20 articles from twelve countries. The overall prevalence of tuberculosis among household contacts was 3.29 % (95 % CI; 2.35 %-4.23 %). The overall prevalence rate of active tuberculosis in children aged less than five years was 2.60 % (95 % CI; 1.81 %-3.39 %). When the index patient age was less than 18 years old, the pooled prevalence of active TB in HHC was 2.64 % (95 % CI; 1.46 %-3.81 %). The pooled proportion of HIV in index TB patients was 53.12 % (95 % CI, 39.73 %-66.51 %). The overall pooled prevalence of HIV in household contacts was 7.75 % (95 % CI, 4.21 %-11.29 %).
    UNASSIGNED: Our systematic review showed that, in Sub-Saharan African nations, household contacts are at a high risk of contracting tuberculosis from their index patient. According to this study, one out of every thirty household contacts will develop active tuberculosis. This demonstrated the significance of doing thorough active tuberculosis case tracing in household contacts to locate missing tuberculosis patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界上四分之一的人口感染了结核分枝杆菌(M.tb),10%的病例发展为活动性结核病(TB),90%有潜伏性结核感染。结核病患者的家庭成员具有潜在结核病感染的最高潜力。这项研究旨在确定活动性结核病患者家庭接触者中家庭成员的潜伏性结核病感染和危险因素。本研究采用接触追踪法进行横断面研究设计。选择的受试者是112名活动性TB患者的241名总家庭成员中的138人。受试者接受结核菌素皮肤试验(TST),使用2单位结核菌素(TU)纯化的蛋白质衍生物(PPD)0.1mL(PT。BioFarmaPersero,万隆,印度尼西亚)。在家访期间收集数据风险因素。数据采用卡方检验和多元逻辑回归分析。共有63.8%(88/138)的活动性结核病患者家庭接触者有潜伏性结核病感染。劳动者/农民/渔民的职业类型是与潜伏性结核病感染相关的最主要危险因素(AOR:7.04;95%CI:1.70-29.02),其次是不合格的卧室密度(<8m2/2人)(AOR:5.33;95%CI:2.44-12.71)和接触持续时间≥5小时/天(AOR:4.70;95%CI:1.33-16.66)。活动性结核病患者家庭接触者家庭成员的潜伏性结核病感染相当高。职业类型,接触持续时间,和卧室密度同时被证实是潜伏结核感染的主要危险因素。因此,建议在与活动性结核病患者家庭接触的家庭成员中识别和预防潜伏性结核病感染。
    A quarter of the world\'s population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), 10% of cases develop active tuberculosis (TB), and 90% have a latent TB infection. Family members of TB patients have the highest potential for latent TB infection. This study aims to identify latent TB infection and risk factors in family members within the household contacts of active TB patients. This study used a crosssectional study design with a contact tracing method. The selected subjects were 138 people from 241 total family members of 112 active TB patients. Subjects underwent a tuberculin skin test (TST), using 2 units of tuberculin (TU) purified protein derivative (PPD) 0.1 mL (PT. Bio Farma Persero, Bandung, Indonesia). Data risk factors were collected during home visits. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and multiple logistic regression. A total of 63.8% (88/138) of family members of active TB patients\' household contacts had latent TB infection. The type of occupation of laborers/ farmers/fishers is the most dominant risk factor associated with latent TB infection (AOR: 7.04; 95% CI: 1.70-29.02), followed by unqualified bedroom density (<8 m2/2 people) (AOR: 5.33; 95% CI: 2.44- 12.71) and contact duration ≥5 hours/day (AOR: 4.70; 95% CI:1.33-16.66). Latent TB infection in family members of active TB patients\' household contacts was quite high. Occupation type, contact duration, and bedroom density were simultaneously confirmed as the main risk factors related to latent TB infection. Therefore, it is recommended to identify and prevent latent TB infection in family members in household contact with active TB patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该分析总结了18岁以下人群中SARS-CoV-2的观察性流行病学数据和传播动态,以更好地表征儿科COVID-19大流行。
    我们对丹佛儿童的公共卫生监测数据进行了回顾性研究,科罗拉多,据报道,从2020年3月1日至2021年9月30日感染了COVID-19。我们使用描述性统计和双变量比率(RR)来描述人口统计学和临床特征,传输动力学,案例趋势,和生态协会。
    在研究期间,共报告了9815名患有COVID-19的儿童和青少年。14-17岁的青少年每千人的发病率(IR)最高(IR=107.5;3021/28108)。西班牙裔/拉丁裔儿童的感染率是非西班牙裔白人儿童的1.6倍(RR=1.57;95%CI,1.50-1.65;P<.001)。很少发生住院(n=138,1.4%)和死亡(n=3,0%)。大多数儿童有症状(5499中的4487例,81.6%)。在家庭集群中,很大比例的儿科病例(n=6136)是次要病例(n=3959,64.5%),其次是索引病例(n=1170,19.1%)和联合索引病例(n=1007,16.4%)。非西班牙裔白人儿童成为指数或联合指数病例的风险增加(RR=1.14;95%CI,1.06-1.23;P<.001),而西班牙裔/拉丁裔儿童成为次要病例的风险增加(RR=1.07;95%CI,1.03-1.11;P<.001).从2020年到2021年,儿科病例率与贫困率较高的社区和3人以上的家庭之间的关联下降。
    年龄较大的儿童和那些确定为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人的疾病发病率不成比例。相当比例的儿童被认为是索引病例或共同索引病例。儿科预防策略,尤其是接种疫苗,对大流行控制至关重要。
    This analysis summarizes observational epidemiologic data and transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 among people aged <18 years to better characterize the pediatric COVID-19 pandemic.
    We conducted a retrospective study of public health surveillance data among children in Denver, Colorado, who were reported to have COVID-19 from March 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate rate ratios (RRs) to describe demographic and clinical characteristics, transmission dynamics, case trends, and ecological associations.
    A total of 9815 children and adolescents who had COVID-19 were reported during the study period. Adolescents aged 14-17 years had the highest incidence rate (IR) per 1000 people (IR = 107.5; 3021 of 28 108). Hispanic/Latino children had a 1.6 times higher rate of infection than non-Hispanic White children (RR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.50-1.65; P < .001). Few hospitalizations (n = 138, 1.4%) and deaths (n = 3, 0%) occurred. Most children were symptomatic (4487 of 5499, 81.6%). Within household clusters, a large proportion of pediatric cases (n = 6136) were a secondary case (n = 3959, 64.5%), followed by index case (n = 1170, 19.1%) and co-index case (n = 1007, 16.4%). Non-Hispanic White children had an increased risk of being an index or co-index case (RR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23; P < .001), while Hispanic/Latino children had an increased risk of being a secondary case (RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; P < .001). From 2020 to 2021, the association between pediatric case rates and neighborhoods with higher poverty and households with ≥3 people decreased.
    Older children and those identifying as Hispanic/Latino had a disproportionate incidence of disease. A sizable proportion of children were considered index cases or co-index cases. Pediatric prevention strategies, especially vaccinations, are vital for pandemic control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号