health database

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是长期家庭无创通气(NIV)的最常见适应症,但支持当前指南的数据存在不确定性。这项研究描述了COPD患者在家庭NIV开始之前的健康轨迹,并比较了不同NIV前健康轨迹组的死亡率结局。
    数据来自法国国家健康保险报销系统数据库,用于2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间年龄≥40岁且NIV报销≥1的COPD患者。通过K聚类(TAK分析)使用时间序列分析确定常见的健康轨迹。
    分析了来自54,545个人的数据;该人群是老年人(中位年龄70岁),患有多种合并症。产生了四个簇。第1组(n=35,975/54,545;66%)在门诊或首次急性事件/恶化后开始NIV。第2组(6653/54,545;12%)在过去6个月中发生≥2次严重加重后开始NIV。第3组(11,375/54,545;21%)在前一年频繁的严重COPD相关恶化后开始NIV。第4组(652/54,545;1%)在多次长期严重加重后开始NIV。这四个集群的年龄不同,性别,合并症,NIV前的调查,和NIV开始的处方/位置。死亡率在集群之间存在显着差异:集群4中最高,集群1中最低。
    NIV临床启动的显著异质性可能反映了目前缺乏强有力的证据和指南建议。关于不同集群的特征和结果的知识应用于解决不平等问题,并促进COPD中更一致和个性化地使用domiciliaryNIV。
    JLP和SB在格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学基金会的“调查”计划(ANR-15-IDEX-02)和“电子健康和综合护理与轨迹医学和MIAI人工智能(ANR-19-P3IA-0003)”卓越主席的框架内得到了法国国家研究机构的支持。这项工作得到了ResMed的支持。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common indication for long-term domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) but there is uncertainty in data supporting current guidelines. This study described health trajectories before initiation of at-home NIV in people with COPD, and compared mortality outcomes between groups with different pre-NIV health trajectories.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were from the French national health insurance reimbursement system database for individuals with COPD aged ≥40 years and ≥1 reimbursement for NIV between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. Common health trajectories were determined using time sequence analysis through K-clustering (TAK analysis).
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 54,545 individuals were analysed; the population was elderly (median age 70 years) with multiple comorbidities. Four clusters were generated. Cluster 1 (n = 35,975/54,545; 66%) had NIV initiated in ambulatory settings or after the first acute event/exacerbation. Cluster 2 (6653/54,545; 12%) started NIV after ≥2 severe exacerbations in the previous 6 months. Cluster 3 (11,375/54,545; 21%) started NIV after frequent severe COPD-related exacerbations in the previous year. Cluster 4 (652/54,545; 1%) started NIV after many long-lasting severe exacerbations. The four clusters differed in age, sex, comorbidities, pre-NIV investigations, and prescriber/location of NIV initiation. Mortality differed significantly between clusters: highest in Cluster 4 and lowest in Cluster 1.
    UNASSIGNED: The significant heterogeneity in clinical initiation of NIV probably reflects the current lack of strong evidence and guideline recommendations. Knowledge about the characteristics and outcomes in different clusters should be used to address inequities and facilitate more consistent and personalised use domiciliary NIV in COPD.
    UNASSIGNED: JLP and SB are supported by the French National Research Agency in the framework of the \"Investissements d\'avenir\" program (ANR-15-IDEX-02) and the \"e-health and integrated care and trajectories medicine and MIAI artificial intelligence (ANR-19-P3IA-0003)\" Chairs of excellence from the Grenoble Alpes University Foundation. This work was supported by ResMed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的主要目的是验证丹麦国家患者登记处(DNPR)中癫痫发作病例的癫痫诊断,其中包含近9000000个人的信息,并确定经过验证的队列中符合国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)耐药性癫痫(DRE)标准的人员。
    方法:我们回顾了所有首次诊断为癫痫的个体的医疗记录的随机样本(国际疾病分类,2010年至2019年,丹麦中部地区第10版[ICD-10]:G40)或缉获量(ICD-10:G41、R56或F445)。在确诊为癫痫事件的人中,我们在最近的接触中确定了与DRE的比例。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定与DRE风险相关的临床因素。
    结果:在20723名首次诊断为癫痫(n=11812)或癫痫发作(n=8911)的人中,我们回顾了n=1067例癫痫发作和n=610例癫痫发作的医疗记录.在那些有癫痫诊断的人中,838例确诊(45%为女性,发病平均年龄=42.4岁),提供79%的阳性预测值(PPV)(95%置信区间[CI]=76%-81%)。局灶性癫痫的PPV为86%(95%CI=82%-89%),全身性癫痫的PPV为71%(95%CI=61%-80%)。在740例确诊的癫痫发作和≥1年的随访患者中,103(14%)符合DRE的定义,476(64%)是药物反应,161例(22%)患者的反应性不明确.在多变量逻辑回归分析中,癫痫发作的早期年龄,认知障碍,癫痫持续状态病史与DRE相关.
    结论:在DNPR中,我们发现PPV的癫痫诊断为79%。在确诊的癫痫患者中,14%符合DRE的ILAE标准。癫痫发作的早期年龄,认知障碍,癫痫持续状态病史与耐药独立相关。
    OBJECTIVE: The main purposes of this study were to validate the epilepsy diagnosis in incident epilepsy cases in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), which contains information on nearly 9 000 000 individuals, and to identify persons in the validated cohort who fulfilled the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).
    METHODS: We reviewed a random sample of medical records from all individuals registered with a first diagnosis of epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10]: G40) or seizures (ICD-10: G41, R56, or F445) in the Central Denmark Region from 2010 to 2019. In persons with a validated incident epilepsy diagnosis, we determined the proportion with DRE at the latest contact. We performed logistic regression analyses to identify clinical factors that correlated with risk of DRE.
    RESULTS: Of 20 723 persons with a first diagnosis of epilepsy (n = 11 812) or seizures (n = 8911), we reviewed the medical records of n = 1067 with incident epilepsy and n = 610 with incident seizures. Among those with a register diagnosis of epilepsy, the diagnosis was confirmed in 838 cases (45% females, mean age at onset = 42.4 years), providing a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76%-81%). The PPV of focal epilepsy was 86% (95% CI = 82%-89%), and the PPV of generalized epilepsy was 71% (95% CI = 61%-80%). Of 740 patients with confirmed incident epilepsy and ≥1 year of follow-up, 103 (14%) fulfilled the definition of DRE, 476 (64%) were drug responsive, and 161 (22%) had undefined responsiveness. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, early age at epilepsy onset, cognitive impairment, and a history of status epilepticus were associated with DRE.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the DNPR, we found a PPV of the epilepsy diagnosis of 79%. Among persons with confirmed epilepsy, 14% fulfilled ILAE criteria for DRE. Early age at epilepsy onset, cognitive impairment, and a history of status epilepticus were independently associated with drug resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:欧洲国家在数据链接整合方面的差异(即,最近强调能够将数据库之间的患者数据匹配)与常规公共卫生活动相匹配。在法国,索赔数据库几乎涵盖了从出生到死亡的整个人口,为数据链接提供了巨大的研究潜力。由于使用通用唯一标识符直接链接个人数据通常受到限制,已经开发了与一组间接密钥标识符的链接,这与链接质量挑战相关,以最大限度地减少链接数据中的错误。
    目的:本系统综述的目的是分析法国有关健康产品使用和护理轨迹的间接数据链接的研究出版物的类型和质量。
    方法:实现了对截至2022年12月31日在PubMed/Medline和Embase数据库中发表的所有论文的全面搜索,涉及链接的法国数据库,重点关注健康产品的使用或护理轨迹。仅包括基于使用间接标识符的研究(即,没有可用于轻松链接数据库的唯一个人标识符)。还实现了对数据链接与质量指标的描述性分析以及对Bohensky框架的评估数据链接研究的坚持。
    结果:总计,选择了16篇论文。在7例(43.8%)病例中在国家一级进行了数据链接,在9例(56.2%)研究中在地方一级进行了数据链接。不同数据库中包含的患者数量以及由数据链接产生的患者数量差异很大,分别,713至75,000名患者和210至31,000名相关患者。研究的疾病主要是慢性疾病和感染。数据链接的目标是多个:估计药物不良反应的风险(ADR;n=6,37.5%),重建患者的护理轨迹(n=5,31.3%),描述治疗用途(n=2,12.5%),为了评估治疗的益处(n=2,12.5%),并评估治疗依从性(n=1,6.3%)。登记处是与法国索赔数据最频繁链接的数据库。没有研究研究过与医院数据仓库的联系,临床试验数据库,或患者自我报告的数据库。在7项(43.8%)研究中,连锁方法是确定性的,4项(25.0%)研究中的概率,5项(31.3%)研究中未指明。联动率主要从80%到90%(11/15报告,73.3%,研究)。坚持Bohensky框架来评估数据链接研究表明,总是对链接的源数据库进行描述,但是没有系统地描述要链接的变量的完成率和准确性。
    结论:这篇综述强调了法国对健康数据关联的兴趣与日俱增。然而,监管,技术,人为限制仍然是其部署的主要障碍。音量,品种,数据的有效性代表了一个真正的挑战,处理这些大数据需要统计分析和人工智能方面的先进专业知识和技能。
    European national disparities in the integration of data linkage (ie, being able to match patient data between databases) into routine public health activities were recently highlighted. In France, the claims database covers almost the whole population from birth to death, offering a great research potential for data linkage. As the use of a common unique identifier to directly link personal data is often limited, linkage with a set of indirect key identifiers has been developed, which is associated with the linkage quality challenge to minimize errors in linked data.
    The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the type and quality of research publications on indirect data linkage on health product use and care trajectories in France.
    A comprehensive search for all papers published in PubMed/Medline and Embase databases up to December 31, 2022, involving linked French database focusing on health products use or care trajectories was realized. Only studies based on the use of indirect identifiers were included (ie, without a unique personal identifier available to easily link the databases). A descriptive analysis of data linkage with quality indicators and adherence to the Bohensky framework for evaluating data linkage studies was also realized.
    In total, 16 papers were selected. Data linkage was performed at the national level in 7 (43.8%) cases or at the local level in 9 (56.2%) studies. The number of patients included in the different databases and resulting from data linkage varied greatly, respectively, from 713 to 75,000 patients and from 210 to 31,000 linked patients. The diseases studied were mainly chronic diseases and infections. The objectives of the data linkage were multiple: to estimate the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs; n=6, 37.5%), to reconstruct the patient\'s care trajectory (n=5, 31.3%), to describe therapeutic uses (n=2, 12.5%), to evaluate the benefits of treatments (n=2, 12.5%), and to evaluate treatment adherence (n=1, 6.3%). Registries are the most frequently linked databases with French claims data. No studies have looked at linking with a hospital data warehouse, a clinical trial database, or patient self-reported databases. The linkage approach was deterministic in 7 (43.8%) studies, probabilistic in 4 (25.0%) studies, and not specified in 5 (31.3%) studies. The linkage rate was mainly from 80% to 90% (reported in 11/15, 73.3%, studies). Adherence to the Bohensky framework for evaluating data linkage studies showed that the description of the source databases for the linkage was always performed but that the completion rate and accuracy of the variables to be linked were not systematically described.
    This review highlights the growing interest in health data linkage in France. Nevertheless, regulatory, technical, and human constraints remain major obstacles to their deployment. The volume, variety, and validity of the data represent a real challenge, and advanced expertise and skills in statistical analysis and artificial intelligence are required to treat these big data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:流行病学犯罪学是指影响被监禁和非监禁罪犯人口的健康问题,一个被认为具有挑战性的小组进行研究。尽管如此,迫切需要新的知识和干预措施来改善健康,正义,以及这个边缘化人口的社会结果。
    目的:为了更好地了解流行病学犯罪学领域的研究成果,我们通过分析同行评审发表的产出来确定国家和组织(例如,大学,政府和非政府组织)负责同行评审的出版物。
    方法:我们使用半自动方法检查了1946年至2021年间以英语发表的23,904份PubMed流行病学研究的第一作者从属关系,这些流行病学研究涉及被监禁和罪犯人群。我们还将研究产出映射到世界正义项目法治指数,以更好地了解研究产出与一国司法系统的整体标准之间是否存在关系。
    结果:北欧国家(瑞典,挪威,芬兰,和丹麦)的研究产出与其被监禁人口成比例最高,其次是澳大利亚。大学附属第一作者占已发表文章的73.3%,卡罗林斯卡研究所(瑞典)是出版最多的,其次是新南威尔士大学(澳大利亚)。政府附属的第一作者占已发表产出的8.9%,监狱附属团体占1%。研究产出最低的国家在法治指数上的得分也最低。
    结论:这项研究提供了关于谁在流行病学犯罪学领域发表研究的重要信息。这对促进研究多样性具有重要意义,独立性,融资股权,以及大学和政府部门之间的伙伴关系,以控制对被监禁和冒犯人口的访问。
    BACKGROUND: Epidemiological criminology refers to health issues affecting incarcerated and nonincarcerated offender populations, a group recognized as being challenging to conduct research with. Notwithstanding this, an urgent need exists for new knowledge and interventions to improve heath, justice, and social outcomes for this marginalized population.
    OBJECTIVE: To better understand research outputs in the field of epidemiological criminology, we examined the lead author\'s affiliation by analyzing peer-reviewed published outputs to determine countries and organizations (eg, universities, governmental and nongovernmental organizations) responsible for peer-reviewed publications.
    METHODS: We used a semiautomated approach to examine the first-author affiliations of 23,904 PubMed epidemiological studies related to incarcerated and offender populations published in English between 1946 and 2021. We also mapped research outputs to the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index to better understand whether there was a relationship between research outputs and the overall standard of a country\'s justice system.
    RESULTS: Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark) had the highest research outputs proportional to their incarcerated population, followed by Australia. University-affiliated first authors comprised 73.3% of published articles, with the Karolinska Institute (Sweden) being the most published, followed by the University of New South Wales (Australia). Government-affiliated first authors were on 8.9% of published outputs, and prison-affiliated groups were on 1%. Countries with the lowest research outputs also had the lowest scores on the Rule of Law Index.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important information on who is publishing research in the epidemiological criminology field. This has implications for promoting research diversity, independence, funding equity, and partnerships between universities and government departments that control access to incarcerated and offending populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数据和连接COVID-19疫苗药物警戒(DaC-VaP)英国范围内的合作旨在监测疫苗的摄取和有效性,并使用常规临床和管理数据提供药物警戒。为了监控这些,可能需要进行汇总分析。然而,术语的变化是一个障碍,因为英格兰使用系统化的医学临床术语命名法(SNOMEDCT),而英国其他地区在初级保健中使用Readv2术语。整个英国的数据源可用性并不统一。
    目的:本研究旨在使用观察性医学结果伙伴关系(OMOP)通用数据模型(CDM)中的概念映射来识别记录的常见概念,并在重复的横断面研究中报告这些概念。我们计划这样做是为了疫苗覆盖率和2个关注的不良事件(AEIs),脑静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)和过敏反应。我们确定了概念映射到SNOMEDCT,阅读v2,世界卫生组织的国际疾病分类第十次修订(ICD-10)术语,和英国药品和器械词典(dm+d)。
    方法:选择药物警戒研究对DaC-VaP感兴趣的暴露和结果。从观察健康数据科学和信息学(OHDSI)自动术语协调中确定了这些变量与英国权力下放国家/地区使用的不同术语的映射,Extraction,和NormalizationforAnalytics(ATHENA)在线浏览器。然后,来自每个国家的首席分析师确认或添加到确定的映射中。然后使用这些映射以通用格式报告AEI。我们报告了每28天接种疫苗后0-2天和3-28天的窗口率。
    结果:我们列出了Readv2、SNOMEDCT、ICD-10和dm+d。对于疫苗暴露,我们发现了从OMOP到我们临床术语的清晰映射,尽管dm+d在搜索时OMOP没有列出代码。我们找到了一份CVST和过敏反应代码列表。对于CVST,我们必须使用更广泛的脑静脉血栓形成概念性方法,包括Readv2.我们识别了56个SNOMEDCT代码,其中我们选择了47个(84%),和15读取v2代码。对于过敏反应,我们的精确搜索确定了60个SNOMEDCT代码和9个Readv2代码,其中我们选择了10个(17%)和4个(44%),分别,纳入我们重复的横断面研究。
    结论:这种方法可以在OMOPCDM中使用不同术语的映射,而无需对整个数据库进行编目。然而,阅读v2的概念粒度比某些术语小,比如SNOMEDCT。此外,OMOPCDM无法弥补临床编码系统的局限性.Readv2和ICD-10的粒度都不足以使CVST能够被特别标记。因此,任何汇总分析都必须在脑血管静脉血栓形成的特异性较低的水平上进行.总的来说,此CDM内的映射是有用的,和我们的方法可以用于快速合作,只有有限数量的概念池。
    BACKGROUND: The Data and Connectivity COVID-19 Vaccines Pharmacovigilance (DaC-VaP) UK-wide collaboration was created to monitor vaccine uptake and effectiveness and provide pharmacovigilance using routine clinical and administrative data. To monitor these, pooled analyses may be needed. However, variation in terminologies present a barrier as England uses the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), while the rest of the United Kingdom uses the Read v2 terminology in primary care. The availability of data sources is not uniform across the United Kingdom.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to use the concept mappings in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) to identify common concepts recorded and to report these in a repeated cross-sectional study. We planned to do this for vaccine coverage and 2 adverse events of interest (AEIs), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and anaphylaxis. We identified concept mappings to SNOMED CT, Read v2, the World Health Organization\'s International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision (ICD-10) terminology, and the UK Dictionary of Medicines and Devices (dm+d).
    METHODS: Exposures and outcomes of interest to DaC-VaP for pharmacovigilance studies were selected. Mappings of these variables to different terminologies used across the United Kingdom\'s devolved nations\' health services were identified from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Automated Terminology Harmonization, Extraction, and Normalization for Analytics (ATHENA) online browser. Lead analysts from each nation then confirmed or added to the mappings identified. These mappings were then used to report AEIs in a common format. We reported rates for windows of 0-2 and 3-28 days postvaccine every 28 days.
    RESULTS: We listed the mappings between Read v2, SNOMED CT, ICD-10, and dm+d. For vaccine exposure, we found clear mapping from OMOP to our clinical terminologies, though dm+d had codes not listed by OMOP at the time of searching. We found a list of CVST and anaphylaxis codes. For CVST, we had to use a broader cerebral venous thrombosis conceptual approach to include Read v2. We identified 56 SNOMED CT codes, of which we selected 47 (84%), and 15 Read v2 codes. For anaphylaxis, our refined search identified 60 SNOMED CT codes and 9 Read v2 codes, of which we selected 10 (17%) and 4 (44%), respectively, to include in our repeated cross-sectional studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: This approach enables the use of mappings to different terminologies within the OMOP CDM without the need to catalogue an entire database. However, Read v2 has less granular concepts than some terminologies, such as SNOMED CT. Additionally, the OMOP CDM cannot compensate for limitations in the clinical coding system. Neither Read v2 nor ICD-10 is sufficiently granular to enable CVST to be specifically flagged. Hence, any pooled analysis will have to be at the less specific level of cerebrovascular venous thrombosis. Overall, the mappings within this CDM are useful, and our method could be used for rapid collaborations where there are only a limited number of concepts to pool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能(AI)已成为21世纪技术发展的主要驱动力,然而,人们很少关注算法对老年人的偏见。
    目的:本文记录了范围审查的搜索策略和过程,探讨了与年龄相关的偏见如何在AI系统中编码或放大,以及相应的法律和道德含义。
    方法:范围审查遵循Arksey和O\'Malley开发的6阶段方法框架。已在6个数据库中建立了检索策略。我们将通过搜索灰色文献数据库来调查人工智能中年龄歧视的法律含义,有针对性的网站,和流行的搜索引擎,并使用迭代搜索策略。研究符合纳入标准,如果他们是英语,同行评审,以电子方式提供全文,并满足以下两个附加标准之一:(1)在任何应用程序中包括与AI相关的“偏见”(例如,面部识别)和(2)讨论与老年或年龄歧视概念相关的偏见。至少有两名审稿人将独立进行标题,abstract,全文筛选。搜索结果将使用PRISMA-ScR(系统评论的首选报告项目和范围评论的Meta分析扩展)报告指南报告。我们将以结构化的形式绘制数据,并进行主题分析,以突出社会,legal,以及文献中报道的伦理含义。
    结果:在2021年11月进行搜索时,数据库搜索产生了7595条记录。范围审查将于2022年12月完成。
    结论:这些发现将为AI系统中与年龄相关的偏见程度提供跨学科的见解。研究结果将提供基础知识,鼓励多部门合作,以确保人工智能的开发和部署符合道德价值观和人权立法,因为它与老年人和老龄化人口有关。我们将在同行评审的期刊上发布评审结果,并通过研讨会和网络研讨会与利益相关者传播关键结果。
    背景:OSF注册局AMG5P;https://osf.io/amg5p。
    DERR1-10.2196/33211。
    BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a major driver of technological development in the 21st century, yet little attention has been paid to algorithmic biases toward older adults.
    OBJECTIVE: This paper documents the search strategy and process for a scoping review exploring how age-related bias is encoded or amplified in AI systems as well as the corresponding legal and ethical implications.
    METHODS: The scoping review follows a 6-stage methodology framework developed by Arksey and O\'Malley. The search strategy has been established in 6 databases. We will investigate the legal implications of ageism in AI by searching grey literature databases, targeted websites, and popular search engines and using an iterative search strategy. Studies meet the inclusion criteria if they are in English, peer-reviewed, available electronically in full text, and meet one of the following two additional criteria: (1) include \"bias\" related to AI in any application (eg, facial recognition) and (2) discuss bias related to the concept of old age or ageism. At least two reviewers will independently conduct the title, abstract, and full-text screening. Search results will be reported using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guideline. We will chart data on a structured form and conduct a thematic analysis to highlight the societal, legal, and ethical implications reported in the literature.
    RESULTS: The database searches resulted in 7595 records when the searches were piloted in November 2021. The scoping review will be completed by December 2022.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings will provide interdisciplinary insights into the extent of age-related bias in AI systems. The results will contribute foundational knowledge that can encourage multisectoral cooperation to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a manner consistent with ethical values and human rights legislation as it relates to an older and aging population. We will publish the review findings in peer-reviewed journals and disseminate the key results with stakeholders via workshops and webinars.
    BACKGROUND: OSF Registries AMG5P; https://osf.io/amg5p.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/33211.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本范围审查探讨并总结了有关使用聊天机器人支持和促进非洲健康的现有文献。
    目的:文献综述的主要目的是了解在什么情况下,聊天机器人在非洲被有效地用于健康,如何开发聊天机器人以达到最佳效果以及如何对其进行评估。第二个目标是为其他聊天机器人确定潜在的经验教训和良好做法。该评论还指出了未来在非洲使用聊天机器人进行健康研究的方向。
    方法:它使用布尔搜索方法来回答四个问题:关于非洲聊天机器人的文献告诉我们有关设计的信息,该技术在该地区的医疗保健部门和社会中的使用和用户体验?这些数据在多大程度上告诉我们有关政策问题的信息,access,关于非洲医疗保健系统和服务中聊天机器人的伦理和监管问题?创新的测量和评估框架在哪里出现,以及在非洲医疗保健中使用聊天机器人的形式?这些数据提供了哪些关于非洲医疗保健部门聊天机器人景观的新问题或未来的见解,包括需要进一步研究的领域?
    结果:审查得出的结论是,当前数据不足以有效地支持聊天机器人在非洲。然而,它确实表明了当前可用的聊天机器人文献类型以及差距所在的位置,并为未来的研究指明了方向。它提供了对流行聊天机器人的见解,以及通过语言考虑使它们可访问的需求,平台选择和用户信任,以及稳健的评估框架对评估其影响的重要性。
    结论:需要将对聊天机器人的研究扩展到现有的和有限的健康学科和功能之外,以及解决围绕道德和包容性的问题,特别是来自农村地区和弱势群体的用户。显然还需要将研究扩展到非洲大陆的新国家。
    背景:
    This scoping review explores and summarizes the existing literature on the use of chatbots to support and promote health in Africa.
    The primary aim was to learn where, and under what circumstances, chatbots have been used effectively for health in Africa; how chatbots have been developed to the best effect; and how they have been evaluated by looking at literature published between 2017 and 2022. A secondary aim was to identify potential lessons and best practices for others chatbots. The review also aimed to highlight directions for future research on the use of chatbots for health in Africa.
    Using the 2005 Arksey and O\'Malley framework, we used a Boolean search to broadly search literature published between January 2017 and July 2022. Literature between June 2021 and July 2022 was identified using Google Scholar, EBSCO information services-which includes the African HealthLine, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases-and other internet sources (including gray literature). The inclusion criteria were literature about health chatbots in Africa published in journals, conference papers, opinion, or white papers.
    In all, 212 records were screened, and 12 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results were analyzed according to the themes they covered. The themes identified included the purpose of the chatbot as either providing an educational or information-sharing service or providing a counselling service. Accessibility as a result of either technical restrictions or language restrictions was also noted. Other themes that were identified included the need for the consideration of trust, privacy and ethics, and evaluation.
    The findings demonstrate that current data are insufficient to show whether chatbots are effectively supporting health in the region. However, the review does reveal insights into popular chatbots and the need to make them accessible through language considerations, platform choice, and user trust, as well as the importance of robust evaluation frameworks to assess their impact. The review also provides recommendations on the direction of future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的使用在全球范围内迅速增加。越来越多的机构和组织制定法规和准则,以实现基于证据的安全使用。在德国,满足预定义标准的mHealth应用程序(DigitaleGesundheitsanwendungen[DiGA])可以规定并由德国法定健康保险计划报销。由于DiGA分布的增加,问题和障碍应该得到特别关注。
    目的:本研究旨在确定与使用符合DiGA标准的mHealth应用程序相关的问题和障碍。
    方法:本范围审查将遵循已发布的方法学框架和PRISMA-Scr(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的Meta扩展分析)标准。电子数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFO,和JMIR),相关文章的参考列表,和灰色文献来源将被搜索。两名审稿人将通过两个阶段(标题和摘要以及全文)筛选过程来评估文章的资格。本研究仅包括与满足DiGA标准的mHealth应用程序相关的问题和障碍。将使用MAXQDA对确定的研究进行分类和分析。
    结果:本范围审查概述了现有证据,并确定了与DiGA相关的问题和障碍的研究空白。计划将结果提交给索引,2022年第一季度的同行评审期刊。
    结论:这是第一次审查,以确定与使用mHealth应用程序符合德国对DiGA的定义有关的问题和障碍。然而,这些发现也可以应用于其他环境和医疗保健系统。
    UNASSIGNED:DERR1-10.2196/32702。
    BACKGROUND: The use of mobile health (mHealth) apps is increasing rapidly worldwide. More and more institutions and organizations develop regulations and guidelines to enable an evidence-based and safe use. In Germany, mHealth apps fulfilling predefined criteria (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen [DiGA]) can be prescribed and are reimbursable by the German statutory health insurance scheme. Due to the increasing distribution of DiGA, problems and barriers should receive special attention.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the relevant problems and barriers related to the use of mHealth apps fulfilling the criteria of DiGA.
    METHODS: This scoping review will follow published methodological frameworks and the PRISMA-Scr (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) criteria. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and JMIR), reference lists of relevant articles, and grey literature sources will be searched. Two reviewers will assess the eligibility of the articles by a two-stage (title and abstract as well as full text) screening process. Only problems and barriers related to mHealth apps fulfilling the criteria of DiGA are included for this research. The identified studies will be categorized and analyzed with MAXQDA.
    RESULTS: This scoping review gives an overview of the available evidence and identifies research gaps regarding problems and barriers related to DiGA. The results are planned to be submitted to an indexed, peer-reviewed journal in the first quarter of 2022.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review to identify the problems and barriers related to the use of mHealth apps fulfilling the German definition of DiGA. Nevertheless, the findings can be applied to other contexts and health care systems as well.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/32702.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过免费提供的癌症文献促进了癌症研究的发展,数据库,和工具。基因组学和大数据的时代引发了合作和数据共享的需求,以便在COVID-19大流行中有效利用这一新信息。虽然有许多癌症研究的数据库,由于处理和管理数据的方式不同,它们的访问并不容易。缺乏统一的平台来以透明和更易于理解的方式管理所有这些内容。
    目的:在本研究中,提供了一个改进的综合癌症研究数据库和平台,以促进对癌症与COVID-19大流行之间相关性的更深入的统计洞察,统一了几乎所有以前发表的癌症数据库的集合,并为癌症研究定义了一个模型网络数据库,根据癌症的各种类型对数据库进行评分,样本量,组学结果的完整性,和用户界面。
    方法:检查和集成的数据库包括数据门户数据库,基因组数据库,蛋白质组数据库,表达式数据库,基因数据库,和突变数据库;预计此次发布将进行排序,保存,促进理解并鼓励在癌症研究环境中使用这些资源。
    结果:为了便于搜索有价值的信息,85个癌症数据库以表格的形式提供,并且在本文中已经建立并呈现了名为癌症研究数据库(CRDB)的数据库。此外,CRDB在此配备了独特的导航工具,以便通过三种方法进行探索;也就是说,可以通过在给定的搜索栏中键入名称来浏览任何单个数据库,而所有类别都可以通过点击类别名称或图像表达式图标进行浏览,因此,作为一个设施,可以提供所有的类别数据库在一个单一的点击。
    结论:计算平台(PHP,HTML,CSS,和MySQL)用于为癌症科学界构建CRDB,可以在互联网上自由调查和浏览,并计划及时更新。此外,基于所提出的平台,本文使用CRDB彻底调查了COVID-19大流行期间癌症的状况和诊断统计数据,从而提供了一个易于管理的,可理解的框架,为未来的研究人员挖掘知识。
    BACKGROUND: The advancement of cancer research has been facilitated through freely available cancer literature, databases, and tools. The age of genomics and big data has given rise to the need for cooperation and data sharing in order to make efficient use of this new information in the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there are many databases for cancer research, their access is not easy owing to different ways of processing and managing the data. There is an absence of a unified platform to manage all of them in a transparent and more comprehensible way.
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, an improved integrated cancer research database and platform is provided to facilitate a deeper statistical insight into the correlation between cancer and the COVID-19 pandemic, unifying the collection of almost all previous published cancer databases and defining a model web database for cancer research, and scoring databases on the basis of the variety types of cancer, sample size, completeness of omics results, and user interface.
    METHODS: Databases examined and integrated include the Data Portal database, Genomic database, Proteomic database, Expression database, Gene database, and Mutation database; and it is expected that this launch will sort, save, advance the understanding and encourage the use of these resources in the cancer research environment.
    RESULTS: To make it easy to search valuable information, 85 cancer databases are provided in the form of a table, and a database of databases named the Cancer Research Database (CRDB) has been built and presented herein. Furthermore, the CRDB has been herein equipped with unique navigation tools in order to be explored by three methods; that is, any single database can be browsed by typing the name in the given search bar, while all categories can be browsed by clicking on the name of the category or image expression icon, thus serving as a facility that could provide all the category databases on a single click.
    CONCLUSIONS: The computational platform (PHP, HTML, CSS, and MySQL) used to build CRDB for the cancer scientific community can be freely investigated and browsed on the internet and is planned to be updated in a timely manner. In addition, based on the proposed platform, the status and diagnoses statistics of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic have been thoroughly investigated herein using CRDB, thus providing an easy-to-manage, understandable framework that mines knowledge for future researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:了解消费者在怀孕轨迹的所有阶段的健康信息需求对于发展使他们能够获取高质量的健康信息的机制至关重要,定制,和外行人友好的健康信息。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定妊娠相关消费者信息需求和来自不同来源的可用信息的研究差距。
    方法:我们对CINAHL进行了系统评价,科克伦,PubMed,和WebofScience获取2009年至2019年发表的相关文章。使用关键评估技能计划评估了所包含文章的质量。对这些文章进行了描述性数据分析。根据审查结果,我们开发了妊娠信息需求本体论(PINO),并在GitHub和BioPortal中公开发布.
    结果:来自9个国家的总共33篇文章符合本综述的纳入标准,其中大多数发布时间不早于2016年。大多数研究要么是描述性的(9/33,27%),面试(7/33,21%),或调查/问卷(7/33,21%);20篇文章提到消费者“怀孕相关信息需求”。一半(9/18,50%)的人类受试者研究在美国进行。超过三分之一(13/33,39%)的所有研究集中在怀孕期间阶段;只有一项研究(1/33,3%)是关于怀孕的所有阶段。最常见的消费者信息需求与人工交付有关(9/20,45%),孕期用药(6/20,30%),新生儿护理(5/20,25%),和实验室测试(6/20,30%)。最常见的信息来源是互联网(15/24,63%)。PINO由267个类组成,555公理,和271个子类关系。
    结论:只有少数文章评估了获取妊娠相关信息的障碍和每个信息来源的质量;需要进一步的工作。还需要今后的工作来解决所需信息与现有信息之间的差距。
    BACKGROUND: Understanding consumers\' health information needs across all stages of the pregnancy trajectory is crucial to the development of mechanisms that allow them to retrieve high-quality, customized, and layperson-friendly health information.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify research gaps in pregnancy-related consumer information needs and available information from different sources.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science for relevant articles that were published from 2009 to 2019. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. A descriptive data analysis was performed on these articles. Based on the review result, we developed the Pregnancy Information Needs Ontology (PINO) and made it publicly available in GitHub and BioPortal.
    RESULTS: A total of 33 articles from 9 countries met the inclusion criteria for this review, of which the majority were published no earlier than 2016. Most studies were either descriptive (9/33, 27%), interviews (7/33, 21%), or surveys/questionnaires (7/33, 21%); 20 articles mentioned consumers\' pregnancy-related information needs. Half (9/18, 50%) of the human-subject studies were conducted in the United States. More than a third (13/33, 39%) of all studies focused on during-pregnancy stage; only one study (1/33, 3%) was about all stages of pregnancy. The most frequent consumer information needs were related to labor delivery (9/20, 45%), medication in pregnancy (6/20, 30%), newborn care (5/20, 25%), and lab tests (6/20, 30%). The most frequently available source of information was the internet (15/24, 63%). PINO consists of 267 classes, 555 axioms, and 271 subclass relationships.
    CONCLUSIONS: Only a few articles assessed the barriers to access to pregnancy-related information and the quality of each source of information; further work is needed. Future work is also needed to address the gaps between the information needed and the information available.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号