eye-tracker

眼动仪
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在线理解以自然语言编写的数字内容对于生活的许多方面都至关重要,包括学习,专业任务,和决策。然而,面对理解困难会对学习成果产生负面影响,批判性思维能力,决策,错误率,和生产力。本文介绍了一种创新的方法来预测本地内容级别的理解困难(例如,段落)。使用负担得起的可穿戴设备,我们从自主神经系统非侵入性地获得生理反应,特别是脉搏率变异性,和皮肤电活动。此外,我们整合了来自经济高效的眼动仪的数据。我们的机器学习算法识别对应于高认知负荷的内容和区域内的“热点”。这些热点代表了理解困难的实时预测因素。通过将生理数据与上下文信息(例如个人的经验水平)集成,我们的方法的准确率为72.11%±2.21,准确率为0.77,召回率为0.70,f1得分为0.73.这项研究为开发智能,认知意识接口。这样的接口可以提供即时的上下文支持,减轻内容中的理解挑战。无论是通过翻译,内容生成,或使用可用的大型语言模型进行内容摘要,这种方法有可能增强语言理解。
    Comprehending digital content written in natural language online is vital for many aspects of life, including learning, professional tasks, and decision-making. However, facing comprehension difficulties can have negative consequences for learning outcomes, critical thinking skills, decision-making, error rate, and productivity. This paper introduces an innovative approach to predict comprehension difficulties at the local content level (e.g., paragraphs). Using affordable wearable devices, we acquire physiological responses non-intrusively from the autonomous nervous system, specifically pulse rate variability, and electrodermal activity. Additionally, we integrate data from a cost-effective eye-tracker. Our machine learning algorithms identify \'hotspots\' within the content and regions corresponding to a high cognitive load. These hotspots represent real-time predictors of comprehension difficulties. By integrating physiological data with contextual information (such as the levels of experience of individuals), our approach achieves an accuracy of 72.11% ± 2.21, a precision of 0.77, a recall of 0.70, and an f1 score of 0.73. This study opens possibilities for developing intelligent, cognitive-aware interfaces. Such interfaces can provide immediate contextual support, mitigating comprehension challenges within content. Whether through translation, content generation, or content summarization using available Large Language Models, this approach has the potential to enhance language comprehension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多基于视频的眼睛跟踪器依赖于检测和跟踪眼睛特征,可能受到许多个人或环境因素负面影响的任务。在这种情况下,这项研究的目的是实际评估如何使用巩膜隐形眼镜与两个集成的近红外激光器(称为CLP)可以提高在困难的照明条件下的跟踪鲁棒性,尤其是户外的。我们评估了CLP(在模型眼睛上)在四种照明条件下(1lx,250lx,50klux和交替的1lx/250lx)。将这些结果与商业眼睛跟踪器(瞳孔核心)以等于或大于0.9的置信度分数检测人眼瞳孔的能力进行比较。CLP在所有条件(跟踪精度和检测率)下都能提供良好的结果。相比之下,瞳孔核心在所有室内条件下表现良好(99%检测),但在室外条件下失败(9.85%检测).总之,CLP通过提供易于跟踪的功能,在户外条件下提高基于视频的眼睛跟踪器的可靠性具有强大的潜力。
    Many video-based eye trackers rely on detecting and tracking ocular features, a task that can be negatively affected by a number of individual or environmental factors. In this context, the aim of this study was to practically evaluate how the use of a scleral contact lens with two integrated nearinfrared lasers (denoted CLP) could improve the tracking robustness in difficult lighting conditions, particularly outdoor ones. We assessed the ability of the CLP (on a model eye) to detect the lasers and to deduce a gaze position with an accuracy better than 1° under four lighting conditions (1 lx, 250 lx, 50 klux and alternating 1lx /250 lx) on an artificial eye. These results were compared to the ability of a commercial eye tracker (Pupil Core) to detect the pupil on human eyes with a confidence score equal to or greater than 0.9. CLP provided good results in all conditions (tracking accuracy and detection rates). In comparison, the Pupil Core performed well in all indoor conditions (99% detection) but failed in outdoor conditions (9.85% detection). In conclusion, the CLP presents strong potential to improve the reliability of video-based eyetrackers in outdoor conditions by providing easy trackable feature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    \“巴甫洛夫\”或\“动机\”偏见描述了预期结果的效价调节行动活力的现象:奖励前景振兴行动,而惩罚前景压制了它。这些偏见在决策中的适应性作用尚不清楚。一个想法是,在以高唤醒为特征的情况下,它们构成了一种快速节俭的决策策略,例如,在捕食者面前,这需要快速反应。在这项预先注册的研究中(N=35),我们测试了这种通过潜意识表现的愤怒和中立面孔引起的情况是否会导致对巴甫洛夫偏见的依赖增加。当参与者执行正交激励Go/NoGo任务时,我们通过跟踪瞳孔直径来测量逐个试验的唤醒。反应中存在巴甫洛夫偏见,反应时间,甚至凝视,在厌恶的提示下,凝视分散较低,反映出凝视的冻结。“潜意识中出现的面孔并不影响反应,反应时间,或瞳孔直径,这表明唤醒操纵是无效的。然而,瞳孔扩张反映了偏置抑制的小平面,特别是克服厌恶性抑制所需的身体(而非认知)努力:当参与者设法对厌恶性提示进行围棋反应时,会发生特别强烈和持续的扩张。相反,当它们设法抑制对Win线索的反应时,没有发生这种扩张。这些结果表明,瞳孔直径本身并不反映反应冲突,也不反映强效反应的抑制,但需要特别努力的行动,以克服厌恶的抑制。我们在纹状体多巴胺的“工作价值”理论的背景下讨论我们的结果。
    \"Pavlovian\" or \"motivational\" biases describe the phenomenon that the valence of prospective outcomes modulates action invigoration: Reward prospect invigorates action, whereas punishment prospect suppresses it. The adaptive role of these biases in decision-making is still unclear. One idea is that they constitute a fast-and-frugal decision strategy in situations characterized by high arousal, e.g., in presence of a predator, which demand a quick response. In this pre-registered study (N = 35), we tested whether such a situation-induced via subliminally presented angry versus neutral faces-leads to increased reliance on Pavlovian biases. We measured trial-by-trial arousal by tracking pupil diameter while participants performed an orthogonalized Motivational Go/NoGo Task. Pavlovian biases were present in responses, reaction times, and even gaze, with lower gaze dispersion under aversive cues reflecting \"freezing of gaze.\" The subliminally presented faces did not affect responses, reaction times, or pupil diameter, suggesting that the arousal manipulation was ineffective. However, pupil dilations reflected facets of bias suppression, specifically the physical (but not cognitive) effort needed to overcome aversive inhibition: Particularly strong and sustained dilations occurred when participants managed to perform Go responses to aversive cues. Conversely, no such dilations occurred when they managed to inhibit responses to Win cues. These results suggest that pupil diameter does not reflect response conflict per se nor the inhibition of prepotent responses, but specifically effortful action invigoration as needed to overcome aversive inhibition. We discuss our results in the context of the \"value of work\" theory of striatal dopamine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在奥林匹克攀岩学科中,登山者可以在实际攀登巨石之前预览巨石。虽然这种攀爬前路线预览被认为是后续攀爬性能的核心,缺乏对抱石形态准备阶段的认知行为过程的研究。本研究旨在通过检查巨石预览过程中的认知行为过程来扩展与运动活动准备过程中高级技能水平相关的神经效率过程的现有发现。
    方法:中间体(n=20),先进(n=20),精英(n=20)登山者被要求先预览,然后尝试两个不同难度级别的巨石(巨石1:高级难度;巨石2:精英难度)。在预览期间,攀登者的凝视行为是使用便携式眼睛跟踪器收集的。
    结果:线性回归显示,两个巨石的参与者的技能水平与预览持续时间和预览扫描次数之间存在显着关系。精英登山者比高级和中级登山者更常用于表面扫描路径。在更困难的巨石中,精英和高级登山者都显示出更长的预览持续时间,执行了更多扫描,与在更容易的巨石中相比,使用表面扫描路径的频率较低。
    结论:研究结果表明,路线预览过程中的认知行为过程与攀爬专业知识和巨石困难有关。卓越的特定领域认知能力似乎可以解释巨石预览中的专业知识处理范式,有助于更快、更有意识地获得感知线索,更有效的视觉搜索策略,以及更好地识别专家之间的代表性模式。
    BACKGROUND: In the Olympic climbing discipline of bouldering, climbers can preview boulders before actually climbing them. Whilst such pre-climbing route previewing is considered as central to subsequent climbing performance, research on cognitive-behavioural processes during the preparatory phase in the modality of bouldering is lacking. The present study aimed at extending existing findings on neural efficiency processes associated with advanced skill level during motor activity preparation by examining cognitive-behavioural processes during the previewing of boulders.
    METHODS: Intermediate (n = 20), advanced (n = 20), and elite (n = 20) climbers were asked to preview first, and then attempt two boulders of different difficulty levels (boulder 1: advanced difficulty; boulder 2: elite difficulty). During previewing, climbers\' gaze behaviour was gathered using a portable eye-tracker.
    RESULTS: Linear regression revealed for both boulders a significant relation between participants\' skill levels and both preview duration and number of scans during previewing. Elite climbers more commonly used a superficial scan path than advanced and intermediate climbers. In the more difficult boulder, both elite and advanced climbers showed longer preview durations, performed more scans, and applied less often a superficial scan path than in the easier boulder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed that cognitive-behavioural processes during route previewing are associated with climbing expertise and boulder difficulty. Superior domain-specific cognitive proficiency seems to account for the expertise-processing-paradigm in boulder previewing, contributing to faster and more conscious acquisition of perceptual cues, more efficient visual search strategies, and better identification of representative patterns among experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,欺凌经历与欺凌动态中的不同解释和行为方式有关。然而,在信息处理的第一步:注意力的分配中,这些区别是否已经存在仍然不确定。
    该研究探索了在日常生活中具有不同欺凌经历的意大利学生的注意模式,同时观察通过欺凌小插曲代表的不同角色。
    参与者(72名学生,法师=11.18)被归类为受害者,欺凌受害者,或者根据他们在自我报告问卷上的分数不参与。他们观察到9个欺凌小插图,上面展示了不同的肖像(欺凌,受害者,亲欺凌者,辩护人,旁观者),而眼睛跟踪器记录了注意力指数(固定,访问和持续时间)。
    Kruskal-Wallis和成对比较显示,欺凌者和亲欺凌者的肖像具有显着影响,因为欺凌者比受害者表现出更大的关注和访问,而未参与的学生与其他组没有显着差异。
    我们的研究表明,欺凌受害者更多地关注威胁线索,而受害者则将目光与他们分开,确认欺凌的经历会影响他们如何探索攻击性情况。学习参与的学生如何引导他们的注意力有助于我们理解不同的反应,导致强有力的干预。
    UNASSIGNED: Previous research showed that bullying experiences are associated with different ways of interpreting and behaving in bullying dynamics. However, it remains uncertain whether these distinctions can already be present during the first step of information processing: the allocation of attention.
    UNASSIGNED: The study explored attentional patterns of Italian students with different bullying experiences in daily life while observing different roles represented through bullying vignettes.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants (72 students, Mage= 11.18) were categorized as victims, bully-victims, or not involved based on their scores on a self-report questionnaire. They observed 9 bullying vignettes on which different portraits were presented (bully, victim, pro-bully, defender, bystander) while the eye-tracker registered attentional indexes (fixation, visit and duration).
    UNASSIGNED: Kruskal- Wallis and pairwise comparisons revealed a significant effect for the portraits of the bully and the pro-bully as bully-victims exhibited greater fixations and visits than victims, while students not involved showed no significant differences with the other groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Our research reveals that bully-victims focused more on threatening cues while victims diverged their gaze from them, confirming that the experience of bullying influences how they explore aggressive situations. Learning how involved students direct their attention helps us understand different responses, leading to powerful interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自闭症谱系条件(ASC)的核心特征是社交互动中存在困难。这可以通过对社会信息的非典型注意处理来解释:患有ASC的个人可能会表现出将注意力定向到与社会相关的刺激和/或抑制他们对无关的注意力反应的问题。为了阐明这个问题,我们检查了对情绪刺激的注意取向和抑制控制(愤怒,快乐,和中性面孔)。对29名ASC儿童和27名具有典型发育(TD)儿童的最终样本进行了反扫视任务(同时使用前视和反扫视)。尽管患有ASC的孩子在看到愤怒的面孔时犯了更多的反扫视错误,而不是快乐或中立的面孔,与中性面孔相比,TD儿童在遇到快乐面孔时会犯更多的反扫视错误。此外,ASC患儿的前视阻滞和抗扫视阻滞潜伏期更长,并且与ASC症状的严重程度相关.因此,当出现愤怒的面孔时,患有ASC的儿童表现出抑制控制受损。这种对负面高唤醒信息的偏见与ASC的情感信息处理理论是一致的,这表明威胁性刺激会在ASC中引起压倒性的反应。将注意力转移到情绪刺激(即面部)的治疗策略可以改善ASC症状学及其社交功能。
    A core feature of Autistic Spectrum Condition (ASC) is the presence of difficulties in social interactions. This can be explained by an atypical attentional processing of social information: individuals with ASC may show problems with orienting attention to socially relevant stimuli and/or inhibiting their attentional responses to irrelevant ones. To shed light on this issue, we examined attentional orienting and inhibitory control to emotional stimuli (angry, happy, and neutral faces). An antisaccade task (with both prosaccade and antisacade blocks) was applied to a final sample of 29 children with ASC and 27 children with typical development (TD). Whereas children with ASC committed more antisaccade errors when seeing angry faces than happy or neutral ones, TD children committed more antisaccade errors when encountering happy faces than neutral faces. Furthermore, latencies in the prosaccade and antisaccade blocks were longer in children with ASC and they were associated with the severity of ASC symptoms. Thus, children with ASC showed an impaired inhibitory control when angry faces were presented. This bias to negative high-arousal information is congruent with affective information-processing theories on ASC, suggesting that threatening stimuli induce an overwhelming response in ASC. Therapeutic strategies where train the shift attention to emotional stimuli (i.e. faces) may improve ASC symptomatology and their socials functioning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究了注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)成年人对人类对话场景的视线测量。我们检查了眼睛凝视测量是否可能是ADHD的生物学标记。
    方法:22名ADHD患者(平均年龄,34.5年)参加昭和大学喀山医院门诊的研究,和26名健康个体(平均年龄,32.6年)无精神障碍史的患者作为对照组。对于参与者来说,智力功能是使用日本成人阅读测试来估计的,使用自闭症谱系商和Conner的成人ADHD评定量表评估精神症状。我们从两部经典电影中提取了人类对话场景作为视觉刺激,并在使用Tobii的眼动仪观看这些场景时记录了参与者的凝视。
    结果:对于凝视时间,重复测量方差分析显示,“组”没有显着的主要作用,“组”与感兴趣的区域(AOI)之间也没有显着的交互作用。“在正常组中,眼睛的凝视时间明显长于嘴巴,身体,和背景;在多动症组,眼睛的凝视时间明显长于背景。
    结论:鉴于过去在ASD中获得的不同结果,这些结果表明,有必要直接比较两组,以确定凝视测量是否显示ASD和ADHD的显著差异.
    OBJECTIVE: Eye gaze measurement to human dialogue scenes in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was investigated. We examined whether eye gaze measurement might be a biological marker of ADHD.
    METHODS: Twenty-two individuals with ADHD (mean age, 34.5 years) attending the outpatient clinic of Showa University Karasuyama Hospital were included in the study, and 26 healthy individuals (mean age, 32.6 years) with no history of mental disorders were used as the control group. For the participants, intellectual functioning was estimated using the Japanese Adult Reading Test, and mental symptoms were assessed using the Autism Spectrum Quotient and Conner\'s Adult ADHD Rating Scale. We extracted human dialogue scenes from two classic movies as visual stimuli and recorded the participant\'s gaze while watching these scenes using Tobii\'s eye tracker.
    RESULTS: For gazing time, repeated measures analysis of variance showed no significant main effect of \"group\" and no significant interaction effect between \"group\" and areas of interest \"(AOI).\" In the normal group, gazing time at the eyes was significantly longer than those at the mouth, body, and background; in the ADHD group, gazing time at the eyes was significantly longer than only that at the background.
    CONCLUSIONS: Given the different results obtained in the past in ASD, these results suggest that it would be necessary to directly compare the two groups to determine whether the gaze measurement shows significant differences in ASD and ADHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成年人在解决加法和减法时,将注意力沿空间连续体转移到右侧或左侧,分别。研究表明,这些变化不仅支持对结果的精确计算,而且在处理操作数时也不可避免地缩小了合理答案的范围。然而,关于这些注意力转移在儿童时期在算术习得过程中何时以及如何出现的情况知之甚少。这里,具有高时空分辨率的眼睛跟踪器用于测量自发的眼球运动,用作注意力转移的代理,而2年级(8岁;N=50)和4年级(10岁;N=48)的孩子解决了简单的加法(例如,4+3)和减法(例如,3-2).凝视模式显示两组的水平和垂直注意力转移。严重的,一旦出现第一个操作数和操作员,因此在精确计算开始之前,就在4年级的学生中观察到了水平的眼球运动。在二年级,仅在做出反应之前的第二个手术后才观察到注意力转移。这表明当孩子们解决算术问题时,空间注意力被吸引,甚至在学习数学的早期阶段。这些注意力转移的时间过程表明,通过算术练习,儿童开始使用空间注意力来耐心地指导寻找答案并促进解决程序的实施。研究重点:增加和减少与成人左右注意力转移有关,但尚不清楚这些机制何时出现在儿童时期。8-10岁的孩子在看着空白屏幕时解决了一位数的加法和减法。眼球运动表明,8岁的孩子在知道两个操作数时已经表现出可能代表反应的空间偏差。10岁的孩子在知道第二个操作之前就转移了注意力,以耐心地指导寻找合理的答案。
    Adults shift their attention to the right or to the left along a spatial continuum when solving additions and subtractions, respectively. Studies suggest that these shifts not only support the exact computation of the results but also anticipatively narrow down the range of plausible answers when processing the operands. However, little is known on when and how these attentional shifts arise in childhood during the acquisition of arithmetic. Here, an eye-tracker with high spatio-temporal resolution was used to measure spontaneous eye movements, used as a proxy for attentional shifts, while children of 2nd (8 y-o; N = 50) and 4th (10 y-o; N = 48) Grade solved simple additions (e.g., 4+3) and subtractions (e.g., 3-2). Gaze patterns revealed horizontal and vertical attentional shifts in both groups. Critically, horizontal eye movements were observed in 4th Graders as soon as the first operand and the operator were presented and thus before the beginning of the exact computation. In 2nd Graders, attentional shifts were only observed after the presentation of the second operand just before the response was made. This demonstrates that spatial attention is recruited when children solve arithmetic problems, even in the early stages of learning mathematics. The time course of these attentional shifts suggests that with practice in arithmetic children start to use spatial attention to anticipatively guide the search for the answer and facilitate the implementation of solving procedures. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Additions and subtractions are associated to right and left attentional shifts in adults, but it is unknown when these mechanisms arise in childhood. Children of 8-10 years old solved single-digit additions and subtractions while looking at a blank screen. Eye movements showed that children of 8 years old already show spatial biases possibly to represent the response when knowing both operands. Children of 10 years old shift attention before knowing the second operand to anticipatively guide the search for plausible answers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自从COVID-19大流行开始以来,远程工作和教育以及数字显示的使用变得越来越普遍。然而,与印刷材料相比,数字显示器会导致更多的眼睛疲劳,并可能降低任务性能。例如,监视器上的反射会导致不适或分心,特别是当眩光监视器与黑色背景一起使用时。
    这项研究同时使用脑电图(EEG)和眼睛跟踪器来测量使用眩光监视器对句子难以辨认的可能负面影响。
    实验结果表明,眩光和非眩光监视器之间的阅读时间和主观难以辨认等级没有差异。然而,有眩光监视器,当阅读持续更长时间时,眼睛的固定。Further,EEGβ(15-20Hz)功率变化表明,当使用黑色背景的眩光监视器时,参与者对阅读任务的参与度较低。
    这些结果表明,使用眩光监视器的负面影响是微妙的,但肯定存在。他们还表明,脑电图和眼动追踪等生理措施可以客观地评估微妙的影响,即使行为测量,如主观难以辨认等级或阅读时间可能不会显示差异。
    Since the COVID-19 pandemic started, remote work and education and digital display use have become more prevalent. However, compared with printed material, digital displays cause more eye fatigue and may decrease task performance. For instance, the reflections on the monitor can cause discomfort or distraction, particularly when glare monitors are used with black backgrounds.
    This study simultaneously uses electroencephalography (EEG) and an eye-tracker to measure the possible negative effects of using a glare monitor on the illegibility of sentences.
    The experiment results showed no difference in reading time and subjective illegibility rating between glare and non-glare monitors. However, with glare monitors, eye fixation when reading lasted longer. Further, EEG beta (15-20 Hz) power variations suggested that the participants were less engaged in the reading task when a glare monitor was used with a black background.
    These results indicate that the negative effects of using a glare monitor are subtle but certainly present. They also show that physiological measures such as EEG and eye tracking can assess the subtle effects in an objective manner, even if behavioral measures such as subjective illegibility ratings or reading time may not show the differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    在线方法允许测试更大的,更多样化的人口,与实验室测试相比,工作量要少得多。然而,许多心理物理学测量,包括视觉拥挤,需要准确的眼睛固定,这通常是通过只测试有经验的观察者来实现的,他们已经学会了可靠地固定,或通过使用凝视跟踪器将测试限制在固定准确的时刻。唉,这两种方法在网上都是不切实际的,因为在线观察者往往缺乏经验,和在线凝视跟踪,使用内置的网络摄像头,精度较低(±4度,Papoutsaki等人。,2016)。EasyEyes开源软件可靠地在线测量外围阈值,以新颖的方式实现精确固定,没有凝视跟踪。EasyEyes告诉观察者使用光标来跟踪移动的十字准线。在成功跟踪期间的随机时间,在外围提出了一个简短的目标。观察者通过识别目标来响应。为了评估EasyEyes固定的准确性和阈值,我们以平衡的顺序以三种方式测试了12个幼稚的观察者:第一,在实验室里,使用凝视或有刺激呈现(Kurzawski等人。,2023年;佩里等人。,2016);第二,在实验室里,使用EasyEyes,同时独立监测凝视;第三,在家上网,使用EasyEyes。我们发现拥挤阈值是一致的(不同方式的阈值的均值和方差没有显着差异),并且个体差异是保守的。在目标呈现期间的小的均方根(RMS)固定误差(0.6deg)消除了对注视跟踪的需要。因此,EasyEyes实现了依赖于固定的在线测量,便于对更大和更多样化的人群进行测试。
    Online methods allow testing of larger, more diverse populations, with much less effort than in-lab testing. However, many psychophysical measurements, including visual crowding, require accurate eye fixation, which is classically achieved by testing only experienced observers who have learned to fixate reliably, or by using a gaze tracker to restrict testing to moments when fixation is accurate. Alas, both approaches are impractical online since online observers tend to be inexperienced, and online gaze tracking, using the built-in webcam, has a low precision (±4 deg, Papoutsaki et al., 2016). The EasyEyes open-source software reliably measures peripheral thresholds online with accurate fixation achieved in a novel way, without gaze tracking. EasyEyes tells observers to use the cursor to track a moving crosshair. At a random time during successful tracking, a brief target is presented in the periphery. The observer responds by identifying the target. To evaluate EasyEyes fixation accuracy and thresholds, we tested 12 naive observers in three ways in a counterbalanced order: first, in the lab, using gaze-contingent stimulus presentation (Kurzawski et al., 2023; Pelli et al., 2016); second, in the lab, using EasyEyes while independently monitoring gaze; third, online at home, using EasyEyes. We find that crowding thresholds are consistent (no significant differences in mean and variance of thresholds across ways) and individual differences are conserved. The small root mean square (RMS) fixation error (0.6 deg) during target presentation eliminates the need for gaze tracking. Thus, EasyEyes enables fixation-dependent measurements online, for easy testing of larger and more diverse populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号