disease free survival

无病生存
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    奥沙利铂联合S-1(SOX)辅助化疗治疗胃癌D2胃切除术后(GC)已被证明有效。尚未有一项评估佐剂纳米颗粒白蛋白结合的紫杉醇(nab-紫杉醇)加S-1的研究。在这个单一中心,回顾性研究,2018年1月至2020年12月,浙江大学附属第一医院招募了D2胃切除术后接受nab-紫杉醇联合S-1(AS组)或SOX组的GC患者。静脉给药nab-紫杉醇120mg/m2或260mg/m2和奥沙利铂130mg/m2,共8个3周周期,尤其是AS和SOX组。两组患者在每个周期的第1-14天每天两次以40mg/m2的剂量接受S-1。终点为3年无病生存率(DFS)和不良事件(AE)。有56名合格患者,AS组28和SOX组35。AS组3年DFS率为78.0%,SOX组为70.7%(p=0.46)。亚组分析显示,与SOX组相比,AS组印戒阳性患者的DFS延长(40.0vs.13.8米,p=0.02)。与SOX组相比,AS组弥漫性GC或低分化与数字上延长的DFS相关。但相关性无统计学意义(p=0.27,尤其是p=0.15).白细胞减少症(14.3%)是AS组中最常见的不良事件,而SOX组的血小板减少(28.5%)。中性粒细胞减少症(AS组为7.1%)和血小板减少症(SOX组为22.8%)是最常见的3或4级不良事件。在这项分析过去数据的研究中,在印戒阳性患者中使用AS方案时,观察到3年DFS有增加的趋势.与SOX组相比,AS组的血小板减少更少。应该用更大的样本量进行更多的研究。
    Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) after D2 gastrectomy has been proven effective. There has yet to be a study that evaluates adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus S-1. In this single-center, retrospective study, GC patients after D2 gastrectomy received either nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS group) or SOX group were recruited between January 2018 and December 2020 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 or 260 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 were administered as eight 3 week cycle, especially in the AS and SOX group. Patients received S-1 twice daily with a dose of 40 mg/m2 in the two groups on days 1-14 of each cycle. The end points were disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 3 years and adverse events (AEs). There were 56 eligible patients, 28 in the AS group and 35 in the SOX group. The 3 year DFS rate was 78.0% in AS group versus 70.7% in SOX group (p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis showed that the patients with signet-ring positive in the AS group had a prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group (40.0 vs. 13.8 m, p = 0.02). The diffuse-type GC or low differentiation in the AS group was associated with numerically prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group, but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.27 and p = 0.15 especially). Leukopenia (14.3%) were the most prevalent AEs in the AS group, while thrombocytopenia (28.5%) in the SOX group. Neutropenia (7.1% in AS group) and thrombocytopenia (22.8% in SOX group) were the most common grade 3 or 4 AEs. In this study analyzing past data, a tendency towards a greater 3 year DFS was observed when using AS regimen in signet-ring positive patients. AS group had fewer thrombocytopenia compared to SOX group. More studies should be conducted with larger sample sizes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:准确的预后评估对于充分告知分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者的个体化随访和管理至关重要。我们旨在通过采用决策树模型来开发接受手术和131I治疗的DTC患者复发性疾病的预测模型。
    方法:年龄,性别,组织学,T级,N级,风险类别,剩余估计,促甲状腺激素(TSH),甲状腺球蛋白(Tg),给予131I活动和治疗后全身闪烁显像(PT-WBS)被确定为潜在的预测因子,并放入回归算法(条件推断树,c-tree)来开发风险分层模型,以预测随时间的持续/复发疾病。
    结果:PT-WBS模式将人群分为两个亚组(PT-WBS远处转移阳性或阴性)。远处转移的患者表现出较低的无病生存率(无论是结构性的,DFS-SD,和生化,DFS-BD,疾病)与没有转移的患者相比。同时,后者根据Tg值进一步分为三个风险亚组.值得注意的是,Tg值>63.1ng/mL预测存活时间较短,Tg值<63.1和<8.9ng/mL时DFS-SD增加,分别。针对生化疾病(BD)生成了一个可比较的模型,尽管通过与DFS-SD相比略微不同的Tg截止值(41.2和8.8ng/mL)来预测不同的DFS。
    结论:我们开发了一种简单的,准确且可重复的决策树模型,能够提供有关TTA后结构和/或生化持续/复发DTC概率的可靠信息。反过来,提供的信息与完善初始风险分层高度相关,确定结构和生化DFS降低风险较高的患者,并调整其他疗法和相对随访。
    OBJECTIVE: An accurate prognostic assessment is pivotal to adequately inform and individualize follow-up and management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We aimed to develop a predictive model for recurrent disease in DTC patients treated by surgery and 131I by adopting a decision tree model.
    METHODS: Age, sex, histology, T stage, N stage, risk classes, remnant estimation, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroglobulin (Tg), administered 131I activities and post-therapy whole body scintigraphy (PT-WBS) were identified as potential predictors and put into regression algorithm (conditional inference tree, c-tree) to develop a risk stratification model for predicting persistent/recurrent disease over time.
    RESULTS: The PT-WBS pattern identified a partition of the population into two subgroups (PT-WBS positive or negative for distant metastases). Patients with distant metastases exhibited lower disease-free survival (either structural, DFS-SD, and biochemical, DFS-BD, disease) compared to those without metastases. Meanwhile, the latter were further stratified into three risk subgroups based on their Tg values. Notably, Tg values >63.1 ng/mL predicted a shorter survival time, with increased DFS-SD for Tg values <63.1 and <8.9 ng/mL, respectively. A comparable model was generated for biochemical disease (BD), albeit different DFS were predicted by slightly different Tg cutoff values (41.2 and 8.8 ng/mL) compared to DFS-SD.
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple, accurate and reproducible decision tree model able to provide reliable information on the probability of structurally and/or biochemically persistent/relapsed DTC after a TTA. In turn, the provided information is highly relevant to refine the initial risk stratification, identify patients at higher risk of reduced structural and biochemical DFS, and modulate additional therapies and the relative follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)根治性切除术后复发的模式和影响因素。
    连续接受PDAC治疗(2011-21)并同意数据和组织收集(Barts胰腺组织库)的患者随访至2023年5月。使用Cox比例风险模型分析临床病理变量。
    91人(42名男性[46%];中位年龄,71年[范围,43-86岁]),中位随访时间为51个月(95%置信区间[CI],40-61个月),复发率为72.5%(n=66;12个局部区域,11只肝脏,5单肺,3单独腹膜,29同时发生局部区域和远处转移,和6个首次复发诊断时的多灶性远处转移)。中位复发时间为8.5个月(95%CI,6.6-10.5个月)。复发后中位生存期为5.8个月(95%CI,4.2-7.3个月)。按复发位置进行分层显示,仅在局部区域复发之间的复发时间存在显着差异(中位数,13.6个月;95%CI,11.7-15.5个月)和同时发生局部区域并伴有远处复发(中位数,7.5个月;95%CI,4.6-10.4个月;p=0.02,成对对数秩检验)。复发的重要预测因素是全身炎症指数(SII)≥500(风险比[HR],4.5;95%CI,1.4-14.3),淋巴结比率≥0.33(HR,2.8;95%CI,1.4-5.8),和辅助化疗(HR,0.4;95%CI,0.2-0.7)。
    仅局部复发的时间明显长于同时局部复发和远处复发的时间。复发的重要预测因素是SII,淋巴结定量,和辅助化疗。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate patterns and factors affecting recurrence after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC (2011-21) and consented to data and tissue collection (Barts Pancreas Tissue Bank) were followed up until May 2023. Clinico-pathological variables were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 91 people (42 males [46%]; median age, 71 years [range, 43-86 years]) with a median follow-up of 51 months (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 40-61 months), the recurrence rate was 72.5% (n = 66; 12 loco-regional alone, 11 liver alone, 5 lung alone, 3 peritoneal alone, 29 simultaneous loco-regional and distant metastases, and 6 multi-focal distant metastases at first recurrence diagnosis). The median time to recurrence was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.6-10.5 months). Median survival after recurrence was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.3 months). Stratification by recurrence location revealed significant differences in time to recurrence between loco-regional only recurrence (median, 13.6 months; 95% CI, 11.7-15.5 months) and simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence (median, 7.5 months; 95% CI, 4.6-10.4 months; p = 0.02, pairwise log-rank test). Significant predictors for recurrence were systemic inflammation index (SII) ≥ 500 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.3), lymph node ratio ≥ 0.33 (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.8), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7).
    UNASSIGNED: Timing to loco-regional only recurrence was significantly longer than simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence. Significant predictors for recurrence were SII, lymph node ration, and adjuvant chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:神经周浸润(PNI),根据其在肿瘤标本中的存在或不存在进行分类,被认为是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的不良预后因素。在这里,我们确定了PNI的5个组织学特征,并研究了它们对PDAC切除患者生存结局的影响.
    方法:PNI的五个组织病理学特征(直径,number,site,鞘受累,和神经周浸润内的有丝分裂图)合并为额外的最终评分(范围从0到8),并对PDAC患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。PNI+患者根据中位数评分(分别<6和≥6)分为两类。分析PNI对无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。
    结果:纳入45例患者,其中34人具有PNI(PNI+),11人没有PNI(PNI-)。DFS是11个月,而不是未达到(NR)(p=0.258),而操作系统是19个月与PNI+和PNI-患者的NR(p=0.040),分别。≥6PNI被确定为OS较差与OS较差的独立预测因子。<6PNI+患者(29例vs.11个月,p<0.001)和<6PNI+和PNI-患者(43vs.11个月,p<0.001)。PNI≥6是DFS与DFS的独立阴性预后因素。<6名PNI+和PNI-患者(13名vs.6个月,p=0.022)。
    结论:我们报告了一个PNI评分系统,该系统以分级方式对手术治疗的PDAC患者进行分层,与患者预后相关程度优于目前的二分法(存在/不存在)定义。然而,需要进一步和更大的研究来支持PNI评分系统.
    OBJECTIVE: Perineural invasion (PNI), classified according to its presence or absence in tumor specimens, is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Herein, we identified five histological features of PNI and investigated their impact on survival outcomes of PDAC resected patients.
    METHODS: Five histopathological features of PNI (diameter, number, site, sheath involvement, and mitotic figures within perineural invasion) were combined in an additional final score (ranging from 0 to 8), and clinical data of PDAC patients were retrospectively analyzed. PNI + patients were stratified in two categories according to the median score value (<6 and ≥ 6, respectively). Impact of PNI on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 34 with PNI (PNI+) and 11 without PNI (PNI-). The DFS was 11 months vs. not reached (NR) (p = 0.258), while the OS was 19 months vs. NR (p = 0.040) in PNI+ and PNI- patients, respectively. A ≥6 PNI was identified as an independent predictor of worse OS vs. <6 PNI + patients (29 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001) and <6 PNI+ and PNI- patients (43 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001). PNI ≥6 was an independent negative prognostic factor of DFS vs. <6 PNI+ and PNI- patients (13 vs. 6 months, p = 0.022).
    CONCLUSIONS: We report a PNI scoring system that stratifies surgically-treated PDAC patients in a graded manner that correlates with patient prognosis better than the current dichotomous (presence/absence) definition. However, further and larger studies are needed to support this PNI scoring system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管I期肺腺癌(LUAD)患者的总生存期有希望,其中10-25%的患者在手术后仍然复发。[1]虽然对于I期患者是否需要辅助化疗仍有争议。[2]非黏液性LUAD的IASLC分级系统显示,轻度高级别模式是预后不良的重要指标。[3]其他风险因素,例如,胸膜侵犯,淋巴管浸润,STAS,等。也与预后不良有关。[4-6]仍然缺乏IASLC分级本身或与其他危险因素一起是否可以指导I期患者辅助治疗的使用的证据。在这篇文章中,我们尝试为I期LUAD患者建立多变量复发预测模型,该模型能够确定辅助化疗的候选药物.
    方法:我们回顾性收集了2018.8.1至2018.12.31在我们机构接受肺手术并诊断为肺腺癌pT1-2aN0M0(I期)的患者。临床数据,CT扫描的表现,病理特征,收集驱动基因突变和随访信息.使用非辅助队列进行Cox比例风险回归分析以预测无病生存(DFS),并构建列线图并应用于总队列。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较各组间DFS。通过R版本3.6.3进行统计学分析。
    结果:本研究共纳入913例I期LUAD患者。中位随访时间为48.1个月,4年和5年DFS分别为92.9%和89.6%。65例患者出现复发或死亡。4年DFS为97.0%,94.6%和76.2%,5年期DFS为95.5%,在IASLC等级1、2和3中分别为90.0%和74.1%(p<0.0001)。由单一危险因素定义的高危患者,例如,IASLC3级胸膜侵犯,STAS,切除较少的LN不能从辅助治疗中获益。建立LASSO-COX回归模型,将患者分为高危和低危组。在高危人群中,接受辅助化疗的患者比没有接受辅助化疗的患者有更长的DFS(p=0.024),而在低风险组中,接受辅助化疗的患者的DFS低于未接受辅助化疗的患者(p<0.001).
    结论:IASLC分级是DFS的重要指标,然而,在我们的I期LUAD队列中,它不能指导辅助治疗.生长模式和T指标以及其他危险因素可以确定高危患者是辅助治疗的潜在候选者。包括一些IALUAD期患者。
    Despite promising overall survival of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, 10-25 % of them still went through recurrence after surgery. [1] While it is still disputable whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for stage I patients. [2] IASLC grading system for non-mucinous LUAD shows that minor high-grade patterns are significant indicator of poor prognosis. [3] Other risk factors, such as, pleura invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, STAS, etc. are also related to poor prognosis. [4-6] There still lack evidence whether IASLC grade itself or together with other risk factors can guide the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I patients. In this article, we tried to establish a multi-variable recurrence prediction model for stage I LUAD patients that is able to identify candidates of adjuvant chemotherapy.
    We retrospectively collected patients who underwent lung surgery from 2018.8.1 to 2018.12.31 at our institution and diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma pT1-2aN0M0 (stage I). Clinical data, manifestation on CT scan, pathologic features, driver gene mutations and follow-up information were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed utilizing the non-adjuvant cohort to predict disease free survival (DFS) and a nomogram was constructed and applied to the total cohort. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare DFS between groups. Statistical analysis was conducted by R version 3.6.3.
    A total of 913 stage I LUAD patients were included in this study. Median follow-up time is 48.1 months.4-year and 5-year DFS are 92.9 % and 89.6 % for the total cohort. 65 patient experienced recurrence or death. 4-year DFS are 97.0 %,94.6 % and 76.2 %, and 5-year DFS are 95.5 %, 90.0 % and 74.1 % in IASLC Grade1, 2 and 3, respectively(p < 0.0001). High-risk patients defined by single risk factors, such as, IASLC grade 3, pleura invasion, STAS, less LN resected could not benefit from adjuvant therapy. A LASSO-COX regression model was built and patients are divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. In the high-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have longer DFS than those who did not (p = 0.024), while in the low-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have inferior DFS than those who did not (p < 0.001).
    IASLC grading is a significant indicator of DFS, however it could not guide adjuvant therapy in our stage I LUAD cohort. Growth patterns and T indicators together with other risk factors could identify high-risk patients that are potential candidate of adjuvant therapy, including some stage IA LUAD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    KIF2C/MCAK(KIF2C)是驱动蛋白13家族中特征最明确的成员,这对有丝分裂过程中微管(MT)动力学的调节至关重要,以及相间。这篇系统的综述简要描述了KIF2C的重要结构元素,它通过多种分子机制进行调节,及其广泛的细胞功能。此外,它系统地总结了其在恶性进展中的致癌潜力,并对其在癌症患者中的预后价值进行了荟萃分析。KIF2C被证明参与多个关键的细胞过程,包括细胞迁移和侵袭。DNA修复,衰老诱导和免疫调节,众所周知,这在恶性肿瘤的发展过程中至关重要。的确,越来越多的出版物表明KIF2C在多种癌症实体中异常表达.因此,我们已经强调了它参与至少五个癌症的标志,即:基因组不稳定,抵抗细胞死亡,激活侵袭和转移,避免免疫破坏和细胞衰老。随后,系统研究了KIF2C/MCAK在各种恶性肿瘤实体中的表达及其与临床病理特征的相关性。将现有数据合并到多个加权荟萃分析中,以了解KIF2CHH蛋白或基因表达与乳腺癌总生存期之间的相关性。非小细胞肺癌和肝细胞癌患者。此外,KIF2C的高表达与肝细胞癌的无病生存期相关.所有荟萃分析均显示KIF2CHH表达的癌症患者预后不良,与总生存率下降和无病生存率下降相关,表明KIF2C在恶性进展中的致癌潜力,并作为预后标志物。这项工作描述了KIF2C与现代体内和体外技术的有希望的研究前景,以进一步破译KIF2C在恶性肿瘤发展和进展中的功能。这可能有助于建立KIF2C作为用于诊断或评估至少三种癌症实体的生物标志物。
    KIF2C/MCAK (KIF2C) is the most well-characterized member of the kinesin-13 family, which is critical in the regulation of microtubule (MT) dynamics during mitosis, as well as interphase. This systematic review briefly describes the important structural elements of KIF2C, its regulation by multiple molecular mechanisms, and its broad cellular functions. Furthermore, it systematically summarizes its oncogenic potential in malignant progression and performs a meta-analysis of its prognostic value in cancer patients. KIF2C was shown to be involved in multiple crucial cellular processes including cell migration and invasion, DNA repair, senescence induction and immune modulation, which are all known to be critical during the development of malignant tumors. Indeed, an increasing number of publications indicate that KIF2C is aberrantly expressed in multiple cancer entities. Consequently, we have highlighted its involvement in at least five hallmarks of cancer, namely: genome instability, resisting cell death, activating invasion and metastasis, avoiding immune destruction and cellular senescence. This was followed by a systematic search of KIF2C/MCAK\'s expression in various malignant tumor entities and its correlation with clinicopathologic features. Available data were pooled into multiple weighted meta-analyses for the correlation between KIF2Chigh protein or gene expression and the overall survival in breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Furthermore, high expression of KIF2C was correlated to disease-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma. All meta-analyses showed poor prognosis for cancer patients with KIF2Chigh expression, associated with a decreased overall survival and reduced disease-free survival, indicating KIF2C\'s oncogenic potential in malignant progression and as a prognostic marker. This work delineated the promising research perspective of KIF2C with modern in vivo and in vitro technologies to further decipher the function of KIF2C in malignant tumor development and progression. This might help to establish KIF2C as a biomarker for the diagnosis or evaluation of at least three cancer entities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺大细胞神经内分泌癌(PLCNEC)是一种罕见但侵袭性的肺癌亚型,发病率约为3%。确定有效的预后指标对于指导治疗至关重要。这项研究检查了炎症标志物与PLCNEC患者总生存期(OS)之间的关系,并试图确定其在PLCNEC中的预后意义。
    2007年至2022年在肿瘤中心诊断为PLCNEC的患者,被回顾性地包括在内。接受手术的患者在手术后经病理重新分期。潜在的预后参数(中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率,血小板/淋巴细胞比率[PLR],泛免疫炎症价值,在诊断时计算预后营养指数和改良的格拉斯哥预后评分[mGPS])。
    纳入60例患者。中位随访时间为23个月。最初诊断为早期或局部晚期的38例患者。mGPS被确定为影响无病生存(DFS)四倍(p=0.03)的不良预后因素。所有患者的中位OS为45个月。评估影响所有患者OS的因素,在OS和预后营养指数之间观察到有统计学意义的关系(p=0.001),中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(p=0.03),血小板/淋巴细胞比率(p=0.002),和泛免疫炎症值(p=0.005)。经过多变量分析,血小板/淋巴细胞比率被确定为OS的独立不良预后因素,死亡风险增加5.4倍(p=0.002)。
    mGPS与非转移性PLCNEC的预后显著相关,mGPS较高的患者表现出较差的长期DFS。这一发现有助于不断发展对PLCNEC的理解。我们采用的多变量预测模型表明,PLR在所有阶段都是操作系统的独立预测因子。较低的PLR与较差的总体生存率相关。因此,PLR可能是PLCNEC患者容易获得且具有成本效益的预后因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of lung cancer with an incidence of approximately 3 %. Identifying effective prognostic indicators is crucial for guiding treatments. This study examined the relationship between inflammatory markers and PLCNEC patient overall survival (OS) and sought to determine their prognostic significance in PLCNEC.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with PLCNEC between 2007 and 2022 at the oncology center, were retrospectively included. Patients who underwent surgery were pathologically re-staged post-surgery. Potential prognostic parameters (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio [PLR], panimmune inflammatory value, prognostic nutritional index and modified Glasgow prognostic score [mGPS]) were calculated at that time of diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty patients were included. The median follow-up was 23 months. Thirty-eight patients initially diagnosed with early or locally advanced. The mGPS was identified as a poor prognostic factor that influenced disease free survival (DFS) fourfold (p = 0.03). All patients\' median OS was 45 months. Evaluating factors affecting OS in all patients, statistically significant relationships were observed between OS and the prognostic nutritional index (p = 0.001), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.03), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002), and pan-immunoinflammatory value (p = 0.005). Upon multivariate analysis, the platelet/lymphocyte ratio was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS, increasing the mortality risk by 5.4 times (p = 0.002).
    UNASSIGNED: mGPS was significantly linked with prognosis in non-metastatic PLCNEC, with patients with higher mGPS exhibiting poorer long-term DFS. This finding contributes to the evolving understanding of PLCNEC. The multivariable predictive model we employed suggests that PLR is an independent predictor of OS at all stages. A lower PLR was correlated with worse overall survival. Thus, PLR can be a readily accessible and cost-effective prognostic factor in PLCNEC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在靶向治疗和个性化医疗的时代,BRCA突变状态对卵巢癌患者的生存有重要影响。我们的目的是验证老年卵巢癌患者的不良预后是否与肿瘤的生物学有关,超出了他们自己的发病率和/或欠佳的治疗方法。
    方法:这是一项回顾性的单机构研究,评估诊断为卵巢癌和已知BRCA状态的患者的预后。我们根据年龄组收集临床和手术特征以及BRCA突变状态的分布。
    结果:1840例患者被纳入分析。BRCA突变率在年龄范围内从<50岁患者的49.7%下降到≥80岁女性的18.8%。当关注老年人群时,BRCA状态对生存的预后作用得以维持。无病生存率提高(BRCA突变和野生型分别为27.2个月和16.5个月,p=0.001)和癌症特异性生存率(BRCA突变和野生型分别为117.6个月和43.1个月,与BRCAwt患者相比,BRCAmut的p=0.001)。在多变量分析中,在老年妇女中,前期手术和BRCA突变是影响生存率的独立因素.
    结论:由于多种因素,包括医疗条件和合并症,老年患者的预后较差,治疗不足,最重要的是疾病特征。我们发现除了差异之外,BRCA突变仍然是影响疾病复发和死亡风险的最强独立预后因素。
    OBJECTIVE: In the era of target therapy and personalized medicine, BRCA mutational status has a major influence on survival in ovarian cancer patients. Our aim is to verify if the poorer prognosis of elderly ovarian cancer patients can be related to the biology of the tumor beyond their own morbidities and/or suboptimal treatments.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution study evaluating prognosis of patients with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer and known BRCA status. We collected clinical and surgical characteristics and the distribution of BRCA mutational status according to age groups.
    RESULTS: 1840 patients were included in the analysis. The rate of BRCA mutated decreased over age-range from 49.7% in patients aged <50 years to 18.8% in ≥80 years old women. The prognostic role of BRCA status on survival is maintained when focusing on the elderly population, with improved Disease Free Survival (27.2 months vs 16.5 months for BRCA mutated and wild type respectively, p = 0.001) and Cancer Specific Survival (117.6 months vs 43.1 months for BRCA mutated and wild type respectively, p = 0.001) for BRCAmut compared to BRCAwt patients. In the multivariable analysis, among elderly women, upfront surgery and BRCA mutation are independent factors affecting survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients experiment a poorer prognosis due to multiple factors that include both their medical condition and comorbidities, under-treatment and most importantly disease characteristics. We found that beyond disparities, BRCA mutation is still the strongest independent prognostic factor affecting both the risk of recurrence and death due to disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究旨在回顾新辅助化疗(NACT)和间隔减积手术(IDS)在晚期子宫内膜癌患者中的作用。招募了2010年1月至2020年1月在我们研究所接受NACT和IDS治疗的晚期子宫内膜癌患者。与基线患者特征有关的数据,手术细节,组织病理学/影像学报告,从机构数据库收集治疗和随访细节,包括复发和死亡的发展.使用KaplanMeier存活曲线计算无病存活期(DFS)和总存活期(OS)。我们招募了31名患者进行研究。约83.9%的患者显示部分反应,6.4%的患者对NACT完全反应,没有患者发生疾病进展。90.3%的患者实现了完全的细胞减少,3.2%患者的最佳细胞减量,6.5%患者的手术效果欠佳.完成初级治疗后,80.6%的患者达到完全缓解,16.1%的患者出现疾病进展.中位随访时间为21个月(1-61个月)。随访期间,51.6%的患者在完全缓解后出现疾病复发,61.3%的患者死于疾病进展/复发。队列的中位DFS和中位OS分别为15个月和21个月。该队列的2年DFS为34.1%,3年OS为30.5%。对于不适合初次手术的晚期子宫内膜癌,NACT和IDS是一个相当好的选择。在这群患者中需要创新的治疗方法。
    Our study aims to review the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with NACT followed by IDS at our institute from January 2010 to January 2020 were recruited. Data pertaining to baseline patient characteristics, surgical details, histopathology/imaging reports, treatment and follow up details including the development of recurrence and death were collected from institutional database. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan Meier survival curves. We recruited 31 patients for our study. About 83.9% patients showed partial response and 6.4% patients responded completely to NACT with none of the patients developing disease progression. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90.3% patients, optimal cytoreduction in 3.2% patients while 6.5% patients had suboptimal surgery. On completion of primary treatment, complete remission was achieved by 80.6% patients while 16.1% patients had progressive disease. Median follow up period was 21 months (range 1- 61 months). During follow up period, 51.6% patients developed recurrent disease after achieving complete remission and 61.3% patients died of disease progression/recurrence. The median DFS and median OS of the cohort was 15 months and 21 months respectively. The 2 year DFS for the cohort was 34.1% and the 3 year OS was 30.5%. NACT followed by IDS is a reasonably good option for advanced stage endometrial cancer not amenable to primary surgery. Innovative treatments are warranted in this cluster of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们的目的是分析散发性胃肠道间质瘤与其他肿瘤相关的差异。
    方法:回顾性队列研究,包括在我们中心手术的诊断为胃肠道间质瘤的患者。患者分为两组,根据他们是否有其他肿瘤,同步和异形。计算两组的无病生存率和总生存率。
    结果:纳入96例患者,60人(62.5%)为男性,年龄中位数为66.8(35-84)。33例(34.3%)与其他肿瘤相关;同步12例(36.3%)和异时21例(63.7%)。相关肿瘤中突变的存在为70%,非相关肿瘤中突变的存在为75%。根据Fletcher的分层量表(p=0.001)将相关肿瘤分类为低风险肿瘤,因为与非相关肿瘤相比,它们通常尺寸较小,每50HPF小于≤5个有丝分裂。在分析总生存率时,两组之间的差异有统计学意义(p=0.035)。
    结论:胃肠道间质瘤病例与相关肿瘤的比例相对较高,这表明需要开展一项研究以排除第二种肿瘤的存在,并应进行长期随访以诊断可能的第二种肿瘤。与其他肿瘤相关的胃肠道间质瘤通常具有低复发风险和良好的长期预后。
    BACKGROUND: Our aim is to analyze the differences between sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and those associated with other tumors.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients with diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors operated at our center. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they had associated other tumors, both synchronously and metachronously. Disease free survival and overall survival were calculated for both groups.
    RESULTS: 96 patients were included, 60 (62.5%) were male, with a median age of 66.8 (35-84). An association with other tumors was found in 33 cases (34.3%); 12 were synchronous (36.3%) and 21 metachronous (63.7%). The presence of mutations in associated tumors was 70% and in non-associated tumors 75%. Associated tumors were classified as low risk tumors based on Fletcher\'s stratification scale (p = 0.001) as they usually were smaller in size and had less than ≤5 mitosis per 50 HPF compared to non-associated tumors. When analyzing overall survival, there were statistically significant differences (p = 0,035) between both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors cases with associated tumors suggests the need to carry out a study to rule out presence of a second neoplasm and a long-term follow-up should be carried out in order to diagnose a possible second neoplasm. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with other tumors have usually low risk of recurrence with a good long-term prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号