disease free survival

无病生存
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的证据表明,低HER2乳腺癌患者可以从新型抗HER2抗体-药物偶联物(ADC)治疗中受益,这为低HER2患者提供了更好的治疗方法。这项研究的目的是描述临床病理特征,在接受新辅助化疗(NACT)的TNBC中,HER2-Low和HER2-Zero的化疗效果和生存结局。我们回顾性评估了2014年8月至2022年8月期间接受新辅助化疗的638例三阴性乳腺癌患者。在HER2-Low队列中分析病理学完全缓解(pCR)和生存结果,HER2-Zero队列和整体患者,分别。在整个队列中,342例(53.6%)患者为低HER2,296例(46.4%)患者为零HER2。基于所有临床病理特征,HER2-Low和HER2-Zero患者之间没有发现显着差异。TNBC患者中有143例(22.4%)在NACT后达到pCR。HER2-Low患者和HER2-Zero患者的pCR率分别为21.3%和23.6%,分别,没有统计学差异(p=0.487)。在HER2-Low患者或HER2-Zero患者中,与非pCR组相比,NACT后pCR组的生存率显着提高。尽管我们发现HER2-Low患者的DFS比HER2-Zero患者长,没有显著差异(p=0.068)。然而,HER2-Low患者的OS显著长于HER2-Zero患者(p=0.012)。本研究的数据证实了TNBC中HER2低表达的临床重要性。需要进一步努力来确定HER2-Low是否可能是用于个体治疗的更有利的预后标志物。
    Mounting evidence showed that HER2-Low breast cancer patients could benefit from the novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) treatment, which pointed the way towards better therapy for HER2-Low patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinicopathological features, along with chemotherapeutic effects and survival outcomes of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We retrospectively evaluated 638 triple-negative breast cancer patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between August 2014 and August 2022. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes were analyzed in HER2-Low cohort, HER2-Zero cohort and the overall patients, respectively. In the entire cohort, 342 (53.6%) patients were HER2-Low and 296 (46.4%) patients were HER2-Zero. No significant difference was found between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero patients based on all the clinical-pathological characteristics. 143 cases (22.4%) achieved pCR after NACT in the overall TNBC patients. The pCR rate of the HER2-Low patients and the HER2-Zero patients was 21.3% and 23.6%, respectively, exhibiting no statistical difference (p = 0.487). The survival of pCR group after NACT significantly improved compared to non-pCR group either in HER2-Low patients or in HER2-Zero patients. Although we found that patients with HER2-Low had longer DFS than patients with HER2-Zero, there was no considerable difference (p = 0.068). However, HER2-Low patients had a dramatically longer OS than HER2-Zero patients (p = 0.012). The data from present study confirmed the clinical importance of HER2-Low expression in TNBC. Further effort is needed to determine whether HER2-Low could be a more favorable prognostic marker for individual treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    奥沙利铂联合S-1(SOX)辅助化疗治疗胃癌D2胃切除术后(GC)已被证明有效。尚未有一项评估佐剂纳米颗粒白蛋白结合的紫杉醇(nab-紫杉醇)加S-1的研究。在这个单一中心,回顾性研究,2018年1月至2020年12月,浙江大学附属第一医院招募了D2胃切除术后接受nab-紫杉醇联合S-1(AS组)或SOX组的GC患者。静脉给药nab-紫杉醇120mg/m2或260mg/m2和奥沙利铂130mg/m2,共8个3周周期,尤其是AS和SOX组。两组患者在每个周期的第1-14天每天两次以40mg/m2的剂量接受S-1。终点为3年无病生存率(DFS)和不良事件(AE)。有56名合格患者,AS组28和SOX组35。AS组3年DFS率为78.0%,SOX组为70.7%(p=0.46)。亚组分析显示,与SOX组相比,AS组印戒阳性患者的DFS延长(40.0vs.13.8米,p=0.02)。与SOX组相比,AS组弥漫性GC或低分化与数字上延长的DFS相关。但相关性无统计学意义(p=0.27,尤其是p=0.15).白细胞减少症(14.3%)是AS组中最常见的不良事件,而SOX组的血小板减少(28.5%)。中性粒细胞减少症(AS组为7.1%)和血小板减少症(SOX组为22.8%)是最常见的3或4级不良事件。在这项分析过去数据的研究中,在印戒阳性患者中使用AS方案时,观察到3年DFS有增加的趋势.与SOX组相比,AS组的血小板减少更少。应该用更大的样本量进行更多的研究。
    Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) after D2 gastrectomy has been proven effective. There has yet to be a study that evaluates adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus S-1. In this single-center, retrospective study, GC patients after D2 gastrectomy received either nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS group) or SOX group were recruited between January 2018 and December 2020 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 or 260 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 were administered as eight 3 week cycle, especially in the AS and SOX group. Patients received S-1 twice daily with a dose of 40 mg/m2 in the two groups on days 1-14 of each cycle. The end points were disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 3 years and adverse events (AEs). There were 56 eligible patients, 28 in the AS group and 35 in the SOX group. The 3 year DFS rate was 78.0% in AS group versus 70.7% in SOX group (p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis showed that the patients with signet-ring positive in the AS group had a prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group (40.0 vs. 13.8 m, p = 0.02). The diffuse-type GC or low differentiation in the AS group was associated with numerically prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group, but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.27 and p = 0.15 especially). Leukopenia (14.3%) were the most prevalent AEs in the AS group, while thrombocytopenia (28.5%) in the SOX group. Neutropenia (7.1% in AS group) and thrombocytopenia (22.8% in SOX group) were the most common grade 3 or 4 AEs. In this study analyzing past data, a tendency towards a greater 3 year DFS was observed when using AS regimen in signet-ring positive patients. AS group had fewer thrombocytopenia compared to SOX group. More studies should be conducted with larger sample sizes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)根治性切除术后复发的模式和影响因素。
    连续接受PDAC治疗(2011-21)并同意数据和组织收集(Barts胰腺组织库)的患者随访至2023年5月。使用Cox比例风险模型分析临床病理变量。
    91人(42名男性[46%];中位年龄,71年[范围,43-86岁]),中位随访时间为51个月(95%置信区间[CI],40-61个月),复发率为72.5%(n=66;12个局部区域,11只肝脏,5单肺,3单独腹膜,29同时发生局部区域和远处转移,和6个首次复发诊断时的多灶性远处转移)。中位复发时间为8.5个月(95%CI,6.6-10.5个月)。复发后中位生存期为5.8个月(95%CI,4.2-7.3个月)。按复发位置进行分层显示,仅在局部区域复发之间的复发时间存在显着差异(中位数,13.6个月;95%CI,11.7-15.5个月)和同时发生局部区域并伴有远处复发(中位数,7.5个月;95%CI,4.6-10.4个月;p=0.02,成对对数秩检验)。复发的重要预测因素是全身炎症指数(SII)≥500(风险比[HR],4.5;95%CI,1.4-14.3),淋巴结比率≥0.33(HR,2.8;95%CI,1.4-5.8),和辅助化疗(HR,0.4;95%CI,0.2-0.7)。
    仅局部复发的时间明显长于同时局部复发和远处复发的时间。复发的重要预测因素是SII,淋巴结定量,和辅助化疗。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate patterns and factors affecting recurrence after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC (2011-21) and consented to data and tissue collection (Barts Pancreas Tissue Bank) were followed up until May 2023. Clinico-pathological variables were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 91 people (42 males [46%]; median age, 71 years [range, 43-86 years]) with a median follow-up of 51 months (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 40-61 months), the recurrence rate was 72.5% (n = 66; 12 loco-regional alone, 11 liver alone, 5 lung alone, 3 peritoneal alone, 29 simultaneous loco-regional and distant metastases, and 6 multi-focal distant metastases at first recurrence diagnosis). The median time to recurrence was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.6-10.5 months). Median survival after recurrence was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.3 months). Stratification by recurrence location revealed significant differences in time to recurrence between loco-regional only recurrence (median, 13.6 months; 95% CI, 11.7-15.5 months) and simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence (median, 7.5 months; 95% CI, 4.6-10.4 months; p = 0.02, pairwise log-rank test). Significant predictors for recurrence were systemic inflammation index (SII) ≥ 500 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.3), lymph node ratio ≥ 0.33 (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.8), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7).
    UNASSIGNED: Timing to loco-regional only recurrence was significantly longer than simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence. Significant predictors for recurrence were SII, lymph node ration, and adjuvant chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管I期肺腺癌(LUAD)患者的总生存期有希望,其中10-25%的患者在手术后仍然复发。[1]虽然对于I期患者是否需要辅助化疗仍有争议。[2]非黏液性LUAD的IASLC分级系统显示,轻度高级别模式是预后不良的重要指标。[3]其他风险因素,例如,胸膜侵犯,淋巴管浸润,STAS,等。也与预后不良有关。[4-6]仍然缺乏IASLC分级本身或与其他危险因素一起是否可以指导I期患者辅助治疗的使用的证据。在这篇文章中,我们尝试为I期LUAD患者建立多变量复发预测模型,该模型能够确定辅助化疗的候选药物.
    方法:我们回顾性收集了2018.8.1至2018.12.31在我们机构接受肺手术并诊断为肺腺癌pT1-2aN0M0(I期)的患者。临床数据,CT扫描的表现,病理特征,收集驱动基因突变和随访信息.使用非辅助队列进行Cox比例风险回归分析以预测无病生存(DFS),并构建列线图并应用于总队列。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较各组间DFS。通过R版本3.6.3进行统计学分析。
    结果:本研究共纳入913例I期LUAD患者。中位随访时间为48.1个月,4年和5年DFS分别为92.9%和89.6%。65例患者出现复发或死亡。4年DFS为97.0%,94.6%和76.2%,5年期DFS为95.5%,在IASLC等级1、2和3中分别为90.0%和74.1%(p<0.0001)。由单一危险因素定义的高危患者,例如,IASLC3级胸膜侵犯,STAS,切除较少的LN不能从辅助治疗中获益。建立LASSO-COX回归模型,将患者分为高危和低危组。在高危人群中,接受辅助化疗的患者比没有接受辅助化疗的患者有更长的DFS(p=0.024),而在低风险组中,接受辅助化疗的患者的DFS低于未接受辅助化疗的患者(p<0.001).
    结论:IASLC分级是DFS的重要指标,然而,在我们的I期LUAD队列中,它不能指导辅助治疗.生长模式和T指标以及其他危险因素可以确定高危患者是辅助治疗的潜在候选者。包括一些IALUAD期患者。
    Despite promising overall survival of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, 10-25 % of them still went through recurrence after surgery. [1] While it is still disputable whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for stage I patients. [2] IASLC grading system for non-mucinous LUAD shows that minor high-grade patterns are significant indicator of poor prognosis. [3] Other risk factors, such as, pleura invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, STAS, etc. are also related to poor prognosis. [4-6] There still lack evidence whether IASLC grade itself or together with other risk factors can guide the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I patients. In this article, we tried to establish a multi-variable recurrence prediction model for stage I LUAD patients that is able to identify candidates of adjuvant chemotherapy.
    We retrospectively collected patients who underwent lung surgery from 2018.8.1 to 2018.12.31 at our institution and diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma pT1-2aN0M0 (stage I). Clinical data, manifestation on CT scan, pathologic features, driver gene mutations and follow-up information were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed utilizing the non-adjuvant cohort to predict disease free survival (DFS) and a nomogram was constructed and applied to the total cohort. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare DFS between groups. Statistical analysis was conducted by R version 3.6.3.
    A total of 913 stage I LUAD patients were included in this study. Median follow-up time is 48.1 months.4-year and 5-year DFS are 92.9 % and 89.6 % for the total cohort. 65 patient experienced recurrence or death. 4-year DFS are 97.0 %,94.6 % and 76.2 %, and 5-year DFS are 95.5 %, 90.0 % and 74.1 % in IASLC Grade1, 2 and 3, respectively(p < 0.0001). High-risk patients defined by single risk factors, such as, IASLC grade 3, pleura invasion, STAS, less LN resected could not benefit from adjuvant therapy. A LASSO-COX regression model was built and patients are divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. In the high-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have longer DFS than those who did not (p = 0.024), while in the low-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have inferior DFS than those who did not (p < 0.001).
    IASLC grading is a significant indicator of DFS, however it could not guide adjuvant therapy in our stage I LUAD cohort. Growth patterns and T indicators together with other risk factors could identify high-risk patients that are potential candidate of adjuvant therapy, including some stage IA LUAD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺大细胞神经内分泌癌(PLCNEC)是一种罕见但侵袭性的肺癌亚型,发病率约为3%。确定有效的预后指标对于指导治疗至关重要。这项研究检查了炎症标志物与PLCNEC患者总生存期(OS)之间的关系,并试图确定其在PLCNEC中的预后意义。
    2007年至2022年在肿瘤中心诊断为PLCNEC的患者,被回顾性地包括在内。接受手术的患者在手术后经病理重新分期。潜在的预后参数(中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率,血小板/淋巴细胞比率[PLR],泛免疫炎症价值,在诊断时计算预后营养指数和改良的格拉斯哥预后评分[mGPS])。
    纳入60例患者。中位随访时间为23个月。最初诊断为早期或局部晚期的38例患者。mGPS被确定为影响无病生存(DFS)四倍(p=0.03)的不良预后因素。所有患者的中位OS为45个月。评估影响所有患者OS的因素,在OS和预后营养指数之间观察到有统计学意义的关系(p=0.001),中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(p=0.03),血小板/淋巴细胞比率(p=0.002),和泛免疫炎症值(p=0.005)。经过多变量分析,血小板/淋巴细胞比率被确定为OS的独立不良预后因素,死亡风险增加5.4倍(p=0.002)。
    mGPS与非转移性PLCNEC的预后显著相关,mGPS较高的患者表现出较差的长期DFS。这一发现有助于不断发展对PLCNEC的理解。我们采用的多变量预测模型表明,PLR在所有阶段都是操作系统的独立预测因子。较低的PLR与较差的总体生存率相关。因此,PLR可能是PLCNEC患者容易获得且具有成本效益的预后因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of lung cancer with an incidence of approximately 3 %. Identifying effective prognostic indicators is crucial for guiding treatments. This study examined the relationship between inflammatory markers and PLCNEC patient overall survival (OS) and sought to determine their prognostic significance in PLCNEC.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with PLCNEC between 2007 and 2022 at the oncology center, were retrospectively included. Patients who underwent surgery were pathologically re-staged post-surgery. Potential prognostic parameters (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio [PLR], panimmune inflammatory value, prognostic nutritional index and modified Glasgow prognostic score [mGPS]) were calculated at that time of diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty patients were included. The median follow-up was 23 months. Thirty-eight patients initially diagnosed with early or locally advanced. The mGPS was identified as a poor prognostic factor that influenced disease free survival (DFS) fourfold (p = 0.03). All patients\' median OS was 45 months. Evaluating factors affecting OS in all patients, statistically significant relationships were observed between OS and the prognostic nutritional index (p = 0.001), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.03), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002), and pan-immunoinflammatory value (p = 0.005). Upon multivariate analysis, the platelet/lymphocyte ratio was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS, increasing the mortality risk by 5.4 times (p = 0.002).
    UNASSIGNED: mGPS was significantly linked with prognosis in non-metastatic PLCNEC, with patients with higher mGPS exhibiting poorer long-term DFS. This finding contributes to the evolving understanding of PLCNEC. The multivariable predictive model we employed suggests that PLR is an independent predictor of OS at all stages. A lower PLR was correlated with worse overall survival. Thus, PLR can be a readily accessible and cost-effective prognostic factor in PLCNEC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究旨在回顾新辅助化疗(NACT)和间隔减积手术(IDS)在晚期子宫内膜癌患者中的作用。招募了2010年1月至2020年1月在我们研究所接受NACT和IDS治疗的晚期子宫内膜癌患者。与基线患者特征有关的数据,手术细节,组织病理学/影像学报告,从机构数据库收集治疗和随访细节,包括复发和死亡的发展.使用KaplanMeier存活曲线计算无病存活期(DFS)和总存活期(OS)。我们招募了31名患者进行研究。约83.9%的患者显示部分反应,6.4%的患者对NACT完全反应,没有患者发生疾病进展。90.3%的患者实现了完全的细胞减少,3.2%患者的最佳细胞减量,6.5%患者的手术效果欠佳.完成初级治疗后,80.6%的患者达到完全缓解,16.1%的患者出现疾病进展.中位随访时间为21个月(1-61个月)。随访期间,51.6%的患者在完全缓解后出现疾病复发,61.3%的患者死于疾病进展/复发。队列的中位DFS和中位OS分别为15个月和21个月。该队列的2年DFS为34.1%,3年OS为30.5%。对于不适合初次手术的晚期子宫内膜癌,NACT和IDS是一个相当好的选择。在这群患者中需要创新的治疗方法。
    Our study aims to review the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with NACT followed by IDS at our institute from January 2010 to January 2020 were recruited. Data pertaining to baseline patient characteristics, surgical details, histopathology/imaging reports, treatment and follow up details including the development of recurrence and death were collected from institutional database. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan Meier survival curves. We recruited 31 patients for our study. About 83.9% patients showed partial response and 6.4% patients responded completely to NACT with none of the patients developing disease progression. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90.3% patients, optimal cytoreduction in 3.2% patients while 6.5% patients had suboptimal surgery. On completion of primary treatment, complete remission was achieved by 80.6% patients while 16.1% patients had progressive disease. Median follow up period was 21 months (range 1- 61 months). During follow up period, 51.6% patients developed recurrent disease after achieving complete remission and 61.3% patients died of disease progression/recurrence. The median DFS and median OS of the cohort was 15 months and 21 months respectively. The 2 year DFS for the cohort was 34.1% and the 3 year OS was 30.5%. NACT followed by IDS is a reasonably good option for advanced stage endometrial cancer not amenable to primary surgery. Innovative treatments are warranted in this cluster of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉减少症定义为肌肉功能以及肌肉质量的下降。肌肉减少症本身和肌肉减少性肥胖,定义为肥胖患者的肌肉减少症,已被用作结直肠癌预后较差的替代药物。这篇综述旨在确定是否有证据表明少肌症作为结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的预后参数。
    PubMed,Embase,CochraneCentral,WebofScience,Scopus,我们在CINAHL数据库中搜索了根据PRISMA指南选择的文章.主要结果是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。进行随机效应荟萃分析。
    消除重复项并筛选摘要(n=111)后,筛选了949项研究,33份出版物符合纳入标准。其中,15个是经过密切的论文审查后选出的,和10个被纳入荟萃分析,其中包括825名患者。肌少症对OS无显著影响(比值比(OR),2.802(95%置信区间(CI),1.094-1.11);p=0.4)或DFS(OR,发现1.203(95%CI,1.162-1.208);p=0.5),尽管有明显的肌少症趋势。肌肉减少显著影响术后并发症发生率(OR,7.905(95%CI,1.876-3.32);p=0.001)在两项数据可用的研究中。
    存在关于肌少症对接受CRLM切除术的患者的术后OS和DFS的影响的现有证据。在我们的分析中,我们无法确认肌少症患者的OS和DFS明显更差,尽管这一假设的趋势是可见的。肌肉减少症似乎会影响并发症的发生率,但需要进行前瞻性研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Sarcopenia is defined as a decline in muscle function as well as muscle mass. Sarcopenia itself and sarcopenic obesity, defined as sarcopenia in obese patients, have been used as surrogates for a worse prognosis in colorectal cancer. This review aims to determine if there is evidence for sarcopenia as a prognostic parameter in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases were searched for articles that were selected in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A random effects meta-analysis was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: After eliminating duplicates and screening abstracts (n = 111), 949 studies were screened, and 33 publications met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 15 were selected after close paper review, and 10 were incorporated into the meta-analysis, which comprised 825 patients. No significant influence of sarcopenia for OS (odds ratio (OR), 2.802 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.094-1.11); p = 0.4) or DFS (OR, 1.203 (95% CI, 1.162-1.208); p = 0.5) was found, although a trend was defined toward sarcopenia. Sarcopenia significantly influenced postoperative complication rates (OR, 7.905 (95% CI, 1.876-3.32); p = 0.001) in two studies where data were available.
    UNASSIGNED: Existing evidence on the influence of sarcopenia on postoperative OS as well as DFS in patients undergoing resection for CRLM exists. We were not able to confirm that sarcopenic patients have a significantly worse OS and DFS in our analysis, although a trend toward this hypothesis was visible. Sarcopenia seems to influence complication rates but prospective studies are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的宫颈癌是影响印度妇女的主要癌症之一。同步放化疗是治疗宫颈癌的标准护理。我们的目的是研究体积调节电弧疗法(VMAT)的结果和毒性特征,一种用于治疗宫颈癌患者的先进放射方式。材料和方法本研究招募了属于FIGO(国际妇产科联合会)IB2-IVA期的宫颈癌患者。患者接受VMAT治疗,以28分的50.4Gy的EBRT(外部束放射治疗)剂量治疗,随后是每个部分8Gy的近距离放射治疗方案,到三个部分的A点。在治疗过程中每周监测毒性,然后在每次随访时监测毒性。治疗后三个月进行反应评估CECT(对比增强计算机断层扫描)扫描,并使用RECIST(实体瘤反应评估标准)标准记录反应。结果64例患者可用于分析,大多数患者属于IIB期(50.3%),其次是IIIB期(28.5%)。在3个月和12个月的中位随访时,完全缓解率为90.6%。总生存率为100%,无病生存率为89.1%.对临床显着毒性(2级或更差)的分析表明,腹泻是最常见的(20.3%),其次是直肠炎(14%)和贫血(9.3%)。结论该研究的结果确定,体积调节电弧疗法是一种可接受的治疗宫颈癌的方式,具有诱人的毒性。然而,更长时间的随访将提供有关长期疾病控制和治疗后期毒性的有价值信息.
    Objective Carcinoma cervix is one of the major cancers affecting Indian women. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard of care in the treatment of carcinoma cervix. We aimed to study the outcomes and toxicity profile of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), an advanced modality of radiation delivery when used to treat patients with carcinoma cervix. Materials and methods Patients of carcinoma cervix belonging to FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages IB2- IVA were recruited into the study. The patients were treated with VMAT to an EBRT (External Beam Radiation Therapy) dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions, which was followed by a brachytherapy schedule of 8Gy for each fraction to point A for three fractions. Toxicities were monitored weekly during the course of treatment and thereafter at every follow-up visit. A response assessment CECT (Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography) scan was done three months after treatment and the response was recorded using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria. Results Sixty-four patients were available for analysis and most of the patients belonged to stage IIB (50.3%) followed by stage IIIB (28.5%). The complete response rate was 90.6% at three months and at a median follow-up of 12 months, the overall survival was 100% and disease-free survival was 89.1%. An analysis of clinically significant toxicities (grade 2 or worse) showed that diarrhea was the most common (20.3%) followed by proctitis (14%) and anemia (9.3%). Conclusion The results of the study established that volumetric modulated arc therapy is an acceptable modality of treatment of carcinoma cervix with an attractive toxicity profile. However, longer follow-ups will provide valuable information regarding the long-term disease control and late toxicities of the treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    喉鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)是一种常见的侵袭性肿瘤,死亡率高。分子生物标志物的应用有助于LSCC的早期诊断和治疗。
    从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库获得表达和临床信息。主成分分析(PCA)用于区分LSCC和正常样品。通过单变量和多变量cox分析筛选出hub基因。使用Kaplan-Meier(K-M)和接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线来验证预测性能。单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA),使用基因本体论(GO)和京都基因和基因组百科全书(KEGG)分析来确定富集功能。在STRING中构建蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络。通过估算进行免疫分析,IPS和xCELL。用GSCA数据库鉴定药物敏感性。
    我们发现,与正常组相比,有47个细胞外基质(ECM)基因在LSCC中差异表达。单变量和多变量cox分析确定富含亮氨酸的胶质瘤灭活4(LGI4),matrilin4(MATN4),微纤维相关蛋白2(MFAP2)和纤维蛋白原样2(FGL2)与LSCC的无病生存(DSS)密切相关。ROC曲线确定该风险模型具有良好的预测性能。PPI网络显示hub基因相关性高的前100个基因。ssGSEA,GO和KEGG富集分析确定免疫应答显著参与LSCC的发展。免疫浸润分析显示,高危评分组大部分免疫细胞和免疫检查点受到抑制。药敏剖析显示MATN4、FGL2和LGI4与各类药物呈负相干,而MFAP2与多种药物呈正相关。
    我们建立了一个由四个ECM相关基因构建的风险模型,可以有效预测LSCC的预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a kind of common and aggressive tumor with high mortality. The application of molecular biomarkers is useful for the early diagnosis and treatment of LSCC.
    UNASSIGNED: The expression and clinical information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to discriminate between LSCC and normal samples. The hub genes were screened out through univariate and multivariate cox analyses. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to validate the predictive performance. The single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were used to determine the enrichment function. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network was constructed in STRING. The immune analysis was performed by ESTIMATE, IPS and xCELL. The drug sensitivity was identified with GSCA database.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified that 47 extracellular matrix (ECM) genes were differentially expressed in LSCC compared with normal group. Univariate and multivariate cox analysis determined that leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 4 (LGI4), matrilin 4 (MATN4), microfibrillar-associated protein 2 (MFAP2) and fibrinogen like 2 (FGL2) were closely related to the disease free survival (DSS) of LSCC. ROC curve determined that the risk model has a good predictive performance. PPI network showed the top 100 genes with high correlation of hub genes. The ssGSEA, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses determined that immune response was significantly involved in the development of LSCC. Immune infiltration analysis showed that most immune cells and immune checkpoints were inhibited in high risk score group. Drug sensitivity analysis showed that MATN4, FGL2 and LGI4 were negatively related to various drugs, while MFAP2 was positively related to many drugs.
    UNASSIGNED: We established a risk model constructed with four ECM-related genes, which could effectively predict the prognosis of LSCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:本研究旨在分析1型子宫内膜癌患者3年无病生存期(DFS)与错配修复(MMR)蛋白水平之间的相关性。许多研究报道了关于MMR在子宫内膜癌预后中的作用的不同结果;因此,我们的目标是在我们的医院中确定这种关联。
    方法:这项观察性研究采用了历史队列设计,纳入了2017年1月至2019年12月在Soetomo医生医院接受手术的1型子宫内膜癌患者。获得符合这些标准的医疗记录和石蜡块。使用免疫组织化学评估MMR蛋白(MLH1和MSH2)。
    结果:共46例1型子宫内膜癌患者。我们观察到12例患者(26.1%)的MMR缺乏(dMMR)和34例患者(73.9%)的MMR熟练程度(pMMR)。在12例dMMR患者中,9例(75%)被诊断为I期,7例(58.33%)被诊断为低度。dMMR和pMMR患者的3年DFS分别为83.3%和67.6%,分别(危险比2.31,95%CI0.5135-10.475,p=0.27)。较高分期的复发风险增加了5.42倍(95%CI1.3378-21.9358,p=0.018)。较高的组织病理学分级也与8.65倍的复发风险相关(95%CI2.5020-29.8738,p=0.001)。
    结论:dMMR患者的DFS优于pMMR患者;然而,差异无统计学意义。肿瘤分期和组织病理学分级是复发的独立危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and mismatch repair (MMR) protein levels in patients with type 1 endometrial carcinoma. Many studies have reported different results regarding the role of MMR in the prognosis of endometrial carcinoma; therefore, we aimed to identify this association in our hospital.
    METHODS: This observational study employed a historical cohort design and included patients with type 1 endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery at Dr. Soetomo Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019. Medical records and paraffin blocks meeting these criteria were obtained. MMR proteins (MLH1 and MSH2) were assessed using immunohistochemistry.
    RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with type 1 endometrial carcinoma were analyzed. We observed MMR deficiency (dMMR) in 12 patients (26.1%) and MMR proficiency (pMMR) in 34 patients (73.9%). Of the 12 patients with dMMR, nine cases (75%) were diagnosed as stage I and 7 (58.33%) as low grade. The 3-year DFS in patients with dMMR and pMMR was 83.3% and 67.6%, respectively (Hazard Ratio 2.31, 95% CI 0.5135-10.475, p=0.27). Higher stages had a 5.42 times increased risk of recurrence (95% CI 1.3378-21.9358, p=0.018). Higher histopathological grades were also associated with 8.65 times increased risk of recurrence (95% CI 2.5020-29.8738, p=0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dMMR had a better DFS compared to those with pMMR; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The tumor stage and histopathological grade were independent risk factors for recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号