BACKGROUND: Since several studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), we conducted a meta-analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2024. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures to compare DOACs with VKAs.
RESULTS: A total of 9 observational studies were included. The pooled analysis revealed that a trend towards higher complete recanalization rates with DOACs (71.4%) compared to VKAs (55.3%), though not statistically significant (OR 1.95; 95%CI 0.70 to 5.44). For SVT extension, a significant effect was observed favoring DOACs (OR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.54). No significant differences were found in other efficacy outcomes or safety outcomes, except for major bleeding, which was significantly lower with DOACs (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: DOACs are superior to VKAs in SVT extension and major bleeding, suggesting that DOACs may be a favorable treatment option in the treatment of SVT.

UNASSIGNED: The All Nippon Atrial Fibrillation In the Elderly Registry provides real-world insights into non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in >30,000 elderly Japanese patients (aged ≥75 years), including >2,000 nonagenarians. We aimed to investigate outcomes in these patients by age and oral anticoagulant (OAC) type.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort, 2-year follow-up study included elderly patients with NVAF who were able to attend hospital visits. The incidences of stroke/systemic embolic events (SEE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events (MACNE) were evaluated by age. Incidence rates increased significantly with age. Stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and ICH incidences plateaued in patients aged ≥90 years. Direct OACs (DOACs) yielded a numerically lower event incidence vs. warfarin in all age groups and endpoints, except for major bleeding in patients aged ≥90 years. DOACs (vs. warfarin) were significantly associated with a lower risk of stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and ICH in the ≥80-<85 years group, and reduced cardiovascular and all-cause death in the ≥75-<80 years group. In the ≥90 years subgroup, major bleeding history was a risk factor for all-cause death.
UNASSIGNED: Although DOAC vs. warfarin offers potential benefits for stroke prevention, limitations occurred in reducing major bleeding among those aged ≥90 years, indicating a potential benefit of very-low-dose DOAC for this demographic.

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) last published clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in 2019, with a partial update in 2020. In this new update to the guidelines, SEOM seeks to incorporate recent evidence, based on a critical review of the literature, to provide practical current recommendations for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of VTE in patients with cancer. Special clinical situations whose management and/or choice of currently recommended therapeutic options (low-molecular-weight heparins [LMWHs] or direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) is controversial are included.

BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) pose a significant risk, particularly in the elderly population on anticoagulation therapy. The safety of discharging these patients from the emergency department (ED) with a negative initial computed tomography (CT) scan has been debated due to the risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (d-ICH).
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes, including d-ICH, between elderly patients on anticoagulation therapy presenting with mTBI who were admitted versus discharged from the ED after an initial negative head CT scan.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, assessing outcomes of 1598 elderly patients on anticoagulation therapy who presented with mTBI and an initial negative head CT scan. Patients were either admitted for 24-h observation (Group A, n = 829) or discharged immediately from the ED (Group B, n = 769). The primary outcome was incidence of d-ICH within 14 days.
RESULTS: Among the 1598 patients included in the study, 46 admitted patients and 1 discharged patient returned within 14 days for repeat CT, identifying one asymptomatic hemorrhage in the discharged patient. Mortality at 30 days was significantly higher in admitted patients compared to discharged patients (4.8% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.001), though cause of death was unrelated to head injury in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients on anticoagulation with mTBI and a negative initial CT, admission was associated with a higher risk of d-ICH compared to discharge. These findings have implications for clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children presents unique challenges due to the limitations of standard anticoagulation therapies. Herein, we aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pediatric patients with acute VTE.
METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing DOACs to standard anticoagulation in pediatric VTE patients. Efficacy outcomes included VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality, while safety outcomes comprised major bleeding and other adverse events.
RESULTS: Three RCTs with 790 participants were included. When compared with standard anticoagulation, DOACs demonstrated a reduced risk of VTE recurrence (risk difference[RD] = -3%, 95% confidence interval[CI]: -6% to 0%, P = 0.04) and an increased risk of any adverse event (RD = 8%, 95% CI: 1% to 14%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, or total bleeding between the DOAC and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: DOACs, primarily dabigatran and rivaroxaban, are non-inferior to standard anticoagulants in reducing VTE recurrence in pediatric patients, with comparable safety profiles. Further research is essential to confirm these findings.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been widely applied in adults for thrombosis prophylaxis. However, the effect of DOACs in pediatric patients with congenital or acquired heart diseases who need anticoagulation therapy remains unclear.
METHODS: We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and the World Health Organization\'s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until June 2024 to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). If the number of included studies was less than 5, we performed a narrative review to assess the effect of DOACs in pediatric patients.
RESULTS: Four studies were included. In the UNIVERSE study, thrombotic events occurred in 2% of the rivaroxaban group and 9% of the aspirin group, with bleeding events in 36% and 41%, respectively. The ENNOBLE-ATE study showed no thromboembolic events in the edoxaban group and 1.7% in the SOC group (rate difference: -0.07%, 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.07%). Major bleeding rates were similar (rate difference: -0.03%, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.12%). The SAXOPHONE trial showed no thromboembolic events in either group and similar major bleeding rates (-0.8%, 95% CI: -8.1 to 3.3%). In the DIVERSITY trial, 81% of dabigatran patients achieved the primary outcome versus 59.3% in the SOC group (Odds ratio: 0.342, 95% CI: 0.081-1.229). No major bleeding occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing studies suggest that the use of DOACs hold promise as an effective and safe alternative for preventing and treating thromboembolism in pediatric patients with heart conditions.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a predominant contributor to morbidity and mortality, and stroke prevention remains the mainstay for the management of AF. The precise mechanism involved in thrombus formation remains unknown. However, factors such as stretch-induced fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, disordered atrial contractions, and pro-thrombotic states have been postulated for the development of AF. Various risk assessment strategies have been acknowledged for determining the risk of stroke in AF, of which the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age between 65-74, and female sex (CHA2DS2-VASc) score remains the ultimate risk stratification tool. For the longest time, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only oral anticoagulants available but were associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were approved and considered more efficient and safer than or as secure as warfarin in stroke prevention and lowering intra-cranial bleeding events. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DOACs were also clarified in this article. This review article compiles current evidence-based data on the role of DOACs, uncovering their underlying mechanisms, and comparing their efficacy with warfarin in stroke prevention in AF.

UNASSIGNED: Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been recommended as first-line anticoagulants for patients with left ventricular thrombosis (LVT). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used as an alternative to the standard of care in anticoagulation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of VKAs and DOACs in the treatment of patients with LVT.
UNASSIGNED: Studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The main outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), thrombus resolution, and bleeding events. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated with fixed effect or random effect models.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen studies were included. Pooled estimate showed that DOACs had comparable efficacy in prevention of SSE (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.16; p = 0.677) and thrombus resolution as compared with VKAs (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.18; p = 0.193). DOACs significantly decreased the risk of stroke in patients with LVT (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.00; p = 0.048). However, this effect was not observed in the sensitive analysis by high-quality studies (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.02; p = 0.06). In terms of safety outcomes, DOACs had similar risk of bleeding events (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.57; p = 0.386) and clinically relevant bleeding events (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.23, 1.03; p = 0.060). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that none of the variables (study design, concomitant antiplatelet medication, duration of follow-up, primary cause of LVT, sample size, types of DOACs) had an impact on the risk of SSE, thrombus resolution and bleeding events. Subgroup analysis based on the use of antiplatelet and treatment switching revealed that there were no significant differences among patients with different treatment regimens.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the present evidence, both DOACs and VKA offered similar effective and safe outcomes in patients with LVT.

UNASSIGNED: Recommendations for drug treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) are based on the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines; however, the etiology of LVT has changed. Due to the lack of evidence regarding LVT treatment in the heart failure population, current heart failure guidelines do not cover LVT treatment. We sought to review the etiology of LVT and changes in antithrombotic therapy over the previous 12 years and explore the impact of anticoagulation treatment from a single center\'s experience.
UNASSIGNED: From January 2009 to June 2021, we studied 1675 patients with a discharge diagnosis of LVT at a single center to investigate the clinical characteristics, incidence of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), systemic embolism (SE), and major bleeding events. Patients were divided into an anticoagulant group and a non-anticoagulant group according to whether they received oral anticoagulant therapy at discharge.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 909 patients (anticoagulation, 510; no anticoagulation, 399). While overall antiplatelet therapy dramatically decreased, more patients with LVT received oral anticoagulation in 2021 (74.0%) than in 2009 (29.6%). In addition, more than half of the patients had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) each year. The all-cause mortality was 17.3% during 3.8 years of follow-up. The incidences of cardiovascular death, stroke, MACCE, SE, and major bleeding were 16.0%, 3.3%, 19.8%, 5.1%, and 1.7%, respectively. The anticoagulation group had a significantly higher proportion of dilated cardiomyopathy than the non-anticoagulation group (24.7% vs. 5.5%, p < 0.001), and a lower LVEF (34.0 vs. 41.0, p < 0.001). The anticoagulation group also had a higher probability of adverse events on long-term follow-up (p > 0.05). A multivariable competing risk regression model found no significant difference in all six endpoints between the groups (all p > 0.05). Similar results were found by matched and weighted data analysis. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio (HR), 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.93; p = 0.027), renal insufficiency (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.60-3.50; p < 0.001), history of previous stroke (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13-2.29; p = 0.009), and HFrEF (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.78-3.64; p < 0.001) were predictors of increased risk of MACCE.
UNASSIGNED: Heart failure, rather than acute myocardial infarction, is currently the primary cause of LVT. A trend towards better prognosis in the no anticoagulation group was noted. Multivariable, matching and weighting analysis showed no improvement in prognosis with anticoagulant therapy. Our study does not negate the efficacy of anticoagulation but suggests the need to strengthen the management of anticoagulation in order to achieve better efficacy.

UNASSIGNED: Real-world, observational studies have investigated the safety profile of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) on Major Hemorrhage (MH) used for stroke prevention in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the comparative safety of DOACs versus other DOACs and versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We defined MH according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis statement or as the composite outcome of intracranial, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, respiratory, cavitary and musculoskeletal bleeding in case of studies using International Statistical Classification of Diseases codes for patient selection.
UNASSIGNED: We systematically investigated two databases (Medline, Embase) until April of 2021, gathered observational studies and extracted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) on our outcome of interest. Additional subgroup analyses according to DOAC dosing, prior diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, prior diagnosis of stroke, history of previous use of VKA, the users\' age, the users\' gender and study population geographic region were conducted. All analyses were performed with a random-effects model.
UNASSIGNED: From this search, 55 studies were included and 76 comparisons were performed. The MH risk associated with Rivaroxaban use was higher than the risk with Dabigatran use (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.21-1.45, I 2 : 12.39%) but similar to VKA use (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.87-1.02, I 2 : 76.57%). The MH risk associated with Dabigatran use was lower than the risk with VKA use (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.90, I 2 : 87.57%). The MH risk associated with Apixaban use was lower than the risk with Dabigatran use (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.88, I 2 : 58.66%), with Rivaroxaban use (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.50-0.68, I 2 : 74.16%) and with VKA use (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.55-0.65, I 2 : 58.83%). Our aforementioned subgroup analyses revealed similar results.
UNASSIGNED: All in all, Apixaban was associated with a reduced MH risk compared to Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban and VKA. Dabigatran was associated with a reduced MH risk compared to both Rivaroxaban and VKA.