The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) last published clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in 2019, with a partial update in 2020. In this new update to the guidelines, SEOM seeks to incorporate recent evidence, based on a critical review of the literature, to provide practical current recommendations for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of VTE in patients with cancer. Special clinical situations whose management and/or choice of currently recommended therapeutic options (low-molecular-weight heparins [LMWHs] or direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) is controversial are included.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults. Prevention of the ischaemic risk with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is widely recommended, and current clinical guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as preference therapy for stroke prevention. However, there are currently no clinical practice guidelines or recommendation documents on the optimal management of OACs in patients with AF that specifically address and adapt to the Central American and Caribbean context. The aim of this Delphi-like study is to respond to doubts that may arise in the management of OACs in patients with non-valvular AF in this geographical area. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, a recommended ADOLOPMENT-like approach, and the application of a two-round Delphi survey. In the first round, 31 recommendations were evaluated and 30 reached consensus, of which, 10 unanimously agreed. The study assessed expert opinions in a wide variety of contextualized recommendations for the optimal management of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There is a broad consensus on the clinical practice guideline (CPG) statements used related to anticoagulation indication, patient follow-up, anticoagulation therapy complications, COVID-19 management and prevention, and cardiac interventions.

In clinical practice, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention. A substantial proportion of patients with venous thromboembolism are also obese. International guidance published in 2016 stated that DOACs could be used in standard doses in patients with obesity up to a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2, but should not be used in those with severe obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2) owing to limited supporting data at the time. Although updated guidance in 2021 removed this limitation, some health care providers still avoid DOACs even in patients with lower levels of obesity. Furthermore, there are still evidence gaps regarding treatment of severe obesity, the role of peak and trough DOAC levels in these patients, use of DOACs after bariatric surgery, and appropriateness of DOAC dose reduction in the setting of secondary venous thromboembolism prevention. This document describes proceedings and outcomes of a multidisciplinary panel convened to review these and other key issues regarding DOAC use for treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism in individuals with obesity.

Annually, 15% of patients who receive oral anticoagulation require interruption for surgery or an invasive procedure. This study evaluates the adherence of patients with atrial fibrillation with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack to the Thrombosis Canada Perioperative guidelines for the discontinuation and reinitiation of anticoagulation treatment.
We collected data from a prospective patient survey at the Stroke Prevention Clinic in the University of Alberta hospital. Patients\' charts were reviewed from the electronic medical records, and adherence was looked at according to the Thrombosis Canada Perioperative guidelines for the interruption of anticoagulants.
During the study period (2016-2019), there were 509 patients surveyed. Anticoagulation treatment was interrupted in 150 patients with 98 interrupted for surgical or invasive procedures. The interruption was adherent to guidelines in only 29 (29.6%) of patients and inappropriate or nonadherent in 69 (70.4%) patients. There were seven ischemic strokes recorded during the period of interruption. The proportion of strokes was higher in patients whose anticoagulation interruption was longer than what the guidelines recommended (6/61 or 9.8%) when compared to those who adhered to recommended perioperative anticoagulation guidelines (1/29 or 3.4%).
Our results indicate that significant discrepancy with following the recommended perioperative anticoagulation guidelines is common in real-life practice. Delay in re-anticoagulation may increase the risk of complications.

These evidence-based guidelines from the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society intend to support clinicians in best decisions regarding the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Editor was selected by the three national societies and was tasked with the recruitment of the recognized panel. All financial support was solely derived from the sponsoring societies without the direct involvement of industry or other external stakeholders. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians in terms of VTE. The panel agreed on 42 recommendations under 15 headings for the diagnosis, initial management, secondary prevention of VTE, and treatment of recurrent VTE events. Important recommendations included the use of ultrasonography, preference for home treatment over hospital treatment for uncomplicated VTE, preference for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists for primary treatment of cancer and non-cancer-related VTE, extended or indefinite anticoagulation with DOACs in selected high-risk patients. Early catheter-directed thrombectomy was recommended in only young symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of fresh iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients with cancer and is one of the most common causes of increased morbidity and mortality. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) has been evaluated in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess efficacy and safety of using DOACs for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of CA-VTE and provide a summary for available guidelines\' recommendations.
METHODS: MEDLINE was searched to identify studies evaluating the use of DOACs for thromboprophylaxis or treatment in patients with cancer. Search was limited to peer-reviewed studies published in English. Studies were excluded if they were not RCTs or subgroup analyses of data derived from RCTs, if they did not report efficacy and safety data on patients with active cancer, or if they were published as an abstract. New VTE or VTE recurrence, and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were used to assess the efficacy and safety, respectively. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model risk ratios (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the pooled treatment effects of DOACs.
RESULTS: Four studies evaluating DOACs use for thromboprophylaxis and four - for treatment of CA-VTE were included. Thromboprophylaxis with DOACs was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic VTE (RR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.37,0.91) but with an incremental risk of major bleeding or CRNMB (RR = 1.57; 95%CI 1.10,2.26). CA-VTE treatment with DOACs was linked with a significant reduction in VTE recurrence (RR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.44,0.87) but with an incremental risk of CRNMB (RR = 1.58; 95%CI 1.11,2.24).
CONCLUSIONS: The DOACs are associated with a lower risk of symptomatic VTE and VTE recurrence, but the risk of bleeding remains a considerable concern. Clinical decisions should be made by assessing individual patient\'s risk of VTE and bleeding.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) requires long-term anticoagulation to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used in APS patients, but contradictory guidelines recommendations on their use do exist. We performed a systematic review of literature including studies investigating the role of DOACs in APS patients. At this aim, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 14 studies which investigated the use of DOACs in patients with APS, of which 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs, 7 case series and 3 cohort studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective). Among DOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used (n = 531), followed by dabigatran (n = 90) and apixaban (n = 46). Regarding guidelines indications, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend against the use of DOACs in all APS patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), British Society for Haematology (BSH), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance provided more detailed indications stating that warfarin should be the first-choice treatment but DOACs may be considered in patients (1) already on a stable anticoagulation with a DOAC, (2) with low-quality anticoagulation by warfarin, (3) unwilling/unable to undergo INR monitoring, (4) with contraindications or serious adverse events under warfarin. Patients with arterial APS or triple positivity should be treated with warfarin while venous APS with single or double positivity may be candidate to DOACs, but high-quality studies are needed.

OBJECTIVE: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are considered the mainstay in preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). OAC treatment remains suboptimal among AF patients, even after the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to assess trends overtime and current implementation of OAC treatment guidelines in AF, using a large dataset of real world data from Israel.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that includes all adult members of Clalit Health Services, the largest healthcare provider in Israel, with newly diagnosed nonvalvular AF between January 2014 and December 2019 with CHA2 DS2 -VASc score ≥2. OAC treatment rates were calculated and multivariate regression models were used to identify predictors of OACs initiation.
RESULTS: Overall, 46 531 patients were included in the study. The 3-months cumulative OAC treatment rates increased consistently over the years: 46.9% (95% confidence interval, 46.1-47.7%), 54.9% (54.1-55.6%) and 61.7% (60.9-62.4%) during 2014-2015, 2016-2017 and 2018-2019, respectively. DOACs constituted 51.3% of prescribed OACs in 2014-2015 and increased to 95.1% during 2018-2019. On multivariate analyses, the likelihood of OACs initiation among AF patients increased across the years and across higher socioeconomic classes, and was more likely among females, Jews, statins users and patients previously screened for colorectal cancer, but less likely among smokers and patients with impaired renal function. The likelihood of treatment increased with higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc score and decreased with higher HAS-BLED score.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing OAC treatment rates among high-risk AF patients, mainly attributed to the expanding DOAC use, OAC treatment scope is still far from optimal.

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has become a standard of treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT). Until recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have not had data about efficacy and safety in cancer patients. However, in the last two years, four randomized open-label studies comparing DOAC and LMWH in the treatment of CAT have been published. The first one was a large trial with edoxaban, followed by two smaller studies with rivaroxaban and apixaban, and, recently, by another large trial with apixaban. There are some differences among the studies concerning design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, length of treatment. In summary, DOAC are associated with a trend to the reduction of the risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism; however, this is at the expense of some increase in bleeding risk. This risk is differential; the prevailing site of bleeding is the upper part of gastrointestinal tract, and, to a lesser extent, genitourinary tract. The updated guidelines for the treatment of CAT suggest DOAC as an alternative, however with careful consideration of the risk of bleeding and the risk of drug interactions. So far, the guidelines have mentioned edoxaban and rivaroxaban. With emerging evidence, apixaban is expected to play a role as well.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are mostly prescribed to prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of guidelines recommend DOAC in AF patients with preserved renal function for the prevention of thromboembolism and an increased use of DOAC in daily practice is recorded also in elderly patients. Aging is associated with a reduction of glomerular filtration rate and impaired renal function, regardless of the cause, increases the risk of bleeding. Multiple medication use (polypharmacy) for treating superimposed co-morbidities is common in both elderly and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and drug-drug interaction may cause accumulation of DOAC, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. There is uncertainty on the safety profile of DOAC in patients with CKD, particularly in those with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease, due to the heterogeneity of studies and the relative paucity of data. This document reports the position of three Italian scientific societies engaged in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation who are treated with DOAC and present with CKD.