OBJECTIVE: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) aim to prevent adverse drug events. However, these systems generate an overload of alerts that are not always clinically relevant. Anticoagulants are frequently involved in these alerts. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of CDSS alerts on anticoagulants in Dutch hospital pharmacies.
METHODS: A multicentre, single-day, cross-sectional study was conducted using a flashmob design in Dutch hospital pharmacies, which have CDSSs that operate on both a national medication surveillance database and on self-developed clinical rules. Hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians collected data on the number and type of alerts and time needed for assessing these alerts. The primary outcome was the CDSS efficiency on anticoagulants, defined as the percentage of alerts on anticoagulants that led to an intervention. Secondary outcomes where among other CDSSs efficiency related to any medications and the time expenditure. Descriptive data-analysis was used.
RESULTS: Of the 69 hospital pharmacies invited, 42 (61%) participated. The efficiency of CDSS alerts on anticoagulants was 4.0% (interquartile range [IQR] 14.0%) for the national medication surveillance database alerts and 14.3% (IQR 40.0%) for alerts from clinical rules. For any medication, the efficiency was lower: 1.8% (IQR 7.5%) and 13.4% (IQR 21.5%) respectively. The median time for assessing the relevance of all alerts was 2 (IQR 1:21) h/day for pharmacists and 6 (IQR 5:01) h/day for pharmacy technicians.
CONCLUSIONS: CDSS efficiency is generally low, both for anticoagulants and any medication, while the time investment is high. Optimization of CDSSs is needed.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, serious condition that requires anticoagulation for at least three months to prevent recurrence and long-term complications. After this initial period, the decision to continue or stop anticoagulation depends on the balance between the risk of recurrent VTE and the risk of bleeding. Established guidelines suggest short-term anticoagulation for VTE caused by transient factors and indefinite anticoagulation for recurrent or cancer-associated VTE. However, for a first unprovoked VTE, decision-making remains challenging. Current predictive scores for recurrence and bleeding are not sufficiently reliable, and the safety and efficacy of reduced-dose anticoagulation remain unclear. In the future, precision and patient-centred medicine may improve treatment decisions in this area.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first line anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, patients with severe inherited thrombophilias represent a group where the efficiency and safety of DOACs is poorly studied. In this communication, we focus on the utility of DOACs in the secondary prevention of VTE in patients with severe thrombophilia. Current evidence is based only on cohort or single center studies, and poor data is available on compliance of the patients in the studies. Analysis of the studies suggested that full-dose DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have a similar efficacy and bleeding risk in the secondary prevention of VTE in patients with thrombophilia; with a low hazard ratio for recurrent VTE calculated from cohort studies for DOAC vs warfarin, ranging from 0.3 to 0.75. We wish to highlight that treatment failure is greater in those with severe forms of Protein S deficiency (below 20%), and possibly in AT deficiency Type II HBS homozygous Budapest 3. In summary, the current approach to using DOACs in patients with severe thrombophilia is dependent on clinical judgment and experience. Limited evidence suggests that for those with severe thrombophilias, full dose DOACs have similar utility as VKAs. We recommend caution in using low - dose DOACs due to lack of evidence. Ideally large randomized multicenter studies are required to develop a reliable treatment algorithm.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of kinase inhibitors with warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
METHODS: An in vitro CYP probe substrate cocktail assay was used to study the inhibitory effects of fifteen kinase inhibitors on CYP2C9, 3A, and 1A2. Then, DDI predictions were performed using both mechanistic static and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.
RESULTS: Linsitinib, masitinib, regorafenib, tozasertib, trametinib, and vatalanib were identified as competitive CYP2C9 inhibitors (Ki = 1.4, 1.0, 1.1, 3.8, 0.5, and 0.1 μM, respectively). Masitinib and vatalanib were competitive CYP3A inhibitors (Ki = 1.3 and 0.2 μM), and vatalanib noncompetitively inhibited CYP1A2 (Ki = 2.0 μM). Moreover, linsitinib and tozasertib were CYP3A time-dependent inhibitors (KI = 26.5 and 400.3 μM, kinact = 0.060 and 0.026 min-1, respectively). Only linsitinib showed time-dependent inhibition of CYP1A2 (KI = 13.9 μM, kinact = 0.018 min-1). Mechanistic static models identified possible DDI risks for linsitinib and vatalanib with (S)-/(R)-warfarin, and for masitinib with (S)-warfarin. PBPK simulations further confirmed that vatalanib may increase (S)- and (R)-warfarin exposure by 4.37- and 1.80-fold, respectively, and that linsitinib may increase (R)-warfarin exposure by 3.10-fold. Mechanistic static models predicted a smaller risk of DDIs between kinase inhibitors and apixaban or rivaroxaban. The greatest AUC increases (1.50-1.74) were predicted for erlotinib in combination with apixaban and rivaroxaban. Linsitinib, masitinib, and vatalanib were predicted to have a smaller effect on apixaban and rivaroxaban AUCs (AUCR 1.22-1.53). No kinase inhibitor was predicted to increase edoxaban exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that several kinase inhibitors, including vatalanib and linsitinib, can cause CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions with warfarin and, to a lesser extent, with apixaban and rivaroxaban. The work provides mechanistic insights into the risk of DDIs between kinase inhibitors and anticoagulants, which can be used to avoid preventable DDIs in the clinic.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) changed stroke prevention and decreased the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy. The numbers of patients prescribed DOACs has increased rapidly. Availability of specific reversal agents opened new avenues in the prevention and management of DOAC complications. An ideal specific reversal agent for a DOAC in acute stroke is an agent which lacks safety concerns and immediately reverses DOAC anticoagulation activity, thereby enabling effective treatment. Reversal of anticoagulant activity is mandatory in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) before performing therapeutic procedures such as intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and neurosurgery in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in order to improve clinical outcomes. In this manuscript we pursue an interdisciplinary approach in discussing advantages and concerns of specific reversal agents in acute stroke DOAC-treated patients in everyday clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess if dicloxacillin/flucloxacillin reduces the therapeutic efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the underlying molecular mechanism.
METHODS: In a randomized, crossover study, we assessed whether dicloxacillin reduces oral absorption of drugs through P-glycoprotein (P-gp) during 10 and 28 days of treatment. To study the impact of dicloxacillin/flucloxacillin on intestinal and hepatic expression of P-gp in vitro, we usd LS174T cells and 3D spheroids of primary human hepatocytes. Finally, we used nationwide Danish health registries and the UK\'s Clinical Practice Research Datalink to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of stroke and systemic embolism following dicloxacillin/flucloxacillin exposure among DOAC users, using phenoxymethylpenicillin and amoxicillin as active comparators.
RESULTS: Dicloxacillin reduced the area under the curve of dabigatran to a geometric mean ratio 10 days of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.1) and geometric mean ratio 28 days of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.39-1.4), suggesting reduced oral absorption via increased P-gp expression. In vitro, dicloxacillin raised P-gp expression in both intestinal and liver cells, while flucloxacillin only affected liver cells. In the pharmacoepidemiologic study, dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin were not associated with increased risk of stroke/systemic embolism (dicloxacillin vs. phenoxymethylpenicillin HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.72-1.2; flucloxacillin vs. amoxicillin HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.51-1.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Dicloxacillin increases expression of intestinal P-gp, leading to reduced oral absorption of dabigatran. However, concomitant use of dicloxacillin/flucloxacillin was not associated with stroke and systemic embolism among DOAC users, suggesting no clinical impact from the drug-drug interaction between dicloxacillin/flucloxacillin and DOACs.

BACKGROUND: Since several studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), we conducted a meta-analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2024. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures to compare DOACs with VKAs.
RESULTS: A total of 9 observational studies were included. The pooled analysis revealed that a trend towards higher complete recanalization rates with DOACs (71.4%) compared to VKAs (55.3%), though not statistically significant (OR 1.95; 95%CI 0.70 to 5.44). For SVT extension, a significant effect was observed favoring DOACs (OR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.54). No significant differences were found in other efficacy outcomes or safety outcomes, except for major bleeding, which was significantly lower with DOACs (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: DOACs are superior to VKAs in SVT extension and major bleeding, suggesting that DOACs may be a favorable treatment option in the treatment of SVT.

UNASSIGNED: The All Nippon Atrial Fibrillation In the Elderly Registry provides real-world insights into non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in >30,000 elderly Japanese patients (aged ≥75 years), including >2,000 nonagenarians. We aimed to investigate outcomes in these patients by age and oral anticoagulant (OAC) type.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort, 2-year follow-up study included elderly patients with NVAF who were able to attend hospital visits. The incidences of stroke/systemic embolic events (SEE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events (MACNE) were evaluated by age. Incidence rates increased significantly with age. Stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and ICH incidences plateaued in patients aged ≥90 years. Direct OACs (DOACs) yielded a numerically lower event incidence vs. warfarin in all age groups and endpoints, except for major bleeding in patients aged ≥90 years. DOACs (vs. warfarin) were significantly associated with a lower risk of stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and ICH in the ≥80-<85 years group, and reduced cardiovascular and all-cause death in the ≥75-<80 years group. In the ≥90 years subgroup, major bleeding history was a risk factor for all-cause death.
UNASSIGNED: Although DOAC vs. warfarin offers potential benefits for stroke prevention, limitations occurred in reducing major bleeding among those aged ≥90 years, indicating a potential benefit of very-low-dose DOAC for this demographic.

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) last published clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in 2019, with a partial update in 2020. In this new update to the guidelines, SEOM seeks to incorporate recent evidence, based on a critical review of the literature, to provide practical current recommendations for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of VTE in patients with cancer. Special clinical situations whose management and/or choice of currently recommended therapeutic options (low-molecular-weight heparins [LMWHs] or direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) is controversial are included.

BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) pose a significant risk, particularly in the elderly population on anticoagulation therapy. The safety of discharging these patients from the emergency department (ED) with a negative initial computed tomography (CT) scan has been debated due to the risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (d-ICH).
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes, including d-ICH, between elderly patients on anticoagulation therapy presenting with mTBI who were admitted versus discharged from the ED after an initial negative head CT scan.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, assessing outcomes of 1598 elderly patients on anticoagulation therapy who presented with mTBI and an initial negative head CT scan. Patients were either admitted for 24-h observation (Group A, n = 829) or discharged immediately from the ED (Group B, n = 769). The primary outcome was incidence of d-ICH within 14 days.
RESULTS: Among the 1598 patients included in the study, 46 admitted patients and 1 discharged patient returned within 14 days for repeat CT, identifying one asymptomatic hemorrhage in the discharged patient. Mortality at 30 days was significantly higher in admitted patients compared to discharged patients (4.8% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.001), though cause of death was unrelated to head injury in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients on anticoagulation with mTBI and a negative initial CT, admission was associated with a higher risk of d-ICH compared to discharge. These findings have implications for clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.