BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been widely applied in adults for thrombosis prophylaxis. However, the effect of DOACs in pediatric patients with congenital or acquired heart diseases who need anticoagulation therapy remains unclear.
METHODS: We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and the World Health Organization\'s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until June 2024 to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). If the number of included studies was less than 5, we performed a narrative review to assess the effect of DOACs in pediatric patients.
RESULTS: Four studies were included. In the UNIVERSE study, thrombotic events occurred in 2% of the rivaroxaban group and 9% of the aspirin group, with bleeding events in 36% and 41%, respectively. The ENNOBLE-ATE study showed no thromboembolic events in the edoxaban group and 1.7% in the SOC group (rate difference: -0.07%, 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.07%). Major bleeding rates were similar (rate difference: -0.03%, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.12%). The SAXOPHONE trial showed no thromboembolic events in either group and similar major bleeding rates (-0.8%, 95% CI: -8.1 to 3.3%). In the DIVERSITY trial, 81% of dabigatran patients achieved the primary outcome versus 59.3% in the SOC group (Odds ratio: 0.342, 95% CI: 0.081-1.229). No major bleeding occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing studies suggest that the use of DOACs hold promise as an effective and safe alternative for preventing and treating thromboembolism in pediatric patients with heart conditions.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a predominant contributor to morbidity and mortality, and stroke prevention remains the mainstay for the management of AF. The precise mechanism involved in thrombus formation remains unknown. However, factors such as stretch-induced fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, disordered atrial contractions, and pro-thrombotic states have been postulated for the development of AF. Various risk assessment strategies have been acknowledged for determining the risk of stroke in AF, of which the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age between 65-74, and female sex (CHA2DS2-VASc) score remains the ultimate risk stratification tool. For the longest time, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only oral anticoagulants available but were associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were approved and considered more efficient and safer than or as secure as warfarin in stroke prevention and lowering intra-cranial bleeding events. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DOACs were also clarified in this article. This review article compiles current evidence-based data on the role of DOACs, uncovering their underlying mechanisms, and comparing their efficacy with warfarin in stroke prevention in AF.

UNASSIGNED: Real-world, observational studies have investigated the safety profile of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) on Major Hemorrhage (MH) used for stroke prevention in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the comparative safety of DOACs versus other DOACs and versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We defined MH according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis statement or as the composite outcome of intracranial, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, respiratory, cavitary and musculoskeletal bleeding in case of studies using International Statistical Classification of Diseases codes for patient selection.
UNASSIGNED: We systematically investigated two databases (Medline, Embase) until April of 2021, gathered observational studies and extracted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) on our outcome of interest. Additional subgroup analyses according to DOAC dosing, prior diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, prior diagnosis of stroke, history of previous use of VKA, the users\' age, the users\' gender and study population geographic region were conducted. All analyses were performed with a random-effects model.
UNASSIGNED: From this search, 55 studies were included and 76 comparisons were performed. The MH risk associated with Rivaroxaban use was higher than the risk with Dabigatran use (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.21-1.45, I 2 : 12.39%) but similar to VKA use (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.87-1.02, I 2 : 76.57%). The MH risk associated with Dabigatran use was lower than the risk with VKA use (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.90, I 2 : 87.57%). The MH risk associated with Apixaban use was lower than the risk with Dabigatran use (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.88, I 2 : 58.66%), with Rivaroxaban use (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.50-0.68, I 2 : 74.16%) and with VKA use (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.55-0.65, I 2 : 58.83%). Our aforementioned subgroup analyses revealed similar results.
UNASSIGNED: All in all, Apixaban was associated with a reduced MH risk compared to Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban and VKA. Dabigatran was associated with a reduced MH risk compared to both Rivaroxaban and VKA.

Background: Real-world data show limited utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) due to concerns regarding their efficacy and safety in this demographic. Aim: This review aimed to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE). The primary efficacy outcome assessed a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism (SE), and myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 28, 2023. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 35 studies involving 434,320 participants were analyzed. DOAC use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of the composite outcome (RR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.65, 0.98], I2 = 95%), hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88], I2 = 92%), major bleeding (RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.63, 0.92], I2 = 94%), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.49, 0.72], I2 = 88%), and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.34, 0.60], I2 = 44%) compared to warfarin. A non-significant benefit of DOACs was observed for all-cause mortality, MI, the composite of stroke or SE, ischemic stroke, SE, VTE, and minor bleeding compared to warfarin. Subgroup analysis indicated no significant effect modification based on the indication for anticoagulation or study design. Conclusions: DOACs demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in obese individuals compared to warfarin.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the preferred option for treatment of venous thromboembolism due to their favorable profile compared with other agents such as vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin. However, findings from randomized controlled trials suggest efficacy and/or safety concerns with DOAC use in some clinical contexts. This illustrated review will summarize indications where DOACs have proven efficacy and safety, situations where they fall short, and situations where uncertainty remains compared with other treatments for venous thromboembolism.

UNASSIGNED: This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients on dialysis.
UNASSIGNED: All types of studies published on PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up to 10 September 2023 and comparing outcomes of apixaban vs. VKA in dialysis patients were eligible.
UNASSIGNED: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six retrospective studies were included. Apixaban treatment was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.77; I2 = 50%) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98, I2 = 9%) compared to VKA. Meta-analysis also showed that the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.85, I2 = 16%) and intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.84, I2 = 0%) was significantly reduced with apixaban. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.06, 2.69, I2 = 0%), mortality (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.74, 2.16, I2 = 94%) and recurrent venous thromboembolism (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.21, I2 = 0%) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed no difference in bleeding outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Low-quality evidence from a mix of RCTs and retrospective studies shows that apixaban may have better safety and equivalent efficacy as compared to VKA in dialysis patients. Apixaban treatment correlated with significantly reduced risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in observational studies but not in RCTs. The predominance of retrospective data warrants caution in the interpretation of results.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and their comparison with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), conflicting results have been reported regarding the optimal treatment for left ventricular thrombosis (LVT).
OBJECTIVE: In this meta-analysis, we intend to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of these treatments.
METHODS: All clinical trials and cohorts that compared the efficacy or safety of VKAs with DOACs in the treatment of LVTs were systematically searched until April 15, 2023.
RESULTS: The results of 32 studies with a pooled sample size of 4213 patients were extracted for meta-analysis. DOACs, especially rivaroxaban and apixaban, cause faster resolution, lower mortality, and fewer complications (SSE and bleeding events) than VKAs in the management of LVTs.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with VKAs, DOACs result in significantly faster (only rivaroxaban) and safer resolution of left ventricular thrombosis.

UNASSIGNED: Recent guidelines suggest that antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care in the absence of long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) indications in patients post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The superiority of one method over the other remains controversial.
UNASSIGNED: Several databases, including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, were electronically searched. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/TIA, haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, systemic embolism, and valve thrombosis in post-TAVR patients receiving APT and oral anticoagulants (OACs). Forest plots were generated using Review Manager version 5.4, with a p value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies were selected. No significant differences were observed in APT and OAC group for ACM [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI:0.45-1.01; P=0.05], cardiovascular death [RR:0.91; 95% CI:0.73-1.14; P=0.42], MI [RR:1.69; 95% CI:0.43-6.72; P=0.46], Stroke/TIA [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.58-1.06; P=0.12], ischaemic stroke [RR:0.83; 95% CI:0.50-1.37; P=0.47], haemorrhagic stroke [RR:1.08; 95% CI: 0.23-5.15; P=0.92], major bleeding [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.51-1.21; P=0.28], minor bleeding [RR:1.09; 95% CI: 0.80-1.47; P=0.58], life-threatening bleeding [RR:0.85; 95% CI:0.55-1.30; P=0.45], any bleeding [RR:0.98; 95% CI:0.83-1.15; P=0.78], and systemic embolism [RR:0.87; 95% CI:0.44-1.70; P=0.68]. The risk of valve thrombosis was higher in patients receiving APT than in those receiving OAC [RR:2.61; 95% CI:1.56-4.36; P =0.0002].
UNASSIGNED: Although the risk of valve thrombosis increased in patients receiving APT, the risk of other endpoints was comparable between the two groups.

BACKGROUND: Currently published studies have not observed consistent results on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) combined with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, this study conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of DOACs for patients with AF complicated with CKD.
METHODS: Database literature was searched up to May 30, 2023, to include randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving patients with AF complicated with CKD DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Stroke, systemic embolism (SE), and all-cause mortality were used as effectiveness indicators, and major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), fatal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were used as safety outcomes.
RESULTS: Nine RCT studies were included for analysis according to the inclusion criteria. Results of the efficacy analysis showed that compared with VKAs, DOACs reduced the incidence of stroke/SE (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84) and all-cause deaths (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93) in patients with AF who had comorbid CKD. Safety analyses showed that compared with VKAs, DOACs improved safety by reducing the risk of major bleeding (OR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.65-0.90), ICH (OR = 0.46, 95%CI 0.38-0.56), and fatal bleeding (OR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.65-0.87), but did not reduce the incidence of GIB and CRNMB.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with VKAs, DOACs may increase efficacy and improve safety in AF patients with CKD (90 ml/min> Crcl≥15 ml/min), and shows at least similar efficacy and safety in AF patients with Kidney failure (Crcl<15 ml/min).

UNASSIGNED: Prescribing DOACs presents with challenges in the elderly and patients with renal and hepatic impairment. To mitigate safety risks, pharmacists have a role in detection, prevention, and resolution of DOAC-associated drug-related problems (DRPs).
UNASSIGNED: To identify the types of DOAC-associated DRPs in patients on DOAC therapy and factors that predispose patients to DOAC-associated DRPs.
UNASSIGNED: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in SGH from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019, on patients prescribed with a DOAC (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban). Data were electronically extracted for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and details of DOAC-related DRPs identified by pharmacists. Matching of DRP group to non-DRP group at a ratio of 1:2 based on gender, race, and DOAC was performed. The DRP group included patients with detected DRPs while non-DRP group included patients without them. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize patient characteristics and types of DOAC-associated DRPs. In the matched population, conditional logistic regression was used to calculate unadjusted (UOR) and adjusted odds (AOR) ratio to detect association of DOAC-associated DRPs with age, renal function, ≥2 comorbidities, and DOAC indication (atrial fibrillation [AF] vs venous thromboembolism).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 8432 patients prescribed DOACs were analyzed, which consisted of 827 (9.8%) and 7602 (90.2%) patients with DRPs and no DRPs, respectively. The top DOAC-associated DRP was inappropriate drug regimen (n = 487, 60.1%). After matching, 2403 patients were analyzed, consisting of 801 patients from DRP group and 1602 from non-DRP group. Factors associated with DOAC-associated DRPs were statistically significant for renal function at creatinine clearance (CrCl) of >30 to 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (AOR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.14-1.76; P = .002), 15 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.42-2.66; P < .001), and <15 mL/min/1.73m2 (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.13-4.88; P = .022), respectively, compared with a CrCl of >50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and DOAC indication for AF (AOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.47-2.30; P < .001) compared with venous thromboembolism.
UNASSIGNED: Inappropriate drug regimen was the most common DOAC-associated DRP. Impaired renal function and patients with AF increased the likelihood of DOAC-associated DRPs.