背景:病虫害是撒哈拉以南非洲产量损失的主要原因,促使小农寻求具有成本效益的,可获得的和生态友好的作物保护替代品。这项研究探索了影响Ehlanzeni区八个选定村庄农作物的病虫害的管理,姆普马兰加省,南非。
方法:利用雪球技术有目的地选择了120个小农。使用半结构化访谈时间表,通过访谈和焦点小组讨论收集了有关植物病虫害管理的信息。民族植物学指数,包括相对引用频率(RFC),使用价值(UV)和线人共识因子(FIC),用于对研究区域中用于作物保护的植物进行量化和排名。
结果:属于16个科的23种植物(16种自然外来植物和7种本地植物)用于管理害虫(脊椎动物和无脊椎动物)和影响作物的疾病(真菌和细菌相关)研究区域。参与者种植的主要(100%)作物是洋葱,印度芒果,SolanumlycopersicumL.和ZeamaysL.RFC值范围为0.08至0.83,三种最受欢迎的作物保护植物是CapciumannuumL.(0.83),A.cepa(0.63)和Dichrostachyscinerea(L.)怀特和阿恩。(0.43)。就UV而言,用作生物防治的五种最有前途的植物是Tulbaghiaviolacea(0.13),A.cepa(0.12),C.annuumL.(0.09),茄属喜树根。前A.Richi.(0.09)和松果松(0.08)。基于FIC,建立了四个类别,并以真菌病为主(0.64)。此外,紫罗兰T.和A.cepa是最常被提及的对抗真菌条件的植物。引用的其他类别是细菌性疾病(0.3),无脊椎动物害虫(0.11)和脊椎动物害虫(0.14),这表明小农对用于其管理的植物的共识或常识有限。制备方法包括浸渍(38%),汤剂(38%)和灼烧(24%)。在处理作物病虫害期间,叶面施用(67%)和土壤浸透(33%)用于施用植物提取物。
结论:该研究强调了植物药和相关土著知识在姆普马兰加省小农中的重要性,南非。通过生成有关其生物功效和植物化学概况的经验数据来探索这些植物药的价值是相关的。
BACKGROUND: Pests and diseases are a major contributor to yield losses in sub-Saharan Africa, prompting smallholder farmers to seek cost-effective, accessible and ecologically friendly alternatives for crop protection. This study explored the management of pests and diseases affecting crops across eight selected villages in Ehlanzeni District, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.
METHODS: A total of 120 smallholder farmers were purposefully selected utilising the snowball technique. Information on the management of plant pests and diseases was collected through interviews and focus group discussions using semi-structured interview schedules. Ethnobotanical indices, including relative frequency of citation (RFC), use-value (UV) and informant consensus factor (Fic), were used to quantify and rank the plants used for crop protection in the study area.
RESULTS: Twenty-three plant species (16 naturalised exotics and seven indigenous plants) belonging to 16 families were used for managing pests (vertebrates and invertebrates) and diseases (fungal and bacterial related) affecting crops in the study area. The dominant (100%) crops cultivated by the participants were Allium cepa L., Mangifera indica L., Solanum lycopersicum L. and Zea mays L. The RFC value ranged from 0.08 to 0.83 and the three most popular plants for crop protection were Capsium annuum L. (0.83), A. cepa (0.63) and Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. (0.43). In terms of the UV, the five most promising plants used as biocontrol were Tulbaghia violacea (0.13), A. cepa (0.12), C. annuum L. (0.09), Solanum campylacanthum Hochst. Ex A.Rich.(0.09) and Pinus pinaster (0.08). Based on the Fic, four categories were established and dominated by fungal diseases (0.64). Furthermore, T. violacea and A. cepa were the most often mentioned plants used against fungal conditions. Other categories cited were bacterial diseases (0.3), invertebrate pests (0.11) and vertebrate pests (0.14), an indication that smallholder farmers had limited agreement or common knowledge about the plants used for their management. The preparation methods included maceration (38%), decoction (38%) and burning (24%). Foliar application (67%) and soil drenching (33%) were used for administering plant extracts during the management of crop pests and diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the importance of botanicals and associated indigenous knowledge among smallholder farmers in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. It is pertinent to explore the valorisation of these botanicals by generating empirical data on their biological efficacies and phytochemical profiles.