core stability

堆芯稳定性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰骶移行椎骨(LSTV)是一种常见的脊柱变体,报告的患病率从8.1%到36%不等。LSTV已被证明可以改变腰骨盆参数并降低全髋关节置换术的益处,但LSTV对髋关节发育的具体影响尚不清楚。因此,这项研究的目的是研究LSTV对髋关节发育改变的影响。
    根据全身计算机断层扫描(CT)成像,将总共310个人分为三组:一组23个骶骨前椎骨(PSV)(n=102),一组腰痛为25PSV(n=108),和24PSV的正常对照组(n=100)。腰骨盆髋关节复合体(LPHC)的定量参数,包括腰椎前凸(LL),骨盆发病率(PI),骨盆倾斜(PT),骶骨斜坡(SS),轴向和矢状髋臼前倾角(AAA),中心边缘(CE)角,锐角,测量和分析股骨颈干角(FNSA)。统计分析用于比较三组之间这些定量参数的差异,并评估髋关节和腰椎-骨盆参数之间的关系。
    仅在矢状AAA中发现了三组中每对与LSTV亚组之间的显着差异(左侧:P=0.008;右侧:P<0.001),没有发现其他参数的差异。与正常组(24PSV)相比,23PSV和25PSV组在矢状AAA中均表现出增加的值,尤其是在23PSV组的右侧。仅矢状AAA与PI(r=0.195-0.429;P=0.001-0.08)和PT(r=0.239-0.605;P=0.001-0.03)的骨盆参数呈低至中度正相关。
    LSTV的变化与通过LPHC传播的髋关节解剖发育相关,并可能降低髋臼矢状覆盖,特别是在右侧的23PSV亚型中。
    UNASSIGNED: Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is a common spinal variant, with the reported prevalence varying from 8.1% to 36%. LSTV has been shown to alter the lumbo-pelvic parameters and reduce the benefits of total hip arthroplasty, but the specific effects of LSTV on hip development remain unclear. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the impact of LSTV on developmental alterations of the hip.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 310 individuals were categorized into three groups according to whole-body computed tomography (CT) imaging: a group with sacralization of 23 presacral vertebrae (PSV) (n=102), a group with lumbarization of 25 PSV (n=108), and a normal control group with 24 PSV (n=100). Quantitative parameters of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (LPHC) including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), axial and sagittal acetabular anteversion angle (AAA), center-edge (CE) angle, Sharp angle, and femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA) were measured and analyzed. Statistical analyses were used to compare the differences of these quantitative parameters among the three groups and to assess the relationship between hip and lumbar-pelvic parameters.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences between each pair of three groups and the LSTV subgroups were only found in the sagittal AAA (left side: P=0.008; right side: P<0.001), with no differences found for the other parameters. Compared to the normal group (24 PSV), both the 23 PSV and 25 PSV groups exhibited increased values in the sagittal AAA, especially in the right side of the 23 PSV group. Only the sagittal AAA showed low-to-moderate positive correlations with pelvic parameters of PI (r=0.195-0.429; P=0.001-0.08) and PT (r=0.239-0.605; P=0.001-0.03).
    UNASSIGNED: Variations of LSTV are correlated with the hip anatomical development via LPHC transmission and may potentially reduce the sagittal acetabular coverage, particularly in the 23 PSV subtype on the right side.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:工作场所健康促进(WHP)治疗背痛的项目传统上只关注与工作相关的问题,而不关注脊柱的休闲压力。我们开发了一个全面的WHP项目,该项目涉及医院工作人员的背部健康,无论其工作的身体特征如何,并比较了其对久坐和身体活跃的医院工作人员的影响。
    方法:在参与WHP干预之前和之后6个月进行研究评估。主要结局参数是背痛(Oswestry残疾指数,ODI)。焦虑(广义焦虑症-7),工作能力(工作能力指数),抑郁症(患者健康问卷-9),压力(感知压力量表-10),和生活质量(简表-36)通过问卷作为次要结局参数进行评估.物理性能通过30秒坐立测试(30secSTS)测量。
    结果:68名非特异性背痛的医护人员被纳入WHP项目“BackHealth24/7/365”的评估研究。六个月后,背痛,物理性能,两组的自我感知的身体功能(SF-36身体功能分量表)均显着改善。没有一个参数显示出与组分配的交互作用。
    结论:全面的WHP干预对医院工作人员显示出显著的积极影响,无论其工作的身体特征如何。
    BACKGROUND: Projects for workplace health promotion (WHP) for back pain traditionally focus exclusively on work-related but not on leisure-time stress on the spine. We developed a comprehensive WHP project on the back health of hospital workers regardless of the physical characteristics of their work and compared its effects on sedentary and physically active hospital workers.
    METHODS: Study assessments were carried out before and six months after participation in the WHP intervention. The primary outcome parameter was back pain (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI). Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), work ability (Work Ability Index), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed via questionnaires as secondary outcome parameters. Physical performance was measured via the 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand test (30secSTS).
    RESULTS: Sixty-eight healthcare workers with non-specific back pain were included in the evaluation study of the WHP project \"Back Health 24/7/365\". After six months, back pain, physical performance, and self-perceived physical functioning (SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale) improved significantly in both groups. Not a single parameter showed an interaction effect with the group allocation.
    CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive WHP-intervention showed significant positive effects on hospital workers regardless of the physical characteristics of their work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是观察核心稳定训练是否在功能性能测试期间对消防员完成时间起着重要作用。使用受试者内研究设计,其中受试者(n=13,84.6%男性,33.7±7.4岁,91.06±13.29kg,身体脂肪25.79±6.55%,包括7次针对消防员的练习,穿着22.68公斤重的背心模仿典型的消防员装备。在测试会话之间,受试者接受特定的核心稳定训练,每周至少进行3天,共4周.在第一次(300.89±42.11s)和第二次(256.92±34.31s)性能测试之间,完成时间明显更快,平均43.8秒(p<0.001)。在整个研究过程中,体重指数(p=0.065)和测试过程中感知的劳累等级(p=0.084)并未显着降低。足够的健身对消防员的工作任务表现至关重要。这项研究的数据表明,定期进行核心稳定训练可能有助于优化有效性,和潜在的安全,消防员在高强度功能技能方面的表现。
    The purpose of this study was to observe if core stabilization training plays a significant role in firefighter time-to-completion during a functional performance test. A within subjects study design was used in which subjects (n = 13, 84.6% male, 33.7 ± 7.4 years of age, 91.06 ± 13.29 kg, 25.79 ± 6.55 percent body fat, 8.96 ± 7.51 years of firefighting experience) completed two performance tests (pre and post core training), comprised of 7 firefighter-specific exercises performed while wearing a 22.68 kg weight vest to mimic typical firefighter equipment. Between testing sessions, subjects were prescribed specific core stabilization exercises to perform at least three days a week for a total of 4 weeks. Time-to-completion was significantly quicker between the first (300.89 ± 42.11s) and second (256.92 ± 34.31s) performance testing, on average by 43.8 seconds (p < 0.001). Body mass index (p = 0.065) and rating of perceived exertion during testing (p = 0.084) did not significantly decrease across the course of the study. Adequate fitness is essential to firefighters\' job task performance. Data from this study suggests that regular core stabilization training may assist in optimizing the effectiveness, and potentially safety, of firefighters\' performance in high intensity functional skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非特异性慢性下腰痛(NSCLBP)是一种普遍的疾病,影响90%的经历下腰痛的个体。核心稳定练习(CSE)是管理NSCLBP最常用的治疗方法。然而,等长型(ISOM)和等渗(ISOT)型CSE在NSCLBP治疗中的优异有效性仍存在不确定性.
    本研究的主要目的是比较ISOM和ISOT锻炼对NSCLBP患者疼痛和残疾的疗效。此外,本研究旨在评估ISOM和ISOT在这些患者中的有效性,并与未对这些变量进行干预相比.
    这项研究是一项随机对照试验,涉及41名男性和女性患有NSCLBP。参与者被随机分为三组:ISOMCSE(n=13),ISOTCSE(n=14),和waitlist控件(n=14)。运动训练在长达8周的时间内每周三次进行40-60分钟。在干预前后测量疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表或VAS评估)和残疾(通过Oswestry残疾指数或ODI评估)变量。
    根据结果,两个运动组(ISOM和ISOT)在疼痛和残疾方面没有显着差异。然而,ISOM组的数值结果优于ISOT组。ISOM和ISOT组的疼痛水平均显著下降,随着ISOM的VAS评分从5.5降至2.7,ISOT的VAS评分从5.8降至3.7,与对照组相比(分别为P<0.001和P=0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,ISOM组(ODI评分为17~11分)和ISOT组(ODI评分为15.4~11分)的平均残疾均有显著改善(P<0.001).
    ISOM和ISOT方法均可有效缓解NSCLBP患者的疼痛和残疾。然而,它们之间的好处没有显着差异。数字上,ISOM练习被发现是优越的。需要进一步的研究才能获得关于其优越性的更准确的答案。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a prevalent condition that affects 90% of individuals experiencing low back pain. Core stabilization exercises (CSE) stand out as the most commonly employed therapeutic approach for managing NSCLBP. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty regarding the superior effectiveness between isometric (ISOM) and isotonic (ISOT) types of CSE in the treatment of NSCLBP.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ISOM and ISOT exercises concerning pain and disability in patients with NSCLBP. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the effectiveness of both ISOM and ISOT in comparison to no intervention concerning these variables in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a randomized controlled trial that involved 41 men and women experiencing NSCLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to three groups: ISOM CSE (n = 13), ISOT CSE (n = 14), and a waitlist control (n = 14). The exercise training was administered for 40 - 60 minutes three times a week over a period of up to 8 weeks. Pain (assessed using the Visual Analog Scale or VAS) and disability (evaluated through the Oswestry Disability Index or ODI) variables were measured before and after the interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the results, there was no significant difference between the 2 exercise groups (ISOM and ISOT) regarding pain and disability. However, the ISOM group demonstrated numerically better results than the ISOT group. Both the ISOM and ISOT groups exhibited a significant decrease in pain levels, with the VAS score decreasing from 5.5 to 2.7 for ISOM and from 5.8 to 3.7 for ISOT, as compared to the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Additionally, the average disability showed a significant improvement in both the ISOM (ODI score from 17 to 11) and ISOT (ODI score from 15.4 to 11) groups compared to the control group (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Both ISOM and ISOT methods are effective in alleviating pain and disability in patients with NSCLBP. However, there is no significant difference in the benefits between them. Numerically, ISOM exercises were found to be superior. Further studies are needed to obtain a more accurate answer regarding their superiority.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    骶髂关节功能障碍(SIJD),虽然是腰痛的主要原因,仍然被忽视并被视为腰痛。Mulligan的运动动员(MWM)技术和核心稳定性练习(CSE)通常用于治疗腰痛。没有太多证据表明它在SIJD中有效。评价CSE联合MWM(CSE+MWM)治疗SIJD的疗效。
    招募39名SIJD患者,并随机分为以下不同的组:对照组(n=13),CSE组(n=13)和CSE+MWM组(n=13)。疼痛数字评分量表(NPRS),罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ),运动范围(ROM),使用压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和矢状面骨盆倾斜角不对称比(PTAR)来衡量干预前(M0)和干预后(M1)的成功。对所有实验数据进行统计分析。
    根据NPRS和RMDQ的测定,CSE+MWM组和CSE组的SIJ相关疼痛指标在M0和M1之间均显著降低。在M0和M1之间,CSE组的左轴旋转ROM和腰椎屈曲ROM明显减少。CSEMWM组的伸展ROM和左侧屈ROM在M0和M1之间均显着增加。在差异变量(M1-M0)中,CSEMWM组在左侧屈ROM中的表现明显优于对照组,在左轴旋转ROM中的表现明显优于CSE组。
    在患有SIJD的个人中,CSE+MWM有利于减轻疼痛,残疾,和功能。用CSE和MWM方法治疗SIJ似乎可以提高这种疗效。
    UNASSIGNED: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD), while being the primary contributor to low back pain, is still disregarded and treated as low back pain. Mulligan\'s Mobilization with Movement (MWM) Techniques and Core Stability Exercises (CSE) are often used to treat low back pain. There is not much evidence that it is effective in SIJD. To evaluate the effectiveness of CSE coupled with MWM (CSE + MWM) in the treatment of SIJD.
    UNASSIGNED: 39 patients with SIJD were recruited and randomly divided into distinct groups as follows: control group (n = 13), CSE group (n = 13) and CSE + MWM group (n = 13). The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Range of Motion (ROM), the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and the pelvic tilt angle asymmetry ratio in the sagittal plane (PTAR) were used to gauge the intervention\'s success both before (M0) and after (M1) it. All experimental data were statistically analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The SIJ-related pain metric significantly decreased in both the CSE + MWM group and the CSE group between M0 and M1, as determined by the NPRS and RMDQ. Between M0 and M1, The CSE group\'s left axial rotation ROM and lumbar flexion ROM were significantly decreased. The CSE + MWM group\'s extension ROM and left lateral flexion ROM both significantly increased between M0 and M1. In the difference variable (M1-M0), the CSE + MWM group substantially outperformed control group in the left lateral flexion ROM and outperformed the CSE group in the left axial rotation ROM.
    UNASSIGNED: In individuals with SIJD, CSE + MWM is beneficial in lowering pain, disability, and function. Treatment with CSE and MWM approaches for SIJ appears to boost this efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    核心稳定性训练对竞技运动员至关重要,想要改善健康和身体表现的人,和那些正在接受临床康复的人。这项研究比较了使用挖空和支撑动作进行的七个流行的躯干稳定性练习之间的腹部和腰椎多裂(LM)肌肉的超声(US)肌肉厚度。44名健康的年轻人,年龄在21至32岁之间,表演了一块木板,鸟狗,野兽爬行,死虫,普拉提水龙头,桥,和使用支撑和挖空操作的侧板。腹横肌(TrA)的厚度,内斜(IO),使用两台超声波机同时测量LM肌肉。方差分析设计表明,在挖空过程中,鸟狗和侧木板运动导致肌肉相对厚度的最大增加。与支撑(休息的18.7±7.40至87.1±20.9%)相比,空洞时(休息的22.7±7.80至106±24.5%)所有肌肉的相对厚度明显更大(p<0.001)。与IO和LM相比,TrA显示出最大的厚度增加(p<0.001)。此外,与LM相比,IO的厚度增加更大(p<0.001)。总之,我们的发现表明,鸟狗和侧木板练习,当执行空洞时,显示出最显著的总肌肉厚度增加。值得注意的是,挖空操作增强了TrA的厚度,IO,和LM肌肉比支撑动作更多。这有助于讨论动态堆芯稳定的最佳策略。
    Core stability training is crucial for competitive athletes, individuals who want to improve their health and physical performance, and those undergoing clinical rehabilitation. This study compared the ultrasound (US) muscle thickness of the abdominals and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles between seven popular trunk stability exercises performed using hollowing and bracing maneuvers. Forty-four healthy young adults, aged between 21 and 32 years, performed a plank, bird dog, beast crawl, dead bug, Pilates tap, bridge, and side planks using the bracing and the hollowing maneuver. The thickness of the transversus abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), and LM muscles was measured simultaneously using two ultrasound machines. Analysis of variance designs indicated that during hollowing, the bird dog and side plank exercises resulted in the greatest increase in the muscle\'s relative thickness overall. The relative thickness of all muscles was significantly greater (p < 0.001) during hollowing (22.7 ± 7.80 to 106 ± 24.5% of rest) compared to bracing (18.7 ± 7.40 to 87.1 ± 20.9% of rest). The TrA showed the greatest increase in thickness (p < 0.001) compared to the IO and LM. Additionally, the IO had a greater increase in thickness (p < 0.001) than the LM. In conclusion, our findings indicate that the bird dog and side plank exercises, when performed with hollowing, showed the most significant total muscle thickness increase. Notably, the hollowing maneuver enhances the thickness of the TrA, IO, and LM muscles more than the bracing maneuver. This contributes to the discussion on optimal strategies for dynamic core stabilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下腰痛(LBP)在全球范围内带来了巨大的负担,影响所有年龄段的人,但在30-60岁的成年人和包括种族在内的人口统计学中更常见,种族,和社会经济地位。物理治疗干预通常用于管理LBP,因为它们具有非侵入性和解决潜在生物力学功能障碍的潜力。这篇综合综述旨在评估各种物理治疗策略在缓解LBP方面的疗效,考虑一系列干预措施及其相关结果。通过对2017年1月至2023年10月现有文献的全面审查,这篇综述综合了手动治疗等干预措施有效性的证据。运动疗法,电疗方式,和基于教育的方法。该综述还审查了不同物理治疗方式的相对有效性及其对特定患者人群的适用性。考虑到诸如慢性等因素,严重程度,和潜在的病理学。通过批判性地评估证据基础,这篇综述旨在提供对缓解LBP最有效的物理治疗策略的见解,慢性下腰痛(CLBP)和慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP),并指导临床实践以循证干预。疼痛的视觉模拟量表和数字疼痛评分量表,Oswestry残疾指数和Roland-Morris残疾问卷,用于测量腰椎屈曲和伸展的改良Schober测试以及用于评估姿势稳定性和平衡的静态和动态平衡是用于预测疼痛增强的措施之一。残疾,balance,和LBP症状。21项符合纳入标准的研究(20至50岁,两种性别)被添加到审查中。核心稳定性练习,加强,矫形器(一种医疗设备,旨在支持,对齐,稳定,或纠正肌肉骨骼结构和功能),经皮神经电刺激,热按摩疗法,干扰电流(物理治疗中使用的电刺激的一种形式),Mulligan的动员(一种手动治疗技术),低水平激光治疗,麦吉尔稳定运动(核心运动)是治疗策略之一。麦肯齐方法(背部练习),超声,感觉运动训练,瑞士球练习,和其他技术减少疼痛和增强力量,balance,和日常活动的方便。每种治疗方法都对从最小到最大的恢复率产生影响。传统的物理疗法不如动员和锻炼等最新的先进技术有效。总之,手动技术的集成,矫形器和保守治疗方法的替代干预策略可以有效缓解疼痛,增强功能,产生更好的整体结果。为了获得有关最佳剂量的更多信息,这些治疗的治疗方式和长期效果,需要更多令人钦佩的研究。本文旨在通过探索非传统物理治疗干预措施并根据最新的WHO指南规定的严格标准评估其疗效,来扩展科学话语。
    Low back pain (LBP) presents a significant burden globally, affecting individuals of all ages, but it is more common in adults aged 30-60 years old and demographics including race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Physiotherapy interventions are commonly employed to manage LBP due to their non-invasive nature and potential for addressing underlying biomechanical dysfunctions. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the efficacy of various physiotherapy strategies in alleviating LBP, considering a range of interventions and their associated outcomes. Through a thorough examination of existing literature from January 2017 to October 2023, this review synthesises evidence on the effectiveness of interventions such as manual therapy, exercise therapy, electrotherapy modalities, and education-based approaches. The review also scrutinizes the comparative effectiveness of different physiotherapy modalities and their suitability for specific patient populations, considering factors such as chronicity, severity, and underlying pathology. By critically evaluating the evidence base, this review aims to provide insights into the most effective physiotherapy strategies for alleviating LBP, chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) and guiding clinical practice toward evidence-based interventions. The Visual Analogue Scale and Numerical Pain Rating Scale for pain, Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for disability, Modified-Modified Schober Test for measurement of lumbar flexion and extension and static and dynamic balance for assessing postural stability and balance were among the measures used to foresee enhancements in pain, disability, balance, and LBP symptoms. Twenty-one studies that fulfilled the criteria for inclusion (aged 20 to 50 years and of both genders) were added to the review. Exercises for core stability, strengthening, orthosis (a medical device designed to support, align, stabilise, or correct musculoskeletal structures and functions), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, heat massage therapy, interferential current (a form of electrical stimulation used in physical therapy), Mulligan\'s mobilization (a manual therapy technique), low-level laser therapy, and McGill stabilization exercises (core exercises) were among the therapeutic strategies. The McKenzie method (back exercises), ultrasound, sensory-motor training, Swiss ball exercises, and other techniques reduced pain and enhanced strength, balance, and ease of daily activities. Every therapeutic approach has an impact on recovery rates ranging from minimal to maximal. Conventional physical therapy is less effective than most recent advanced techniques like mobilisation and exercises. In summary, the integration of manual techniques, orthoses and alternative intervention strategies with conservative therapeutic approaches can effectively alleviate pain, enhance function and yield better overall outcomes. To get more information about the optimal dosage, therapeutic modalities and long-term effects of these treatments, more admirable research is required. This paper aims to expand the scientific discourse by exploring non-traditional physiotherapy interventions and assessing their efficacy in light of the rigorous standards set forth by the latest WHO guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    方向速度(CODS)的变化由几个物理方面决定,比如直线冲刺速度,腿部肌肉的反应力和力量。看来核心力量也可能在CODS中发挥作用,然而,它与CODS的关系尚不清楚。这篇叙述性综述的目的是分析有关a)核心力量与CODS之间的关系以及b)核心力量训练对CODS的影响的文献。该分析揭示了核心力量和稳定性的参数(下肢运动期间激活的核心肌肉的压力和最大自愿收缩的最大平均力输出)与敏捷性T测试中的时间之间的显着关系。然而,该参数与核心肌肉的力量耐力(木板测试的总时间)没有显着相关。核心训练为技能较低的中年青少年运动员的CODS发展提供了足够的刺激,而其有效性在高技能的成年运动员中下降。这些发现表明,核心肌肉力量对方向速度的变化有很大贡献。因此,核心培训对改善CODS很有用。
    Change of direction speed (CODS) is determined by several physical aspects, such as linear sprint speed, reactive strength and power of leg muscles. It appears that core strength may also play a role in CODS, however, its relationship to CODS remains unclear. The aim of this narrative review was to analyze the literature addressing a) the relationship between core strength and CODS and b) the effect of core strength training on CODS. This analysis revealed a significant relationship between the parameters of core strength and stability (the pressure of the activated core muscles during lower limb movement and the greatest mean force output of maximum volunteered contraction) and the time in the Agility T-Test. However, this parameter was not significantly related to the strength endurance of core muscles (total time in the plank test). Core training provides a sufficient stimulus for the development of CODS in less-skilled middle-adolescent athletes, while its effectiveness decreases in higher-skilled adult athletes. These findings indicate that core muscle strength contributes significantly to the change of direction speed. Core training is therefore useful for improving CODS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下肢自主运动过程中不自主躯干运动的不对称性是肌肉骨骼损伤的危险因素,可能与核心稳定性有关。在远端运动过程中,核心稳定性在保持姿势稳定性方面起着关键作用。因为中外侧头部运动部分代表有节奏运动时的躯干运动,控制它可以帮助确保对称躯干运动。这项研究旨在研究有节奏运动过程中核心稳定性与不对称躯干运动之间的关系。并评估反馈音乐对中侧头部运动的影响。
    方法:我们开发了一种系统,该系统使用无线耳塞和高分辨率惯性测量单元传感器来测量头部角度并提供反馈音乐。当头部角度超过预定阈值时,音乐在耳塞的头部倾斜的一侧被静音。在我们的实验室研究中,我们使用这个自主开发的系统以最大速度的70%测量了自行车的头部角度,并在具有良好(Sahrmann核心稳定性测试:2-5级)和较差核心稳定性(0-1级)的个体之间进行比较。头部中外侧运动的幅度由左右峰角之间的差异表示,头部中外侧运动的对称性由左右峰角的平均值表示。
    结果:核心稳定性差的个体表现出明显更大的振幅,对称性较低,头部中外侧运动比核心运动稳定性好。此外,反馈音乐显著降低了核心稳定性良好和核心稳定性较差组的中外侧头部运动幅度.
    结论:我们的发现表明,核心稳定性对于在有节奏的运动(如循环)过程中保持对称的头部运动至关重要。反馈音乐可以作为促进头部运动对称性的有效工具,从而防止肌肉骨骼损伤。
    BACKGROUND: Asymmetry in involuntary trunk motion during voluntary movements of the lower extremities is a risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries and may be related to core stability. Core stability plays a pivotal role in maintaining postural stability during distal segment movements. Because mediolateral head motion partially represents trunk motion during rhythmic movements, controlling it can help ensure symmetric trunk motion. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between core stability and asymmetric trunk motion during rhythmic movements, and to evaluate the effects of feedback music on mediolateral head motion.
    METHODS: We developed a system that uses a wireless earbud and a high-resolution inertial measurement unit sensor to measure head angle and provide feedback music. When the head angle exceeds a predefined threshold, the music is muted in the earbud on the side of the head tilt. In our lab-based study, we measured head angles during cycling at 70% of maximum speed using this self-developed system, and compared them between individuals with good (Sahrmann core stability test: 2-5 level) and poor core stability (0-1 level). The amplitude of mediolateral head motion was represented by the difference between the left and right peak angles, and the symmetry in mediolateral head motion was represented by the average of left and right peak angles.
    RESULTS: Individuals with poor core stability demonstrated significantly greater amplitude of, and less symmetry in, mediolateral head motion than those with good core stability. Additionally, feedback music significantly reduced the amplitude of mediolateral head motion in both the good- and poor-core-stability groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that core stability is crucial for maintaining symmetric head motion during rhythmic movements like cycling. Feedback music could serve as an effective tool for promoting symmetry in head motion and thus preventing musculoskeletal injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了了解健康和疾病期间人类微生物组和宿主之间的动态相互作用,我们分析了微生物组成,时间动态,以及与宿主多组学的关联,免疫,和来自四个身体部位的微生物的临床标记物,在6年的86名参与者中。我们发现微生物组的稳定性和个性是身体部位特异性的,并且受宿主的影响很大。粪便和口腔微生物组比皮肤和鼻腔微生物组更稳定,可能是由于它们与宿主和环境的相互作用。我们确定了个体特异性和共同的细菌分类群,个性化分类单元显示出更大的稳定性。有趣的是,微生物组动态与身体部位相关,表明受宿主-微生物-环境相互作用影响的系统动力学。值得注意的是,胰岛素抵抗个体显示出改变的微生物稳定性和微生物组之间的关联,分子标记,和临床特征,表明它们在代谢疾病中的相互作用被破坏。我们的研究提供了多位点微生物动力学及其与宿主健康和疾病的关系的全面观点。
    To understand the dynamic interplay between the human microbiome and host during health and disease, we analyzed the microbial composition, temporal dynamics, and associations with host multi-omics, immune, and clinical markers of microbiomes from four body sites in 86 participants over 6 years. We found that microbiome stability and individuality are body-site specific and heavily influenced by the host. The stool and oral microbiome are more stable than the skin and nasal microbiomes, possibly due to their interaction with the host and environment. We identify individual-specific and commonly shared bacterial taxa, with individualized taxa showing greater stability. Interestingly, microbiome dynamics correlate across body sites, suggesting systemic dynamics influenced by host-microbial-environment interactions. Notably, insulin-resistant individuals show altered microbial stability and associations among microbiome, molecular markers, and clinical features, suggesting their disrupted interaction in metabolic disease. Our study offers comprehensive views of multi-site microbial dynamics and their relationship with host health and disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号