core stability

堆芯稳定性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非特异性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)主要影响40-80岁女性。体育锻炼是一种主要的治疗形式,功能训练(FT)和双任务训练(DT)由于其独特的特征而成为潜在的方式。然而,关于这些运动方式对CLBP的影响的信息有限。
    目的:比较FT和DT对CLBP老年女性躯干功能和功能适应性的影响。
    方法:这是一项随机临床试验,有两个训练组(FT和DT)和CLBP和非CLBP个体。我们评估了后备箱的稳定性,最大等距强度,躯干肌肉的耐力,以及16周训练前后的功能适应性结果:我们发现循环稳定性和不稳定性仅有时间效应(p<.001),屈肌(p=.006),和伸肌耐力(p<.001)。对于外侧屈肌,与CLBP个体的DT相比,FT侧屈肌耐力平均降低17.3个单位.为了屈肌的强度,与非CLBP相比,CLBP个体表现出69.3单位的增加。为了伸肌的强度,与非CLBP个体相比,CLBP个体减少了75.1个单位。Weidentifiedatimeeffectforallfunctionalfitnessmeasures(p<.050)Conclusion:FTandDTincreasestrunkstability,最大等距强度,躯干肌肉的耐力,除了CLBP老年女性的功能健身意义:专业人士可以选择任何一种训练类型,因为在最初的16周干预中没有差异.
    BACKGROUND: Non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) predominantly affects women aged 40-80 years. Physical exercise is a primary treatment form, with functional training (FT) and dual-task training (DT) emerging as potential modalities due to their distinct characteristics. However, limited information exists regarding the effects of these exercise modalities on CLBP.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the FT and DT effects on trunk function and functional fitness in CLBP older women.
    METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial with two training groups (FT and DT) and CLBP and non-CLBP individuals. We assessed the trunk stability, maximum isometric strength, endurance of trunk muscles, and functional fitness before and after 16 weeks of training RESULTS: We found only time effects for circular stability and instability (p <.001), flexors (p =.006), and extensors endurance (p <.001). For the lateral flexors, there was an average reduction of 17.3 units in lateral flexor endurance in the FT compared to the DT in CLBP individuals. For the strength of the flexor, CLBP individuals exhibited an increase of 69.3 units compared to non-CLBP. For the strength of extensors, CLBP individuals showed a decrease of 75.1 units compared to non-CLBP individuals. We identified a time effect for all functional fitness measures (p <.050) CONCLUSION: FT and DT increase trunk stability, maximum isometric strength, and endurance of trunk muscles, besides the functional fitness of CLBP older women SIGNIFICANCE: Professionals can choose either training type, as there are no differences in the initial 16 weeks of intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有推动器综合征(PS)的患者的特征是由于在空间中缺乏对自己身体的感知而表现出姿势控制改变。当患者积极地用未受影响的四肢向受伤侧推进时,对中线被动拉直的阻力作出反应。10%至50%的中风出现PS。如今,对于PS没有明确的治疗方法。
    目的:设计和验证使用视觉反馈和特定核心稳定性练习(FeViCoS)治疗PS患者的锻炼计划。
    方法:通过专家共识使用德尔菲法进行验证。13名神经康复专家参与了这一过程。使用包含18个Likert类型问题的在线问卷来评估设计的程序。如果在四分位数1和3值之间存在收敛(RIQ=Q1-Q3)或者如果相对四分位数间距(RIR)小于20%,则认为达成共识。通过计算Fleiss\'kappa系数来衡量专家之间的一致程度。
    结果:总共需要2轮才能在100%的参与下达到97.44%的共识。所有问题的RIR小于或等于20%。Fleiss\'kappa指数(0.831)表明专家之间的一致程度非常好。
    结论:神经康复专家认为FeViCoS对PS患者的治疗方法有效。专家共识建议在物理疗法临床实践中采用一种新策略,以改善亚急性中风和PS患者的平衡和姿势取向。
    BACKGROUND: The patient with pusher syndrome (PS) is characterized by showing postural control alterations due to a lack of perception of his own body in the space. It appears when the patient actively pushes with his unaffected limbs towards the injured side, reacting with resistance to passive straightening towards the midline. Between 10% and 50% of strokes present PS. Nowadays, there is no clearly defined treatment for PS.
    OBJECTIVE: To design and validate an exercise program using visual feedback and specific core stability exercises (FeViCoS) for the treatment of patients with PS.
    METHODS: Validation was conducted by expert consensus using the Delphi method. Thirteen neurorehabilitation experts participated in the process. An online questionnaire with 18 Likert-type questions was used to evaluate the designed program. Consensus was considered reached if there was convergence between the quartile 1 and 3 values (RIQ = Q1-Q3) or if the relative interquartile range (RIR) was less than 20%. The degree of agreement between experts was measured by calculating the Fleiss\' kappa coefficient.
    RESULTS: A total of 2 rounds were required to achieve 97.44% consensus with 100% participation. The RIR was less than or equal to 20% for all questions. The Fleiss\' kappa index (0.831) showed that the degree of agreement between experts was excellent.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neurorehabilitation experts considered FeViCoS valid for the therapeutic approach to patients with PS. Expert consensus suggests a novel strategy in physical therapy clinical practice to improve balance and postural orientation in patients with subacute stroke and PS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管指南和系统评价建议使用运动治疗慢性疼痛和颈部疼痛,对于临床上经常使用的保守治疗没有明确的建议.使用被动物理治疗方法支持临床普拉提练习对生物心理社会地位的影响仍然未知。
    目的是研究常规治疗(CT)以及临床普拉提对疼痛水平的影响,身体状况,功能状态,慢性颈痛患者的心理社会地位。
    将50名妇女随机分为2组,临床普拉提小组(普拉提,n=25),以及除临床普拉提外接受CT的组(普拉提CT,n=25)。两组均接受每周3天的治疗,共6周。CT程序涉及热包(HP)应用程序的实施,经皮神经电刺激(TENS),和宫颈区域的治疗性超声(US)。
    除普拉提外,CT在减少视觉模拟量表(在休息和活动期间)方面更有效,颈部残疾指数,恐惧-回避信念问卷,NeckPix秤,医院焦虑抑郁量表,和认知运动疗法方法-生物心理社会问卷得分(p<0.05),以及增加运动范围(ROM)和颈屈肌耐力值的变化程度以及ShortForm-36的能量参数得分(p<0.05)。
    除普拉提外还提供CT更有效地减轻疼痛,残疾,害怕运动,抑郁程度,和阴性的生物心理社会地位和改善延伸ROM和颈屈耐力,颈部意识,以及慢性颈痛患者生活质量的能量/活力参数。
    UNASSIGNED: Although guidelines and systematic reviews recommend the use of exercise in the treatment of chronic pain and neck pain, there are no clear recommendations for conservative treatments frequently used in clinics. The effect of supporting clinical Pilates exercises with passive physiotherapy methods on biopsychosocial status is still unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective was to investigate the effects of conventional treatment (CT) in addition to clinical Pilates on pain levels, physical condition, functional status, and psychosocial status in individuals with chronic neck pain.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty women were randomly divided into 2 groups, the clinical Pilates group (Pilates, n= 25), and the group receiving CT in addition to clinical Pilates (Pilates-CT, n= 25). Both groups received treatment 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The CT program involved the implementation of hot pack (HP) application, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), and therapeutic ultrasound (US) to the cervical area.
    UNASSIGNED: CT in addition to Pilates was more effective in reducing the Visual Analog Scale (at rest and during activity), Neck Disability Index, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, NeckPix Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression, and Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach-Biopsychosocial questionnaire scores (p< 0.05) and in increasing the degree of change in the extension range of motion (ROM) and cervical flexor endurance values and scores in the energy parameter of Short Form-36 (p< 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: CT provided in addition to Pilates was more effective in reducing pain levels, disability, fear of movement, depression levels, and negative biopsychosocial status and improving extension ROM and cervical flexor endurance, neck awareness, and the energy/vitality parameter of quality of life in individuals with chronic neck pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非特异性慢性下腰痛(NSCLBP)是一种普遍的疾病,影响90%的经历下腰痛的个体。核心稳定练习(CSE)是管理NSCLBP最常用的治疗方法。然而,等长型(ISOM)和等渗(ISOT)型CSE在NSCLBP治疗中的优异有效性仍存在不确定性.
    本研究的主要目的是比较ISOM和ISOT锻炼对NSCLBP患者疼痛和残疾的疗效。此外,本研究旨在评估ISOM和ISOT在这些患者中的有效性,并与未对这些变量进行干预相比.
    这项研究是一项随机对照试验,涉及41名男性和女性患有NSCLBP。参与者被随机分为三组:ISOMCSE(n=13),ISOTCSE(n=14),和waitlist控件(n=14)。运动训练在长达8周的时间内每周三次进行40-60分钟。在干预前后测量疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表或VAS评估)和残疾(通过Oswestry残疾指数或ODI评估)变量。
    根据结果,两个运动组(ISOM和ISOT)在疼痛和残疾方面没有显着差异。然而,ISOM组的数值结果优于ISOT组。ISOM和ISOT组的疼痛水平均显著下降,随着ISOM的VAS评分从5.5降至2.7,ISOT的VAS评分从5.8降至3.7,与对照组相比(分别为P<0.001和P=0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,ISOM组(ODI评分为17~11分)和ISOT组(ODI评分为15.4~11分)的平均残疾均有显著改善(P<0.001).
    ISOM和ISOT方法均可有效缓解NSCLBP患者的疼痛和残疾。然而,它们之间的好处没有显着差异。数字上,ISOM练习被发现是优越的。需要进一步的研究才能获得关于其优越性的更准确的答案。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a prevalent condition that affects 90% of individuals experiencing low back pain. Core stabilization exercises (CSE) stand out as the most commonly employed therapeutic approach for managing NSCLBP. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty regarding the superior effectiveness between isometric (ISOM) and isotonic (ISOT) types of CSE in the treatment of NSCLBP.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ISOM and ISOT exercises concerning pain and disability in patients with NSCLBP. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the effectiveness of both ISOM and ISOT in comparison to no intervention concerning these variables in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a randomized controlled trial that involved 41 men and women experiencing NSCLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to three groups: ISOM CSE (n = 13), ISOT CSE (n = 14), and a waitlist control (n = 14). The exercise training was administered for 40 - 60 minutes three times a week over a period of up to 8 weeks. Pain (assessed using the Visual Analog Scale or VAS) and disability (evaluated through the Oswestry Disability Index or ODI) variables were measured before and after the interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the results, there was no significant difference between the 2 exercise groups (ISOM and ISOT) regarding pain and disability. However, the ISOM group demonstrated numerically better results than the ISOT group. Both the ISOM and ISOT groups exhibited a significant decrease in pain levels, with the VAS score decreasing from 5.5 to 2.7 for ISOM and from 5.8 to 3.7 for ISOT, as compared to the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Additionally, the average disability showed a significant improvement in both the ISOM (ODI score from 17 to 11) and ISOT (ODI score from 15.4 to 11) groups compared to the control group (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Both ISOM and ISOT methods are effective in alleviating pain and disability in patients with NSCLBP. However, there is no significant difference in the benefits between them. Numerically, ISOM exercises were found to be superior. Further studies are needed to obtain a more accurate answer regarding their superiority.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Heredia-Elvar,JR,Juan-Recio,C,普拉特-卢里,A,巴巴多斯,D,Ríos-Calonge,Jdl,还有Vera-Garcia,FJ.运动强度的进展和标准,以规定核心稳定性练习在年轻的身体活跃的男人:智能手机加速度计为基础的研究。J强度CondRes38(2):266-273,2024-运动和临床环境中核心稳定性(CS)运动强度进展的建立通常基于主观标准。因此,本研究旨在通过智能手机加速度测量来开发一些最常见的CS运动的运动强度进展,并分析受试者腰骨盆姿势控制对这些进展的影响.57名健康的年轻身体活跃的男学生进行了7种前桥等距变化,后桥,侧桥,和鸟狗练习与智能手机加速度计放置在骨盆上。计算每个变化过程中的平均骨盆加速度,以评估对受试者施加的腰骨盆姿势控制挑战,作为运动难度强度的指标。对于桥梁练习,长桥比短桥产生更高的骨盆加速度,用单腿支撑的桥接比用双腿支撑的桥接更强烈(即使将两条腿放在半球球上用于后桥和前桥),最困难的变化是在瑞士球上进行的,主要是单腿支撑的变化。对于鸟狗运动,2分位置比3分位置更激烈,与前臂在半球球上进行的类似变化相比,在半球球上使用膝盖进行的变化产生了更高的骨盆加速度,与没有肢体运动的类似变化相比,肢体运动的变化产生了更高的骨盆加速度。尽管不同受试者的CS运动进展非常相似,我们的结果显示,需要根据受试者腰盆骨姿势控制水平对CS运动进展的处方进行个体化.
    UNASSIGNED: Heredia-Elvar, JR, Juan-Recio, C, Prat-Luri, A, Barbado, D, Ríos-Calonge, Jdl, and Vera-Garcia, FJ. Exercise intensity progressions and criteria to prescribe core stability exercises in young physically active men: a smartphone accelerometer-based study. J Strength Cond Res 38(2): 266-273, 2024-The establishment of core stability (CS) exercise intensity progressions in sport and clinical settings is normally based on subjective criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to develop exercise intensity progressions for some of the most common CS exercises through smartphone accelerometry and to analyze the effect of the subjects\' lumbopelvic postural control on these progressions. Fifty-seven healthy young physically active male students performed 7 isometric variations of front bridge, back bridge, side bridge, and bird-dog exercises with a smartphone accelerometer placed on the pelvis. Mean pelvic accelerations were calculated during each variation to evaluate the lumbopelvic postural control challenge imposed on the subjects as an index of exercise intensity of difficulty. For the bridge exercises, long bridging produced higher pelvic accelerations than short bridging, bridging with single-leg support was more intense than bridging with double-leg support (even with both legs on a hemisphere ball for the back and front bridge), and the most difficult variations were those performed on a Swiss ball, mainly the variations with single-leg support. For the bird-dog exercise, the 2-point positions were more intense than the 3-point positions, the variations performed with a knee on the hemisphere ball produced higher pelvic accelerations than similar variations performed with the forearm on the hemisphere ball, and the variations with limb motions generated higher pelvic accelerations than similar variations performed without limb motions. Although the CS exercise progressions were very similar across subjects, our results showed the need to individualize the prescription of the CS exercise progressions based on the subjects\' lumbopelvic postural control level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    本研究旨在探讨本体感觉与核心稳定性训练在8周内对聋哑青少年步态参数的影响。共有20名聋哑青少年被随机分为两组:一组接受本体感觉训练(PT,n=10),另一组接受核心稳定性训练(CST,n=10),和11个典型的发育中的青少年被分配到对照组(CON;n=11)。步态由两台数码相机记录;然后,使用Kinovea软件,步态参数包括:步态速度,节奏,步幅长度,跨步时间,站立时间,和摆动时间是根据步行周期的百分比计算的。8周后的PT,PT组和对照组的所有步态参数均无显著差异(p>0.05)。此外,CST8周后,CST组和对照组的步态速度和步调差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。然而,CST8周后,对照组步幅长度(p=0.02)较高;步幅时间(p=0.03),CST组的站立时间(p=0.04)和摆动时间(p=0.04)较高.此外,8周后的PT,数值显示所有步态参数均有显著改善(p=0.001).此外,CST8周后,值显示步态速度和步调显着改善(p=0.001),其他步态参数无显著性差异(p>0.05)。这项研究的结果表明,PT改善了所有步态参数,而CST改善了步态速度和步调。本研究的结果还表明,与CST相比,PT对聋哑青少年的步态参数影响更大。似乎PT比CTS更能增强聋哑青少年的步态参数。试验注册:临床试验登记号:IRCT20170312033029N2。URL:https://en。irct.ir/trial/25584。
    The current study aimed to explore the effects of proprioception versus core stability training over 8 weeks on the gait parameters of deaf adolescents. A total of 20 deaf adolescents were randomized into two groups: one group receiving proprioception training (PT, n = 10), another group receiving core stability training (CST, n = 10), and eleven typically developing adolescents assigned into the control group (CON; n = 11). Gait was recorded by two digital cameras; then, using the Kinovea software, the parameters of gait included: gait velocity, cadence, stride length, stride time, stance time, and swing time were calculated in terms of percentages of the walking cycle. After 8 weeks of PT, no significant differences were observed for all gait parameters between PT and control groups (p > 0.05). Also, after 8 weeks of CST, no significant differences were observed in gait velocity and cadence between the CST and control groups (p > 0.05). However, after 8 weeks of CST, stride length (p = 0.02) was higher in the control group; Stride time (p = 0.03), stance time (p = 0.04) and swing time (p = 0.04) were higher in the CST group. Moreover, after 8 weeks of PT, values showed significant improvements in all gait parameters (p = 0.001). Also, after 8 weeks of CST, values showed significant improvements in gait velocity and cadence (p = 0.001), but no significant differences were observed in other gait parameters (p > 0.05). The findings of this study indicated that PT improved all gait parameters, whereas CST improved gait velocity and cadence. The results of the present study also demonstrated that PT had a greater effect on gait parameters of deaf adolescents compared with CST. It seems that PT induces more training effects than CTS for enhancing gait parameters of deaf adolescents.Trial registration: Clinical trial registry number: IRCT20170312033029N2. URL: https://en.irct.ir/trial/25584 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:下腰痛(LBP)在音乐家人群中比较常见。很少有研究研究核心稳定性锻炼计划对患有LBP的音乐家的有用性。这项研究的目的是研究核心稳定性运动计划对患有LBP的音乐家的疼痛和功能改善的有效性。
    方法:共41名大学级器乐音乐家,非特异性LBP弹钢琴,小提琴,在一项随机对照试验中,或大提琴被随机分配到两组中的一组。对照组的一个人失去了随访。因此,40名参与者(23名女性和17名男性)完成了研究。干预组接受了教育和12周的核心稳定性锻炼计划。对照组只收到一份教育手册。视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)用于确定疼痛的严重程度和功能状态,分别。数据由独立人士收集,基线时以及基线后12周和24周的盲法评估者.
    结果:在所有随访期间,干预组的VAS疼痛严重程度和ODI功能状态均有显着改善,而对照组在24周时疼痛和功能评分恶化。组间分析显示,在随访的第12周和第24周,疼痛强度存在显着差异。然而,对于功能状态,仅在12周后差异显著。
    结论:结构化的核心稳定性锻炼计划,辅以教育手册可有效管理音乐家的LBP。
    OBJECTIVE: Low back pain (LBP) is relatively common among the musician population. Few studies have looked at the usefulness of a core stability exercise program in musicians suffering from LBP. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a core stability exercise program on pain and improvement of function in musicians with LBP.
    METHODS: A total of 41 university-level instrumental musicians with nonspecific LBP who played piano, violin, or cello were randomly allocated to one of two groups in a randomized controlled trial. One person from the control group was lost to follow-up. Thus, 40 participants (23 females and 17 males) completed the study. The intervention group received education and a 12-week core stability exercise program. The control group only received an educational brochure. A visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to determine the severity of pain and functional status, respectively. Data were collected by an independent, blinded evaluator at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks after baseline.
    RESULTS: The intervention group showed a significant improvement in pain severity on the VAS and functional status on the ODI during all times of follow up, whereas the scores of pain and function worsened in the control group at 24 weeks. Between-group analysis showed significant difference in pain intensity at both weeks 12 and 24 of follow-up. However, for functional status, the difference was only significant after 12 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: A structured core stability exercise program supplemented with an educational brochure was effective to manage LBP in musicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:这项研究调查了核心稳定性训练对疼痛的影响,函数,生活质量,颞下颌关节紊乱症患者的姿势。
    方法:将参与者分为:核心稳定性组和对照组。对于疼痛评估,慢性疼痛分级量表2.0;对于功能,20项颌骨功能限制量表(JFLS-20);用于口腔健康相关生活质量,口腔健康影响概况-14(OHIP-14);以及姿势评估,使用纽约量表。对照组采用Rocabado锻炼。此外,脊柱稳定训练应用于核心稳定性组,为期6周.
    结果:两种类型的运动对口腔健康相关的生活质量都有积极的贡献。Rocabado运动提供了慢性疼痛强度和残疾评分的显着变化。
    结论:Rocabado锻炼和核心稳定性训练,用Rocabado实现,提供疼痛值的显著变化。当根据功能进行评估时,两种锻炼方案均无显著差异.
    结论:使用Rocabado进行的核心稳定性训练提供了显着的变化。
    背景:NCT04755621。
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of core stability training on pain, function, quality of life, and posture in individuals with temporomandibular disorder.
    METHODS: Participants were divided into the following: the core stability group and the control group. For pain assessment, the Graded Chronic Pain Scale 2.0; for function, the 20-item Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-20); for oral health-related quality of life, Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14); and for posture assessment, the New York Scale were used. Rocabado exercises were applied to the control group. Additionally, spinal stabilization exercises were applied for the core stability group for 6 weeks.
    RESULTS: Both types of exercise contribute positively to the quality of life associated with oral health. Rocabado exercise provided a significant change in Chronic Pain Intensity and Disability Score.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rocabado exercise and core stability training, implemented with Rocabado, provide significant changes in pain values. When evaluated in terms of function, no significant difference was found in both exercise programs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Core stability training with Rocabado provides significant changes.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04755621.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:中风患者经常出现步行功能障碍。核心训练可以帮助改善中风患者的平衡和步行功能。然而,临床实践中的核心训练动作众多且针对性不同。因此,本研究将探讨采用膈肌呼吸手法(DBM)和吸引式呼吸技术(ADIM)联合训练对患者步行功能的改善。
    方法:这种单盲,随机对照初步分析DBM联合ADIM训练与常规康复治疗对早中期卒中患者的可行性。患者将被随机分配到DBM和ADIM训练或常规康复训练。我们将从上海市第二康复医院招募42例符合试验标准的脑卒中住院患者,并在干预4周后测量平衡和步行功能及其改善情况。主要结果是10m最大步行测试(10MWT)。次要结果指标包括稳定性测试极限(LOS),Berg平衡量表测试(BBS),功能移动类别测试(FAC),定时启动和启动测试(TUG),树干减值量表测试(TIS),膈肌和腹横肌(UI)的超声指标,有节奏的体重转移测试(RWS),穿越测试(WA),Fugl-Meyer下肢评估(FMA-LE),和ADL测试的Barthel指数。
    结论:本项目的主要目的是研究DBM联合ADIM对早中期卒中患者平衡能力和步行功能的影响。这项研究的结果将对康复的未来临床应用具有重要意义。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR),ID:ChiCTR2100054897。2021年12月28日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with stroke frequently experience walking dysfunction. Core training can help improve balance and walking function in patients with stroke. However, core training movements in clinical practice are numerous and differently targeted. Therefore, this study will investigate the improvement of walking function in patients with combined diaphragmatic breathing maneuver (DBM) and draw-in breathing technique (ADIM) training.
    METHODS: This single-blind, randomized controlled preliminary will analyze the viability of DBM combined ADIM training versus routine rehabilitation therapy in patients with stroke with early to mid-stroke. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the DBM and ADIM training or the routine rehabilitation training. We will recruit 42 stroke inpatients from the Second Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai who meet the trial criteria and measure the balance and walking functions and improvement of that after 4 weeks of intervention. The primary outcome is the 10 m maximum walking test (10MWT). The secondary outcomes indices include the limits of stability test (LOS), Berg balance scale test (BBS), Functional Ambulation Categories test (FAC), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), trunk impairment scale test (TIS), ultrasound indicators of the diaphragm and transversus abdominis (UI), rhythmic weight shift test (RWS), walk across test (WA), Fugl-Meyer assessment of lower extremity (FMA-LE), and Barthel index of ADL test.
    CONCLUSIONS: The primary objective of this project was to investigate the effects of DBM combined with ADIM on balance capacity and walking function for patients with early to mid-stroke. The outcomes of this study will hold significant implications for future clinical applications in rehabilitation.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ID: ChiCTR2100054897. Registered on 28 December 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在对疼痛高度恐惧(HFP)的慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中,可以看到姿势稳定性因环境挑战而出现缺陷。因此,必须遵循有效的方法来治疗姿势稳定性缺陷并改善这些患者的健康状况。本研究旨在比较左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)上的阴极和阳极经颅直流电刺激(c-tDCS和a-tDCS)对HFP非特异性CLBP患者姿势稳定性的影响。在这项随机临床试验研究中,75例患者被随机分配到左侧DLPFCa-tDCS,左DLPFCc-tDCS和假刺激组(每组n=25)。所有组都接受了20分钟的单会话2mAtDCS,但在假手术组30s后缓慢关闭刺激。之前,立即,干预后24小时和1周,使用Biodex平衡系统评估姿势稳定性指数。干预后,a-tDCS和c-tDCS组均显示大多数指标显着降低(立即,24h和1周随访)在静态和动态姿势任务期间与假tDCS组相比(p<0.01)。此外,一些测试显示a-tDCS和c-tDCS之间存在显着差异(p<0.05)。结果表明,a-tDCS和c-tDCS对左侧DLPFC均有积极影响,a-tDCS对LBP伴HFP患者姿势稳定性的疗效更高。
    Deficits in postural stability in response to environmental challenges are seen in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with high fear of pain (HFP). Hence, it is essential to follow effective approaches to treat postural stability deficits and improve the health status of these patients. The current study aimed to compare the effects of cathodal and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS and a-tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on postural stability in non-specific CLBP patients with HFP. In this randomized clinical trial study, 75 patients were randomly assigned to left DLPFC a-tDCS, left DLPFC c-tDCS and sham stimulation groups (n = 25 in each group). All groups received a single-session 2 mA tDCS for 20 min, but the stimulation was slowly turned off after 30 s in the sham group. Before, immediately, 24 h and 1 week after the interventions, postural stability indices were assessed using a Biodex Balance System. A significant reduction in most indices was shown in both a-tDCS and c-tDCS groups after interventions (immediately, 24 h and 1 week follow-up) during static and dynamic postural tasks compared with the sham tDCS group (p < .01). In addition, some tests showed a significant difference between a-tDCS and c-tDCS (p < .05). The findings indicated positive effects of both a-tDCS and c-tDCS on the left DLPFC, with more efficacy of a-tDCS on postural stability in LBP patients with HFP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号