■本研究调查了感知的自主支持,教练-运动员关系,团队效能,攻击性行为,团队运动运动员中的运动员倦怠。验证了教练-运动员关系和团队效能感在自主性支持与运动员职业倦怠关系中的中介作用。
■关于自治支持的问卷调查,教练-运动员关系,攻击性行为,对336名团体体育运动员(292名男运动员和44名女运动员)进行了运动员倦怠。采用横断面研究设计来收集数据。为了分析收集的数据,频率,可靠性,描述性统计,并使用SPSS26.0版进行相关性分析。此外,验证性因素分析,收敛有效性测试,并使用AMOS24.0版进行结构模型分析。自举用于检查中介作用。
■通过如下计算拟合指数来评估测量模型的拟合度:x2=329.689,df=124,p<0.001,TLI=0.945,CFI=0.956,RMSEA=0.070(90%CI=0.061-0.080),和SRMR=0.060。自主性支持对教练-运动员关系(β=0.841)和团队效能(β=0.338)有积极影响。教练与运动员的关系对团队效能有正向影响(β=0.479)。此外,自主支持对攻击行为没有显著影响(β=-0.053),并对运动员倦怠产生负面影响(β=-0.305)。教练-运动员关系也没有显着影响攻击行为(β=0.054),并对运动员倦怠产生负面影响(β=-0.303)。团队效能对攻击行为(β=-0.516)和运动员倦怠(β=-0.201)产生负面影响。最后,自主支持被发现通过教练-运动员关系和团队效能影响运动员倦怠。
■考虑到自主性支持通过教练-运动员关系和团队效能影响运动员倦怠,教练员需要提高教练员与运动员关系的质量,提高团队效能,以减少运动员的职业倦怠。最重要的是,研究结果表明,教练需要提供自主支持行为。
UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the relationships between perceived autonomy support, coach-athlete relationship, team efficacy, aggressive behavior, and athlete burnout among team sports athletes. It verified the mediating effects of the coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy on the relationship between autonomy support and athlete burnout.
UNASSIGNED: A questionnaire survey on autonomy support, coach-athlete relationships, aggressive behavior, and athlete burnout was administered to 336 team sports athletes (292 male athletes and 44 female athletes). A cross-sectional research design was used to collect the data. To analyze the collected data, frequency, reliability, descriptive statistical, and correlation analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity tests, and structural model analysis were conducted using AMOS version 24.0. Bootstrapping was used to examine the mediating effects.
UNASSIGNED: The fit of the measurement model was assessed by calculating the fit indices as follows: x 2 = 329.689, df = 124, p < 0.001, TLI = 0.945, CFI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.070 (90% CI = 0.061-0.080), and SRMR = 0.060. Autonomy support positively affected the coach-athlete relationship (β = 0.841) and team efficacy (β = 0.338). The coach-athlete relationship positively affected team efficacy (β = 0.479). Furthermore, autonomy support did not significantly influence aggressive behavior (β = -0.053), and negatively affected athlete burnout (β = -0.305). The coach-athlete relationship also did not significantly affect aggressive behavior (β = 0.054), and negatively affected athlete burnout (β = -0.303). Team efficacy negatively affected aggressive behavior (β = -0.516) and athlete burnout (β = -0.201). Finally, autonomy support was found to affect athlete burnout through the coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: Considering that autonomy support affects athlete burnout through coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy, coaches need to enhance the quality of the coach-athlete relationship and improve team efficacy to reduce athlete burnout. Above all, the study findings suggest that coaches need to provide autonomy-supportive behaviors.