Real-world evidence comparing clinical outcomes between venetoclax and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) in patients with frontline (1 L) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is lacking. We compared treatment effectiveness of 1 L venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (VenO) versus BTKi-based regimens. This retrospective observational study using Optum Clinformatics Data Mart® included adult patients with CLL (≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient claim) who received VenO or BTKi-based regimens in 1 L (1/2019-9/2022). Baseline characteristics were balanced using stabilised inverse probability weighting. Outcomes included duration of therapy (DoT), persistence, time to next treatment or death (TTNT-D), and time off-treatment. Among 1506 eligible patients (VenO: 203; BTKi: 1303), the median follow-up duration was 12.6 (VenO) and 16.2 months (BTKi). Median DoT for VenO was 12.3 months; persistence remained higher in VenO versus BTKi through expected 1 L fixed treatment duration. Median TTNT-D was not reached for VenO; however, more VenO- versus BTKi-treated patients had not switched therapies/experienced death through Month 12 (87.1% vs. 75.3%). Among patients that discontinued, median time to discontinuation was 11.7 vs. 5.9 months for VenO versus BTKi and median time off-treatment was 11.3 vs. 4.3 months. In this real-world study, VenO was associated with better effectiveness outcomes than BTKi-based regimens in 1 L CLL.

Despite significant progress in treating chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), resistance to therapy remains challenging. NOTCH1 activation, common in CLL, confers adverse prognosis. This study explores the impact of NOTCH1 signalling on venetoclax sensitivity in vitro. Although NOTCH1 activation minimally impaired the susceptibility of CLL cells to venetoclax, ex vivo cell competition studies reveal that cells with constitutive NOTCH1 activation outgrew their wild-type counterparts in the presence of ongoing venetoclax exposure. Our findings suggest that while NOTCH1 activation is insufficient to confer venetoclax refractoriness, there is enhanced potential for cells with NOTCH1 activation to escape and thus become fully resistant to venetoclax.

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised hosts (ICH) experience more breakthrough infections and worse clinical outcomes following infection with COVID-19 than immunocompetent people. Prophylactic monoclonal antibody therapies can be challenging to access, and escape variants emerge rapidly. Immunity conferred through vaccination remains a central prevention strategy for COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccines do not elicit optimal immunity in ICH but boosting, through additional doses of vaccine improves humoral and cellular immune responses. This trial aims to assess the immunogenicity and safety of different COVID-19 vaccine booster strategies against SARS-CoV-2 for ICH in Australia.
METHODS: Bringing optimised COVID-19 vaccine schedules to immunocompromised populations (BOOST-IC) is an adaptive randomised trial of one or two additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines 3 months apart in people living with HIV, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, or those who have haematological malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma). Key eligibility criteria include having received 3 to 7 doses of Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)-approved COVID-19 vaccines at least 3 months earlier, and having not received SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibodies in the 3 months prior to receiving the study vaccine. The primary outcome is the geometric mean concentration of anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) 28 days after the final dose of the study vaccine. Key secondary outcomes include anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG titres and the proportion of people seroconverting 6 and 12 months after study vaccines, local and systemic reactions in the 7 days after vaccination, adverse events of special interest, COVID-19 infection, mortality and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will enhance the understanding of COVID-19 vaccine responses in ICH, and enable the development of safe, and optimised vaccine schedules in people with HIV, SOT, or haematological malignancy.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05556720. Registered on 23rd August 2022.

Population-based studies have demonstrated a high risk of second cancers, especially of the skin, among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We describe age-standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) of second primary malignancies (SPM) in Australian patients with relapsed/refractory CLL treated with at least two lines of therapy, including ibrutinib. From December 2014 to November 2017, 156 patients were identified from 13 sites enrolled in the Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry, and 111 had follow-up data on rates of SPM. At 38.4 months from ibrutinib therapy commencement, 25% experienced any SPM. SIR for melanoma and all cancers (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancers) were 15.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.0-35.3) and 4.6 (95% CI: 3.1-6.9) respectively. These data highlight the importance of primary preventive interventions and surveillance, particularly as survival from CLL continues to improve.

This systematic literature review (CRD42023393903) and a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to assess the relative safety profile of first-line targeted therapies (acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, pirtobrutinib, ublituximab, umbralisib, venetoclax, zanubrutinib) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities. The NMA revealed that zanubrutinib was the safest treatment option in terms of the overall safety profile (e.g., serious adverse events [AEs] grade 1-5), followed by venetoclax-obinutuzumab, which showed an advantage in terms of AEs grade 1-5. The use of Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) monotherapy was more favourable in terms of the risk of haematological AEs, but chemoimmunotherapy showed advantages in terms of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and infectious AEs. The risk of secondary cancers was similar between treatments. In conclusion, targeted therapies are associated with variable and clinically relevant AEs. The therapies appear to be safer when used as monotherapy rather than in combination with immunological agents in naïve CLL patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib is a Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment and relapse of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), Waldenström\'s macroglobulinemia (WM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This study aimed to describe the characteristics of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib and its effectiveness, safety, and treatment pattern in real life.
METHODS: All patients covered by the general health scheme (approximately 80% of the French population) with a first ibrutinib dispensation from August 1, 2017 (date of reimbursement in France) to December 31, 2020, were identified in the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS). An algorithm was developed to identify the disease (CLL, MCL or WM) for which ibrutinib was prescribed. This article focused on CLL patients. The time to next treatment (TTNT) was plotted using Kaplan‒Meier curves.
RESULTS: During this period, 6,083 patients initiated ibrutinib, among whom 2,771 (45.6%) patients had CLL (mean age of 74 years; 61% of men). At ibrutinib initiation, 46.6% of patients had a cardiovascular comorbidity. Most patients (91.7%) were not hospitalized during the exposure period for one of the cardiovascular or bleeding events studied. Hospitalizations were more frequent in patients with a cardiovascular comorbidity (5.9% versus 11.0%, p-value < 0.0001) and aged over 70 (5.9% versus 9.4%, p-value < 0.0001). The median TTNT was not reached.
CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest cohorts of ibrutinib-treated patients in the world. The profile of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib was in accordance with the marketing authorization and reimbursement. This study confirmed effectiveness and safety data.

The mutational status of the IGHV gene is routinely assessed in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), since it is both prognostic of clinical outcome and predictive of response to treatment. This study evaluates the IGHV mutational status, assessed in newly diagnosed CLL patients, as a stand-alone predictor of time to first treatment (TTFT). We analysed the data of 236 CLL patients, diagnosed at our centre between January 2004 and September 2020, with a minimum follow-up period of 3.0 years, Binet A-B and Rai 0-II stages. IGHV was unmutated in 38.1 % and mutated in 61.9 % of cases. The univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in TTFT based on unmutated (85.2 % at 14 years, 95 % CI = 63.3-94.5 %) or mutated (41.3 % at 14 years, 95 % CI = 29.5-51.8 %) and the need for treatment at 1, 3 and 5 years was of 20.0 % vs 4.1 % (p < 0.001), 42.7 % vs 11.4 % (p < 0.001) and 55.8 % vs 20.0 % (p < 0.001) in unmutated and mutated IGHV patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that unmutated IGHV status negatively affects TTFT (p < 0.001), in addition to high-risk genomic aberration (p = 0.025), Rai stage I (p = 0.007) and II (p-value < 0.001). The difference in TTFT based on unmutated or mutated IGHV status remains statistically significant also when considering the subgroups by the genomic aberrations and Rai stages. Our findings suggest that, with the single analysis of the IGHV mutational status at CLL diagnosis, along with clinical and laboratory data, and without karyotype and TP53 data, clinicians will have prognostic and predictive indications for the first clinical treatment and appropriate follow-up of patients.

In chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), comorbidities assessed by the CLL comorbidity index (CLL-CI) have been associated with outcomes in Western cohorts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of an unselected Middle Eastern cohort of newly diagnosed CLL patients seen at the Kuwait Cancer Control Center (n = 300). Compared to Western studies, these Middle Eastern patients were diagnosed at a younger age (median of 59) and had a higher comorbidity burden (69% non-low risk CLL-CI). A higher CLL-CI score was independently associated with significantly shorter event-free survival and greater risk of death. Our analysis demonstrates that CLL-CI is a valuable tool for comorbidity assessment and prognostic influence in (relatively young) Middle Eastern CLL patients.

Pharmacotherapy options for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) have expanded significantly in recent years. These options include chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy and signalling pathway inhibitors. A notable shift in the treatment landscape began with the widespread adoption of ibrutinib in 2016. This analysis of claims data focuses on understanding how the use of novel therapies has evolved in clinical practice over the past decade in Germany. Anonymized claims data (2010-2022) from German statutory health insurance was used, covering patient demographics, treatments, and prescriptions. The study population included patients with two confirmed CLL diagnoses. Treatment patterns were analysed, and survival outcomes were compared using time-to-event analyses. In the analysed cohort of 2983 incident CLL patients, 1041 started first-line therapy between 2011 and 2022, with a median duration of 18 months from diagnosis to the first prescription. Chemoimmunotherapy, the predominant 1L therapy until 2019, decreased significantly, while targeted therapy usage increased from 3% in 2015 to 77% in 2022. Targeted therapies became dominant in patients receiving treatment for relapsed or refractory disease after 2016. Median treatment durations were: 122 days for chemo, 176 days for chemo-immuno, and 373 days for targeted therapy. The overall survival for patients diagnosed in or after 2016 was significantly better (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.69)). The adoption of targeted therapies like ibrutinib and venetoclax has transformed CLL treatment in Germany, leading to improved patient outcomes. Additionally, we demonstrate successful adherence to evolving clinical guidelines.