central venous catheters

中心静脉导管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)患者血栓形成的风险增加。他们通常需要肠胃外营养(PN),需要长时间静脉进入。我们评估了接受家庭PN(HPN)的IBD患者与外周中心静脉导管(PICC)和隧道导管相关的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的风险。
    方法:使用克利夫兰诊所HPN注册表,我们回顾性研究了2019年6月30日至2023年1月1日期间接受HPN治疗的IBD成人队列.我们收集了人口统计,导管类型,和导管相关DVT(CADVT)数据。我们进行了描述性统计和泊松检验,以比较感兴趣的参数之间的CADVT率。我们生成了Kaplan-Meier图来说明无CADVT生存的寿命和Cox比例风险模型来计算与CADVT相关的风险比。
    结果:我们收集了407名患者的数据,其中,276(68%)接受隧道导管,131(32%)接受PICC作为初始导管。有17例CADVT,总发生率为0.08/1000导管天,而PICC和隧道导管的DVT个体比率为0.16和0.05/1000导管天,分别(P=0.03)。在调整了年龄之后,性别,和合并症,与隧道导管相比,PICC的CADVT风险明显更高,调整后的风险比为2.962(95%CI=1.140-7.698;P=0.025),调整后的发生率比为3.66(95%CI=2.637-4.696;P=0.013)。
    结论:我们的研究表明,与隧道导管相比,PICC的CADVT风险高出近三倍。对于需要输注HPN超过30天的IBD患者,我们建议放置隧道导管。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombosis. They often need parenteral nutrition (PN) requiring intravenous access for prolonged periods. We assessed the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and tunneled catheters for patients with IBD receiving home PN (HPN).
    METHODS: Using the Cleveland Clinic HPN Registry, we retrospectively studied a cohort of adults with IBD who received HPN between June 30, 2019 and January 1, 2023. We collected demographics, catheter type, and catheter-associated DVT (CADVT) data. We performed descriptive statistics and Poisson tests to compare CADVT rates among parameters of interest. We generated Kaplan-Meier graphs to illustrate longevity of CADVT-free survival and a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the hazard ratio associated with CADVT.
    RESULTS: We collected data on 407 patients, of which, 276 (68%) received tunneled catheters and 131 (32%) received PICCs as their initial catheter. There were 17 CADVTs with an overall rate of 0.08 per 1000 catheter days, whereas individual rates of DVT for PICCs and tunneled catheters were 0.16 and 0.05 per 1000 catheter days, respectively (P = 0.03). After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity, CADVT risk was significantly higher for PICCs compared with tunneled catheters, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.962 (95% CI=1.140-7.698; P = 0.025) and adjusted incidence rate ratio of 3.66 (95% CI=2.637-4.696; P = 0.013).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that CADVT risk is nearly three times higher with PICCs compared with tunneled catheters. We recommend tunneled catheter placement for patients with IBD who require HPN infusion greater than 30 days.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:危重患者中心静脉导管(CVC)相关血栓形成的发生率仍不明确,其与潜在危险后遗症的关系未知。该研究的主要目的是评估CVC相关血栓形成的流行病学;次要目的是评估导管相关血栓形成与导管相关感染的关系。肺栓塞和死亡率。
    方法:这是一个单中心,在荷兰的三级重症监护病房(ICU)进行的前瞻性观察性研究。研究人群包括CVC放置在ICU患者中,最小留置时间为48h。超声检查诊断为CVC相关血栓形成。主要结果是患病率和发病率,发病率报告为每1000个留置日的病例数.
    结果:纳入147例患者的173例CVC。患者的中位年龄为64.0[IQR:52.0,72.0],71.1%为男性。血栓形成的患病率为0.56(95%CI:0.49,0.63),每1000个留置日的发生率为65.7(95%CI:59.0,72.3)。未发现与导管相关性感染相关(p=0.566)。与肺栓塞有显著关联(p=0.022)。所有173例CVC均纳入生存分析。导管相关血栓形成与较低的28天死亡风险相关(风险比:0.39,95%CI:0.17,0.87)。
    结论:在危重患者中,导管相关血栓形成的患病率和发生率较高.导管相关性血栓形成与导管相关性感染无关,但与肺栓塞和死亡风险降低相关.
    BACKGROUND: Incidence of central venous catheter (CVC)-related thrombosis in critically ill patients remains ambiguous and its association with potential hazardous sequelae unknown. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the epidemiology of CVC-related thrombosis; secondary aims were to assess the association of catheter-related thrombosis with catheter-related infection, pulmonary embolism and mortality.
    METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in the Netherlands. The study population consisted of CVC placements in adult ICU patients with a minimal indwelling time of 48 h. CVC-related thrombosis was diagnosed with ultrasonography. Primary outcomes were prevalence and incidence, incidence was reported as the number of cases per 1000 indwelling days.
    RESULTS: 173 CVCs in 147 patients were included. Median age of patients was 64.0 [IQR: 52.0, 72.0] and 71.1 % were male. Prevalence of thrombosis was 0.56 (95 % CI: 0.49, 0.63) and incidence per 1000 indwelling days was 65.7 (95 % CI: 59.0, 72.3). No association with catheter-related infection was found (p = 0.566). There was a significant association with pulmonary embolism (p = 0.022). All 173 CVCs were included in the survival analysis. Catheter-related thrombosis was associated with a lower 28-day mortality risk (hazard ratio: 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.17, 0.87).
    CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, prevalence and incidence of catheter-related thrombosis were high. Catheter-related thrombosis was not associated with catheter-related infections, but was associated with pulmonary embolism and a decreased mortality risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耳念珠菌是一种与导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)相关的新兴多重耐药真菌。研究了氯己定(CHX)和CHX/磺胺嘧啶银浸渍(CHX-S)抗微生物中心静脉导管(CVC)对金黄色葡萄球菌的体外功效。
    方法:测定了对19种耳C.auris分离株的最低抑制(MIC)和杀菌(MBC)CHX浓度。为了评估腔外疗效,从CVC外部(CHX-S1)和外部和内部(CHX-S2)的部分进行血浆调节1天和6天,为了评估管腔内疗效,CHX-S2CVC用盐水锁预处理6天,然后进行24小时耳弧菌接种和对浸渍和未浸渍的CVC的微生物粘附性测定。
    结果:CHX抑制所有金丝酵母分离株,MIC和MBC范围为8-128μg/mL。在第1天时,CHX-S1和CHX-S2上的耳梭菌粘附性降低了100%,在第7天时为86.96%-100%,在第7天时,CHX-S2上的耳梭菌粘附性降低了56.86%-90.52%。
    结论:在本研究中观察到的CHX和CHX-SCVC对金黄色葡萄球菌的表现与在先前的临床前和随机对照临床研究中观察到的抗菌益处一致。
    结论:CHX对C.auris显示出较强的抑制和杀灭作用。在体外条件下,CHX-SCVC被证明对这种病原体非常有效。其他研究,然而,需要确认临床获益。
    BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungus associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). In-vitro efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) and CHX/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated (CHX-S) antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs) against C. auris was investigated.
    METHODS: Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) CHX concentrations were determined against nineteen C. auris isolates. To assess extraluminal efficacy, segments from CVCs impregnated externally (CHX-S1) and both externally and internally (CHX-S2) were plasma-conditioned for 1- and 6-days, and to assess intraluminal efficacy CHX-S2 CVCs were pre-conditioned with saline-lock for 6-days, followed by 24-hour C. auris inoculation and microbial adherence determination on impregnated and non-impregnated CVCs.
    RESULTS: CHX inhibited all C. auris isolates with MIC and MBC range of 8-128 μg/mL. C. auris adherence was reduced on CHX-S1 and CHX-S2 extraluminally by 100% on day-1, 86.96%-100% on day-7, and intraluminally on CHX-S2 by 56.86%-90.52% on day-7.
    CONCLUSIONS: CHX and CHX-S CVCs performance against C. auris observed in this study is consistent with antimicrobial benefits observed in prior pre-clinical and randomized controlled clinical studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: CHX showed strong inhibitory and cidal effects on C. auris. CHX-S CVCs proved highly efficacious against this pathogen under in vitro conditions. Additional studies, however, are required to confirm clinical benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外周插入的中央导管(PICC)有助于医疗保健中的诊断和治疗干预。PICC可能由于感染性和非感染性并发症而失败,PICC材料和设计可能有助于,导致患者和医疗系统的负面后遗症。
    目的:评估PICC材料和设计在减少导管失效和并发症方面的有效性。
    方法:昆士兰大学和Cochrane血管信息专家搜索了Cochrane血管专业注册,中部,MEDLINE,Embase,和CINAHL数据库以及WHOICTRP和ClinicalTrials.gov试验注册至2023年5月16日。我们旨在通过搜索检索到的纳入试验的参考列表来确定其他可能符合条件的试验或辅助出版物。以及相关的系统评价,荟萃分析,和卫生技术评估报告。我们联系了该领域的专家,以确定其他相关信息。
    方法:我们纳入了评价PICC设计和材料的随机对照试验(RCT)。
    方法:我们使用标准Cochrane方法。我们的主要结果是静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),PICC相关血流感染(BSI),遮挡,和全因死亡率。次要结果为导管失效,与PICC相关的BSI,导管断裂,PICC停留时间,和安全端点。我们使用GRADE评估了证据的确定性。
    结果:我们纳入了12项RCT,涉及约2913名参与者(一项多臂研究)。除一项研究外,所有研究在一个或多个偏倚风险领域都有较高的偏倚风险。与无瓣膜技术相比,集成瓣膜技术与无瓣膜技术相比,与无瓣膜的PICC相比,集成瓣膜技术对VTE风险的影响很小或没有差异(风险比(RR)0.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.19至2.63;I²=0%;3项研究;437名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定集成阀门技术是否降低了与PICC相关的BSI风险,证据的确定性非常低(RR0.20,95%CI0.01~4.00;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);257名参与者).与无瓣膜的PICC相比,集成瓣膜技术可能对闭塞风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.86,95%CI0.53至1.38;I²=0%;5项研究;900名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定使用集成阀门技术是否降低了全因死亡风险,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR0.85,95%CI0.44~1.64;I²=0%;2项研究;473名参与者)。与无瓣膜的PICC相比,集成瓣膜技术对导管失效风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.80,95%CI0.62至1.03;I²=0%;4项研究;720名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定集成瓣膜技术是否降低了与PICC相关的BSI风险(RR0.51,95%CI0.19至1.32;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);542名参与者)或导管断裂,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR1.05,95%CI0.22~5.06;I²=20%;4项研究;799名参与者).我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面修饰的导管是否可降低VTE风险(RR0.67,95%CI0.13至3.54;I²=15%;2项研究;257名参与者)或PICC相关BSI,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR0.20,95%CI0.01~4.00;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究无事件);257名参与者).我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面修饰导管是否能减少闭塞(RR0.69,95%CI0.04-11.22;I²=70%;2项研究;257名参与者)或全因死亡风险,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR0.49,95%CI0.05至5.26;I²=不适用;1项研究;111名参与者)。使用抗血栓形成表面改性导管可能对导管失效风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.76,95%CI0.37至1.54;I²=46%;2项研究;257名参与者;低确定性证据)。在一项研究中没有PICC相关BSI的报道(111名参与者)。因此,我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面修饰导管是否能降低PICC相关BSI风险(RR不可估计;I²=不适用;确定性证据非常低).我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面改性导管是否能降低导管断裂的风险。证据的确定性非常低(RR0.15,95%CI0.01~2.79;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);257名参与者).我们不确定抗菌浸渍导管的使用是否能降低VTE风险(RR0.54,95%CI0.05至5.88;I²=不适用;1项研究;167名参与者)或PICC相关的BSI风险,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR2.17,95%CI0.20至23.53;I²=不适用;1项研究;167名参与者)。抗菌药物浸渍导管可能对闭塞风险影响很小或没有影响(RR1.00,95%CI0.57至1.74;I²=0%;2项研究;1025名参与者;中度确定性证据)或全因死亡率(RR1.12,95%CI0.71至1.75;I²=0%;2项研究;1082名参与者;中度确定性证据)。浸渍抗菌药物的导管可能对导管失效风险影响很小或没有影响(RR1.04,95%CI0.82至1.30;I²=不适用;1项研究;221名参与者;低确定性证据)。抗菌药物浸渍的导管可能对PICC相关的BSI风险影响很小或没有影响(RR1.05,95%CI0.71至1.55;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);1082名参与者;中度确定性证据)。浸渍抗菌药物的导管可能对导管断裂的风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.86,95%CI0.19至3.83;I²=不适用;1项研究;804名参与者;低确定性证据)。
    结论:可用于指导临床医生对PICC材料和设计决策的高质量RCT证据有限。当前证据的局限性包括样本量小,罕见事件,和偏见的风险。静脉血栓栓塞的风险可能几乎没有差异,PICC相关BSI,遮挡,或PICC材料和设计的死亡率。需要进一步严格的RCT来减少不确定性。
    BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) facilitate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in health care. PICCs can fail due to infective and non-infective complications, which PICC materials and design may contribute to, leading to negative sequelae for patients and healthcare systems.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of PICC material and design in reducing catheter failure and complications.
    METHODS: The University of Queensland and Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 16 May 2023. We aimed to identify other potentially eligible trials or ancillary publications by searching the reference lists of retrieved included trials, as well as relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and health technology assessment reports. We contacted experts in the field to ascertain additional relevant information.
    METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PICC design and materials.
    METHODS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were venous thromboembolism (VTE), PICC-associated bloodstream infection (BSI), occlusion, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were catheter failure, PICC-related BSI, catheter breakage, PICC dwell time, and safety endpoints. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
    RESULTS: We included 12 RCTs involving approximately 2913 participants (one multi-arm study). All studies except one had a high risk of bias in one or more risk of bias domain. Integrated valve technology compared to no valve technology for peripherally inserted central catheter design Integrated valve technology may make little or no difference to VTE risk when compared with PICCs with no valve (risk ratio (RR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 2.63; I² = 0%; 3 studies; 437 participants; low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether integrated valve technology reduces PICC-associated BSI risk, as the certainty of the evidence is very low (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 257 participants). Integrated valve technology may make little or no difference to occlusion risk when compared with PICCs with no valve (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.38; I² = 0%; 5 studies; 900 participants; low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether use of integrated valve technology reduces all-cause mortality risk, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.64; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 473 participants). Integrated valve technology may make little or no difference to catheter failure risk when compared with PICCs with no valve (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.03; I² = 0%; 4 studies; 720 participants; low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether integrated-valve technology reduces PICC-related BSI risk (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.32; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 542 participants) or catheter breakage, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.22 to 5.06; I² = 20%; 4 studies; 799 participants). Anti-thrombogenic surface modification compared to no anti-thrombogenic surface modification for peripherally inserted central catheter design We are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces risk of VTE (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.54; I² = 15%; 2 studies; 257 participants) or PICC-associated BSI, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 257 participants). We are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces occlusion (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.04 to 11.22; I² = 70%; 2 studies; 257 participants) or all-cause mortality risk, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.26; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 111 participants). Use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters may make little or no difference to risk of catheter failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.54; I² = 46%; 2 studies; 257 participants; low certainty evidence). No PICC-related BSIs were reported in one study (111 participants). As such, we are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces PICC-related BSI risk (RR not estimable; I² = not applicable; very low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces the risk of catheter breakage, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.79; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 257 participants). Antimicrobial impregnation compared to non-antimicrobial impregnation for peripherally inserted central catheter design We are uncertain whether use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters reduces VTE risk (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.88; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 167 participants) or PICC-associated BSI risk, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 2.17, 95% CI 0.20 to 23.53; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 167 participants). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters probably make little or no difference to occlusion risk (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.74; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 1025 participants; moderate certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.75; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 1082 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters may make little or no difference to risk of catheter failure (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 221 participants; low certainty evidence). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters probably make little or no difference to PICC-related BSI risk (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.55; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 1082 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters may make little or no difference to risk of catheter breakage (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.83; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 804 participants; low certainty evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: There is limited high-quality RCT evidence available to inform clinician decision-making for PICC materials and design. Limitations of the current evidence include small sample sizes, infrequent events, and risk of bias. There may be little to no difference in the risk of VTE, PICC-associated BSI, occlusion, or mortality across PICC materials and designs. Further rigorous RCTs are needed to reduce uncertainty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脐静脉导管是早产儿和危重患儿在新生儿重症监护病房中的重要接入装置。正确的定位至关重要,因为错位会导致严重的并发症。根据国际准则,脐静脉导管尖端的位置必须实时评估;传统上,导管用胸腹X线观察,但最有效和最安全的方法之一是实时超声。
    方法:本研究比较了实时超声和传统X线方法评估461例脐静脉导管尖端位置的情况。回顾性分析尖端错位的发生率。次要目的是评估脐静脉导管的留置时间和移除原因。
    结果:实时超声尖端位置,被发现更可靠和高效,与X射线评估相比,原发性定位不良的发生率显着降低(9.6vs.75.9%)。该研究还强调了实时超声与减少导管操作的关联,更少的射线照片,脐静脉导管留置次数较多。多元逻辑回归显示,使用实时超声尖端定位的脐静脉导管尖端中心安全位置的可能性很高(比值比29.5,95%置信区间:17.4-49.4)。
    结论:研究结果支持在临床环境中采用实时超声来提高脐静脉导管放置的准确性并将相关风险降至最低。需要最少的培训投资才能熟练地可视化脐静脉导管,在程序的成本效益和提高患者安全性方面提供了实质性优势。
    BACKGROUND: The umbilical venous catheter is a vital access device in neonatal intensive care units for preterm and critically ill infants. Correct positioning is crucial, as malpositioning can lead to severe complications. According to international guidelines, the position of the umbilical venous catheter tip must be assessed in real time; traditionally, the catheter is visualized with a thoracoabdominal X-ray, but one of the most effective and safest methods is therefore real-time ultrasound.
    METHODS: This study compares real-time ultrasound and traditional X-ray methods for assessing umbilical venous catheter tip location in 461 cases. The rate of tip malposition was analyzed retrospectively. The secondary aim was to assess indwelling time of umbilical venous catheters and reasons of removal.
    RESULTS: Real-time ultrasound tip location, found to be more reliable and efficient, demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of primary malpositioning compared to X-ray assessments (9.6 vs. 75.9%). The study also highlighted the association of real-time ultrasound with reduced catheter manipulation, fewer radiographs, and higher indwelling times of umbilical venous catheter. The multiple logistic regression showed a high probability of the central safe position of the umbilical venous catheter tip using real-time ultrasound tip location (odds ratio 29.5, 95% confidence interval: 17.4-49.4).
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the adoption of real-time ultrasound in clinical settings to enhance umbilical venous catheter placement accuracy and minimize associated risks. A minimal training investment is needed to attain the proficiency to visualize the umbilical venous catheters, offering a substantial advantage in terms of both cost-effectiveness for the procedure and enhanced patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:经外周插入的中央导管(PICC)和中线导管(MC)可以提供方便的静脉通路,但是支持他们在姑息治疗中地位的证据是有限的。本综述旨在评估导管适应症,利用率,并发症,停留时间,以及接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的患者体验。
    方法:在Medline进行了关于导管使用支持或症状治疗的系统研究,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScience,科克伦,和中央数据库。包括研究人群或姑息治疗癌症患者亚组的研究。使用有效公共卫生实践质量评估工具评估研究质量。
    结果:在7631个独特的标题中,详细研究了17篇文章,均在2002年至2022年之间发布。导管中值停留时间从15天到194天不等。用于家庭肠外营养的时间最长。对于疼痛和症状管理,典型的持续时间是2-4周,通常直到病人死亡。并发症发生率很低,血栓形成,感染,和闭塞范围从0到2.46事件/1000导管天。在姑息治疗服务的研究中,患者在手术过程中报告的痛苦最小,用户满意度高。术后生活质量评估有所改善,可能受同时提供专科姑息治疗的影响。所有研究均被评估为中等或较弱的质量。
    结论:PICC和MC是姑息治疗癌症患者的安全和有价值的工具,他们将受益于静脉介入治疗的症状管理。需要进一步的研究来阐明PICC或MC在姑息治疗中的适应症。
    BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters (MCs) may offer convenient intravenous access, but evidence to support their place in palliative care is limited. This review aimed to assess catheter indications, utilization, complications, dwell time, and patient experiences in cancer patients receiving palliative care.
    METHODS: A systematic search for studies on catheter utilization for supportive or symptom treatment was conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CENTRAL databases. Studies with a study population or a subgroup of palliative care cancer patients were included. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Quality assessment tool.
    RESULTS: Of 7631 unique titles, 17 articles were examined in detail, all published between 2002 and 2022. Median catheter dwell time varied from 15 to 194 days, the longest when utilized for home parenteral nutrition. For pain and symptom management, the typical duration was 2-4 weeks, often until the patient\'s death. Complication rates were minimal, with thrombosis, infections, and occlusion ranging from 0 to 2.46 incidents per 1000 catheter days. In studies from palliative care services, patients reported minimal distress during procedures and high user satisfaction. Quality of life assessments post-procedure improved, possibly influenced by concurrent specialist palliative care provision. All studies were assessed to be of moderate or weak quality.
    CONCLUSIONS: PICC and MC are safe and valuable tools in palliative care cancer patients who would benefit from intravenous access for symptom management. Further studies are needed to clarify indications for PICC or MC in palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内设备对于儿科多种疾病的诊断和治疗方法至关重要。和中心静脉导管(CVC)尤为重要。最常见的并发症之一是这些设备的感染,这与高发病率和死亡率有关。这些感染非常复杂,需要使用大量资源,对于他们的诊断和治疗,并更频繁地影响入住高复杂性病房的弱势儿科患者。与成年人相比,儿科患者的管理证据较少,西班牙没有发表关于这一主题的共识文件。本文件的目的,由西班牙儿科传染病学会(SEIP)和西班牙儿科重症监护学会(SECIP)联合开发,旨在基于可获得的最大程度的证据提供共识建议,以优化导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)的诊断和治疗。本文件侧重于CRBSIs的非新生儿儿科患者,没有涉及这些感染的预防。
    Intravascular devices are essential for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to multiple diseases in paediatrics, and central venous catheters (CVCs) are especially important. One of the most frequent complications is the infection of these devices, which is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. These infections are highly complex, requiring the use of substantial resources, both for their diagnosis and treatment, and affect vulnerable paediatric patients admitted to high-complexity units more frequently. There is less evidence on their management in paediatric patients compared to adults, and no consensus documents on the subject have been published in Spain. The objective of this document, developed jointly by the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases (SEIP) and the Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP), is to provide consensus recommendations based on the greatest degree of evidence available to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). This document focuses on non-neonatal paediatric patients with CRBSIs and does not address the prevention of these infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有终末期肾病(ESRD)的血液透析患者容易感染和菌群失调。导管相关感染通常由机会性皮肤病原体引起。这项研究旨在比较隧道袖口导管(导管周围组)和对侧部位(对照组)出口部位周围的皮肤微生物群变化。
    招募接受血液透析的ESRD患者。用潮湿的皮肤拭子收集皮肤微生物群,并使用16SrDNAV3-V4区域的高通量测序进行分析。去噪之后,去复制,去除嵌合体,读数被分配到零半径操作分类单位(ZOTU).
    我们发现,与对照组相比,导管周组的α多样性显着降低,正如香农所指出的,约斯特,和公平性指数,但不是通过Chao1或丰富度指数。Beta多样性分析显示,导管周围的微生物区系与其相应的对照组存在显着差异。Firmicutes的代表过多,放线菌的代表不足,变形杆菌,和酸性细菌在导管周围组的门水平。最丰富的ZOTU(葡萄球菌属。)急剧增加,而Cutibacterium,一种共生细菌,在导管周围组下降。网络分析显示,皮肤微生物群显示出与局部和生化因素的协方差。
    总而言之,与对照部位相比,ESRD透析患者的出口部位存在显著的皮肤微生物群失调.管理皮肤菌群失调是预防导管相关细菌感染的有希望的目标。
    UNASSIGNED: Hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are susceptible to infections and dysbiosis. Catheter-related infections are typically caused by opportunistic skin pathogens. This study aims to compare the skin microbiota changes around the exit site of tunneled cuffed catheters (peri-catheter group) and the contralateral site (control group).
    UNASSIGNED: ESRD patients on hemodialysis were recruited. The skin microbiota were collected with moist skin swabs and analyzed using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA V3-V4 region. After denoising, de-replication, and removal of chimeras, the reads were assigned to zero-radius operational taxonomic units (ZOTU).
    UNASSIGNED: We found significantly reduced alpha diversity in the peri-catheter group compared to the control group, as indicated by the Shannon, Jost, and equitability indexes, but not by the Chao1 or richness indexes. Beta diversity analysis revealed significant deviation of the peri-catheter microbiota from its corresponding control group. There was an overrepresentation of Firmicutes and an underrepresentation of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria at the phylum level in the peri-catheter group. The most abundant ZOTU (Staphylococcus spp.) drastically increased, while Cutibacterium, a commensal bacterium, decreased in the peri-catheter group. Network analysis revealed that the skin microbiota demonstrated covariance with both local and biochemical factors.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, there was significant skin microbiota dysbiosis at the exit sites compared to the control sites in ESRD dialysis patients. Managing skin dysbiosis represents a promising target in the prevention of catheter-related bacterial infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于患有金黄色葡萄球菌中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CLABSI)的成人,建议拔除导管,但对于长期使用中心静脉导管(LTCVC)的儿童,存在争议。我们评估了患有金黄色葡萄球菌LTCVC相关CLABSI的儿童的导管抢救策略(CSS)的发生,并评估了CSS失败的决定因素。
    方法:我们回顾性地纳入了法国8家三级保健医院(2010-2018年)的患有LTCVC和金黄色葡萄球菌CLABSI住院的儿童(<18岁)。CSS定义为在开始经验性抗生素治疗怀疑菌血症后≥72小时的LTCVC。回顾了患者的特征,并进行多变量逻辑回归以确定与CSS失败相关的因素(即,持久性,复发,或菌血症的并发症)。
    结果:我们纳入了273例金黄色葡萄球菌LTCVC相关CLABSI。CSS在273例(71%)中的194例中被选中,其中74例(38%)失败。CSS失败的主要类型是持续的菌血症(74例中有39例,53%)。与CSS失败独立相关的因素是:导管感染史(调整比值比[aOR]3.18,95%置信区间[95CI]1.38-7.36),CLABSI发生在植入式静脉接入装置上(aOR7.61,95CI1.98-29.20),与带隧道的CVC相比,多微生物CLABSI(AOR3.45,95CI1.25-9.50),感染初期严重脓毒症(aOR4.46,95CI1.18-16.82)。
    结论:在患有金黄色葡萄球菌LTCVC相关CLABSI的儿童中经常选择CSS,和失败发生在三分之一的案例。确定的风险因素可以帮助临床医生识别有CSS失败风险的儿童。
    OBJECTIVE: Catheter removal is recommended in adults with S. aureus central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) but is controversial in children with long-term central venous catheters (LTCVC). We evaluated the occurrence of catheter salvage strategy (CSS) in children with S. aureus LTCVC-associated CLABSI and assessed determinants of CSS failure.
    METHODS: We retrospectively included children (<18 years) with an LTCVC and hospitalized with S. aureus CLABSI in 8 French tertiary care hospitals (2010-2018). CSS was defined as an LTCVC left in place ≥ 72 hours after initiating empiric antibiotic treatment for suspected bacteremia. Characteristics of patients were reviewed, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with CSS failure (i.e., persistence, recurrence, or complications of bacteremia).
    RESULTS: We included 273 episodes of S. aureus LTCVC-associated CLABSI. CSS was chosen in 194 out of 273 (71%) cases and failed in 74 of them (38%). The main type of CSS failure was the persistence of bacteremia (39 out of 74 cases, 53%). Factors independently associated with CSS failure were: history of catheter infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.18, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.38-7.36), CLABSI occurring on an implantable venous access device (aOR 7.61, 95%CI 1.98-29.20) when compared with tunneled-cuffed CVC, polymicrobial CLABSI (aOR 3.45, 95%CI 1.25-9.50), and severe sepsis at the initial stage of infection (aOR 4.46, 95%CI 1.18-16.82).
    CONCLUSIONS: CSS was frequently chosen in children with S. aureus LTCVC-associated CLABSI, and failure occurred in one-third of cases. The identified risk factors may help clinicians identify children at risk for CSS failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:维持静脉通路具有重要的临床意义。在外周静脉导管(PIVC)中通常使用缓慢连续输注以保持静脉开放(KVO)。先前的研究比较了通过外周插入的中央导管(PICCs)间歇性冲洗和连续输注的效果。在这项研究中,我们将KVO应用于中心静脉导管(CVC),并比较了该技术与间歇冲洗技术的闭塞率.
    方法:这是一项中国14家医院的随机对照试验。这项研究将招募250名患者,他们将以1:1的比例随机化。纳入研究后,将接受CVC插入的患者将接受用预充式盐水注射器间歇冲洗(对照组)或用弹性泵输注KVO(试验组).在第3天和第7天,通过检查导管注射和抽吸(CINAS)分类来检查所有导管的通畅性。主要结果是7天内导管闭塞率。将对患者进行随访,直到CVC插入后9天,导管闭塞,或导管移除。次要结果是3天内导管闭塞率,护士满意度,成本效益,不良事件发生率,导管相关血流感染率,导管相关血栓形成率,外渗率,静脉炎发生率,和导管迁移。
    结论:我们希望该试验将产生可为临床导管冲洗技术的改进和优化提供循证依据的发现。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2200064007。2022年9月23日注册。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311。
    BACKGROUND: Maintaining venous access is of great clinical importance. Running a slow continuous infusion to keep the vein open (KVO) is often used in peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs). Previous studies have compared the effects of intermittent flushing and continuous infusion via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). In this study, we applied KVO to central venous catheters (CVCs) and compared the occlusion rate of this technique with that of the intermittent flushing technique.
    METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial of 14 hospitals in China. A total of 250 patients will be recruited in this study, and they will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio. After study inclusion, patients who will undergo CVC insertion will receive intermittent flushing with prefilled saline syringes (control group) or KVO infusion with elastic pumps (test group). All the catheters will be checked for patency by scoping Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) Classification on Days 3 and 7. The primary outcome is the rate of catheter occlusion in 7 days. Patients will be followed up until 9 days after CVC insertion, catheter occlusion, or catheter removal. The secondary outcomes are the rate of catheter occlusion in 3 days, nurse satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, adverse event rate, catheter-related bloodstream infection rate, catheter-related thrombosis rate, extravasation rate, phlebitis rate, and catheter migration.
    CONCLUSIONS: We expect that the trial will generate findings that can provide an evidence-based basis for the improvement and optimization of clinical catheter flushing techniques.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200064007. Registered on 23 September 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号