central venous catheters

中心静脉导管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项荟萃分析评估了ABO血型与中心静脉导管相关性血栓形成(CRT)的相关性。
    方法:数据来自2015年1月至2021年12月四川省肿瘤医院的8477例患者,以及以前在中英文数据库中发表的文章。我们医院的数据是通过查看电子病历收集的。搜索数据库包括CNKI,VIP,万芳,中国生物医学,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,EMBASE,CINAHL,和OVID(截至2023年7月)。所有统计分析均使用SPSS22.0和Revman5.3进行。Bonferroni方法用于调整α检验水平,以降低多重比较中I错误的风险。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。使用两个独立样本T检验分析连续变量。卡方检验用于分析分类数据。
    结果:在搜索中确定了总共818项研究。然而,只有4项研究符合纳入标准.结合我们医院的数据,纳入5项研究,共18407例.这些研究仅集中于外周插入中心静脉导管(PICC)。根据我们医院的数据,Logistic回归显示骨髓抑制[比值比(OR),1.473;P=0.005)和放疗(OR,1.524;P<0.001)是症状性PICC-VTE的独立危险因素。A型血(或,1.404;P=0.008),B(或,1.393;P=0.016),和AB(或,1.861;P<0.001)与有症状的PICC-VTE的风险明显高于O型血。血液肿瘤的PICC-VTE的风险明显高于乳腺癌(OR,0.149;P<0.001),和妇科肿瘤(OR,0.386;P=0.002)。在ABO血型与PICC相关性血栓的meta分析中,I2统计量在任何成对比较中都不显著,固定效应模型随后用于所有分析.荟萃分析表明,O型血个体的症状性PICC相关血栓发生率(3.30%)明显低于A型血个体(4.92%),B(5.20%),或AB型(6.58%)血型(均P<0.0083)。然而,在A之间的成对比较中,B,AB,差异无统计学意义(P>0.0083).
    结论:根据我们单中心分析的结果,我们发现骨髓抑制,放射治疗,血液肿瘤,非O型血是症状性PICC相关血栓形成的独立危险因素。在进一步探讨ABO血型与PICC相关血栓形成的Meta分析中,我们发现ABO血型可能影响PICC相关血栓形成,O型血个体发生PICC相关血栓的风险低于非O型血个体。
    BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis evaluated the association of ABO blood type on central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CRT).
    METHODS: Data were derived from 8477 patients at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 and articles previously published in Chinese and English databases. Data from our hospital were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. Searched databases included CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang, China Biomedical, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and OVID (up to July 2023). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 and Revman 5.3. The Bonferroni method was used to adjust the α test level for reducing the risk of I errors in the multiple comparisons. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were analyzed using a two-independent sample T test. The chi-squared test was used to analyze categorical data.
    RESULTS: A total of 818 studies were identified in the search. However, only four studies met the inclusion criteria. Combined with data from our hospital, five studies were included with a total of 18407 cases. Those studies only focused on peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). According to the data from our hospital, logistic regression revealed that myelosuppression [odds ratio (OR), 1.473; P = 0.005) and radiotherapy(OR, 1.524; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for symptomatic PICC- VTE. Blood types A (OR, 1.404; P = 0.008), B (OR, 1.393; P = 0.016), and AB (OR, 1.861; P<0.001) were associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic PICC-VTE than blood type O. And the hematologic tumor has a significantly higher risk of PICC-VTE than breast cancer (OR, 0.149; P < 0.001), and gynecological tumor (OR, 0.386; P = 0.002). In the meta-analysis of the association between ABO blood type and PICC related thrombosis, the I2 statistic was not significant in any of the pairwise comparisons, and a fixed-effects model was subsequently used for all analyses. The meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of symptomatic PICC related thrombosis was significantly lower in individuals with the O blood type (3.30%) than in those with the A (4.92%), B (5.20%), or AB (6.58%) blood types (all P < 0.0083). However, in the pairwise comparisons among A, B, and AB, the differences were nonsignificant (P > 0.0083).
    CONCLUSIONS: According to the results from our single center analysis, we found that myelosuppression, radiotherapy, hematologic tumor, and non-O blood type were independent risk factors for symptomatic PICC related thrombosis. In the meta-analysis of further exploration of ABO blood type and PICC related thrombosis, we found that ABO blood type may influence PICC related thrombosis, and individuals with the O blood type had a lower risk of PICC related thrombosis than those with non-O blood type.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有终末期肾病(ESRD)的血液透析患者容易感染和菌群失调。导管相关感染通常由机会性皮肤病原体引起。这项研究旨在比较隧道袖口导管(导管周围组)和对侧部位(对照组)出口部位周围的皮肤微生物群变化。
    招募接受血液透析的ESRD患者。用潮湿的皮肤拭子收集皮肤微生物群,并使用16SrDNAV3-V4区域的高通量测序进行分析。去噪之后,去复制,去除嵌合体,读数被分配到零半径操作分类单位(ZOTU).
    我们发现,与对照组相比,导管周组的α多样性显着降低,正如香农所指出的,约斯特,和公平性指数,但不是通过Chao1或丰富度指数。Beta多样性分析显示,导管周围的微生物区系与其相应的对照组存在显着差异。Firmicutes的代表过多,放线菌的代表不足,变形杆菌,和酸性细菌在导管周围组的门水平。最丰富的ZOTU(葡萄球菌属。)急剧增加,而Cutibacterium,一种共生细菌,在导管周围组下降。网络分析显示,皮肤微生物群显示出与局部和生化因素的协方差。
    总而言之,与对照部位相比,ESRD透析患者的出口部位存在显著的皮肤微生物群失调.管理皮肤菌群失调是预防导管相关细菌感染的有希望的目标。
    UNASSIGNED: Hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are susceptible to infections and dysbiosis. Catheter-related infections are typically caused by opportunistic skin pathogens. This study aims to compare the skin microbiota changes around the exit site of tunneled cuffed catheters (peri-catheter group) and the contralateral site (control group).
    UNASSIGNED: ESRD patients on hemodialysis were recruited. The skin microbiota were collected with moist skin swabs and analyzed using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA V3-V4 region. After denoising, de-replication, and removal of chimeras, the reads were assigned to zero-radius operational taxonomic units (ZOTU).
    UNASSIGNED: We found significantly reduced alpha diversity in the peri-catheter group compared to the control group, as indicated by the Shannon, Jost, and equitability indexes, but not by the Chao1 or richness indexes. Beta diversity analysis revealed significant deviation of the peri-catheter microbiota from its corresponding control group. There was an overrepresentation of Firmicutes and an underrepresentation of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria at the phylum level in the peri-catheter group. The most abundant ZOTU (Staphylococcus spp.) drastically increased, while Cutibacterium, a commensal bacterium, decreased in the peri-catheter group. Network analysis revealed that the skin microbiota demonstrated covariance with both local and biochemical factors.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, there was significant skin microbiota dysbiosis at the exit sites compared to the control sites in ESRD dialysis patients. Managing skin dysbiosis represents a promising target in the prevention of catheter-related bacterial infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:维持静脉通路具有重要的临床意义。在外周静脉导管(PIVC)中通常使用缓慢连续输注以保持静脉开放(KVO)。先前的研究比较了通过外周插入的中央导管(PICCs)间歇性冲洗和连续输注的效果。在这项研究中,我们将KVO应用于中心静脉导管(CVC),并比较了该技术与间歇冲洗技术的闭塞率.
    方法:这是一项中国14家医院的随机对照试验。这项研究将招募250名患者,他们将以1:1的比例随机化。纳入研究后,将接受CVC插入的患者将接受用预充式盐水注射器间歇冲洗(对照组)或用弹性泵输注KVO(试验组).在第3天和第7天,通过检查导管注射和抽吸(CINAS)分类来检查所有导管的通畅性。主要结果是7天内导管闭塞率。将对患者进行随访,直到CVC插入后9天,导管闭塞,或导管移除。次要结果是3天内导管闭塞率,护士满意度,成本效益,不良事件发生率,导管相关血流感染率,导管相关血栓形成率,外渗率,静脉炎发生率,和导管迁移。
    结论:我们希望该试验将产生可为临床导管冲洗技术的改进和优化提供循证依据的发现。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2200064007。2022年9月23日注册。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311。
    BACKGROUND: Maintaining venous access is of great clinical importance. Running a slow continuous infusion to keep the vein open (KVO) is often used in peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs). Previous studies have compared the effects of intermittent flushing and continuous infusion via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). In this study, we applied KVO to central venous catheters (CVCs) and compared the occlusion rate of this technique with that of the intermittent flushing technique.
    METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial of 14 hospitals in China. A total of 250 patients will be recruited in this study, and they will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio. After study inclusion, patients who will undergo CVC insertion will receive intermittent flushing with prefilled saline syringes (control group) or KVO infusion with elastic pumps (test group). All the catheters will be checked for patency by scoping Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) Classification on Days 3 and 7. The primary outcome is the rate of catheter occlusion in 7 days. Patients will be followed up until 9 days after CVC insertion, catheter occlusion, or catheter removal. The secondary outcomes are the rate of catheter occlusion in 3 days, nurse satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, adverse event rate, catheter-related bloodstream infection rate, catheter-related thrombosis rate, extravasation rate, phlebitis rate, and catheter migration.
    CONCLUSIONS: We expect that the trial will generate findings that can provide an evidence-based basis for the improvement and optimization of clinical catheter flushing techniques.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200064007. Registered on 23 September 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中央导管血流感染(CRBSI)是医疗保健相关感染的主要原因。然而,很少有因素被普遍接受,一些研究对一些因素有矛盾的发现,可能是由于与个体研究相关的局限性引起的。本研究旨在确定重症监护病房CRBSI的危险因素。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,科克伦图书馆,Webofscience和EMBASE数据库以及4个顶级中文数据库,包括万方数据,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和中国科技期刊数据库(VIP),截至2023年7月的中国生物制药圆盘(CBM)。纳入病例对照和队列研究。两位作者独立筛选了文献,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估了研究质量。使用比值比(OR)估计合并效应大小,计算相应的95%置信区间(CI)。CochraneQ(χ2)和I2检验用于评估研究之间的异质性,并使用固定或随机效应模型测试每个风险因素的稳健性。
    结果:共纳入32项研究,其中确定了11个因素,它们分为两类:可改变的和不可改变的因素。可改变的因素:导管插入时间(≥5d)(OR:2.07,95CI:1.41-3.03),导管插入时间(≥7d)(OR:3.62,95CI:2.65-4.97),导管插入时间(≥14d)(OR:4.85,95CI:3.35-7.01),总肠外营养(OR:2.27,95CI:1.56-3.29),使用多腔导管(OR:3.41,95CI:2.27-5.11),管留置次数(OR:3.50,95CI:2.93-4.17),ICU住院时间(OR:4.05,95CI:2.41-6.80),留置位置(OR:2.41,95CI:2.03-2.85);不可修改因素:APACHEII评分(OR:1.84,95CI:1.54-2.20),年龄≥60岁(OR:2.19,95CI:1.76-2.73),抗生素的广泛使用(OR:3.54,95CI:1.65-7.61),糖尿病(OR:3.06,95CI:2.56-3.66),免疫抑制(OR:2.87,95CI:2.08-3.95)。
    结论:针对上述可改变因素的有效干预措施可能会降低ICU发生CRBSI的风险,并改善患者的临床预后。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
    BACKGROUND: Central catheter bloodstream infections (CRBSI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. However, few factors are generally accepted and some studies have conflicting finding about some factors, possibly caused by limitation associated with an individual study. This study was to identify risk factors for CRBSI in intensive care units.
    METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science and EMBASE databases and the 4 top Chinese-language databases, including WanFang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) as of July 2023. Case control and cohort studies were included. Two authors independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The pooled effect size was estimated using the odds ratio (OR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Cochrane Q (χ2) and I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity among studies, and each risk factor was tested for its robustness using fixed- or random-effects models.
    RESULTS: A total of 32 studies enrolled, among which eleven factors were identified, they were divided into two categories: modifiable and unmodifiable factors. Modifiable factors: duration of catheterization (≥ 5d) (OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.41-3.03), duration of catheterization (≥ 7d) (OR: 3.62, 95%CI: 2.65-4.97), duration of catheterization (≥ 14d)(OR: 4.85, 95%CI: 3.35-7.01), total parenteral nutrition (OR: 2.27,95%CI: 1.56-3.29), use of multiple-lumen catheters(OR: 3.41, 95%CI: 2.27-5.11), times of tube indwelling (OR: 3.50, 95%CI: 2.93-4.17), length of ICU stay (OR: 4.05, 95%CI: 2.41-6.80), the position of indwelling(OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 2.03-2.85); Unmodifiable factors: APACHEII scores (OR: 1.84, 95%CI: 1.54-2.20), Age≥ 60 years old (OR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.76-2.73), the extensive use of antibiotic (OR: 3.54, 95%CI: 1.65-7.61), Diabetes mellitus (OR: 3.06, 95%CI: 2.56-3.66), Immunosuppression (OR: 2.87, 95%CI: 2.08-3.95).
    CONCLUSIONS: Effective interventions targeting the above modifiable factors may reduce the risk of developing CRBSI in ICU and improve the clinical outcome of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:中心静脉导管(CVC)的错位可能导致血管损伤,穿孔,甚至纵隔损伤.CVC从右锁骨下静脉到奇静脉的错位极为罕见。这里,我们报告了一例CVC经右锁骨下静脉错位进入奇静脉的患者.我们对奇静脉的解剖结构以及与奇静脉错位相关的表现进行了全面的回顾。此外,我们通过小心地抽出特定长度的导管来探索将导管重新定位到上腔静脉的分辨率.
    方法:一名79岁女性患者出现完全性肠梗阻症状。通过右锁骨下静脉插入双腔CVC,以促进全胃肠外营养。由于手术期间镇静药物的起效缓慢,麻醉师错误地认为CVC穿透了上腔静脉,导致CVC的过早去除。术后胸部对比增强计算机断层扫描证实,中心静脉导管未穿透上腔静脉,而是错位进入奇静脉。患者术后15天出院,无任何并发症。
    结论:CVC错位进入奇静脉极为罕见。临床医生应警惕这种形式的导管错位。确保每次输注前CVC的准确定位至关重要。利用正面和侧面的胸部X光片,以及胸部计算机断层扫描,可以帮助确认导管错位的存在。
    BACKGROUND: The malposition of central venous catheters (CVCs) may lead to vascular damage, perforation, and even mediastinal injury. The malposition of CVC from the right subclavian vein into the azygos vein is extremely rare. Here, we report a patient with CVC malposition into the azygos vein via the right subclavian vein. We conduct a comprehensive review of the anatomical structure of the azygos vein and the manifestations associated with azygos vein malposition. Additionally, we explore the resolution of repositioning the catheter into the superior vena cava by carefully withdrawing a specific length of the catheter.
    METHODS: A 79-year-old female presented to our department with symptoms of complete intestinal obstruction. A double-lumen CVC was inserted via the right subclavian vein to facilitate total parenteral nutrition. Due to the slow onset of sedative medications during surgery, the anesthetist erroneously believed that the CVC had penetrated the superior vena cava, leading to the premature removal of the CVC. Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest confirmed that the central venous catheter had not penetrated the superior vena cava but malpositioned into the azygos vein. The patient was discharged 15 days after surgery without any complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: CVC malposition into the azygos vein is extremely rare. Clinical practitioners should be vigilant regarding this form of catheter misplacement. Ensuring the accurate positioning of the CVC before each infusion is crucial. Utilizing chest X-rays in both frontal and lateral views, as well as chest computed tomography, can aid in confirming the presence of catheter misplacement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然在植入完全植入式静脉接入端口(TIVAP)时,总是在制作端口袋之前进行血管穿刺,一些外科医生更喜欢先制作端口口袋。本研究旨在验证口袋优先技术的安全性和可行性。
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了2017年7月至2022年11月接受TIVAP植入的447例患者。所有患者均按先血管穿刺或先做口袋分为两组。一般资料,回顾并分析手术资料及术后并发症。
    结果:所有手术均成功完成。性别没有差异,年龄,高度,体重,BMI,比较两组的端口位置和总并发症发生率。穿刺组和口袋组手术时间分别为46.9±22.4min和33.8±13.6min(P<0.00001)。在SCV入路的患者中,两组手术时间分别为37.4±14.8min和33.5±10.9min(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,可变的BMI和首次手术是手术时间的独立预后因素。在使用SCV/AxV方法的情况下,可变的首次手术是手术时间的唯一独立预后因素(P=0.002)。
    结论:口袋优先技术可以被认为是一种安全的,TIVAP植入的可行和方便的技术。与穿刺优先技术相比,耗时显着缩短,并且在使用SCV/AxV方法时,这种优势可能会更加明显。
    BACKGROUND: While vascular puncture is always performed before making port pocket in the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP), some surgeons preferred to make port pocket first. This study seeks to verify the safety and feasibility for the pocket-first technique.
    METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed 447 patients who undergone TIVAP implantation from July 2017 to November 2022. All the patients were divided into two groups based on vascular puncture first or making port pocket first. The general information, operation information and post-operative complications were reviewed and analyzed.
    RESULTS: All the operations were performed successfully. No difference was observed in the sex, age, height, weight, BMI, port location and total complication rate between the two groups. The operation time of the Puncture Group and the Pocket Group were 46.9 ± 22.4 min and 33.8 ± 13.6 min ( P<0.00001 ). In the patients of SCV approach, the operation time between the two groups were 37.4 ± 14.8 min and 33.5 ± 10.9 min ( P<0.05 ). Multivariate analysis showed the variable BMI and first procedure were independent prognostic factors for operation time. In the cases using SCV/AxV approach the variable first procedure was the only independent prognostic factor for operation time (P = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The pocket-first technique can be considered as a safe, feasible and convenient technique for TIVAP implantation. The time consuming is significantly shortened compared with the puncture-first technique and this advantage may be more obvious when using SCV/AxV approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    The clinical data of 23 patients undergoing real-time echocardiography-guided infusion port implantation in the Breast Center of Tsinghua Changgung Hospital in Beijing from January to July 2021 were analyzed. The length of catheter insertion L1 was initially estimated using surface measurement method in all patients. Intraoperatively, transthoracic echocardiography was applied using the parasternal four-chamber view to visualize the catheter image within the right atrium, and the length of catheter insertion L2 was recorded under the guidance of echocardiography. Postoperatively, chest radiographs were taken in the upright position to observe the position of the catheter tip. According to chest CT scans, the ideal length (L) for catheter tip placement was calculated when it was located at the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium. Bland-Altman scatter plot analysis and linear regression fitting test were used on L1 and L2 respectively with L to evaluate the consistency. A total of 23 patients were included in this study, among which one case of left breast cancer patient undergoing breast-conserving surgery had difficulty in identifying the catheter tip position due to residual pleural effusion obscuring the imaging of the cardiac apex four-chamber view. In 22 patients, the results of intraoperative ultrasound imaging were good, including 1 case of catheter ectopic to azygos vein, and 21 cases of right atrial catheter could be detected by ultrasound. Statistical analysis showed that there was a good consistency between L1 and L, L2 and L, and the difference between them was d=0.28 cm (95%CI:-1.76-2.31 cm) and d=0.20 cm(95%CI:-0.84-1.23 cm), respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). In the linear regression model, L2 and L had a higher fit than L1, and the difference was statistically significant (R²=0.954, P<0.001). This study found that real-time echocardiographic localization technique can be applied in adult port surgery to replace X-ray-guided real-time catheter tip detection and adjustment to the optimal position.
    分析2021年1至7月北京清华长庚医院乳腺中心进行实时超声心动图引导下输液港植入手术的23例患者的临床资料。所有患者先采用体表测量法预估导管置入长度L1,术中应用经胸壁超声心动图技术通过心尖四腔心切面在右心房内探测导管影像,记录超声心动图法指导下导管置入长度L2。术后拍摄胸部X线正位片观察导管尖端位置,结合患者胸部CT计算导管尖端位于上腔静脉和右心房连接处时应置入理想长度L。将L1和L2分别与L进行Bland-Altman散点图一致性分析和线性回归拟合度检验,分析其一致性。研究共纳入23例患者,其中1例左侧乳腺癌患者保乳手术区域靠近心尖部,因残腔浆液肿,影响心尖部四腔心切面的成像效果,难以识别导管尖端位置。22例患者术中超声成像效果良好,其中1例导管异位至奇静脉,另外21例可经超声探测到右心房内导管。统计学分析显示,L1与L、L2与L的一致性较好,两者差值分别为d=0.28 cm(95%CI:-1.76~2.31 cm)、d=0.20 cm(95%CI:-0.84~1.23 cm),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。线性回归模型下,与L1相比L2与L的拟合度更高,差异有统计学意义(R²=0.954,P<0.001)。研究发现超声心动图实时定位技术可应用于成人输液港手术,替代术中X线辅助下实时探查导管尖端并调整至最佳位置。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:空气栓塞通常是一种医源性并发症,可发生在静脉和动脉中。静脉空气栓塞主要与大中心静脉导管和机械通气有关。一名59岁的妇女因自发性脑出血被送往我院,并采用左前臂外周静脉导管输注药物保守治疗。48小时后,患者的血氧饱和度降低到92%,呼吸打鼾。头部和胸部的计算机断层扫描显示右锁骨下有散落的气体,胸骨的右边缘,上腔静脉,和心脏阴影的前沿。
    方法:她被送到重症监护病房进行高流量吸氧,并立即向左侧倾斜。由于患者处于脑出血的急性期,并且没有采取Trendelenburg位置。
    结果:24小时后的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描显示空气栓塞消退。
    空气栓塞可以在任何临床情况下发生,建议医务人员提高识别和处理空气栓塞的能力。对于临床实践中的类似病例,可以考虑空气栓塞。
    BACKGROUND: Air embolization is usually an iatrogenic complication that can occur in both veins and arteries. Intravenous air embolization is mainly associated with large central vein catheters and mechanical ventilation. A 59-year-old woman was sent to our hospital with spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage and treated conservatively with a left forearm peripheral venous catheter infusion drug. After 48 hours, the patient\'s oxygen saturation decreased to 92 % with snoring breathing. Computer tomography of the head and chest revealed scattered gas in the right subclavian, the right edge of the sternum, the superior vena cava, and the leading edge of the heart shadow.
    METHODS: She was sent to the intensive care unit for high-flow oxygen inhalation and left-side reclining instantly. As the patient was at an acute stage of cerebral hemorrhage and did not take the Trendelenburg position.
    RESULTS: The computed tomography (CT) scan after 24 hours shows that the air embolism subsides.
    UNASSIGNED: Air embolism can occur in any clinical scenario, suggesting that medical staff should enhance the ability to identify and deal with air embolism. For similar cases in clinical practice, air embolism can be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:循证护理实践可以减少与中心静脉导管(CVC)相关的并发症。在这个项目中,卫生服务研究实施综合促进行动(i-PARIHS)框架被认为是确定实施循证实践的促进因素和障碍的理想理论工具.
    方法:该项目在中国六家三级儿童医院的儿科重症监护病房进行。从最佳实践建议中获得了22项审计标准,并进行了基线审计,以根据最佳实践评估当前实践。接下来,i-PARIHS框架用于确定最佳实践的促进者和障碍,并制定改进策略.然后进行了后续审计,以衡量符合最佳做法的变化。
    结果:在创新中确定了促进者和障碍,收件人,和上下文级别。然后制定了全面的CVC维护策略,以将最佳证据应用于护士的临床工作。在22项审计标准中,与基线审计相比,17显示出显着改善。
    结论:i-PARIHS框架是开发有针对性的,基于证据的改进策略,并将其应用于临床环境。CVC维护期间护士的临床实践质量得到了提高。然而,不确定这些积极的结果可以保持,需要长期数据来验证这一点。
    http://links。www.com/IJEBH/A185.
    BACKGROUND: Evidence-based nursing practice can reduce complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). In this project, the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework was considered an ideal theoretical instrument to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing evidence-based practice.
    METHODS: The project was conducted in pediatric intensive care units in six Chinese tertiary children\'s hospitals. Twenty-two audit criteria were obtained from best practice recommendations, and a baseline audit was conducted to assess current practice against best practice. Next, the i-PARIHS framework was used to identify facilitators and barriers to best practice and develop improvement strategies. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.
    RESULTS: Facilitators and barriers were identified at the innovation, recipient, and context levels. A comprehensive CVC maintenance strategy was then developed to apply the best evidence to nurses\' clinical work. Of the 22 audit criteria, 17 showed significant improvement compared with the baseline audit.
    CONCLUSIONS: The i-PARIHS framework is an effective tool for developing targeted, evidence-based improvement strategies and applying these to the clinical setting. The quality of the nurses\' clinical practice improved during CVC maintenance. However, there is no certainty that these positive results can be maintained, and long-term data are needed to verify this.
    UNASSIGNED: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A185.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了调查发病率,危险因素,新生儿经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管引起导管相关性血流感染的病原学特点,为降低外周中心静脉置管感染率提供参考。回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年6月在新生儿重症监护病房接受外周中心静脉置管(PICC)治疗的680例新生儿的临床资料。采用单因素和多因素分析确定PICC导管相关性血流感染的危险因素和独立危险因素。分别。680例接受PICC的新生儿中有38例发生导管相关血流感染。感染率为4.74%。真菌的比例,革兰氏阳性菌,革兰阴性菌占42.11%,36.84%,和21.05%,分别。真菌主要为近带念珠菌(18.42%),革兰阳性菌以凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌为主(23.68%),革兰阴性菌以肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌为主(7.89%)。单因素分析显示胎龄≤32周,出生体重≤1500g,先天性疾病,营养支持,导管插入时间,5分钟APGAR评分≤7分,新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征与PICC导管相关性血流感染有关。多因素分析显示早产,低出生体重,肠外营养,导管插入时间长,5分钟APGAR评分≤7分与PICC导管相关性血流感染相关。在检测到的病原体中,肺炎克雷伯菌6例,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌5例,真菌2例。低出生体重,早产,非现场营养,导管插入时间长,5分钟APGAR评分≤7是经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的新生儿发生导管相关性血流感染的独立危险因素。病原菌为真菌和多重耐药菌。
    To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and pathogenic characteristics of catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by peripherally inserted central venous catheter in neonates, and to provide references for reducing the infection rate of peripherally inserted central venous catheter. The clinical data of 680 neonates who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the neonatal intensive care unit from June 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors and independent risk factors of catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by PICC were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. Catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred in 38 of 680 neonates who underwent PICC. The infection rate was 4.74%. The proportions of fungi, gram-positive bacteria, and gram-negative bacteria were 42.11%, 36.84%, and 21.05%, respectively. Candida parapsilosis was the main fungus (18.42%), coagulase negative Staphylococcus was the main gram-positive bacteria (23.68%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli were the main gram-negative bacteria (7.89%). Univariate analysis showed that gestational age ≤32 weeks, birth weight ≤1500 g, congenital diseases, nutritional support, catheterization time, 5-minute APGAR score ≤7, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome were associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by PICC. Multivariate analysis showed that premature delivery, low birth weight, parenteral nutrition, long catheterization time, and 5-minute APGAR score ≤7 were associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by PICC. Among the pathogens detected, there were 6 cases of K pneumoniae, 5 cases of coagulase negative staphylococci, and 2 cases of fungi. Low birth weight, premature delivery, off-site nutrition, long catheterization time, and 5-minute APGAR score ≤7 are independent risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection in neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters. The pathogenic bacteria are fungi and multidrug-resistant bacteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号