bystander intervention

旁观者干预
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    旁观者行为的情境模型是一个经过验证的5步过程,用于理解干预欺凌和性骚扰,然而,促进从一个步骤到下一个步骤进展的个体水平和上下文水平的因素还没有得到很好的理解。本研究的目的是检查个体特征(社交情感技能,情感移情,认知移情,以及个人对欺凌和性骚扰的态度)和上下文因素(学校氛围和对欺凌和性骚扰的同伴态度)解释了旁观者干预模型的后续步骤之间的关联。788名高中生的样本完成了这些结构的几项验证措施。结构方程模型分析表明,每一步都显著且积极地预测了下一步,以及从承担责任到帮助改进模型拟合的直接路径。中介模型表明,个体层面的特征对将欺凌和性骚扰解释为问题有显著的直接影响,承担责任,和帮助,以及从注意到欺凌和性骚扰到所有后续步骤的间接影响,除了知道。相比之下,语境层面的影响有助于接受相反方向的责任。
    The situational model of bystander behavior is a validated 5-step process for understanding intervention in bullying and sexual harassment, yet the individual-level and contextual-level factors that facilitate the progression from one step to the next are not well understood. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether individual characteristics (social-emotional skills, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and personal attitudes toward bullying and sexual harassment) and contextual-level factors (school climate and perceived peer attitudes toward bullying and sexual harassment) explained the association between subsequent steps of the bystander intervention model. A sample of 788 high school students completed several validated measures of these constructs. Structural equation modeling analysis revealed that each step significantly and positively predicted the next step, and the addition of a direct path from accepting responsibility to helping improved model fit. The mediational model indicated that individual-level characteristics had significant direct effects on interpreting bullying and sexual harassment as problems, accepting responsibility, and helping, and indirect effects from noticing the bullying and sexual harassment to all subsequent steps except knowing. In contrast, contextual-level effects contributed to accepting responsibility in an inverse direction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于性别的暴力(GBV)预防计划长期以来在教授GBV的现实和培训人们避免,缓解,并应对暴力。本文通过分析反暴力组织和大学提供的81个GBV教育计划,研究了加拿大GBV预防培训的现状。我们在针对男性的计划中以及在提供旁观者干预培训方面,在与技术促进的暴力和虐待有关的主题方面发现了明显的差距。这些领域中的每一个都代表着重要的,但尚未实现,预防暴力的机会。
    Gender-based violence (GBV) prevention programs have long played an important part in both teaching the realities of GBV and training people in techniques to avert, mitigate, and respond to violence. This article examines the current state of GBV prevention training in Canada through an analysis of 81 GBV education programs provided by antiviolence organizations and universities. We identified notable gaps in topics relating to technology-facilitated violence and abuse in programs targeting men and in the provision of bystander intervention training. Each of these areas represents important, but as yet unrealized, opportunities in violence prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估父母培训的可行性,该培训被设计为农村社区中学生欺凌旁观者干预(STAC)的同伴模块。从三所农村中学邀请的父母(N=23)观看了父母培训并完成了通过即时计划结果评估有限功效的措施(例如,知识,信心,自我效能感,态度,行为意图)和程序可行性,以及参加焦点小组以提供有关计划可接受性的反馈,需求,实用性,和在线交付适应。父母报告说,支持青少年干预欺凌情况的知识和信心有所增加,管理欺凌的信心和安慰,欺凌自我效能感,沟通自我效能感,有责任积极参与预防欺凌,以及从训练前到训练后的反欺凌态度。父母还报告了使用他们学到的策略来支持青少年干预欺凌情况的行为意图。Further,父母的回答表明,计划的可接受性很高,以及对互动的兴趣,自定进度的在线家长培训。焦点小组的主题(n=12)表明需要对农村社区的学生和家长进行欺凌预防培训,并发现培训是有用的,容易理解,和相关和适合他们的社区。父母发现了包括成本在内的障碍,时间,程序的灵活性,以及父母买入的重要性。家长还提供了针对在线培训的反馈,包括对智能手机应用程序和设计元素的偏好,以增加参与度。讨论了对农村社区计划开发的影响。
    The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of parent training designed as a companion module to a bullying bystander intervention (STAC) for middle school students in rural communities. Parents (N = 23) invited from three rural middle schools viewed a parent training and completed measures to assess limited efficacy through immediate program outcomes (e.g., knowledge, confidence, self-efficacy, attitudes, behavioral intentions) and program feasibility, as well as participated in focus groups to provide feedback about program acceptability, demand, practicality, and online delivery adaptation. Parents reported increases in knowledge and confidence in supporting their adolescents to intervene in bullying situations, confidence and comfort in managing bullying, bullying self-efficacy, communication self-efficacy, responsibility to actively engage in bullying prevention, and anti-bullying attitudes from pre-training to post-training. Parents also reported behavioral intentions to use strategies they learned to support their adolescents to intervene in bullying situations. Further, parents\' responses suggested high levels of program acceptability, as well as interest in an interactive, self-paced online parent training. Themes from focus groups (n = 12) revealed a need for bullying prevention training for both students and parents in rural communities and found the training to be useful, easy to understand, and relevant and appropriate for their community. Parents identified barriers including cost, time, program flexibility, and the importance of parent buy-in. Parents also provided feedback specific to an online training, including a preference for a smartphone application and design elements to increase engagement. Implications for program development for rural communities are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    性侵犯(SA),特别是涉及酒精的SA,在大学女性中仍然很普遍。因为SA通常始于社会背景,旁观者干预已成为一种流行的预防方法。旁观者干预训练个人代表他人进行干预,包括陌生人,尽管研究表明,当旁观者与目标有关系时,干预更有可能发生。当潜在的旁观者利用促进干预的关系和责任的品质时,将重点转移到朋友身上。女大学生(N=35)参加了焦点小组(N=8),在此期间,他们观看了与朋友配对进行的基于朋友的动机访谈(FMI)干预会议的视频原型,并提供了有关相关性和可行性的反馈使用这种方法来减少在社交环境中一起喝酒的朋友之间的SA。焦点小组成绩单的内容分析产生了三个主题:a)朋友作为自然旁观者;b)酒精在干预中的作用,和c)对FMI干预的接受度。女性表示,她们觉得有责任保护朋友的安全,这种责任感促进了帮助行为。女性还描述了酒精中毒可以影响帮助行为的方式。妇女对FMI干预方法表示热情,并将其强调友谊和灵活的人身安全方法视为优势。研究结果强调了FMI干预方法的前景,该方法利用女性友谊的优势来创建与参与者价值观一致的安全目标,并克服干预障碍,包括酒精中毒.
    Sexual assault (SA), particularly alcohol-involved SA, remains prevalent among college women. Because SA often begins in social contexts, bystander intervention has become a popular approach to prevention. Bystander interventions train individuals to intervene on behalf of others, including strangers, despite research indicating that intervention is more likely to occur when the bystander has a relationship with the target. Shifting the focus to friends as potential bystanders capitalizes on the qualities of relationship and responsibility that facilitate intervention. College women (N = 35) participated in focus groups (N = 8) during which they viewed a video prototype of a friend-based motivational interviewing (FMI) intervention session conducted with a friend dyad and provided feedback about the relevance and feasibility of using such an approach to reduce SA among friends who drink together in social settings. Content analysis of focus group transcripts yielded three themes: a) Friends as Natural Bystanders; b) The Role of Alcohol in Intervention, and c) Receptivity to FMI intervention. Women indicated that they feel responsible for keeping their friends safe, and that this sense of responsibility facilitates helping behaviors. Women also described ways through which alcohol intoxication can affect helping behavior. Women expressed enthusiasm for the FMI intervention approach and identified its emphasis on friendship and flexible approaches to personal safety as strengths. Findings highlight the promise of FMI intervention approaches that capitalize on the strengths of women\'s friendship to create safety goals that align with participants\' values and overcome barriers to intervention, including alcohol intoxication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:描述医疗大赦(MA)政策的共同组成部分,并研究MA政策在机构之间的差异。参与者:50所美国大学和大学目前的硕士政策。方法:编制清单,比较和评估50所院校的校园MA政策。描述性统计,卡方,和回归分析被用来检查共同的政策组成部分和不同类型的机构的差异。结果:40%的政策不包括目的声明。42%的政策没有提到如何使用该政策。48%的人没有提到对大赦的限制。32%的人没有提到后续行动。24%的政策提到延长对在场人员的大赦。不同学校特征的政策成分没有显着差异。结论:许多政策缺乏细节,强调需要制定千年发展目标政策的指导方针和最佳做法。未来的研究可以检查这些政策组成部分对帮助寻求意图的影响。
    Objective: To describe common components of medical amnesty (MA) policies and examine how MA policies differ across institutions. Participants: 50 U.S. colleges and universities with current MA policies. Methods: A checklist was developed to compare and assess the campus MA policies of 50 institutions. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and regression analyses were used to examine common policy components and differences across types of institutions. Results: 40% of policies did not include a purpose statement. 42% of policies had no mention about how to use the policy. 48% did not mention restrictions on amnesty. 32% did not mention follow-up actions. 24% of policies mentioned extending amnesty for additional person(s) present. There were no significant differences in policy components across school characteristics. Conclusions: Many policies lacked detail, highlighting the need for guidelines and best practices to develop MA policies. Future research could examine the effects of these policy components on help seeking intentions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是探讨韩国旁观者对家庭暴力(DV)和性暴力(SV)情况的干预意图和干预类型的预测因素。使用2016年全国性别平等实况调查(N=7,399)和基于逻辑回归的模型的全国代表性数据,这项研究集中在两个关键的预测因素上,旁观者性别和对性别平等的态度,在控制年龄的同时,教育水平,和就业状况。我们的发现表明,男性和女性同样有可能陈述干预DV和SV情况的意图。虽然男性和女性都更有可能声明他们会间接而不是直接干预,在这两种情况下,女性比男性更不可能直接干预。表明性别平等的态度进一步增加了在多变量模型中干预DV和SV情况的意图。性别平等态度,然而,降低了直接干预DV而不是SV情况的意图。讨论了局限性和含义。
    The purpose of this study is to explore the predictors of bystanders\' intentions to intervene and types of intended intervention in domestic violence (DV) and sexual violence (SV) situations in South Korea. Using nationally representative data from the 2016 National Fact-Finding Survey on Gender Equality (N = 7,399) and logistic regression-based models, this study focused on two key predictors, bystander gender and attitudes about gender equality, while controlling for age, educational level, and employment status. Our findings indicated that males and females were equally likely to state intentions to intervene in both DV and SV situations. While both males and females were more likely to state that they would intervene indirectly rather than directly, females were even less likely to intervene directly than were males for both situations. Attitudes indicative of gender equality further increased the intention to intervene for DV and SV situations in multivariate models. Gender equality attitudes, however, decreased the intentions to intervene directly in DV but not SV situations. Limitations and implications are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    旁观者干预(BI)是一种通常用于人际暴力的预防方法,但对有问题的酒精使用(PAU)的研究较少。国内研究生和国际学生的生活经历为BI在PAU中的潜在应用带来了独特的背景。
    我们进行了一项混合方法研究,该研究包括美国东南大学的需求评估和焦点小组。这项研究的目的是了解(1)国内研究生与国际学生在PAUBI机会方面的差异,(2)PAUBI使用差异的原因,和(3)使用PAUBI的障碍/促进者。
    总的来说,参与者很少有机会使用BI。与国际学生相比,国内研究生的机会略多。缺乏机会的最突出原因包括不想开车,饮酒的成本,并持有研究生身份(例如对大量饮酒不感兴趣)。信任他人对自己负责是不使用BI作为PAU的常见障碍。
    PAUBI课程应将国内研究生和国际学生的经验背景化,以提供适当的技能发展,考虑到干预使用的独特障碍和促进者。
    UNASSIGNED: Bystander intervention (BI) is a prevention approach commonly used for interpersonal violence, but is less studied for problematic alcohol use (PAU). Domestic graduate and international students\' life experiences bring a unique context for the potential application of BI to PAU.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a mixed methods study that consisted of a needs assessment and focus groups at a southeastern university in the U.S. The aims of this study were to understand (1) differences in PAU BI opportunities for domestic graduate versus international students, (2) reasons for differences in PAU BI use, and (3) barriers/facilitators in use of PAU BI.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, participants had few opportunities to use BI. Domestic graduate students had slightly more opportunities compared to international students. Most prominent reasons for lack of opportunities included not wanting to drive, the cost of drinking, and holding a graduate student identity (e.g. not interested in heavy drinking). Trusting others to be responsible for themselves was a common barrier noted for not using BI for PAU.
    UNASSIGNED: PAU BI programs should contextualize experiences of domestic graduate and international students to provide appropriate skill development that considers unique barriers and facilitators to intervention use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文对有关工作场所性骚扰(SH)主题的评论进行了范围审查,一个引起全球极大关注的话题。SH现象对工作场所的机会均等和性别平等构成了严峻挑战。
    这篇综述旨在综合现有研究,专注于先例,后果,以及与SH相关的干预措施。
    纳入和排除标准是根据研究问题建立的,它改编自PICO战略。协议按照“DS-CPC”格式设计,其中包括与文件相关的注意事项,研究,Construct,参与者,和上下文。搜索是利用几个自动数据库进行的,特别关注心理学领域,行为科学,和健康。初步检索共468篇文章,审查最终共包括22篇文章。
    这篇综述严格地考察了SH的复杂性,包括旁观者的角色,神话和误解的延续,以及骚扰者对权力失衡的利用。它还探讨了SH在男性主导的工作场所中的表现,以及组织意识和对此类事件的反应。审查强调了培养一种组织文化的重要性,这种文化不仅承认和保护受害者,而且还采取有效措施惩罚肇事者。
    它旨在阐明SH的复杂性,并倡导以尊重和问责为特征的工作环境。通过全面的分析,本文旨在为未来的研究提供信息和指导,政策制定,以及有关SH的组织实践。
    UNASSIGNED: This article presents a scoping review of reviews on the topic of Sexual Harassment (SH) in the workplace, a subject that has garnered significant global attention. The phenomenon of SH poses a critical challenge to equal opportunity and gender equity in the workplace.
    UNASSIGNED: The review aims to synthesize existing research, focusing on the antecedents, consequences, and interventions related to SH.
    UNASSIGNED: The inclusion and exclusion criteria were established based on the research question, which was adapted from the PICO strategy. A protocol was devised following the \"DS-CPC\" format, which encompasses considerations related to Documents, Studies, Construct, Participants, and Contexts. The search was carried utilizing several automated databases, specifically focusing on the fields of Psychology, Behavioral Sciences, and Health. Preliminary search yielded a total of 468 articles, and the review ultimately encompassed a total of 22 articles.
    UNASSIGNED: This review critically examines the complexity of SH, including the role of bystanders, the perpetuation of myths and misconceptions, and the exploitation of power imbalances by harassers. It also explores the manifestation of SH in male-dominated workplaces and the varying levels of organizational awareness and response to such incidents. The review highlights the importance of fostering an organizational culture that not only acknowledges and protects victims but also implements effective measures to penalize perpetrators.
    UNASSIGNED: It aims to elucidate the intricacies of SH and advocate for a workplace environment characterized by respect and accountability. Through this comprehensive analysis, the article seeks to inform and guide future research, policy development, and organizational practices concerning SH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    性暴力是一个连续的框架,包括(但不限于)性骚扰和性侵犯。虽然一些研究已经评估了学生参与旁观者干预(BI)以防止性侵犯的倾向和取向,在防止性骚扰方面做得很少。这项研究的目的是评估基于理论的大学生从事BI预防性侵犯或性骚扰的意愿的差异。在两个时间点对学生进行了调查。在T1,意图,态度,感知规范,并对BI预防性侵犯的感知行为控制(PBC)进行了评估,同样的变量在T2时进行性骚扰评估.独立t检验评估组间差异。线性回归分析用于评估两组BI意图的决定因素。学生对BI/性侵犯的态度明显高于学生对BI/性骚扰的态度(p=.019;d=.22)。相反,学生对BI/性骚扰的PBC明显高于学生对BI/性侵犯的PBC(p≤.001;d=.49)。态度(p<.001)和PBC(p<.001)解释了BI/性侵犯意图差异的45.9%,而感知规范(p<.001)和态度(p<.001)解释了BI/性骚扰意图差异的28.4%。性暴力,包括性侵犯和性骚扰,是大学校园里普遍存在的问题.更多的注意力应该集中在防止性骚扰上,因为它可以产生下游效应。此外,应调查特定的BI实践,以了解哪些更有效地防止性骚扰和性侵犯。
    Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students\' predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for preventing sexual harassment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate theory-based differences in college students\' willingness to engage in BI for preventing either sexual assault or sexual harassment. Students were surveyed at two time points. At T1, intentions, attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) for BI to prevent sexual assault were evaluated, and the same variables were evaluated at T2 for sexual harassment. Independent t-tests evaluated differences between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate determinants of intentions for BI for both groups. Students\' attitudes toward BI/sexual assault were significantly higher than students\' attitudes toward BI/sexual harassment (p = .019; d = .22). Conversely, students\' PBC toward BI/sexual harassment was significantly higher than students\' PBC for BI/sexual assault (p ≤.001; d = .49). Attitudes (p < .001) and PBC (p < .001) explained 45.9% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual assault, while perceived norms (p < .001) and attitudes (p < .001) explained 28.4% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual harassment. Sexual violence, encompassing both sexual assault and sexual harassment, is a pervasive issue on college campuses. More attention should be focused on preventing sexual harassment, as it can create a downstream effect. Furthermore, specific BI practices should be investigated to understand which are more effective at preventing sexual harassment and sexual assault.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:暴力是年轻人死亡和残疾的主要原因,并对整个生命周期的前景产生严重影响。教育部门是通过纳入解决态度和行为的方案来防止青年暴力的关键环境。预防暴力导师(MVP)计划旨在改变有害的态度和规范,并增加非暴力的旁观者干预,通过同伴指导的方法。迄今为止,关于英国学校环境中干预措施有效性的证据有限。本研究的目的是评估该计划对学生预防暴力的态度和知识的影响。
    方法:本研究采用混合方法设计。前后调查测量了学生(11-18岁)与预防暴力和旁观者行为有关的态度和知识的变化,性别陈规定型观念,暴力的可接受性,以及对他人干预意愿的看法。面试/焦点小组与方案交付和学生,匿名方案数据被用来探索和补充调查结果。
    结果:总体而言,对节目内容和交付的看法是积极的。该计划对导师(提供该计划的学生)产生了一些有益的影响,包括对预防暴力的知识和态度以及旁观者方法的重大积极变化,暴力行为的可接受性,以及对其他学生干预意愿的看法(效果大小为中小)。然而,研究发现,受训者(接受导师课程的年轻学生)的任何结果均无显著变化.尽管如此,定性证据表明,受训者喜欢该计划的内容和同伴主导的交付,这与年长的学生建立了关系。定性证据还确定了该计划对导师的额外好处,包括领导和沟通技巧,增强信心和支持关系。
    结论:这项研究的证据表明,MVP作为导师的目标计划是有效的,但是没有发现重要证据证明其作为普遍的旁观者和针对受训者的暴力预防计划的有效性。虽然需要更强大的研究设计的进一步研究,培养导师作为预防暴力的领导者是该方案本身的宝贵影响。
    BACKGROUND: Violence is a leading cause of death and disability for young people and has serious impacts on prospects across the lifecourse. The education sector is a crucial setting for preventing youth violence through incorporating programmes that address attitudes and behaviours. The Mentors in Violence Prevention (MVP) programme aims to change harmful attitudes and norms, and increase non-violent bystander intervention, through a peer mentoring approach. To date there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention in UK school settings. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the programme on students\' attitudes and knowledge related to violence prevention.
    METHODS: The study employed a mixed methods design. Pre and post surveys measured changes in students\' (aged 11-18) attitudes and knowledge related to violence prevention and bystander behaviour, gender stereotyping, acceptability of violence, and perceptions of others\' willingness to intervene. Interviews/focus groups with programme delivers and students, and anonymised programme data were used to explore and supplement survey findings.
    RESULTS: Overall, perceptions of the programme content and delivery were positive. Several beneficial impacts of the programme were found for mentors (students delivering the programme), including significant positive changes on measures of knowledge and attitudes towards violence prevention and the bystander approach, acceptability of violence perpetration, and perceptions of other students\' willingness to intervene (effect sizes were small-medium). However, the study found no significant change on any of the outcomes amongst mentees (younger students receiving the programme from mentors). Despite this, qualitative evidence suggested mentees enjoyed the content of the programme and the peer-led delivery, and this built relationships with older students. Qualitative evidence also identified additional benefits of the programme for mentors, including leadership and communication skills, and increased confidence and supportive relationships.
    CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this study suggests MVP is effective as a targeted programme for mentors, but no significant evidence was found to demonstrate its effectiveness as a universal bystander and violence prevention programme for mentees. Whilst further research with more robust study design is needed, developing mentors as leaders in violence prevention is a valuable impact of the programme in its own right.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号