Abstract：
Objective: To describe common components of medical amnesty (MA) policies and examine how MA policies differ across institutions. Participants: 50 U.S. colleges and universities with current MA policies. Methods: A checklist was developed to compare and assess the campus MA policies of 50 institutions. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and regression analyses were used to examine common policy components and differences across types of institutions. Results: 40% of policies did not include a purpose statement. 42% of policies had no mention about how to use the policy. 48% did not mention restrictions on amnesty. 32% did not mention follow-up actions. 24% of policies mentioned extending amnesty for additional person(s) present. There were no significant differences in policy components across school characteristics. Conclusions: Many policies lacked detail, highlighting the need for guidelines and best practices to develop MA policies. Future research could examine the effects of these policy components on help seeking intentions.
摘要：
目标：描述医疗大赦（MA）政策的共同组成部分，并研究MA政策在机构之间的差异。参与者：50所美国大学和大学目前的硕士政策。方法：编制清单，比较和评估50所院校的校园MA政策。描述性统计，卡方,和回归分析被用来检查共同的政策组成部分和不同类型的机构的差异。结果：40％的政策不包括目的声明。42％的政策没有提到如何使用该政策。48%的人没有提到对大赦的限制。32%的人没有提到后续行动。24%的政策提到延长对在场人员的大赦。不同学校特征的政策成分没有显着差异。结论：许多政策缺乏细节，强调需要制定千年发展目标政策的指导方针和最佳做法。未来的研究可以检查这些政策组成部分对帮助寻求意图的影响。
