botox injections

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肛门内括约肌失弛缓症(IASA)是一种罕见的肛门直肠疾病,在儿科中表现为慢性难治性便秘。对传统的便秘疗法反应不佳,它经常被误诊为其他疾病,如超短节段先天性巨结肠病。这个案例报告描述了一个罕见的IASA在青春期女性,强调排除其他差异的重要性,包括先天性巨结肠病,通过直肠活检,从而允许早期靶向治疗,以改善生活方式条件。一名有IASA病史的20岁女性每年注射一次肉毒杆菌毒素。尽管最初的救济,四到五个月后,她的便秘症状逐渐恢复。她从小就有传统便秘治疗无效的病史,这促使了进一步的工作。她十几岁时的活检结果证实了神经节细胞的存在,将IASA与先天性巨结肠病区分开来。管理计划涉及一年两次的肛周注射肉毒杆菌毒素,提供大约六个月的救济。IASA的生理基础涉及神经支配的改变,没有硝化神经,肛门内括约肌的神经肌肉接头有缺陷.诊断需要肛门直肠测压和直肠抽吸活检。治疗方案包括肉毒杆菌中毒,毒素注射,后肛门内括约肌切除术。肉毒中毒注射可以暂时缓解,而肌切除术提供了长期的改善。
    Internal anal sphincter achalasia (IASA) is a rare anorectal disorder that presents as chronic refractory constipation in pediatrics. With a poor response to conventional constipation-based therapy, it is often misdiagnosed as other conditions, such as ultra-short-segment Hirschsprung disease. This case report describes a rare case of IASA in an adolescent female, emphasizing the importance of ruling out other differentials, including Hirschsprung disease, via rectal biopsy and thus allowing for earlier targeted therapy to improve lifestyle conditions. A 20-year-old female with a history of IASA presents for semiannual botulism toxin injections. Despite initial relief, her constipation symptoms gradually returned after four to five months. She has had a history of ineffective conventional constipation treatments since childhood, which prompted a further workup. Biopsy results during her teenage years confirmed the presence of ganglionic cells, differentiating IASA from Hirschsprung disease. The management plan involved biannual perianal Botox injections, offering relief for approximately six months. IASA\'s physiological basis involves altered innervation, the absence of nitrergic nerves, and defective neuromuscular junctions in the internal anal sphincter. Diagnosis requires anorectal manometry and a rectal suction biopsy. Treatment options include botulism, toxin injections, and posterior internal anal sphincter myectomy. Botulism injections offer temporary relief, while myectomy provides long-term improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一个24岁的妇女的案例,她在注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素六天后被转诊到一位作者的诊所治疗额头上的动态纹,glabella复合体,和乌鸦的脚区域。她的第一次美学注射是由另一位同事在另一家诊所完成的。她的主要主诉是眼睑下垂,这是在她接受治疗四天后开始的,并继续恶化,直到她寻求我们的帮助。我们用另一剂量的肉毒杆菌毒素治疗。我们注射后五天,病人开始注意到眼睑逐渐好转,所以在第14天,她的眼睑非常接近正常张开;完全康复。在我们的文章中,通过第二剂量的肉毒杆菌毒素,令人惊讶地和成功地逆转了由于肉毒杆菌毒素注射引起的下垂。这表明这种管理成功地治疗了此类病例,并且可以为从业者及其患者提供有益的逆转选择。病例报告得出的结论是,应通过多模式方法及时评估和治疗下垂。
    We report the case of a 24-year-old woman who was referred to one of the authors\' clinics after six days of botulinum toxin type A injection to treat dynamic lines on her forehead, glabella complex, and crow\'s feet area. Her first esthetic injection was done by another colleague elsewhere in a different clinic. Her main complaint was full eyelid ptosis, which started four days after her treatment and continued to aggravate until the time she sought our help. We treated it with another dose of botulinum toxins. The patient started to notice a gradual improvement in her eyelid five days after our injection, so on day 14th, her eyelid was very closely back to normal opening; complete recovery was achieved. Ptosis due to botulinum toxin injection was surprisingly and successfully reversed in our article by a second dose of botulinum toxins. This suggests that this management successfully treats such cases and can deliver a beneficial reversal option for practitioners and their patients. The case report concludes that ptosis should be promptly evaluated and treated through a multimodal approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这篇文献综述中,我们将评估OnabotulinumtoxinA(Botox)和抗降钙素基因相关肽(anti-CGRP)治疗偏头痛的有效性。这两种疗法通常用于管理和预防偏头痛,并已获得食品和药物管理局(FDA)的批准。作用机制,副作用,合规,成本效益,和这两种药物提供的偏头痛治疗在几个研究的分析中进行了比较。许多研究发现,由于医生每三个月服用一次肉毒杆菌素,副作用比抗CGRP少,每月自我管理,它比反CGRP更合规。检查数据后,肉毒杆菌被认为是最有效的治疗方法。虽然两种疗法都是有效的,本文对它们进行了比较,以确定哪一种是最佳的管理策略。
    In this literature review, we will evaluate the effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) in the treatment of migraine headaches. Both therapies are frequently prescribed for managing and preventing migraines and have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. The mechanism of action, side effects, compliance, cost-effectiveness, and migraine treatment provided by these two medicines were compared in the analysis of several studies. Many studies found that as Botox was administered by a doctor every three months and had fewer side effects than anti-CGRP, which is self-administered every month, it was more compliant than anti-CGRP. After examining the data, Botox is believed to be the most effective therapy. Although both therapies are efficient, this article compares them to determine which is the best management strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经痛的特征是由体感系统的损伤或疾病引起的慢性疼痛,包括负责传递感觉信息的神经.目前神经性疼痛的治疗方法,这是一种神经痛,成功率有限,并可能导致不必要的副作用。自1989年以来,肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTX-A),来自强效的神经毒素肉毒梭状芽孢杆菌,已被用于治疗人类的神经性疼痛。BTX-A通过抑制参与疼痛传递的神经递质的释放而显示出镇痛作用。本综述旨在评估BTX-A在各种类型神经痛中的有效性。指导本综述的研究问题是BTX-A在减轻不同类型神经疼痛方面是否安全有效。为了进行这次审查,使用PubMed进行了文献检索,Medline,和PubMedCentral数据库。搜索策略包括与BTX-A相关的相关关键词,神经痛,和神经性疼痛。筛选标题后,摘要,和全文,共有30篇文章被纳入审查。这些研究检查了BTX-A在各种情况下的疗效,例如带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN),耳颞部神经痛(ATN),枕骨神经痛(ON),麻风病引起的神经性疼痛(LIN),局灶性疼痛性神经病,复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS),三叉神经痛(TN),与脊髓损伤相关的神经性疼痛。然而,需要进一步的研究来增强我们对BTX-A在特定神经痛中的最佳使用的理解.重要的是要承认纳入研究的局限性。然而,BTX-A可能被认为是神经痛的可行治疗选择。
    Neuralgia is characterized by chronic pain resulting from damage or diseases in the somatosensory system, including nerves responsible for transmitting sensory information. Current treatments for neuropathic pain, which is a type of neuralgia, have limited success rates and can cause unwanted side effects. Since 1989, botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A), derived from the potent neurotoxin Clostridium botulinum, has been used to treat neuropathic pain in humans. BTX-A has shown analgesic effects by inhibiting the release of neurotransmitters involved in pain transmission. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BTX-A in various types of neuralgia. The research question guiding this review is whether BTX-A is safe and effective in reducing pain in different types of neuralgias. To conduct this review, a literature search was performed using the PubMed, Medline, and PubMed Central databases. The search strategy included relevant keywords related to BTX-A, neuralgia, and neuropathic pain. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total of 30 articles were included in the review. These studies examined the efficacy of BTX-A in various conditions such as postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), auriculotemporal neuralgia (ATN), occipital neuralgia (ON), leprosy-induced neuropathic pain (LIN), focal painful neuropathies, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury. However, further research is needed to enhance our understanding of the optimal use of BTX-A in specific neuralgias. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the included studies. Nevertheless, BTX-A might be considered a viable treatment option for neuralgia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    当临床医生,特别是一个专门从事初级保健的人面临着深刻的抱怨,锋利,前胸痛,最常见的鉴别诊断包括心脏疼痛和胃肠道疼痛。肌肉骨骼疼痛被认为是可能的根本原因,频率较低。在这个案例报告中,我们描述了一名女性运动员的临床旅程,她主诉烧灼的前胸痛。她的胸骨综合征疼痛最初被误诊为心脏疼痛,导致起搏器植入患者的胸部。疼痛继续,由于以前的胃食管反流病(GERD)病史,因此推测相同的肌肉骨骼疼痛是胃肠道引起的。由于这种错误识别,患者接受了不必要的食管外科手术.这里,我们确定了胸骨综合征疼痛的起源,疼痛可能与其他什么情况混淆,以及临床医生不应该迅速将肌肉骨骼疼痛排除在急性胸痛的鉴别诊断之外。我们讨论了胸骨综合征的有效治疗方法,并阐明了这种不太常见的前胸痛原因,以促进更准确的诊断并避免不必要的手术干预。
    When a clinician, especially one who is specialized in primary care is faced with presenting complaints of deep, sharp, anterior chest pain, the most common differential diagnoses include cardiac and gastrointestinal pain. Musculoskeletal pain is thought of less frequently as a possible root cause. In this case report, we describe the clinical journey of a female athlete who presented with complaints of burning anterior chest pain. Her sternalis syndrome pain was first misdiagnosed as pain of cardiac origin, resulting in pacemaker placement into the patient\'s chest. The pain continued, and the same musculoskeletal pain was then presumed to be of gastrointestinal origin due to a previous history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). As a result of this misidentification, the patient underwent an unnecessary esophageal surgical procedure. Here, we identify the origins of sternalis syndrome pain, what other conditions the pain may be confused with, and how clinicians should not be quick to exclude musculoskeletal pain from a differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. We discuss effective treatments for sternalis syndrome and shed light on this less common cause of anterior chest pain to promote more accurate diagnosis and avoidance of unnecessary surgical interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,对于使用肌肉内植入物的臀肌扩张和重塑手术的需求增加,这种需求正变得越来越流行。直到现在,这个手术主要是在全身麻醉下进行的,但是最近局部麻醉技术,如肿胀局部麻醉,应用越来越多。今天,超声用于局部麻醉和镇痛使我们能够执行越来越精确且风险较低的技术。在这份报告中,我们提出了一种新颖的两步超声引导技术,该技术结合了手术前4周在臀大肌注射肉毒杆菌毒素和肿胀麻醉和腕部神经阻滞.此外,麻醉和镇痛技术的结合可以保证更好的结果,无论是在手术执行干预和减少疼痛,提高病人的舒适度在术后。
    In recent years, there has been an increase in demand for gluteal augmentation and reshaping surgeries with intramuscular implants which are becoming increasingly popular. Until now, this surgery was mainly performed under general anesthesia, but recently locoregional anesthesia techniques, such as tumescent local anesthesia, are being applied more and more. Today, the use of ultrasound for locoregional anesthesia and analgesia allows us to perform techniques that are increasingly precise and burdened with lower risks. In this report, we present a novel two-step ultrasound-guided technique combining a botox injection in the gluteus maximus four weeks before surgery and tumescent anesthesia with a cluneal nerve block. Furthermore, the combination of anesthetic and analgesic techniques can guarantee a better result both in terms of surgical execution of the intervention and in reducing pain and improving patient comfort in the postoperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是确定延世点在南非白人人群中治疗牙龈微笑的疗效。确定了在治疗软糖微笑中进行肉毒杆菌毒素注射的与基础肌肉组织有关的准确表面解剖标准。
    方法:选择19具(男10例,女9例)尸体进行面部解剖。解剖前后拍摄面部资料照片。覆盖之前和之后的照片以确定销位置应该在解剖尸体上的位置以确定延世点。上浮器(LLS),LLSalaequenasi(LLSAN),somaticus小症,使用量角器和尺子来测量the骨的主要肌肉,这说明了手动测量。通过将解剖图像导入ImageJ来测量数字测量。构建直径为2cm(半径为1cm)的圆,以确定延世点是否可以成功影响肌肉纤维。
    结果:数字和手动测量显示出可比的结果,具有高度的相关性和可靠性。结果表明,与韩国人口相比,南非白人人口的面部肌肉组织角度更窄。
    结论:根据所选样本,延世点是一个无效的注射部位,可以成功治疗南非白人人群的软糖微笑。
    The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy of Yonsei point in the treatment of a gummy smile in a White South African population. The accurate surface anatomy criteria in relation to the underlying musculature for the administration of Botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of gummy smile was determined.
    Nineteen (10 males and 9 females) cadavers were selected for facial dissection. Facial profile photographs were taken before and after dissection. The before and after photographs were overlayed to determine where the pin positions should be on the dissected cadaver to determine the Yonsei point. The levator labii superioris (LLS), LLS alaeque nasi (LLSAN), zygomaticus minor, and zygomaticus major muscles were measured using a protractor and ruler, which accounted for the manual measurements. Digital measurements were measured by importing dissected images into ImageJ. Circles with a 2 cm diameter (1 cm radius) were constructed to determine whether the Yonsei point could successfully influence muscles fibers.
    Digital and manual measurements show comparable results with high correlation and reliability. Results showed that the White South African population had narrower facial musculature angles as compared with the Korean population.
    Based on the selected sample, the Yonsei point is an ineffective injection site for the successful treatment of gummy smile in a White South African population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Seat belt syndrome (SBS) represents all injury profiles associated with seat belt injuries and motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Seat belt syndrome classically presents with a superficial seat belt sign that may signify deeper intra-abdominal and/or spinal involvement. The amount of force transmitted from the restraint to the passenger ultimately dictates the amount and severity of the injury. We present a unique case of a 59-year-old female involved in a motor vehicle crash with multiple traumatic injuries, including seat belt syndrome, abdominal wall transection, and bowel injuries. She later had reconstruction of her traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs). Three unique approaches were used in the management of her traumatic abdominal wall hernias: (1) preoperative Botulinum toxin (Botox) injections, (2) operative use of biologic and bioabsorbable meshes in contaminated fields, and (3) postoperative physical therapy and body positioning. The patient did not experience any recurrence of these hernias after her abdominal wall reconstruction and remains alive at the time this case was written. The diagnostic criteria and surgical management of traumatic abdominal wall hernias have yet to be established, and the case presented here provides approaches that should serve as future areas for study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Both calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (botox) are used in the prevention of chronic migraines. However, it is not clear which is more effective overall. This review will compare the efficacy, side effects, cost-effectiveness, and other factors between CGRP mAbs and botox. We searched Pubmed and Google Scholar using the keywords migraines, CGRP mAbs, botox, efficacy, side effects, aura. All articles, including case-control/cohort studies, case series, case reports, randomized control trials, traditional/systematic reviews, were analyzed. CGRP mAbs and botox both reduce the frequency of migraines in patients. Patients have reported they decreased migraines\' frequency and intensity in several studies after being given each medication. While CGRP mAbs are more recent medications, botox has been studied for more than a decade as a migraine preventative. Both drugs have minor short-term side effects, but some CGRP mAbs may cause persistent constipation too. CGRP mAbs are self-injected every month, and botox is physician-injected every three months, making it easier to stay compliant. While both medications are expensive, botox has a lower cost over time. Botox is more effective prophylaxis of migraines based on the articles that were reviewed. While both CGRP mAbs and botox are efficacious and tolerable, botox has been studied longer, has fewer side effects, is more cost-effective, and is easier to comply with.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景泪流是患有神经系统疾病的儿童中常见的合并症。对于保守治疗失败或担心唾液吸入的患者,建议注射肉毒杆菌毒素和外科手术来治疗病理性流涕。以下综述评估了10年期间肉毒杆菌毒素注射和手术干预后的结果,重点是前后流口水患者的治疗选择和结果。方法该研究包括2006年1月1日至2015年12月31日接受流口水手术(与国际疾病分类(ICD)-9和ICD-10代码527.7和K11.7相匹配的当前程序术语(CPT)代码42440、42450、42509、42510、64611)的所有年龄小于25岁的患者。图表审查收集了人口统计数据,流口水的药物使用,和流口水的类型(前,后部,both).结果变量包括术前和术后的围兜数量,父母报告的结果,干预后流口水的药物需求,术后住院时间,和并发症。结果71例患者被纳入我们的分析,总共执行了88个程序。首次干预的平均年龄为8.9岁;43例患者为男性,40例患者患有脑瘫。31例患者出现后流口水或前/后流口水。这些患者更有可能接受手术作为第一次侵入性干预。最常见的干预措施是肉毒杆菌毒素注射(28例患者,39%)和舌下腺切除术(SLGE)下颌下导管结扎术(SMDL)(36例,51%)。在56%的患者中观察到注射后的改善,而在任何手术干预后的患者中为73%。结论流口水的管理是复杂的,在10年内执行了18种不同的程序。手术干预,特别是SLGE与SMDL和颌下腺切除术(SMGE),导致实质性改善;这些通常作为后流口水患者的首次干预措施进行。通过回顾我们的经验,我们希望指导管理决策,并帮助管理患者和护理人员的期望。
    Background Sialorrhea is a common comorbidity among children with neurologic disorders. Botulinum toxin injections and surgical procedures are recommended for the management of pathological sialorrhea in patients who fail conservative management or with concerns for salivary aspiration. The following review evaluates outcomes following botulinum toxin injections and surgical interventions for sialorrhea over a 10-year period with a focus on treatment options and outcomes for patients with anterior and posterior drooling. Methods The study included all patients less than 25 years of age who underwent a procedure for drooling (Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 42440, 42450, 42509, 42510, 64611 matched with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes 527.7 and K11.7) from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015. A chart review collected demographics, drooling medication use, and type of drooling (anterior, posterior, both). Outcome variables included pre- and post-procedure number of bibs, parent-reported outcomes, post-intervention drooling medication requirement, post-procedure length of stay, and complications. Results Seventy-one patients were included in our analysis, with 88 total procedures performed. The average age at first intervention was 8.9 years; 43 patients were male and 40 patients had cerebral palsy. Thirty-one patients experienced posterior drooling or anterior/posterior drooling. These patients were more likely to undergo surgery as the first invasive intervention. The most commonly performed interventions were botulinum toxin injections (28 patients, 39%) and sublingual gland excision (SLGE) with submandibular duct ligation (SMDL) (36 patients, 51%). Improvement following injections was noted in 56% of patients versus 73% of patients following any surgical intervention. Conclusion Management of drooling is complex with 18 different procedures performed over 10 years. Surgical interventions, specifically SLGE with SMDL and submandibular gland excision (SMGE), result in substantial improvement; these are commonly performed as the first intervention in patients with posterior drooling. By reviewing our experience, we hope to guide management decisions and help manage patient and caregiver expectations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号