Neuralgia is characterized by chronic pain resulting from damage or diseases in the somatosensory system, including nerves responsible for transmitting sensory information. Current treatments for neuropathic pain, which is a type of neuralgia, have limited success rates and can cause unwanted side effects. Since 1989, botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A), derived from the potent neurotoxin Clostridium botulinum, has been used to treat neuropathic pain in humans. BTX-A has shown analgesic effects by inhibiting the release of neurotransmitters involved in pain transmission. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BTX-A in various types of neuralgia. The research question guiding this review is whether BTX-A is safe and effective in reducing pain in different types of neuralgias. To conduct this review, a literature search was performed using the PubMed, Medline, and PubMed Central databases. The search strategy included relevant keywords related to BTX-A, neuralgia, and neuropathic pain. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total of 30 articles were included in the review. These studies examined the efficacy of BTX-A in various conditions such as postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), auriculotemporal neuralgia (ATN), occipital neuralgia (ON), leprosy-induced neuropathic pain (LIN), focal painful neuropathies, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury. However, further research is needed to enhance our understanding of the optimal use of BTX-A in specific neuralgias. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the included studies. Nevertheless, BTX-A might be considered a viable treatment option for neuralgia.

When a clinician, especially one who is specialized in primary care is faced with presenting complaints of deep, sharp, anterior chest pain, the most common differential diagnoses include cardiac and gastrointestinal pain. Musculoskeletal pain is thought of less frequently as a possible root cause. In this case report, we describe the clinical journey of a female athlete who presented with complaints of burning anterior chest pain. Her sternalis syndrome pain was first misdiagnosed as pain of cardiac origin, resulting in pacemaker placement into the patient\'s chest. The pain continued, and the same musculoskeletal pain was then presumed to be of gastrointestinal origin due to a previous history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). As a result of this misidentification, the patient underwent an unnecessary esophageal surgical procedure. Here, we identify the origins of sternalis syndrome pain, what other conditions the pain may be confused with, and how clinicians should not be quick to exclude musculoskeletal pain from a differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. We discuss effective treatments for sternalis syndrome and shed light on this less common cause of anterior chest pain to promote more accurate diagnosis and avoidance of unnecessary surgical interventions.

Background Sialorrhea is a common comorbidity among children with neurologic disorders. Botulinum toxin injections and surgical procedures are recommended for the management of pathological sialorrhea in patients who fail conservative management or with concerns for salivary aspiration. The following review evaluates outcomes following botulinum toxin injections and surgical interventions for sialorrhea over a 10-year period with a focus on treatment options and outcomes for patients with anterior and posterior drooling. Methods The study included all patients less than 25 years of age who underwent a procedure for drooling (Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 42440, 42450, 42509, 42510, 64611 matched with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes 527.7 and K11.7) from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015. A chart review collected demographics, drooling medication use, and type of drooling (anterior, posterior, both). Outcome variables included pre- and post-procedure number of bibs, parent-reported outcomes, post-intervention drooling medication requirement, post-procedure length of stay, and complications. Results Seventy-one patients were included in our analysis, with 88 total procedures performed. The average age at first intervention was 8.9 years; 43 patients were male and 40 patients had cerebral palsy. Thirty-one patients experienced posterior drooling or anterior/posterior drooling. These patients were more likely to undergo surgery as the first invasive intervention. The most commonly performed interventions were botulinum toxin injections (28 patients, 39%) and sublingual gland excision (SLGE) with submandibular duct ligation (SMDL) (36 patients, 51%). Improvement following injections was noted in 56% of patients versus 73% of patients following any surgical intervention. Conclusion Management of drooling is complex with 18 different procedures performed over 10 years. Surgical interventions, specifically SLGE with SMDL and submandibular gland excision (SMGE), result in substantial improvement; these are commonly performed as the first intervention in patients with posterior drooling. By reviewing our experience, we hope to guide management decisions and help manage patient and caregiver expectations.