Psoriasis vulgaris, also known as plaque-type psoriasis, is the most common form of psoriasis. It is characterized by erythematous plaques covered with scales. Among the available treatments, the fully human monoclonal antibodies ustekinumab (UST) and guselkumab (GUS) have low immunogenicity. Additionally, GUS has not been found to have a significant risk of inducing the development of clinically relevant neutralizing antibodies. Therefore, we sometimes consider switching to GUS when UST is insufficiently effective. However, switching to another biological agent usually requires an induction phase, potentially incurring additional costs. We herein present the first case of a successful transition from UST 90 mg to an extended dosing interval of GUS without an induction phase. This approach may be a viable and cost-saving option, especially for patients with relatively low disease activity.

UNASSIGNED: Guidelines generally recommend a combination of immunological assays and chest X-ray imaging (CXR) when screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) prior to biologic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether CXR identify patients with suspected LTBI/TB who were not identified with QuantiFERON tests (QFT) when screening for LTBI/TB before starting biologic treatment in IBD patients.
UNASSIGNED: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who had a QFT and a CXR prior to initiation of biologic treatment in a 5-year period (October 1st, 2017 to September 30th, 2022).
UNASSIGNED: 520 patients (56% female, mean age 40.1 years) were included. The majority had none or few risk factors for TB (as reflected by the demographic characteristics) but some risk factors for having false negative QFT results (concurrent glucocorticoid treatment and inflammatory activity). QFT results were positive in 8 patients (1.5%), inconclusive in 18 (3.5%) and negative in 494 (95.0%). Only 1 patient (0.19%) had CXR findings suspicious of LTBI. This patient also had a positive QFT and was subsequently diagnosed with active TB. All patients with negative or inconclusive QFT had CXR without any findings suggesting LTBI/TB. One patient developed active TB after having initiated biologic treatment in spite of having negative QFT and a normal CXR at screening.
UNASSIGNED: In a population with low risk of TB, the benefits of supplementing the QFT with a CXR are limited and are unlikely to outweigh the cost in both patient test-burden, radioactive exposure, and economic resources.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis is a common, often debilitating, chronic autoimmune inflammatory skin disease. Moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis can be treated with biologics such as anti-interleukin and anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies. We aimed to investigate treatment discontinuation among patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study based on anonymized claims data from the German statutory health insurance which covered the years from 2016 to 2021. We included adult patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment in drug-specific cohorts. Over a 365-day follow-up period, we assessed the frequencies and the time until treatment discontinuation for different biologics. Differences in discontinuation rates were compared using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: A total of 2565 patients with psoriasis who initiated treatment with secukinumab (n = 612), adalimumab (n = 454), guselkumab (n = 354), ixekizumab (n = 259), ustekinumab (n = 241), tildrakizumab (n = 205), brodalumab (n = 166), risankizumab (n = 145), etanercept (n = 91), certolizumab (n = 29), and infliximab (n = 9) were included. A total of 1290 patients (50.29%) discontinued treatment during the follow-up period, ranging from 30.34% (risankizumab) to 69.23% (etanercept). Median time until discontinuation of treatment ranged from 102 days (etanercept) to 208 days (risankizumab). Once the biologic treatment was discontinued, 45.05% of patients restarted the treatment with the same agent, 23.10% of patients switched to another biologic, and 31.86% received no further biologic agent. Compared to patients treated with risankizumab, the treatment discontinuation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients treated with the other biologics except ustekinumab (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Further research should explore reasons leading to treatment discontinuation in order to support treatment choices for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term tezepelumab treatment in the DESTINATION study (NCT03706079) resulted in reduced asthma exacerbations, reduced biomarker levels, and improved lung function and symptom control in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the time course of changes in biomarkers and clinical manifestations after treatment cessation after 2 years of tezepelumab treatment.
METHODS: DESTINATION was a 2-year, phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of tezepelumab treatment in patients (12-80 years old) with severe asthma. Patients received their last treatment doses at week 100 and could enroll in an extended follow-up period from weeks 104 to 140. Change over time in key biomarkers and clinical outcomes were assessed in tezepelumab vs placebo recipients for 40 weeks after stopping treatment.
RESULTS: Of 569 patients enrolled in the extended follow-up period, 426 were included in the analysis (289 received tezepelumab and 137 placebo). In the 40-week period after the last tezepelumab dose, blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 scores gradually increased from weeks 4 to 10, with a gradual reduction in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second such that blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and clinical outcomes returned to placebo levels; however, none of these outcomes returned to baseline levels. Total IgE levels increased later from week 28 and remained well below placebo and baseline levels during the 40-week period after the last tezepelumab dose.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals the benefits of continued tezepelumab treatment in the management of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, compared with stopping treatment after 2 years.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03706079.

UNASSIGNED: Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios.
UNASSIGNED: We sought investigate Tezepelumab\'s response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs.
UNASSIGNED: Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs.
UNASSIGNED: Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab\'s potential in real-world settings.
UNASSIGNED: In real-world scenarios, despite the study\'s limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab\'s promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

UNASSIGNED: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease often associated with several comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular diseases, infections, or cancer, among others. With the progressive aging of the population, a growing number of patients with psoriasis can be expected to present multiple comorbidities. Currently, there is a wide range of biological treatments available for moderate to severe psoriasis, including tumor necrosis alpha (TNF) inhibitors, IL12/23 inhibitor, IL17 inhibitors, and IL23 inhibitors.
UNASSIGNED: This review aims to describe the specific characteristics of these drugs in relation to psoriasis comorbidities, in order to facilitate decision-making in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Some of the biological treatments can influence comorbidities, in some cases even improving them. Therefore, comorbidities are a key factor when deciding on one biological treatment over another. The development of new drugs is expanding the therapeutic arsenal for psoriasis. A high level of expertise in the field with a detailed knowledge of the characteristics of every drug is imperative to provide personalized medicine.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) affects reproductive-aged women. Active disease can lead to decreased fertility. Although the vast majority of international guidelines recommend for the continuation of anti-TNF-α during pregnancy, recent studies have raised concerns about the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) therapy during pregnancy, both for patients and for physicians.
METHODS: Studies that evaluate the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnant women with IBD were identified using bibliographical searches. An updated meta-analysis was performed for pregnancy outcomes, such as live birth, abortion, still birth, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital abnormalities, and neonatal infection. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported. Data on disease activity, timing of anti-TNF-α therapy were collected for further analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies were screened from on-line databases and international meeting abstracts. An increased risk of abortion (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.74; P = 0.04) and preterm birth (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28; P = 0.004), and a decreased risk of live birth (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = 0.002]) were found in the anti-TNF-α therapy group compared with the control group (no use of anti-TNF-α therapy). The subgroup analyses based on the disease activity showed there is no significant association between the use of anti-TNF-α therapy during pregnancy on adverse pregnancy outcomes of abortion, preterm birth, and live birth. The rates of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities in the anti-TNF-α therapy group were not significantly different from those in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the risks of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities; however it may be assicated with increased risks of abortion and preterm birth, which are accompanied by a lower rate of live birth. Although these findings may be confounding by potential disease activity, they offer some opposite viewpoints with biologic agent use. Therefore, more studies are required to further confirm the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnancy with IBD.

Scalp psoriasis is a common manifestation of psoriasis that significantly impacts a patient\'s quality of life. About 80% of cases of psoriasis involve the scalp, making it the most frequently affected area of the body. The treatment of scalp psoriasis is particularly crucial because of its hard-to-treat nature and substantial adverse impacts on overall well-being. Along with the physical symptoms of discomfort and itching, psoriasis, especially when it affects the scalp, can cause severe psychological damage. Treating scalp psoriasis can be challenging due to its location and associated symptoms, such as scaling and pruritus, which is why various drugs have become widely used for refractory cases. Topical treatments like corticosteroids and vitamin D analogs manage scalp psoriasis by reducing inflammation and regulating skin cell growth. Tar-based shampoos, salicylic acid solutions, and moisturizers control scaling. Phototherapy with UVB light reduces inflammation. Severe cases may require systemic medications such as oral retinoids and immunosuppressants. While various therapies are accessible for scalp psoriasis, concerns arise due to their limited advantages and the absence of controlled studies assessing their effectiveness. Considering these challenges, there is a clear demand for innovative approaches to address this condition effectively. Recent advancements in topical therapies, phototherapy, systemic agents, and complementary therapies have shown promising results in managing scalp psoriasis. Also, the advent of biologics, specifically anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 drugs for scalp psoriasis, has seen significant improvements. The review highlights the lack of well-tolerated and effective treatments for scalp psoriasis and underscores the importance of further research in this area. The objective of this review is to clarify the different treatment options currently available or being investigated in clinical trials for managing scalp psoriasis.

The management of psoriasis in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) presents a unique challenge, marked by a more severe progression and limited efficacy of first- and second-line treatments. Although conventional systemic therapies might be considered, these agents are immunosuppressants, making their use challenging in people living with HIV (PLHIV). Biologic agents are frequently used in individuals with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, but their efficacy and safety data in PLHIV are very limited, as this patient group tends to be excluded from clinical trials. Risankizumab is a selective interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor that has demonstrated a favourable safety profile and high efficacy in long-term studies and clinical practice. This current case report presents two clinical cases of PLHIV with plaque psoriasis who were effectively treated with the biologic agent risankizumab, with no reported safety issues. Although there are limited data on the use of biologics in PLHIV, this case series suggests that IL-23 inhibitors, namely risankizumab, might be a valuable therapeutic option for this population. Additional research and larger studies are needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the long-term safety and efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors in individuals affected by HIV.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies have demonstrated benefits for individuals with severe asthma, including reduced daily symptoms and severe exacerbations. However, data describing patient perspectives on these treatments are limited. This study sought to understand the preferences and priorities of Canadians with severe asthma in the context of novel biologic treatment options.
METHODS: Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted among Canadians with severe asthma from July to August 2022. Purposeful sampling included individuals with and without biologic therapy experience. All participants described daily life with severe asthma, experiences and priorities related to asthma treatment and their impressions of biologics. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to explore patterns in the data.
RESULTS: Among 18 individuals included, 10 were currently taking or had prior experience with biologic treatment for asthma. Those who had never been treated with biologics were unfamiliar with them, considering treatment, or believed that they may not be eligible. Four themes were developed to convey the perspectives of participants on biologics: (1) life-changing benefits, but not for all; (2) navigating barriers to being prescribed and remaining adherent to biologic treatments; (3) treatment administration preferences are not only about convenience; (4) concerns about safety and the unknown as a source of treatment hesitancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the clinical benefits of biologics align with patient perceptions of achieving good asthma control. However, treatment gaps persist among individuals who do not experience a meaningful improvement in their asthma symptoms and those who face barriers accessing biologics. People with severe asthma attributed importance to greater availability of at-home treatment options, improved access to financial support to cover treatment costs and support to address safety concerns. This research provides insight into patient-based treatment priorities and preferences for biologics, which may help inform decision-making related to emerging therapies for severe asthma.
For people with severe asthma, biologics are a treatment option that can be taken in addition to their regular medication. In this study, we asked 18 Canadians with severe asthma about how having severe asthma affects their lives, their current and previous asthma treatments, and their views on biologics. Ten people in this study were currently taking or had previously taken biologics for severe asthma. We found that biologics can be life changing. Also, people with severe asthma can find it difficult to get on and stay on biologics. They would like financial and educational support when considering biologics and prefer to take biologics at home, if possible. This study helps us understand the priorities and preferences related to biologics of patients with severe asthma.