Psoriasis vulgaris, also known as plaque-type psoriasis, is the most common form of psoriasis. It is characterized by erythematous plaques covered with scales. Among the available treatments, the fully human monoclonal antibodies ustekinumab (UST) and guselkumab (GUS) have low immunogenicity. Additionally, GUS has not been found to have a significant risk of inducing the development of clinically relevant neutralizing antibodies. Therefore, we sometimes consider switching to GUS when UST is insufficiently effective. However, switching to another biological agent usually requires an induction phase, potentially incurring additional costs. We herein present the first case of a successful transition from UST 90 mg to an extended dosing interval of GUS without an induction phase. This approach may be a viable and cost-saving option, especially for patients with relatively low disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis is a common, often debilitating, chronic autoimmune inflammatory skin disease. Moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis can be treated with biologics such as anti-interleukin and anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies. We aimed to investigate treatment discontinuation among patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study based on anonymized claims data from the German statutory health insurance which covered the years from 2016 to 2021. We included adult patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment in drug-specific cohorts. Over a 365-day follow-up period, we assessed the frequencies and the time until treatment discontinuation for different biologics. Differences in discontinuation rates were compared using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: A total of 2565 patients with psoriasis who initiated treatment with secukinumab (n = 612), adalimumab (n = 454), guselkumab (n = 354), ixekizumab (n = 259), ustekinumab (n = 241), tildrakizumab (n = 205), brodalumab (n = 166), risankizumab (n = 145), etanercept (n = 91), certolizumab (n = 29), and infliximab (n = 9) were included. A total of 1290 patients (50.29%) discontinued treatment during the follow-up period, ranging from 30.34% (risankizumab) to 69.23% (etanercept). Median time until discontinuation of treatment ranged from 102 days (etanercept) to 208 days (risankizumab). Once the biologic treatment was discontinued, 45.05% of patients restarted the treatment with the same agent, 23.10% of patients switched to another biologic, and 31.86% received no further biologic agent. Compared to patients treated with risankizumab, the treatment discontinuation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients treated with the other biologics except ustekinumab (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Further research should explore reasons leading to treatment discontinuation in order to support treatment choices for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) affects reproductive-aged women. Active disease can lead to decreased fertility. Although the vast majority of international guidelines recommend for the continuation of anti-TNF-α during pregnancy, recent studies have raised concerns about the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) therapy during pregnancy, both for patients and for physicians.
METHODS: Studies that evaluate the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnant women with IBD were identified using bibliographical searches. An updated meta-analysis was performed for pregnancy outcomes, such as live birth, abortion, still birth, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital abnormalities, and neonatal infection. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported. Data on disease activity, timing of anti-TNF-α therapy were collected for further analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies were screened from on-line databases and international meeting abstracts. An increased risk of abortion (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.74; P = 0.04) and preterm birth (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28; P = 0.004), and a decreased risk of live birth (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = 0.002]) were found in the anti-TNF-α therapy group compared with the control group (no use of anti-TNF-α therapy). The subgroup analyses based on the disease activity showed there is no significant association between the use of anti-TNF-α therapy during pregnancy on adverse pregnancy outcomes of abortion, preterm birth, and live birth. The rates of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities in the anti-TNF-α therapy group were not significantly different from those in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the risks of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities; however it may be assicated with increased risks of abortion and preterm birth, which are accompanied by a lower rate of live birth. Although these findings may be confounding by potential disease activity, they offer some opposite viewpoints with biologic agent use. Therefore, more studies are required to further confirm the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnancy with IBD.

The management of psoriasis in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) presents a unique challenge, marked by a more severe progression and limited efficacy of first- and second-line treatments. Although conventional systemic therapies might be considered, these agents are immunosuppressants, making their use challenging in people living with HIV (PLHIV). Biologic agents are frequently used in individuals with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, but their efficacy and safety data in PLHIV are very limited, as this patient group tends to be excluded from clinical trials. Risankizumab is a selective interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor that has demonstrated a favourable safety profile and high efficacy in long-term studies and clinical practice. This current case report presents two clinical cases of PLHIV with plaque psoriasis who were effectively treated with the biologic agent risankizumab, with no reported safety issues. Although there are limited data on the use of biologics in PLHIV, this case series suggests that IL-23 inhibitors, namely risankizumab, might be a valuable therapeutic option for this population. Additional research and larger studies are needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the long-term safety and efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors in individuals affected by HIV.

UNASSIGNED: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor (RF) for cardiovascular (CV) disease, a leading cause of mortality in RA patients.
UNASSIGNED: Consecutive records of RA patients with high disease activity screened upon biologic therapy initiation were reviewed between January 2001 and 2018. Patients with at least 6-month follow-up and baseline disease activity scores were enrolled (n = 353) and stratified into manifest CV disorder (\"overt CVD\"), any traditional CV risk factor (\"atCVrisk\") and no CV risk factor (\"vlCVrisk\") groups.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, mean (SD) patient age was 51.4 (±12.2) years, and 291 (82.4%) subjects were female. Median follow-up was 41.9 (IQR 18.6, 80) months. Overall, 89 (25.2%) individuals developed at least one new CV RF, of which 65 (18.4%) acquired one and 24 (6.8%) two or more. Incident lipid disorders (42, 11.9%), followed by hypertension (14, 4%), atrial fibrillation (17, 4.8%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (16, 4.5%), were common. Incident major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were not reported in the vlCVrisk group, in contrast to atCVrisk (n = 8, 4.2%) or overt CVD (n = 4, 18.2%). Age was a significant predictor of incident CV risk factor (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07; p < 0.01). In age-adjusted analyses, only baseline body mass index (BMI) (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18; p < 0.01), but not ever smoking (p = 0.93), male sex (p = 0.26), positive RF (p = 0.24), positive ACPA (p = 0.90), or baseline disease activity (p = 0.19), were independent predictor of incident CV risk factors.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with RA initiating biologics should be screened for cardiometabolic risk factors, especially at an older age. The presence of at least one risk factor may be linked to a worse long-term prognosis.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were quickly developed and administered to the population worldwide. As is expected with new vaccine products, adverse reactions following immunization have been reported, namely, the development and/or exacerbation of autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases, including rheumatic diseases. Here, we report a clinical case of a 56-year-old woman with a 44-year history of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis under treatment with an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha biosimilar (adalimumab) with good control of skin disease and without rheumatic involvement to date who came to us with complaints of migratory polyarthralgia starting one week after receiving the second dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The condition progressed over the following months and a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was established. Biologic treatment was switched to an anti-interleukin 17A (secukinumab), with a very good clinical cutaneous and articular response, which was sustained up to the present moment. The mechanisms behind the exacerbation or new-onset of autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases after receiving anti-COVID-19 vaccines are not yet fully understood, requiring further investigation. It is also not known whether rheumatic symptoms post-COVID-19 infection will have similar mechanisms to rheumatic symptoms post-anti-COVID-19 vaccination. With the continuing worldwide vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, clinicians need to be prepared to discuss the risks and benefits of vaccination and should be aware that it may cause or exacerbate immune disorders such as psoriatic arthritis, warranting close follow-up in terms of disease progression and treatment.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin illness that has the potential to manifest at any stage of life, it is most frequently observed in early adulthood. Biological drugs have significantly transformed the landscape of psoriasis treatment through the provision of focused therapy, which effectively mitigates inflammation and regulates the overproduction of skin cells. Notwithstanding the accessibility of these biological drugs, rigorous evaluations that juxtapose their safety and efficacy profiles are necessary. The objective of this study is to conduct a thorough investigation of the relative efficacy of these drugs in alleviating psoriasis symptoms and increasing the quality of life for patients by synthesizing the existing evidence. A comprehensive review was conducted to evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of different biochemical medicines utilized in the management of psoriasis. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, the review process was conducted among the available studies. A search was conducted across electronic databases, such as Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase, utilizing a combination of keywords and Mesh phrases pertaining to psoriasis, biological medications, and particular names of pharmaceuticals. In total, 475 studies were ascertained by the preliminary search of the database. After eliminating duplicate research, 358 distinct studies remained. After meticulous screening of titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion criteria, 281 papers were deemed ineligible and thus excluded. For final inclusion, the whole texts of the remaining 77 studies were evaluated. Forty additional papers were removed during the full-text evaluation for a variety of reasons, including improper research design, or insufficient outcome data. Finally, 37 studies were included in this systematic review since they satisfied all inclusion criteria. The results of the current systematic review showed that all biological medications showed high efficacy in the treatment of skin psoriasis compared with placebo based on the clinical assessment outcomes using different tools such as PASI.

Acne fulminans (AF) is a rare disorder marked by severe eruptions of inflamed nodules, hemorrhagic crusts, and ulcers accompanied by systemic symptoms and often laboratory abnormalities. Commonly affecting adolescent males with pre-existing acne, AF has been associated with isotretinoin therapy and elevated testosterone levels. With unknown pathogenesis, lesions frequently involve the trunk and face and are managed standardly with corticosteroids and isotretinoin. Uncontrolled or recurrent cases pose challenges due to prolonged high-dose corticosteroid use with increased scarring. In this study, we present a case of AF in a 17-year-old male unresponsive to corticosteroid and isotretinoin therapy, successfully treated with ustekinumab, an interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitor. The introduction of ustekinumab facilitated a controlled corticosteroid taper and isotretinoin dose escalation, resulting in significant clinical improvement of skin lesions and systemic symptoms. This case report underscores the potential of ustekinumab as a viable therapeutic option in the treatment of AF, particularly in cases where corticosteroid and isotretinoin combination therapy have proven ineffective.

Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the sclerostin protein, which regulates bone formation and resorption. It is a novel therapy in the treatment of post-menopausal women with osteoporosis. The evidence regarding romosozumab\'s cardiovascular safety is conflicting. We report the first post-marketing case demonstrating cardiac events (i.e., atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure) in a female patient with osteoporosis likely triggered by romosozumab. A literature review on romosozumab and cardiovascular disease is discussed extensively. For osteoporotic patients with cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease, and stroke), the benefits of fracture prevention should be weighed against potential cardiovascular risks before prescribing romosozumab. Real-world data on post-marketing surveillance will shed light on the potential safety signals of romosozumab.

Chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an acquired hematologic condition that involves immune-mediated platelet destruction with resultant bleeding of variable severity. Refractory ITP occurs when patients fail to tolerate and/or respond to multiple treatment modalities. In this case, we examine the clinical course of a 39-year-old female with refractory ITP and discuss how we navigated a multitude of challenges by adapting an established desensitization protocol to meet our patient\'s needs. To our knowledge, we describe the first successful desensitization to ofatumumab for use in ITP in the current literature.