Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder primarily affecting the intertriginous and anogenital regions. Guidelines recommend various treatments for HS, including biologic agents like adalimumab for moderate to severe cases. Adalimumab is a type of human monoclonal IgG1 antibody designed to target tumor necrosis factor α. Recent studies have shown the effectiveness of adalimumab, either alone or combined with surgery, in managing HS. We retrospectively analyzed the medical chart of HS patients in a southern Taiwan medical center from 2019 to 2022 and investigated clinical features and treatment response. The institutional review board at Chang Gung Medical Foundation granted approval for the study. We primarily focused on moderate to severely affected patients. One hundred and two clinically diagnosed HS patients participated, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1 and an average age of 31.8 at diagnosis. Among them, 41.2% were in Hurley stage III and 32.4% in stage II. Nineteen patients received excision with pre-surgical adalimumab; their average age at diagnosis was 31.1, with a gender ratio of 5.3:1. Surgery was most common on the buttocks (68%), axillae (21%), and groin (10%). Excision patients were primarily in advanced stages (Hurley III 94.7%, II 5.3%) with high body mass index. Adalimumab and surgery combined yielded a 68.4% improvement rate, while 15.8% remained stable and 15.8% did not respond as expected. In addition, smoking and obesity were prevalent among patients. Adalimumab showed promising results in moderate to severe HS, with significant improvement observed in our cases. The combination of adalimumab and surgery appeared effective in advanced HS patients with larger involved areas and more tunnels. No severe adverse events were reported. However, our study was limited by its retrospective nature and the lack of a control group. Despite these limitations, our study revealed the benefits of integrating adalimumab with suitable surgical procedures in managing patients experiencing moderate to severe HS in real-world scenarios.

Evidence on serological responses to vaccination in children exposed to ustekinumab (UST) or vedolizumab (VDZ) in utero is lacking. This multicentre prospective study aimed to assess the impact of prenatal exposure to UST or VDZ due to maternal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on serological responses to vaccination and other immunological parameters in exposed children. Children aged ≥ 1 year who were exposed in utero to UST or VDZ and completed at least 1-year of mandatory vaccination were included. We assessed the serological response to vaccination (non-live: tetanus, diphtheria, and Haemophilus influenzae B; live: mumps, rubella, and measles), whole blood count, and immunoglobulin levels. The control group comprised unexposed children born to mothers without IBD. A total of 23 children (median age, 25 months) exposed to UST (n = 13) or VDZ (n = 10) and 10 controls (median age, 37 months) were included. The serological response to vaccination was comparable between the UST and VDZ groups and controls, with an adequate serological response rate of ≥ 80%. Only children exposed to UST showed a slightly reduced serological response to mumps (67% vs. 86% in controls), whereas all children exposed to VDZ showed an adequate response. The majority of the exposed children had normal levels of individual immunoglobulin classes, similar to the controls. No severe pathology was observed in any of the children.Conclusion: Despite the limited sample size, our findings suggest that in utero exposure to VDZ or UST does not significantly impair the vaccine response or broader immunological parameters in exposed children.

BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare, and potentially life-threatening skin condition characterized by flares comprising widespread sterile pustules and systemic inflammation. Both the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease have made GPP classification and standardization of clinical criteria challenging. Before the approval of spesolimab (IL-36R antibody) in 2022, there were no approved treatments in the USA or Europe for GPP flares. Treatment for GPP has amounted to off-label use of medicines approved to treat plaque psoriasis. Our aim was to describe the sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with GPP in Spain.
METHODS: Non-interventional, descriptive, multi-center, retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with GPP in Spain.
RESULTS: 56 patients (50% women) were included, with a mean (standard deviation, SD) age at diagnosis of 53.7 (20.5) and a mean (SD) time of follow-up of 3.7 (3.1) years. In 80% of patients, GPP diagnosis was associated with a flare and 67.3% had known risk factors for GPP (such as previous diagnosis or family history of plaque psoriasis, comorbidities, smoking or stress). Hypertension and plaque psoriasis were the most frequent comorbidities (44.6% each). The number of GPP flares per patient-year was 0.55 with (range 0-4) a mean (SD) body surface area involvement of 21.3% (19.1). The most frequent manifestations of GPP flares were pustules (88.5%), erythema (76.9%), and scaling (76.9%). Additionally, 65.4% of patients had plaque psoriasis, 53.8% had unspecified skin lesions, and 30.8% experienced pain. The treatments used for GPP flares were off-label conventional systemic drugs (75%), mostly corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and acitretin. In the periods between flares, off-label biologics were used in 56.5% of patients. During the study period, 9 patients (16.1%) had at least one complication and 5 of them required hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter study in Spanish GPP patients. Most patients were in their fifties, with personal or family history of plaque psoriasis, stress, smoking and a wide range of comorbidities and complications. Even though the number of flares per patient/year was 0.55, there was variability between patients. Both off-label conventional systemics and off-label biologics were used for flare management without a clear treatment pattern.

Psoriasis vulgaris, also known as plaque-type psoriasis, is the most common form of psoriasis. It is characterized by erythematous plaques covered with scales. Among the available treatments, the fully human monoclonal antibodies ustekinumab (UST) and guselkumab (GUS) have low immunogenicity. Additionally, GUS has not been found to have a significant risk of inducing the development of clinically relevant neutralizing antibodies. Therefore, we sometimes consider switching to GUS when UST is insufficiently effective. However, switching to another biological agent usually requires an induction phase, potentially incurring additional costs. We herein present the first case of a successful transition from UST 90 mg to an extended dosing interval of GUS without an induction phase. This approach may be a viable and cost-saving option, especially for patients with relatively low disease activity.

UNASSIGNED: Guidelines generally recommend a combination of immunological assays and chest X-ray imaging (CXR) when screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) prior to biologic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether CXR identify patients with suspected LTBI/TB who were not identified with QuantiFERON tests (QFT) when screening for LTBI/TB before starting biologic treatment in IBD patients.
UNASSIGNED: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who had a QFT and a CXR prior to initiation of biologic treatment in a 5-year period (October 1st, 2017 to September 30th, 2022).
UNASSIGNED: 520 patients (56% female, mean age 40.1 years) were included. The majority had none or few risk factors for TB (as reflected by the demographic characteristics) but some risk factors for having false negative QFT results (concurrent glucocorticoid treatment and inflammatory activity). QFT results were positive in 8 patients (1.5%), inconclusive in 18 (3.5%) and negative in 494 (95.0%). Only 1 patient (0.19%) had CXR findings suspicious of LTBI. This patient also had a positive QFT and was subsequently diagnosed with active TB. All patients with negative or inconclusive QFT had CXR without any findings suggesting LTBI/TB. One patient developed active TB after having initiated biologic treatment in spite of having negative QFT and a normal CXR at screening.
UNASSIGNED: In a population with low risk of TB, the benefits of supplementing the QFT with a CXR are limited and are unlikely to outweigh the cost in both patient test-burden, radioactive exposure, and economic resources.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis is a common, often debilitating, chronic autoimmune inflammatory skin disease. Moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis can be treated with biologics such as anti-interleukin and anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies. We aimed to investigate treatment discontinuation among patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study based on anonymized claims data from the German statutory health insurance which covered the years from 2016 to 2021. We included adult patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment in drug-specific cohorts. Over a 365-day follow-up period, we assessed the frequencies and the time until treatment discontinuation for different biologics. Differences in discontinuation rates were compared using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: A total of 2565 patients with psoriasis who initiated treatment with secukinumab (n = 612), adalimumab (n = 454), guselkumab (n = 354), ixekizumab (n = 259), ustekinumab (n = 241), tildrakizumab (n = 205), brodalumab (n = 166), risankizumab (n = 145), etanercept (n = 91), certolizumab (n = 29), and infliximab (n = 9) were included. A total of 1290 patients (50.29%) discontinued treatment during the follow-up period, ranging from 30.34% (risankizumab) to 69.23% (etanercept). Median time until discontinuation of treatment ranged from 102 days (etanercept) to 208 days (risankizumab). Once the biologic treatment was discontinued, 45.05% of patients restarted the treatment with the same agent, 23.10% of patients switched to another biologic, and 31.86% received no further biologic agent. Compared to patients treated with risankizumab, the treatment discontinuation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients treated with the other biologics except ustekinumab (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Further research should explore reasons leading to treatment discontinuation in order to support treatment choices for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term tezepelumab treatment in the DESTINATION study (NCT03706079) resulted in reduced asthma exacerbations, reduced biomarker levels, and improved lung function and symptom control in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the time course of changes in biomarkers and clinical manifestations after treatment cessation after 2 years of tezepelumab treatment.
METHODS: DESTINATION was a 2-year, phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of tezepelumab treatment in patients (12-80 years old) with severe asthma. Patients received their last treatment doses at week 100 and could enroll in an extended follow-up period from weeks 104 to 140. Change over time in key biomarkers and clinical outcomes were assessed in tezepelumab vs placebo recipients for 40 weeks after stopping treatment.
RESULTS: Of 569 patients enrolled in the extended follow-up period, 426 were included in the analysis (289 received tezepelumab and 137 placebo). In the 40-week period after the last tezepelumab dose, blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 scores gradually increased from weeks 4 to 10, with a gradual reduction in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second such that blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and clinical outcomes returned to placebo levels; however, none of these outcomes returned to baseline levels. Total IgE levels increased later from week 28 and remained well below placebo and baseline levels during the 40-week period after the last tezepelumab dose.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals the benefits of continued tezepelumab treatment in the management of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, compared with stopping treatment after 2 years.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03706079.

UNASSIGNED: Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios.
UNASSIGNED: We sought investigate Tezepelumab\'s response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs.
UNASSIGNED: Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs.
UNASSIGNED: Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab\'s potential in real-world settings.
UNASSIGNED: In real-world scenarios, despite the study\'s limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab\'s promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

UNASSIGNED: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease often associated with several comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular diseases, infections, or cancer, among others. With the progressive aging of the population, a growing number of patients with psoriasis can be expected to present multiple comorbidities. Currently, there is a wide range of biological treatments available for moderate to severe psoriasis, including tumor necrosis alpha (TNF) inhibitors, IL12/23 inhibitor, IL17 inhibitors, and IL23 inhibitors.
UNASSIGNED: This review aims to describe the specific characteristics of these drugs in relation to psoriasis comorbidities, in order to facilitate decision-making in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Some of the biological treatments can influence comorbidities, in some cases even improving them. Therefore, comorbidities are a key factor when deciding on one biological treatment over another. The development of new drugs is expanding the therapeutic arsenal for psoriasis. A high level of expertise in the field with a detailed knowledge of the characteristics of every drug is imperative to provide personalized medicine.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) affects reproductive-aged women. Active disease can lead to decreased fertility. Although the vast majority of international guidelines recommend for the continuation of anti-TNF-α during pregnancy, recent studies have raised concerns about the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) therapy during pregnancy, both for patients and for physicians.
METHODS: Studies that evaluate the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnant women with IBD were identified using bibliographical searches. An updated meta-analysis was performed for pregnancy outcomes, such as live birth, abortion, still birth, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital abnormalities, and neonatal infection. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported. Data on disease activity, timing of anti-TNF-α therapy were collected for further analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies were screened from on-line databases and international meeting abstracts. An increased risk of abortion (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.74; P = 0.04) and preterm birth (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28; P = 0.004), and a decreased risk of live birth (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = 0.002]) were found in the anti-TNF-α therapy group compared with the control group (no use of anti-TNF-α therapy). The subgroup analyses based on the disease activity showed there is no significant association between the use of anti-TNF-α therapy during pregnancy on adverse pregnancy outcomes of abortion, preterm birth, and live birth. The rates of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities in the anti-TNF-α therapy group were not significantly different from those in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the risks of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities; however it may be assicated with increased risks of abortion and preterm birth, which are accompanied by a lower rate of live birth. Although these findings may be confounding by potential disease activity, they offer some opposite viewpoints with biologic agent use. Therefore, more studies are required to further confirm the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnancy with IBD.