benzodiazepine

苯二氮卓
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本报告评估了氯二氮卓的影响,一种通常用于治疗青少年/儿科人群焦虑相关疾病的苯二氮卓类药物,幼年小鼠的高架迷宫(EPM)表现。采取这种方法是因为氯二氮卓在成年啮齿动物的多种模型中产生抗焦虑作用,然而,对这种苯二氮卓类药物对青少年的行为影响知之甚少。因此,我们对出生后第35天的雄性C57BL/6小鼠单次腹膜内注射氯二氮卓(0,5或10mg/kg).三十分钟后,允许小鼠探索EPM5分钟。我们发现氯二氮卓治疗的小鼠(5和10mg/kg)花费更多的时间探索EPM的开放臂。两组之间没有观察到速度(cm/s)或行进距离(cm)的差异。这些结果表明,氯二氮卓可诱导青春期雄性小鼠的抗焦虑相关行为。
    This report evaluates the effects of chlordiazepoxide, a benzodiazepine commonly prescribed to manage anxiety-related disorders in adolescent/pediatric populations, on elevated plus maze (EPM) performance in juvenile mice. This approach was taken because chlordiazepoxide produces anxiolytic-like effects in multiple models in adult rodents, however, less is known about the behavioral effects of this benzodiazepine in juveniles. Thus, we administered a single intraperitoneal injection of chlordiazepoxide (0, 5, or 10 mg/kg) to postnatal day 35 male C57BL/6 mice. Thirty minutes later, mice were allowed to explore the EPM for 5-min. We found that chlordiazepoxide-treated mice (5 and 10 mg/kg) spent more time exploring the open arms of the EPM. No differences in velocity (cm/s) or distance traveled (cm) were observed between the groups. These results indicate that chlordiazepoxide induces anxiolytic-related behavior in adolescent male mice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:危重病和重症监护可能导致长期的心理和身体损伤。ICU幸存者在暴露于重症监护后成为苯二氮卓类药物的长期使用者的程度尚未得到充分探讨。这项研究旨在描述ICU幸存者在入院前不使用这些药物的长期高效使用苯二氮卓类药物的发作程度。确定与此使用相关的因素,并分析此类使用是否与死亡率增加有关。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:瑞典,包括2010年至2017年期间所有注册的ICU入院。
    方法:ICU患者存活至少3个月,入院前不使用高效苯二氮卓类药物,有资格列入。
    方法:接受重症监护。
    结果:共筛查了237,904名患者,纳入了137,647名患者。在ICU出院后,这5338(3.9%)成为高效苯二氮卓类药物的长期使用者。在前3个月观察到高效苯二氮卓类药物处方的峰值,随后在整个18个月的随访期内持续使用。长期使用与年龄增长有关,女性性别,以及躯体和精神合并症的历史,包括药物滥用。此外,更久的住ICU,估计死亡率很高,和低效苯二氮卓类药物的先前消费与长期使用有关。入住ICU后6至18个月的死亡风险在高效苯二氮卓类药物使用者中明显更高,调整后的风险比为1.8(95%CI,1.7-2.0;p<0.001)。用户和非用户之间的死亡原因没有差异。
    尽管缺乏支持长期治疗的证据,ICU护理后18个月长时间使用高效苯二氮卓类药物是值得注意的,并且与死亡风险增加相关.考虑到重症监护病房的大量入院,预防苯二氮卓类药物误用可能改善重症监护后的长期结局.
    OBJECTIVE: Exposure to critical illness and intensive care may lead to long-term psychologic and physical impairments. To what extent ICU survivors become prolonged users of benzodiazepines after exposure to critical care is not fully explored. This study aimed to describe the extent of onset of prolonged high-potency benzodiazepine use among ICU survivors not using these drugs before admission, identify factors associated with this use, and analyze whether such usage is associated with increased mortality.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: Sweden, including all registered ICU admissions between 2010 and 2017.
    METHODS: ICU patients surviving for at least 3 months, not using high-potency benzodiazepine before admission, were eligible for inclusion.
    METHODS: Admission to intensive care.
    RESULTS: A total of 237,904 patients were screened and 137,647 were included. Of these 5338 (3.9%) became prolonged users of high-potency benzodiazepines after ICU discharge. A peak in high-potency benzodiazepine prescriptions was observed during the first 3 months, followed by sustained usage throughout the follow-up period of 18 months. Prolonged usage was associated with older age, female sex, and a history of both somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, including substance abuse. Additionally, a longer ICU stay, a high estimated mortality rate, and prior consumption of low-potency benzodiazepines were associated with prolonged use. The risk of death between 6 and 18 months post-ICU admission was significantly higher among high-potency benzodiazepine users, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0; p < 0.001). No differences were noted in causes of death between users and nonusers.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the lack of evidence supporting long-term treatment, prolonged usage of high-potency benzodiazepines 18 months following ICU care was notable and associated with an increased risk of death. Considering the substantial number of ICU admissions, prevention of benzodiazepine misuse may improve long-term outcomes following critical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了检查苯二氮卓(BZD)使用的变化如何与抑郁症状强度的变化有关,担心强度,16个月以上的睡眠质量。
    数据来自一项更大的随机对照试验(RCT),名为“SucconèsSevrage计划(PASSE-60+)”研究(NCT02281175)。73名年龄在60岁及以上的参与者参加了为期4个月的中止计划,并在16个月内接受了四次评估。BZD使用的变化定义为两次评估之间报告的mg/天的差异。控制变量为RCT停药组;T1时使用BZD;以及抑郁症状,担心强度,或睡眠质量在T1。分层多元回归用于分析数据。
    在短期内,就在中止计划之后,睡眠质量随着BZD使用率的降低而恶化。在3个月和12个月的随访中,这种联系不再重要。从长远来看,抑郁症状降低BZD的使用。在所有测量时间,与BZD使用相关的担忧强度均未发现变化。
    停药可改善抑郁症状。我们的研究还质疑BZD使用的长期有效性,因为长期停药与忧虑强度和睡眠质量的变化无关。
    UNASSIGNED: To examine how change in benzodiazepine (BZD) use is linked to changes in depressive symptoms intensity, worry intensity, and sleep quality over 16 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Data come from a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT) named the \'Programme d\'Aide du Succès au SEvrage (PASSE-60+)\' study (NCT02281175). Seventy-three participants age 60 years and older took part in a 4-month discontinuation programme and were assessed four times over 16 months. Change in BZD use was defined as the difference in reported mg/day between two assessments. Control variables were RCT discontinuation group; BZD use at T1; and either depressive symptoms, worry intensity, or sleep quality at T1. Hierarchical multiple regressions were used to analyse data.
    UNASSIGNED: In the short term, right after the discontinuation programme, sleep quality worsened with lower BZD use. This link was no longer significant at the 3- and 12-month follow-up. In the long term, depressive symptoms lowered with lower BZD use. No change was found in worry intensity in relation to BZD use at all measurement times.
    UNASSIGNED: Discontinuation may improve depressive symptoms. Our study also questions the long-term effectiveness of BZD use, since long-term discontinuation was not linked with change in worry intensity and sleep quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:同时使用阿片类药物(OPI)和苯二氮卓(BZD)可能会加剧跌倒风险(例如,跌倒和骨折)与不使用或单独使用相比。然而,患者可能需要同时使用OPI-BZD治疗共同发生的情况(例如,疼痛和焦虑)。因此,我们研究了纵向OPI-BZD给药模式与随后的跌倒损伤风险之间的关系.方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2016-2018年启动OPI和/或BZD的非癌症付费医疗保险受益人。我们确定了OPI和/或BZD启动后3个月内的OPI-BZD使用模式(即,轨迹周期)使用基于组的多轨迹模型。我们使用逆概率加权Cox比例风险模型估算了轨迹后3个月内首次伤害下降的时间。结果:在622,588名受益人中(年龄≥65岁=84.6%,女性=58.1%,白色=82.7%;有伤害性跌倒=0.45%),我们确定了13种不同的OPI-BZD下降轨迹:组(A):非常低的OPI-仅下降(仅BZ%)(仅下降早期)(44.9%);(B):仅低OPI(快速下降)(15.1%);(C):非常低的OPI-仅下降(BZD)非常低(仅BZD)非常低(仅BZD)(仅下降)非常低)(与(A)组相比,6个轨迹的3个月内跌倒风险增加:(C):HR=1.78,95%CI=1.58-2.01;(D):HR=2.24,95%CI=1.93-2.59;(E):HR=2.60,95%CI=2.18-3.09;(H):HR=2.02,95%CI=1.70-2.40;(L):HR=2.73,95%CI结论:我们的研究结果表明,3个月的跌倒风险在OPI-BZD轨迹上有所不同,强调在评估老年人使用OPI-BZD的伤害性跌倒风险时,同时考虑剂量和持续时间的重要性。
    Background/Objectives: Concurrent opioid (OPI) and benzodiazepine (BZD) use may exacerbate injurious fall risk (e.g., falls and fractures) compared to no use or use alone. Yet, patients may need concurrent OPI-BZD use for co-occurring conditions (e.g., pain and anxiety). Therefore, we examined the association between longitudinal OPI-BZD dosing patterns and subsequent injurious fall risk. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including non-cancer fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries initiating OPI and/or BZD in 2016-2018. We identified OPI-BZD use patterns during the 3 months following OPI and/or BZD initiation (i.e., trajectory period) using group-based multi-trajectory models. We estimated the time to first injurious falls within the 3-month post-trajectory period using inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 622,588 beneficiaries (age ≥ 65 = 84.6%, female = 58.1%, White = 82.7%; having injurious falls = 0.45%), we identified 13 distinct OPI-BZD trajectories: Group (A): Very-low OPI-only (early discontinuation) (44.9% of the cohort); (B): Low OPI-only (rapid decline) (15.1%); (C): Very-low OPI-only (late discontinuation) (7.7%); (D): Low OPI-only (gradual decline) (4.0%); (E): Moderate OPI-only (rapid decline) (2.3%); (F): Very-low BZD-only (late discontinuation) (11.5%); (G): Low BZD-only (rapid decline) (4.5%); (H): Low BZD-only (stable) (3.1%); (I): Moderate BZD-only (gradual decline) (2.1%); (J): Very-low OPI (rapid decline)/Very-low BZD (late discontinuation) (2.9%); (K): Very-low OPI (rapid decline)/Very-low BZD (increasing) (0.9%); (L): Very-low OPI (stable)/Low BZD (stable) (0.6%); and (M): Low OPI (gradual decline)/Low BZD (gradual decline) (0.6%). Compared with Group (A), six trajectories had an increased 3-month injurious falls risk: (C): HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.58-2.01; (D): HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.93-2.59; (E): HR = 2.60, 95% CI = 2.18-3.09; (H): HR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.70-2.40; (L): HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.98-3.76; and (M): HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.32-2.91. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that 3-month injurious fall risk varied across OPI-BZD trajectories, highlighting the importance of considering both dose and duration when assessing injurious fall risk of OPI-BZD use among older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景和目的:雷马唑仑,一种新型苯二氮卓类药物,由于起效快,作用时间短,因此用于手术镇静和全身麻醉。然而,瑞米唑仑致过敏反应(RIA)是一种罕见但严重的并发症.本研究旨在分析RIA的特点,专注于心血管崩溃,并提供安全使用瑞米唑仑的指南。方法:本研究使用2020年系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。2023年5月26日从PubMed检索的研究文章,使用关键词“雷米咪唑安定和过敏反应”进行了评估,其纳入标准是用英语写的,并与世界过敏组织的过敏反应标准保持一致。而不符合这些标准的研究被排除.截至搜索日期的所有已发表的文章都包括在内,没有任何日期限制。这篇综述分析了年龄等因素,性别,麻醉类型,瑞咪唑安定剂量(推注/连续),过敏症状和体征,使用肾上腺素,血清类胰蛋白酶水平,还有皮肤点刺试验.结果:11例患者中,平均年龄为55.6±19.6岁,男性占81.8%。低血压(81.8%)是最常见的症状,其次是心动过缓(54.5%)和去饱和(36.4%)。两名患者出现心脏骤停。10例患者血清类胰蛋白酶水平证实有过敏反应。肾上腺素是主要的治疗方法,静脉内剂量为0.1mg至0.3mg。结论:当瑞马唑仑给药时,警惕是至关重要的,坚持推荐剂量,并及时用肾上腺素治疗RIA。需要进一步研究以了解风险因素并完善管理策略。提出了安全使用雷米唑仑的指南。
    Background and Objectives: Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, is used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia due to its rapid onset and short duration of action. However, remimazolam-induced anaphylaxis (RIA) is a rare but severe complication. This study aimed to analyze RIA characteristics, focusing on cardiovascular collapse, and provide guidelines for safe remimazolam use. Methods: This study conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Research articles retrieved from PubMed on 26 May 2023, using the keywords \'remimazolam AND anaphylaxis\' were evaluated based on the inclusion criteria of being written in English and aligning with the World Allergy Organization criteria for anaphylaxis, while studies not meeting these criteria were excluded. All published articles up to the search date were included without any date restrictions. The review analyzed factors such as age, sex, type of anesthesia, remimazolam dose (bolus/continuous), allergic symptoms and sign, epinephrine use, serum tryptase levels, and skin prick tests. Results: Among eleven cases, the mean age was 55.6 ± 19.6 years, with 81.8% male. Hypotension (81.8%) was the most common symptom, followed by bradycardia (54.5%) and desaturation (36.4%). Two patients experienced cardiac arrest. Serum tryptase levels confirmed anaphylaxis in ten cases. Epinephrine was the primary treatment, with intravenous doses ranging from 0.1 mg to 0.3 mg. Conclusions: Vigilance is crucial when administering remimazolam, adhering to recommended dosages, and promptly treating RIA with epinephrine. Further research is needed to understand the risk factors and refine the management strategies. Guidelines for safe remimazolam use are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    制备C9-甲基化quazepam1,并对其理化性质进行了研究。1的阻转异构体被分离为(a1R,a2S)和(a1S,a2R)异构体。与使用时间依赖性密度泛函理论计算的那些相比,基于ECD光谱确定了它们的绝对构型。对GABAA受体亲和力的初步检查显示(a1R,1的a2S)异构体具有比其对映体(a1S,a2R)异构体。C9-甲基化quazepa1的活性构型与1,4-苯二氮卓-2-酮的活性构型相同。
    C9-methylated quazepam 1 was prepared, and its physicochemical properties were investigated. The atropisomers of 1 were isolated as (a1R, a2S) and (a1S, a2R) isomers. Their absolute configurations were determined based on ECD spectra in comparison with those calculated using the time-dependent density functional theory. Preliminary examination of affinity for the GABAA receptor revealed that the (a1R, a2S) isomer of 1 possessed higher activity than its antipode (a1S, a2R) isomer. The active configuration of C9-methylated quazepam 1 is the same as that of 1,4-benzodiazepin-2-ones.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长期以来,人们一直需要对重度抑郁症(MDD)进行有效的治疗。抑郁症机制的一个假设涉及神经活性类固醇如别孕烷醇酮的减少,γ-氨基丁酸门控氯通道(GABAA)受体的内源性正变构调节剂。在我们之前的研究中,我们发现了别孕烷醇酮,不是地西泮,在社交失败应激(SDS)模型小鼠的社交互动测试(SIT)中表现出抗抑郁样作用。然而,抗抑郁药样效应背后的神经元活动的动力学仍然未知.在目前的研究中,我们在SIT期间从基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)和内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)进行了局部场电位(LFP)记录,以阐明抗抑郁样效应与神经元振荡之间的关系.我们发现,在SDS模型小鼠的SIT中,通过减少重复社会互动的间隔(事件间间隔),导致社会互动总时间增加。我们还发现,在服用别孕烷醇酮后,在社会互动开始时,BLA中的θ和β振荡增加,这与地西泮的效果不同。社交互动区域内BLA的θ和β功率与互动时间呈正相关。θ和β功率的增加与事件间间隔呈负相关。关于BLA和mPFC之间的θ带协调活性,在使用别孕烯醇酮进行社交互动时,θ功率相关性降低。这些发现表明,社会互动后BLA中的theta活动以及BLA和mPFC之间减少的theta带协调活动与社会互动有关。这是抗抑郁行为之一。神经活性的这些差异可以阐明神经活性类固醇抗抑郁样作用的独特机制,而不是苯二氮卓类药物。
    Effective treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) have long been needed. One hypothesis for the mechanism of depression involves a decrease in neuroactive steroids such as allopregnanolone, an endogenous positive allosteric modulator of the γ-aminobutyric acid-gated chloride channel (GABAA) receptor. In our previous study, we discovered that allopregnanolone, not diazepam, exhibited antidepressant-like effects in the social interaction test (SIT) of social defeat stress (SDS) model mice. However, the dynamics of neuronal activity underlying the antidepressant-like effect remain unknown. In the current study, we conducted local field potentials (LFPs) recordings from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during the SIT to elucidate the relationship between the antidepressant-like effect and neuronal oscillation. We discovered that allopregnanolone has antidepressant-like effects in the SIT of SDS model mice by decreasing intervals of repetitive social interaction (inter-event intervals), resulting in increase of total social interaction time. We also found that theta and beta oscillation increased in BLA at the onset of social interaction following administration of allopregnanolone, which differed from the effects of diazepam. Theta and beta power in BLA within the social interaction zone exhibited a positive correlation with interaction time. This increase of theta and beta power was negatively correlated with inter-event intervals. Regarding theta-band coordinated activity between the BLA and mPFC, theta power correlation decreased at the onset of social interaction with the administration of allopregnanolone. These findings suggest that theta activity in BLA following social interaction and the reduced theta-band coordinated activity between the BLA and mPFC are implicated in social interaction, which is one of the antidepressant behaviors. These differences in neural activity could elucidate the distinctive mechanism underlying antidepressant-like effects of neuroactive steroids, as opposed to benzodiazepines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:近年来,在怀孕期间使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药引起了人们的极大关注。然而,有有限的数据捕获处方模式和使用这些药物的诱发因素,特别是在怀孕前长期使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z催眠药的女性中。
    方法:这项基于人群的队列研究包括2004年至2018年台湾的2930988例怀孕。确定在怀孕期间服用苯二氮卓类药物或Z-催眠药的妇女,并根据她们在怀孕前的状况进一步分层:长期使用者(一年内供应超过180天),短期用户(一年内供应少于180天),和非用户。评估了使用苯二氮卓类药物或Z-催眠药以及与抗抑郁药或阿片类药物一起使用的趋势。使用Logistic回归模型来确定与怀孕期间使用这些药物相关的因素。和中断时间序列分析(ITSA)用于评估这些药物在不同妊娠相关时期的使用模式.
    结果:妊娠期使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的总患病率为3.5%。在孕前长期使用者中,观察到上升趋势。从2004年到2018年,暴露妇女中抗抑郁药或阿片类药物的同时使用分别增加了三倍(从8.6%到23.1%)和六倍(从0.3%到1.7%)。有不健康生活方式行为的女性,例如酗酒(OR2.48;95%CI,2.02-3.03),药物滥用(OR10.34;95%CI,8.46-12.64),和烟草使用(OR2.19;95%CI,1.96-2.45),以及患有焦虑症等精神疾病的患者(OR6.99;95%CI,6.77-7.22),失眠(OR15.99;95%CI,15.55-16.45),抑郁症(OR9.43;95%CI,9.07-9.80),和精神分裂症(OR21.08;95%CI,18.76-23.69),和更高的医疗保健利用率,在怀孕期间更有可能使用苯二氮卓类药物或Z-催眠药。ITSA显示,在确认怀孕后,苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的使用突然减少(水平变化-0.55个百分点;95%CI,-0.59至-0.51)。相比之下,苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的暴露量在分娩后显著增加(水平变化0.12个百分点;95%CI,0.09~0.16).
    结论:在这项队列研究中,孕前长期使用者在怀孕期间使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的趋势增加,以及与抗抑郁药或阿片类药物同时使用。研究结果强调了与怀孕期间使用这些药物相关的各种风险因素的存在。利用模式在怀孕的不同阶段有所不同,强调在怀孕期间使用这些药物的妇女需要处方指南和教育服务。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics during pregnancy has raised significant concerns in recent years. However, there are limited data that capture the prescription patterns and predisposing factors in use of these drugs, particularly among women who have been long-term users of benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics before pregnancy.
    METHODS: This population-based cohort study comprised 2 930 988 pregnancies between 2004 and 2018 in Taiwan. Women who were dispensed benzodiazepines or Z-hypnotics during pregnancy were identified and further stratified into groups based on their status before pregnancy: long-term users (with a supply of more than 180 days within a year), short-term users (with a supply of less than 180 days within a year), and nonusers. Trends in the use of benzodiazepines or Z-hypnotics and concomitant use with antidepressants or opioids were assessed. Logistic regression models were utilized to identify factors associated with use of these drugs during pregnancy, and interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) were employed to evaluate utilization patterns of these drugs across different pregnancy-related periods.
    RESULTS: The overall prevalence of benzodiazepine and Z-hypnotic use was 3.5% during pregnancy. Among prepregnancy long-term users, an upward trend was observed. The concomitant use of antidepressants or opioids among exposed women increased threefold (from 8.6% to 23.1%) and sixfold (from 0.3% to 1.7%) from 2004 to 2018, respectively. Women with unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, such as alcohol abuse (OR 2.48; 95% CI, 2.02-3.03), drug abuse (OR 10.34; 95% CI, 8.46-12.64), and tobacco use (OR 2.19; 95% CI, 1.96-2.45), as well as those with psychiatric disorders like anxiety (OR 6.99; 95% CI, 6.77-7.22), insomnia (OR 15.99; 95% CI, 15.55-16.45), depression (OR 9.43; 95% CI, 9.07-9.80), and schizophrenia (OR 21.08; 95% CI, 18.76-23.69), and higher healthcare utilization, were more likely to use benzodiazepines or Z-hypnotics during pregnancy. ITSA revealed a sudden decrease in use of benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics after recognition of pregnancy (level change -0.55 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.51). In contrast, exposures to benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics increased significantly after delivery (level change 0.12 percentage point; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.16).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, an increased trend of benzodiazepine and Z-hypnotic use during pregnancy among prepregnancy long-term users, as well as concomitant use with antidepressants or opioids were found. The findings have highlighted the existence of various risk factors associated with the use of these drugs during pregnancy. Utilization patterns varied across different stages of pregnancy, highlighting the need for prescription guidelines and educational services for women using these drugs during pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前尚不清楚初级保健医生在引入新型催眠药如食欲素受体拮抗剂和褪黑素受体激动剂后如何治疗失眠。这项基于网络的问卷调查旨在研究日本初级保健实践中失眠的治疗策略。
    方法:以二元反应量表(0=\“不熟悉\”;1=\“熟悉\”)调查了一百一十七位初级保健医生对每种失眠管理方案的熟悉程度,以及他们如何使用九分利克特量表(1=“我从不开/执行它\”;9=“我经常开/执行它\”)。不熟悉管理选项的医生被认为从未开过处方或执行过。
    结果:关于药物,大多数医生都熟悉新的催眠药。苏沃雷生是最常用的催眠药,其次是lemborexant和Ramelteon.这些新型催眠药对睡眠发作和睡眠维持失眠的平均分为4.8-5.4分和4.0-4.7分,分别。相比之下,大多数苯二氮卓类药物很少在两点以下使用。关于心理治疗,只有大约40%的医生熟悉失眠症认知行为疗法(CBT-I),他们很少实施。平均1.5-1.6点。更多的医生熟悉单组分心理治疗(即,放松,睡眠限制治疗,和刺激控制)与CBT-I相比,48-74%的人更频繁地实施它,分数在2.6到3.4分之间。
    结论:这项研究表明,日本初级保健医生很少使用CBT-I治疗失眠。此外,在药物治疗方面,他们使用新型睡眠药物比苯二氮卓类药物更频繁。CBT-I在日本初级保健中的使用和可用性可能会通过以下方式得到促进:教育初级保健医生,实施简短或数字CBT-I,和/或发展初级保健医生和CBT-I专家之间的合作。
    BACKGROUND: It is unclear how primary care physicians manage insomnia after the introduction of novel hypnotics such as orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists. This Web-based questionnaire survey aimed to examine treatment strategies for insomnia in Japanese primary care practice.
    METHODS: One-hundred-and-seventeen primary care physicians were surveyed on the familiarity of each management option for insomnia on a binary response scale (0 = \"unfamiliar\"; 1 = \"familiar\") and how they managed insomnia using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \"I never prescribe/perform it\"; 9 = \"I often prescribe/perform it\"). Physicians who were unfamiliar with a management option were deemed to have never prescribed or performed it.
    RESULTS: Regarding medication, most physicians were familiar with novel hypnotics. Suvorexant was the most used hypnotic, followed by lemborexant and ramelteon. These novel hypnotics averaged 4.8-5.4 points and 4.0-4.7 points for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia, respectively. By contrast, most benzodiazepines were seldom used below two points. Regarding psychotherapy, only approximately 40% of the physicians were familiar with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and they rarely implemented it, at an average of 1.5-1.6 points. More physicians were familiar with single-component psychotherapies (i.e., relaxation, sleep restriction therapy, and stimulus control) compared to CBT-I, and 48-74% of them implemented it slightly more often, with scores ranging from 2.6 to 3.4 points.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Japanese primary care physicians seldom use CBT-I to treat insomnia. In addition, they use novel sleep medications more frequently than benzodiazepines in terms of pharmacotherapy. The use and availability of CBT-I in Japanese primary care might be facilitated by: educating primary care physicians, implementing brief or digital CBT-I, and/or developing collaborations between primary care physicians and CBT-I specialists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性间非他明毒性的特征是兴奋剂作用和神经精神障碍,这是由γ-氨基丁酸A型受体激动剂,包括苯二氮卓。我们利用临床注册数据来检查在非法药物病例中共同暴露于γ-氨基丁酸B型受体激动剂(γ-羟基丁酸酯)的影响,并经分析证实暴露于metamfetamine。
    澳大利亚维多利亚州的新兴药物网络是一个伦理委员会批准的前瞻性注册表,收集急诊科非法药物介绍的临床和分析数据(利用血液样本)。比较组通过分析证实的暴露来定义:单独的氨非他明,间苯丙胺加γ-羟基丁酸酯,间非他明加苯二氮卓,间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯+苯二氮卓。排除同时接触其他兴奋剂或镇静剂的病例。
    间非他明血药浓度中位数在间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯中显著更大(n=153,中位数=0.20mg/L,四分位数间距:0.10-0.32mg/L,95%置信区间:0.20-0.23mg/L)和间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯+苯二氮卓(n=160,中位数=0.20mg/L,四分位数间距:0.10-0.30mg/L,95%置信区间:0.20-0.30mg/L)阳性组与γ-羟基丁酸酯阴性组(n=81,中位数=0.10mg/L,四分位数间距:0.05-0.21mg/L,95%的置信区间:0.09-0.18mg/L)和metamfetamine+苯二氮卓(n=73,中位数=0.10mg/L,四分位数间距:0.06-0.20mg/L,95%置信区间:0.09-0.20mg/L)组(P<0.0004)。在异氨非他明加γ-羟丁酸的情况下呈现心率(n=153,中位数=72次/分钟,四分位间距:每分钟63-86次,95%的置信区间:每分钟70-78次跳动)显着低于metamfetamine加苯二氮卓类药物的情况(n=73,中位数=每分钟84次跳动,四分位间距:每分钟73-98次,95%的置信区间:每分钟80-90次,P<0.0001),和单独的氨非他明病例(n=81,中位数=每分钟110次,四分位间距:每分钟87-131次,95%置信区间:每分钟93-120次,P<0.0001)。甲氨氟胺加γ-羟基丁酸酯病例的温度(中位数=35.8°C,四分位数间距:35.0-36.2°C,95%置信区间35.6-35.9°C)显着低于metamfetamine加苯二氮卓类药物(中位数36.2°C,四分位数间距35.7-36.6°C,95%置信区间,36.0-36.4°C,P=0.017),和单独的间非他明病例(中位数=36.5°C,四分位数间距:35.8-37.1°C,95%置信区间:36.2-36.7°C,P<0.0001)。苯二氮卓阳性组的收缩压中位数显着降低(P≤0.001)(metamfetamine+苯二氮卓中位数=120mmHg,四分位数间距:109-132mmHg,95%置信区间:116-124mmHg和metamfetamine+苯二氮卓+γ-羟基丁酸中位数=124mmHg,四分位数间距:110-137mmHg,95%置信区间:120-129mmHg)。安非他明加γ-羟基丁酸酯的镇静发生率(格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于9分)(63%)明显高于安非他明加苯二氮卓类药物的发生率(27%,P<0.0001)和单独的氨非他明病例(15%,P<0.0001)。间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯+苯二氮卓类药物的躁动发生率显著较低(17%,P<0.0001)和氨非他明加γ-羟基丁酸酯病例(34%,P=0.0004)与单独的间非他明病例(58%)相比。
    γ-氨基丁酸A型和B型受体生理学的差异可能提供γ-氨基丁酸B型激动剂促进的替代药效学机制,能够减弱metamfetamine兴奋剂和神经精神毒性。
    分析证实与γ-羟基丁酸共同接触的Metamfetamine中毒患者的心率显着降低,与单独使用间非他明的患者相比,体温和躁动的发生率。与单独暴露于苯二氮杂卓的患者相比,分析证实的苯二氮杂卓共同暴露于苯二氮杂卓的中毒患者的收缩压显着降低。我们假设γ-氨基丁酸B型受体激动剂可能对急性间非他明毒性的治疗有益。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute metamfetamine toxicity is characterized by stimulant effects and neuropsychiatric disturbance, which is attenuated by gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists including benzodiazepines. We utilized clinical registry data to examine the effect of co-exposure to a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) in illicit drug cases with analytically confirmed exposure to metamfetamine.
    UNASSIGNED: The Emerging Drugs Network of Australia Victoria is an ethics board-approved prospective registry collecting clinical and analytical data (utilising blood samples) on emergency department illicit drug presentations. Comparison groups were defined by analytically confirmed exposure: lone metamfetamine, metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate, metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine, metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate plus benzodiazepine. Cases with co-exposure to other stimulants or sedatives were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: Median metamfetamine blood concentrations were significantly greater in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate (n = 153, median = 0.20 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.10-0.32 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.20-0.23 mg/L) and metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate plus benzodiazepine (n = 160, median = 0.20 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.10-0.30 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.20-0.30 mg/L) positive groups compared to gamma-hydroxybutyrate negative groups including metamfetamine (n = 81, median = 0.10 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.05-0.21 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.09-0.18 mg/L) and metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine (n = 73, median = 0.10 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.06-0.20 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.09-0.20 mg/L) groups (P < 0.0004). Presenting heart rate in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (n = 153, median = 72 beats per minute, interquartile range: 63-86 beats per minute, 95 per cent confidence interval: 70-78 beats per minute) was significantly lower than metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine cases (n = 73, median = 84 beats per minute, interquartile range: 73-98 beats per minute, 95 per cent confidence interval: 80-90 beats per minute, P < 0.0001), and lone metamfetamine cases (n = 81, median = 110 beats per minute, interquartile range: 87-131 beats per minute, 95 per cent confidence interval: 93-120 beats per minute, P < 0.0001). Presenting temperature in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (median = 35.8 °C, interquartile range: 35.0-36.2 °C, 95 per cent confidence interval 35.6-35.9 °C) was significantly lower than metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine cases (median 36.2 °C, interquartile range 35.7-36.6 °C, 95 per cent confidence interval, 36.0-36.4 °C, P = 0.017), and lone metamfetamine cases (median = 36.5 °C, interquartile range: 35.8-37.1 °C, 95 per cent confidence interval: 36.2-36.7 °C, P < 0.0001). Median presenting systolic blood pressure was significantly (P ≤ 0.001) lower in benzodiazepine positive groups (metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine median = 120 mmHg, interquartile range: 109-132 mmHg, 95 per cent confidence interval: 116-124 mmHg and metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate median = 124 mmHg, interquartile range: 110-137 mmHg, 95 per cent confidence interval: 120-129 mmHg). Incidence of sedation (Glasgow Coma Scale less than 9) was significantly greater in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (63 per cent) compared to metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine cases (27 per cent, P < 0.0001) and lone metamfetamine cases (15 per cent, P < 0.0001). Incidence of agitation was significantly lower in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate plus benzodiazepine cases (17 per cent, P < 0.0001) and metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (34 per cent, P = 0.0004) compared to lone metamfetamine cases (58 per cent).
    UNASSIGNED: Differences in gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and B receptor physiology may offer a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B agonist-facilitated alternative pharmacodynamic mechanism able to attenuate metamfetamine stimulant and neuropsychiatric toxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: Metamfetamine intoxicated patients with analytically confirmed co-exposure to gamma-hydroxybutyrate had significantly reduced heart rate, body temperature and incidence of agitation compared to patients with lone metamfetamine exposure. Metamfetamine intoxicated patients with analytically confirmed co-exposure to a benzodiazepine had significantly reduced systolic blood pressure compared to patients with lone metamfetamine exposure. We hypothesize that gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonists may be beneficial in the management of acute metamfetamine toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号