UNASSIGNED: There is a lack of evidence regarding answers for clinical questions about treating insomnia disorder. This study aimed to answer the following clinical questions: (1) how to use each hypnotic and non-pharmacological treatment differently depending on clinical situations and (2) how to reduce or stop benzodiazepine hypnotics using alternative pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.
UNASSIGNED: Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on 10 clinical questions about insomnia disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \"disagree\" to 9 = \"agree\"). The responses of 196 experts were collected, and the answers were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: The primary pharmacological treatment, lemborexant (7.3 ± 2.0), was categorized as a first-line recommendation for sleep initiation insomnia, and lemborexant (7.3 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.8 ± 1.8) were categorized as the first-line recommendations for sleep maintenance insomnia. Regarding non-pharmacological treatments for primary treatment, sleep hygiene education was categorized as the first-line recommendation for both sleep initiation (8.4 ± 1.1) and maintenance insomnia (8.1 ± 1.5), while multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia was categorized as the second-line treatment for both sleep initiation (5.6 ± 2.3) and maintenance insomnia (5.7 ± 2.4). When reducing or discontinuing benzodiazepine hypnotics by switching to other medications, lemborexant (7.5 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.9 ± 1.9) were categorized as first-line recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: Expert consensus indicates that orexin receptor antagonists and sleep hygiene education are recommended as first-line treatments in most clinical situations to treat insomnia disorder.

The British Association for Psychopharmacology developed an evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of catatonia. A group of international experts from a wide range of disciplines was assembled. Evidence was gathered from existing systematic reviews and the primary literature. Recommendations were made on the basis of this evidence and were graded in terms of their strength. The guideline initially covers the diagnosis, aetiology, clinical features and descriptive epidemiology of catatonia. Clinical assessments, including history, physical examination and investigations are then considered. Treatment with benzodiazepines, electroconvulsive therapy and other pharmacological and neuromodulatory therapies is covered. Special regard is given to periodic catatonia, malignant catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and antipsychotic-induced catatonia. There is attention to the needs of particular groups, namely children and adolescents, older adults, women in the perinatal period, people with autism spectrum disorder and those with certain medical conditions. Clinical trials were uncommon, and the recommendations in this guideline are mainly informed by small observational studies, case series and case reports, which highlights the need for randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies in this area.

Psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed in pregnancy, and obstetrical providers should be informed about how and when to use them. The current narrative review addresses the use of some of the most commonly prescribed psychotropic medications-antidepressants, sedatives and hypnotics, and antipsychotic drugs. The aim is neither a complete review of psychiatric disorders in pregnancy nor all possible psychological and pharmacological treatments for mental illness around the time of pregnancy. Rather, the focus is on therapeutic considerations for general obstetrical providers.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment guidelines with respect to unspecified anxiety disorder have not been published. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus among field experts on the management of unspecified anxiety disorder.
METHODS: Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on eight clinical questions concerning unspecified anxiety disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \"disagree\" to 9 = \"agree\"). According to the responses from 119 experts, the choices were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations.
RESULTS: Benzodiazepine anxiolytic use was not categorized as a first-line recommendation for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder, whereas multiple nonpharmacological treatment strategies, including coping strategies (7.9 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (7.9 ± 1.4), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), and relaxation techniques (7.4 ± 1.8), were categorized as first-line recommendations. Various treatment strategies were categorized as first-line recommendations when a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug did not improve anxiety symptoms, that is, differential diagnosis (8.2 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (8.0 ± 1.5), coping strategies (7.8 ± 1.5), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), relaxation techniques (7.2 ± 1.9), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (7.0 ± 1.8). These strategies were also highly endorsed when tapering the dosage of or discontinuing benzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs. There was no first-line recommendation regarding excusable reasons for continuing benzodiazepine anxiolytics.
CONCLUSIONS: The field experts recommend that benzodiazepine anxiolytics should not be used as a first-line option for patients with unspecified anxiety disorder. Instead, several nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRIs were endorsed for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder and as alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics.

To quantify benzodiazepine use non-compliant with guidelines in patients with psychiatric and non-psychiatric chronic diseases and assess the risk of non-recommended use associated with these diseases.
A cohort study was conducted in the French health insurance databases, including 254,488 new benzodiazepine users between 2007 and 2014. Psychiatric, cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes and inflammatory diseases were identified. Patients were followed for 2 years. Non-recommended use was defined as excessive treatment duration, use of long half-life drugs in older patients and concomitant use of several benzodiazepines. Cox models identified the factors associated with non-recommended use.
Non-recommended use was frequent, ranging from 44.9% to 68.1%. It was independently associated with each chronic disease, with a slight increase in patients with chronic inflammatory disease (HR = 1.07; 95%CI 1.03-1.13) or diabetes (HR = 1.09; 1.06-1.12), a higher risk in those with chronic cardiovascular disease (HR = 1.34; 1.31-1.37) or cancer (HR = 1.30; 1.25-1.35) and the highest risk in those with psychiatric disease (HR = 2.04; 2.00-2.09).
Patients with chronic disease have a high risk of benzodiazepine use leading to a higher exposure than recommended. Prescribers should be aware of the need to comply with the recommendations, especially in these patients who are the most frail and vulnerable to adverse events.

UNASSIGNED: Benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) use disorder among older adults is a relatively common and challenging clinical condition.
UNASSIGNED: The Canadian Coalition for Seniors\' Mental Health, with financial support from Health Canada, has produced evidence-based guidelines on the prevention, identification, assessment, and management of this form of substance use disorder.
UNASSIGNED: Inappropriate use of BZRAs should be avoided by considering non-pharmacological approaches to the management of late life insomnia, anxiety, and other common indications for the use of BZRA. Older persons should only be prescribed BZRAs after they are fully informed of alternatives, benefits, and risks associated with their use. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for the presence of BZRA use disorders. The full version of these guidelines can be accessed at www.ccsmh.ca.
UNASSIGNED: A person-centred, stepped care approach utilizing gradual dose reductions should be used in the management of BZRA use disorder.

Guidelines for management of anxiety and sleep disorders emphasize antidepressant medications and/or psychotherapy as first/second-line and benzodiazepines as third-line treatments. We evaluated the association between suicide death and concordance with benzodiazepine guidelines.
Retrospective case-control study of patients with anxiety and/or sleep disorders from health systems across 8 U.S. states within the Mental Health Research Network. Suicide death cases were matched to controls on year and health system. Appropriate benzodiazepine prescribing defined as: no monotherapy, no long duration, and/or age < 65 years. The association between guideline concordance and suicide death was evaluated, adjusting for diagnostic and treatment covariates.
Sample included 6960 patients with anxiety disorders (2363 filled benzodiazepine) and 6215 with sleep disorders (1237 filled benzodiazepine). Benzodiazepine guideline concordance was associated with reduced odds for suicide in patients with anxiety disorders (OR = 0.611, 95% CI = 0.392-0.953, p = 0.03) and was driven by shorter duration of benzodiazepine use with concomitant psychotherapy or antidepressant medication. The association of benzodiazepine guideline concordance with suicide death did not meet statistical significance in the sleep disorder group (OR = 0.413, 95% CI = 0.154-1.11, p = 0.08).
We found reduced odds for suicide in those with anxiety disorders who filled benzodiazepines in short-moderate duration with concomitant psychotherapy or antidepressant treatment.

These practice guidelines for the biological treatment of alcohol use disorders are an update of the first edition, published in 2008, which was developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). For this 2016 revision, we performed a systematic review (MEDLINE/PUBMED database, Cochrane Library) of all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of alcoholism and extracted data from national guidelines. The Task Force evaluated the identified literature with respect to the strength of evidence for the efficacy of each medication and subsequently categorised it into six levels of evidence (A-F) and five levels of recommendation (1-5). Thus, the current guidelines provide a clinically and scientifically relevant, evidence-based update of our earlier recommendations. These guidelines are intended for use by clinicians and practitioners who evaluate and treat people with alcohol use disorders and are primarily concerned with the biological treatment of adults with such disorders.

Several practice guidelines were published by French regulatory agencies between 2006 and 2009 to improve psychotropic drug use in older patients. The objectives of the study were to assess compliance with these guidelines in older patients hospitalized in psychiatric units and to identify characteristics associated with compliance. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 117 patients aged 65 years and older hospitalized in two psychiatric departments of a public hospital, at three dates randomly chosen between January and May 2014. Medical and sociodemographic characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. In all, 8% of psychotropic prescriptions were compliant with guidelines. A total of 98% of antidepressant prescriptions complied with guidelines for product selection (no tricyclics) and 72% for initial dosage (half of that recommended for younger adults). Regarding benzodiazepines, short half-life drugs were chosen in 73% of treatments, low maintenance dosage was found in 64% of treatments, and a discontinuous administration rhythm was noted in 33% of treatments. Regarding antipsychotics, initial dosage was a quarter of the allowed initial dosage for younger adults in 39% of prescriptions and metabolic blood testing was performed in 17% of prescriptions. Neurological and cognitive tolerance was monitored in 41% and 61% of prescriptions, respectively. Few clinical factors were found to be associated with compliance or noncompliance with guidelines in older psychiatric inpatients. Practice guidelines on psychotropic drug prescription were partially respected in older inpatients. Practitioners should take into account the risks associated with non-recommended patterns of psychotropic drug use in this vulnerable population.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether including the birth cohort dimension in time series analysis leads to a more accurate estimation of the (long-term) effect of a guideline change on the trend of benzodiazepine use.
METHODS: We calculated age-specific (20-84 years) and sex-specific prevalence of benzodiazepine use per 1000 population per quarter year (1998 to 2008) using a prescription database set in the Netherlands. We studied the prevalence over time by age group and within birth cohorts through interrupted time series analyses to estimate the effect of the guideline change in 2001.
RESULTS: From 1998 to 2008, the overall age-standardized prevalence of benzodiazepine use per 1000 population declined from ~54 for men and ~107 for women to ~45 for men and ~85 for women. The relative change increased significantly after 2001 for both sexes and for the majority of age groups. Within birth cohorts, the prevalence increased with age until the year 2001 and leveled thereafter. The age-period approach overall had worse model fit indicators than the within-cohort approach and predicted larger long-term effects than the within-cohort approach. The age-period projection estimated 36% decline in benzodiazepine use relative to 2008, whereas the birth-cohort projection estimated 8% decline.
CONCLUSIONS: Explicitly following birth cohort trajectories led to models with better fit; the conventional approach estimated a stronger long-term guideline effect. This has important implications for professional practice.