benzodiazepine

苯二氮卓
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于它们的外观相似且价格低廉,当非法药物市场取代苯二氮卓类药物时,磺酰脲类会导致低血糖。我们介绍了一名患者,该患者在摄入她认为是安定的东西后出现低血糖;检查显示磺酰脲类药物暴露。
    一名33岁的患者在被护理人员发现无反应后被送往医院,报告的静脉血糖水平为18mg/dL(参考范围,70-140毫克/分升)。这提示了静脉内施用12.5g右旋糖的治疗。在医院,静脉血糖水平为15mg/dL,导致开始静脉输注葡萄糖.一旦稳定,患者有药物使用障碍和焦虑病史.她报告说,由于焦虑,她摄入了朋友给她的2颗蓝色药丸作为安定。实验室值显示胰岛素水平升高47.4mIU/mL(2.6-24.9),升高的C肽水平为5.4ng/mL(1.1-4.4),和44mg/dL(>70mg/dL)的葡萄糖水平。患者接受72小时空腹测试。血液低血糖剂筛查显示格列本脲阳性结果(>5ng/mL)。患者出院,情况稳定。
    在服用含有磺酰脲类违禁药物的患者中,大约有2至5例低血糖报告。与使用降血糖药一致的实验室值包括胰岛素和C肽水平升高,低葡萄糖水平,和低血糖药物筛查的阳性结果。
    磺酰脲引起的低血糖可能导致临床镇静,模仿苯二氮卓类药物的作用。当在怀疑服用非法药物的无反应患者中诊断出严重的低血糖时,应怀疑磺酰脲替代或药物污染。
    UNASSIGNED: Because of their similar appearance and inexpensive cost, sulfonylureas can cause hypoglycemia when substituted for benzodiazepines by the illicit drug market. We present a patient who developed hypoglycemia after ingestion of what she thought to be Valium; work-up revealed sulfonylurea exposure.
    UNASSIGNED: A 33-year-old patient was brought to the hospital after being found unresponsive by paramedics with a reported venous blood glucose level of 18 mg/dL (reference range, 70-140 mg/dL). This prompted treatment with 12.5 g of dextrose administered intravenously. At the hospital, the venous blood glucose level was 15 mg/dL resulting in intravenous dextrose infusion initiation. Once stable, the patient endorsed a medical history of substance use disorder and anxiety. She reported ingesting 2 blue pills given to her by a friend as Valium for her anxiety. Laboratory values showed an elevated insulin level of 47.4 mIU/mL (2.6-24.9), an elevated C-peptide level of 5.4 ng/mL (1.1-4.4), and a glucose level of 44 mg/dL (>70 mg/dL). The patient underwent a 72-hour fasting test. Blood hypoglycemia agent screening showed positive results for glyburide (>5 ng/mL). The patient was discharged home in stable condition.
    UNASSIGNED: There are approximately 2 to 5 case reports of hypoglycemia among persons taking illicit drugs containing sulfonylureas. Laboratory values consistent with the use of a hypoglycemic agent include elevated insulin and C-peptide levels, a low glucose level, and positive results for hypoglycemia agent screening.
    UNASSIGNED: Sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia may lead to clinical sedation, mimicking the effects of benzodiazepines. Sulfonylurea substitution or drug contamination should be suspected when severe hypoglycemia is diagnosed in unresponsive patients suspected of taking illicit drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study aimed to assess the anesthetic effects of the combination of 30 mg/kg ketamine and 2 mg/kg midazolam via intranasal (IN) or intramuscular (IM) routes in twelve domestic chickens. Physiological parameters (respiratory rate - RR, heart rate - HR, and cloacal temperature -Tºcloacal) were monitored throughout the experiment, along with recovery time and sedation level (S0: awake, no recumbency, responsive to stimuli; S1: blinking eyes, recumbency, relaxed, response to stimulus, mild movement; S2: open eyes, recumbency, relaxed, mild response to stimuli; S3: closed eyes, recumbency, relaxed, no movement). In the IM group, all birds reached S3, while in IN 5/12 reached S3, 4/12 reached at most S1, and 1/12 at most S2. IM administration showed higher sedation at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 35, 40, and 45 minutes (p<0.05). IN administration exhibited a shorter total recovery time (26.3±21.4 min vs. 92.9±33.4 min; p<0.001). No time, group, or time-group interaction effects were observed in HR and cloacal Tº, with a trend to a decrease in RR both groups (p<0.001). Increased incidences of vocalization and agitation was observed via IM (4/12 vs. 0/12; p=0.028), with no difference in salivation. Despite faster recovery with less agitation and vocalization, the ketamine and midazolam combination via IN provided less consistent sedation compared to the IM route in chickens.
    Este estudo crossover randomizado objetivou avaliar os efeitos anestésicos da associação de 30 mg/kg de cetamina e 2 mg/kg de midazolam via intranasal (IN) ou intramuscular (IM) em doze galinhas. Além dos parâmetros fisiológicos (frequência respiratória – FR e cardíaca – FC e temperatura cloacal – Tºcloacal), registrou-se o tempo de recuperação e o grau de sedação ao longo do experimento (S0: acordada, sem decúbito, responsiva a estímulos; S1: olhos piscando, decúbito, relaxada, resposta a estímulo, movimentação leve; S2: olhos abertos, decúbito, relaxada, resposta leve a estímulos; S3: olhos fechados, decúbito, relaxada, sem movimentação. Pela via IM, todas as aves atingiram o grau S3, enquanto pela via IN 5/12 alcançaram S3, 4/12 atingiram no máximo S1 e 1/12 no máximo S2. A via IM apresentou maior sedação em 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 35, 40 e 45 min (p<0,05). A via IN apresentou menor tempo total até recuperação (26,3±21,4 min vs. 92,9±33,4 min; p<0,001). Não foram observados efeitos de tempo, grupo e interação tempo-grupo na FC e na Tºcloacal com uma tendência de queda da FR nos dois grupos (p<0,001). Observou-se maior incidência de vocalização e agitação pela via IM (4/12 vs. 0/12; p=0,028), não havendo diferença para sialorreia. Apesar da recuperação mais rápida e com menos agitação e vocalização, a associação cetamina e midazolam via IN levou a uma sedação menos consistente que a via IM em galinhas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:危重病和重症监护可能导致长期的心理和身体损伤。ICU幸存者在暴露于重症监护后成为苯二氮卓类药物的长期使用者的程度尚未得到充分探讨。这项研究旨在描述ICU幸存者在入院前不使用这些药物的长期高效使用苯二氮卓类药物的发作程度。确定与此使用相关的因素,并分析此类使用是否与死亡率增加有关。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:瑞典,包括2010年至2017年期间所有注册的ICU入院。
    方法:ICU患者存活至少3个月,入院前不使用高效苯二氮卓类药物,有资格列入。
    方法:接受重症监护。
    结果:共筛查了237,904名患者,纳入了137,647名患者。在ICU出院后,这5338(3.9%)成为高效苯二氮卓类药物的长期使用者。在前3个月观察到高效苯二氮卓类药物处方的峰值,随后在整个18个月的随访期内持续使用。长期使用与年龄增长有关,女性性别,以及躯体和精神合并症的历史,包括药物滥用。此外,更久的住ICU,估计死亡率很高,和低效苯二氮卓类药物的先前消费与长期使用有关。入住ICU后6至18个月的死亡风险在高效苯二氮卓类药物使用者中明显更高,调整后的风险比为1.8(95%CI,1.7-2.0;p<0.001)。用户和非用户之间的死亡原因没有差异。
    尽管缺乏支持长期治疗的证据,ICU护理后18个月长时间使用高效苯二氮卓类药物是值得注意的,并且与死亡风险增加相关.考虑到重症监护病房的大量入院,预防苯二氮卓类药物误用可能改善重症监护后的长期结局.
    OBJECTIVE: Exposure to critical illness and intensive care may lead to long-term psychologic and physical impairments. To what extent ICU survivors become prolonged users of benzodiazepines after exposure to critical care is not fully explored. This study aimed to describe the extent of onset of prolonged high-potency benzodiazepine use among ICU survivors not using these drugs before admission, identify factors associated with this use, and analyze whether such usage is associated with increased mortality.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: Sweden, including all registered ICU admissions between 2010 and 2017.
    METHODS: ICU patients surviving for at least 3 months, not using high-potency benzodiazepine before admission, were eligible for inclusion.
    METHODS: Admission to intensive care.
    RESULTS: A total of 237,904 patients were screened and 137,647 were included. Of these 5338 (3.9%) became prolonged users of high-potency benzodiazepines after ICU discharge. A peak in high-potency benzodiazepine prescriptions was observed during the first 3 months, followed by sustained usage throughout the follow-up period of 18 months. Prolonged usage was associated with older age, female sex, and a history of both somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, including substance abuse. Additionally, a longer ICU stay, a high estimated mortality rate, and prior consumption of low-potency benzodiazepines were associated with prolonged use. The risk of death between 6 and 18 months post-ICU admission was significantly higher among high-potency benzodiazepine users, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0; p < 0.001). No differences were noted in causes of death between users and nonusers.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the lack of evidence supporting long-term treatment, prolonged usage of high-potency benzodiazepines 18 months following ICU care was notable and associated with an increased risk of death. Considering the substantial number of ICU admissions, prevention of benzodiazepine misuse may improve long-term outcomes following critical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:同时使用阿片类药物(OPI)和苯二氮卓(BZD)可能会加剧跌倒风险(例如,跌倒和骨折)与不使用或单独使用相比。然而,患者可能需要同时使用OPI-BZD治疗共同发生的情况(例如,疼痛和焦虑)。因此,我们研究了纵向OPI-BZD给药模式与随后的跌倒损伤风险之间的关系.方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2016-2018年启动OPI和/或BZD的非癌症付费医疗保险受益人。我们确定了OPI和/或BZD启动后3个月内的OPI-BZD使用模式(即,轨迹周期)使用基于组的多轨迹模型。我们使用逆概率加权Cox比例风险模型估算了轨迹后3个月内首次伤害下降的时间。结果:在622,588名受益人中(年龄≥65岁=84.6%,女性=58.1%,白色=82.7%;有伤害性跌倒=0.45%),我们确定了13种不同的OPI-BZD下降轨迹:组(A):非常低的OPI-仅下降(仅BZ%)(仅下降早期)(44.9%);(B):仅低OPI(快速下降)(15.1%);(C):非常低的OPI-仅下降(BZD)非常低(仅BZD)非常低(仅BZD)(仅下降)非常低)(与(A)组相比,6个轨迹的3个月内跌倒风险增加:(C):HR=1.78,95%CI=1.58-2.01;(D):HR=2.24,95%CI=1.93-2.59;(E):HR=2.60,95%CI=2.18-3.09;(H):HR=2.02,95%CI=1.70-2.40;(L):HR=2.73,95%CI结论:我们的研究结果表明,3个月的跌倒风险在OPI-BZD轨迹上有所不同,强调在评估老年人使用OPI-BZD的伤害性跌倒风险时,同时考虑剂量和持续时间的重要性。
    Background/Objectives: Concurrent opioid (OPI) and benzodiazepine (BZD) use may exacerbate injurious fall risk (e.g., falls and fractures) compared to no use or use alone. Yet, patients may need concurrent OPI-BZD use for co-occurring conditions (e.g., pain and anxiety). Therefore, we examined the association between longitudinal OPI-BZD dosing patterns and subsequent injurious fall risk. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including non-cancer fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries initiating OPI and/or BZD in 2016-2018. We identified OPI-BZD use patterns during the 3 months following OPI and/or BZD initiation (i.e., trajectory period) using group-based multi-trajectory models. We estimated the time to first injurious falls within the 3-month post-trajectory period using inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 622,588 beneficiaries (age ≥ 65 = 84.6%, female = 58.1%, White = 82.7%; having injurious falls = 0.45%), we identified 13 distinct OPI-BZD trajectories: Group (A): Very-low OPI-only (early discontinuation) (44.9% of the cohort); (B): Low OPI-only (rapid decline) (15.1%); (C): Very-low OPI-only (late discontinuation) (7.7%); (D): Low OPI-only (gradual decline) (4.0%); (E): Moderate OPI-only (rapid decline) (2.3%); (F): Very-low BZD-only (late discontinuation) (11.5%); (G): Low BZD-only (rapid decline) (4.5%); (H): Low BZD-only (stable) (3.1%); (I): Moderate BZD-only (gradual decline) (2.1%); (J): Very-low OPI (rapid decline)/Very-low BZD (late discontinuation) (2.9%); (K): Very-low OPI (rapid decline)/Very-low BZD (increasing) (0.9%); (L): Very-low OPI (stable)/Low BZD (stable) (0.6%); and (M): Low OPI (gradual decline)/Low BZD (gradual decline) (0.6%). Compared with Group (A), six trajectories had an increased 3-month injurious falls risk: (C): HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.58-2.01; (D): HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.93-2.59; (E): HR = 2.60, 95% CI = 2.18-3.09; (H): HR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.70-2.40; (L): HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.98-3.76; and (M): HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.32-2.91. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that 3-month injurious fall risk varied across OPI-BZD trajectories, highlighting the importance of considering both dose and duration when assessing injurious fall risk of OPI-BZD use among older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景和目的:雷马唑仑,一种新型苯二氮卓类药物,由于起效快,作用时间短,因此用于手术镇静和全身麻醉。然而,瑞米唑仑致过敏反应(RIA)是一种罕见但严重的并发症.本研究旨在分析RIA的特点,专注于心血管崩溃,并提供安全使用瑞米唑仑的指南。方法:本研究使用2020年系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。2023年5月26日从PubMed检索的研究文章,使用关键词“雷米咪唑安定和过敏反应”进行了评估,其纳入标准是用英语写的,并与世界过敏组织的过敏反应标准保持一致。而不符合这些标准的研究被排除.截至搜索日期的所有已发表的文章都包括在内,没有任何日期限制。这篇综述分析了年龄等因素,性别,麻醉类型,瑞咪唑安定剂量(推注/连续),过敏症状和体征,使用肾上腺素,血清类胰蛋白酶水平,还有皮肤点刺试验.结果:11例患者中,平均年龄为55.6±19.6岁,男性占81.8%。低血压(81.8%)是最常见的症状,其次是心动过缓(54.5%)和去饱和(36.4%)。两名患者出现心脏骤停。10例患者血清类胰蛋白酶水平证实有过敏反应。肾上腺素是主要的治疗方法,静脉内剂量为0.1mg至0.3mg。结论:当瑞马唑仑给药时,警惕是至关重要的,坚持推荐剂量,并及时用肾上腺素治疗RIA。需要进一步研究以了解风险因素并完善管理策略。提出了安全使用雷米唑仑的指南。
    Background and Objectives: Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, is used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia due to its rapid onset and short duration of action. However, remimazolam-induced anaphylaxis (RIA) is a rare but severe complication. This study aimed to analyze RIA characteristics, focusing on cardiovascular collapse, and provide guidelines for safe remimazolam use. Methods: This study conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Research articles retrieved from PubMed on 26 May 2023, using the keywords \'remimazolam AND anaphylaxis\' were evaluated based on the inclusion criteria of being written in English and aligning with the World Allergy Organization criteria for anaphylaxis, while studies not meeting these criteria were excluded. All published articles up to the search date were included without any date restrictions. The review analyzed factors such as age, sex, type of anesthesia, remimazolam dose (bolus/continuous), allergic symptoms and sign, epinephrine use, serum tryptase levels, and skin prick tests. Results: Among eleven cases, the mean age was 55.6 ± 19.6 years, with 81.8% male. Hypotension (81.8%) was the most common symptom, followed by bradycardia (54.5%) and desaturation (36.4%). Two patients experienced cardiac arrest. Serum tryptase levels confirmed anaphylaxis in ten cases. Epinephrine was the primary treatment, with intravenous doses ranging from 0.1 mg to 0.3 mg. Conclusions: Vigilance is crucial when administering remimazolam, adhering to recommended dosages, and promptly treating RIA with epinephrine. Further research is needed to understand the risk factors and refine the management strategies. Guidelines for safe remimazolam use are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长期以来,人们一直需要对重度抑郁症(MDD)进行有效的治疗。抑郁症机制的一个假设涉及神经活性类固醇如别孕烷醇酮的减少,γ-氨基丁酸门控氯通道(GABAA)受体的内源性正变构调节剂。在我们之前的研究中,我们发现了别孕烷醇酮,不是地西泮,在社交失败应激(SDS)模型小鼠的社交互动测试(SIT)中表现出抗抑郁样作用。然而,抗抑郁药样效应背后的神经元活动的动力学仍然未知.在目前的研究中,我们在SIT期间从基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)和内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)进行了局部场电位(LFP)记录,以阐明抗抑郁样效应与神经元振荡之间的关系.我们发现,在SDS模型小鼠的SIT中,通过减少重复社会互动的间隔(事件间间隔),导致社会互动总时间增加。我们还发现,在服用别孕烷醇酮后,在社会互动开始时,BLA中的θ和β振荡增加,这与地西泮的效果不同。社交互动区域内BLA的θ和β功率与互动时间呈正相关。θ和β功率的增加与事件间间隔呈负相关。关于BLA和mPFC之间的θ带协调活性,在使用别孕烯醇酮进行社交互动时,θ功率相关性降低。这些发现表明,社会互动后BLA中的theta活动以及BLA和mPFC之间减少的theta带协调活动与社会互动有关。这是抗抑郁行为之一。神经活性的这些差异可以阐明神经活性类固醇抗抑郁样作用的独特机制,而不是苯二氮卓类药物。
    Effective treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) have long been needed. One hypothesis for the mechanism of depression involves a decrease in neuroactive steroids such as allopregnanolone, an endogenous positive allosteric modulator of the γ-aminobutyric acid-gated chloride channel (GABAA) receptor. In our previous study, we discovered that allopregnanolone, not diazepam, exhibited antidepressant-like effects in the social interaction test (SIT) of social defeat stress (SDS) model mice. However, the dynamics of neuronal activity underlying the antidepressant-like effect remain unknown. In the current study, we conducted local field potentials (LFPs) recordings from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during the SIT to elucidate the relationship between the antidepressant-like effect and neuronal oscillation. We discovered that allopregnanolone has antidepressant-like effects in the SIT of SDS model mice by decreasing intervals of repetitive social interaction (inter-event intervals), resulting in increase of total social interaction time. We also found that theta and beta oscillation increased in BLA at the onset of social interaction following administration of allopregnanolone, which differed from the effects of diazepam. Theta and beta power in BLA within the social interaction zone exhibited a positive correlation with interaction time. This increase of theta and beta power was negatively correlated with inter-event intervals. Regarding theta-band coordinated activity between the BLA and mPFC, theta power correlation decreased at the onset of social interaction with the administration of allopregnanolone. These findings suggest that theta activity in BLA following social interaction and the reduced theta-band coordinated activity between the BLA and mPFC are implicated in social interaction, which is one of the antidepressant behaviors. These differences in neural activity could elucidate the distinctive mechanism underlying antidepressant-like effects of neuroactive steroids, as opposed to benzodiazepines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前尚不清楚初级保健医生在引入新型催眠药如食欲素受体拮抗剂和褪黑素受体激动剂后如何治疗失眠。这项基于网络的问卷调查旨在研究日本初级保健实践中失眠的治疗策略。
    方法:以二元反应量表(0=\“不熟悉\”;1=\“熟悉\”)调查了一百一十七位初级保健医生对每种失眠管理方案的熟悉程度,以及他们如何使用九分利克特量表(1=“我从不开/执行它\”;9=“我经常开/执行它\”)。不熟悉管理选项的医生被认为从未开过处方或执行过。
    结果:关于药物,大多数医生都熟悉新的催眠药。苏沃雷生是最常用的催眠药,其次是lemborexant和Ramelteon.这些新型催眠药对睡眠发作和睡眠维持失眠的平均分为4.8-5.4分和4.0-4.7分,分别。相比之下,大多数苯二氮卓类药物很少在两点以下使用。关于心理治疗,只有大约40%的医生熟悉失眠症认知行为疗法(CBT-I),他们很少实施。平均1.5-1.6点。更多的医生熟悉单组分心理治疗(即,放松,睡眠限制治疗,和刺激控制)与CBT-I相比,48-74%的人更频繁地实施它,分数在2.6到3.4分之间。
    结论:这项研究表明,日本初级保健医生很少使用CBT-I治疗失眠。此外,在药物治疗方面,他们使用新型睡眠药物比苯二氮卓类药物更频繁。CBT-I在日本初级保健中的使用和可用性可能会通过以下方式得到促进:教育初级保健医生,实施简短或数字CBT-I,和/或发展初级保健医生和CBT-I专家之间的合作。
    BACKGROUND: It is unclear how primary care physicians manage insomnia after the introduction of novel hypnotics such as orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists. This Web-based questionnaire survey aimed to examine treatment strategies for insomnia in Japanese primary care practice.
    METHODS: One-hundred-and-seventeen primary care physicians were surveyed on the familiarity of each management option for insomnia on a binary response scale (0 = \"unfamiliar\"; 1 = \"familiar\") and how they managed insomnia using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \"I never prescribe/perform it\"; 9 = \"I often prescribe/perform it\"). Physicians who were unfamiliar with a management option were deemed to have never prescribed or performed it.
    RESULTS: Regarding medication, most physicians were familiar with novel hypnotics. Suvorexant was the most used hypnotic, followed by lemborexant and ramelteon. These novel hypnotics averaged 4.8-5.4 points and 4.0-4.7 points for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia, respectively. By contrast, most benzodiazepines were seldom used below two points. Regarding psychotherapy, only approximately 40% of the physicians were familiar with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and they rarely implemented it, at an average of 1.5-1.6 points. More physicians were familiar with single-component psychotherapies (i.e., relaxation, sleep restriction therapy, and stimulus control) compared to CBT-I, and 48-74% of them implemented it slightly more often, with scores ranging from 2.6 to 3.4 points.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Japanese primary care physicians seldom use CBT-I to treat insomnia. In addition, they use novel sleep medications more frequently than benzodiazepines in terms of pharmacotherapy. The use and availability of CBT-I in Japanese primary care might be facilitated by: educating primary care physicians, implementing brief or digital CBT-I, and/or developing collaborations between primary care physicians and CBT-I specialists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    地西泮是一种基石的即时使用的抗癫痫治疗,可以延长癫痫患者癫痫发作之间的持续时间。然而,由于缺乏合适的临床前模型,我们对间歇性抢救治疗对疾病进展的机制理解受到限制.具体来说,地西泮的药代动力学在人类和实验动物之间差异很大。这里,我们在大鼠中开发了一种新的重复挽救疗法给药模式,以维持在人类中观察到的延长的治疗浓度.大鼠接受了三个剂量的地西泮,间隔1小时(0.75、1.5或3mg/kg,腹膜内);最后一次给药后10分钟和1、3或6小时收集血浆和大脑。血浆和脑浓度遵循剂量依赖性增加,重复3mg/kg范例(180ng/mL)后的峰值浓度相当于地西泮鼻喷雾剂人体研究中观察到的血浆水平。在这种范例中,脑血浆比增加表明地西泮在大脑中的积累可能在作用部位起长效作用。总的来说,我们重复地西泮给药模式模拟了在人类中看到的药物浓度和积累,提供了一种临床前工具来研究苯二氮卓类药物抢救治疗对啮齿动物癫痫模型中癫痫发作集群生物学的影响。简单语言总结:还有更多关于地西泮如何在24小时内仅在两次或更多次癫痫发作时使用它的人的大脑中发挥作用(这被称为癫痫发作集群)。动物的伦理研究可用于了解体内药物的更多信息。在这项研究中,我们发现,在大鼠体内服用三剂地西泮给人的药物量与一剂相同。我们现在可以测试患有癫痫的大鼠,看看这种药物如何在需要癫痫发作时服用的人身上起作用。
    Diazepam is a cornerstone immediate-use antiseizure rescue therapy that may extend the duration between seizure clusters in people living with epilepsy. However, our mechanistic understanding of intermittent rescue therapy on disease progression is limited by the lack of suitable preclinical models. Specifically, the pharmacokinetics of diazepam varies widely between humans and laboratory animals. Here, we developed a novel repeat rescue therapy dosing paradigm in rats to maintain prolonged therapeutic concentrations seen in humans. Rats received three diazepam doses separated by 1 h (0.75, 1.5, or 3 mg/kg, intraperitoneal); plasma and brains were collected at 10 min and 1, 3, or 6 h following the last dose. Plasma and brain concentrations followed a dose-dependent increase with peak concentrations following the repeat 3 mg/kg paradigm (180 ng/mL) being equivalent to plasma levels observed in human studies with diazepam nasal spray. Increased brain-to-plasma ratios in this paradigm indicate that diazepam accumulation in the brain may be long-acting at the site of action. Overall, our repeat diazepam dosing paradigm mimics drug concentrations and accumulation seen in humans, offering a preclinical tool to study the impact of benzodiazepine rescue therapy on seizure-cluster biology in rodent models of epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: There is more to learn about how diazepam works in the brains of people who use it only when they have two or more seizures in 24 h (this is called a seizure cluster). Ethical studies in animals can be used to learn more about medicines in the body. In this study, we showed that three doses of diazepam in rats give about the same amount of the drug as one dose for a person. We can now test rats with epilepsy to see how the drug might work in people who take it when needed for seizure clusters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于缺乏任何治疗指南,临床医生在为未指明的焦虑症做出治疗决定时面临困难。这项研究的目的是调查初级保健医生使用药理学和非药理学方法来治疗疾病的熟悉程度和频率。
    在日本的117名初级保健医生中进行了一项调查,他们被要求以二元反应量表(0=“不熟悉,\"1=\"熟悉\")和九点李克特量表上的频率(1=\"从未使用过,\"9=\"常用\")。
    虽然初级保健医生熟悉几种苯二氮卓抗焦虑药,开处方的频率,包括阿普唑仑(4.6±2.6),氯氟嗪乙酯(3.6±2.4),和氯噻嗪(3.5±2.3),很低。相比之下,某些非药理学选择,包括生活方式的改变(5.4±2.3),应对策略(5.1±2.7),和焦虑的心理教育(5.1±2.7),更常用,但在一定程度上。当苯二氮卓抗焦虑药物无效时,初级保健医生选择了以下相对较高的管理策略:鉴别诊断(6.4±2.4),转诊至专科医院(5.9±2.5),生活方式改变(5.2±2.5),并转换为选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(5.1±2.4)。
    初级保健医生在处方苯二氮卓抗焦虑药以治疗未指明的焦虑症时要谨慎。非药物干预和改用SSRI被适度地用作苯二氮卓抗焦虑药的主要治疗选择和替代品。为了确保在初级保健中安全有效地治疗未指明的焦虑症,更多的信息应该从领域专家那里提供。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians face difficulties in making treatment decisions for unspecified anxiety disorder due to the absence of any treatment guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate how familiar and how often primary care physicians use pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to manage the disorder.
    UNASSIGNED: A survey was conducted among 117 primary care physicians in Japan who were asked to assess the familiarity of using each treatment option for unspecified anxiety disorder on a binary response scale (0 = \"unfamiliar,\" 1 = \"familiar\") and the frequency on a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \"never used,\" 9 = \"frequently used\").
    UNASSIGNED: While several benzodiazepine anxiolytics were familiar to primary care physicians, the frequencies of prescribing them, including alprazolam (4.6 ± 2.6), ethyl loflazepate (3.6 ± 2.4), and clotiazepam (3.5 ± 2.3), were low. In contrast, certain nonpharmacological options, including lifestyle changes (5.4 ± 2.3), coping strategies (5.1 ± 2.7), and psychoeducation for anxiety (5.1 ± 2.7), were more commonly utilized, but to a modest extent. When a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug failed to be effective, primary care physicians selected the following management strategies to a relatively high degree: differential diagnosis (6.4 ± 2.4), referral to a specialist hospital (5.9 ± 2.5), lifestyle changes (5.2 ± 2.5), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (5.1 ± 2.4).
    UNASSIGNED: Primary care physicians exercise caution when prescribing benzodiazepine anxiolytics for unspecified anxiety disorder. Nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRI are modestly employed as primary treatment options and alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics. To ensure the safe and effective treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care, more information should be provided from field experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    睡眠相关饮食失调(SRED)患者的夜间饮食行为难以控制,并且可以成为慢性的,导致体重增加和心理困扰。这里,我们报告了一例SRED合并重度抑郁症的病例,通过从溴替唑仑转换为suvorexant成功治疗,也就是说,从苯二氮卓到食欲素受体拮抗剂。
    一名25岁的妇女抱怨夜间吃零食,伴有部分/完全健忘症和梦游1年。她在20岁时被诊断为重度抑郁症,并因抑郁症和失眠而服用帕罗西汀和溴替唑仑。在24岁的时候,她经历了第二次抑郁,然后她的健忘的夜间饮食变得突出。即使在抑郁症状改善后,她每两天经历一次无法控制的夜间进食事件,导致体重增加超过10公斤。通过视频多导睡眠图确认了N2阶段睡眠苏醒后的部分遗忘进食事件,她被诊断出患有SRED。考虑到她想要解决非自愿进食的强烈愿望,我们指示她停止Brotizolam开始Suvorexant.随后,她的夜间饮食完全消失了。她经历了反弹失眠,在1个月内有所改善。然后,她继续服用10mgsuvorexant,并且已经两年没有夜间进食了。
    此案例突出了停用苯二氮卓类药物在SRED治疗中的重要性,但也表明食欲素受体拮抗剂在治疗SRED中的潜在益处。食欲素受体拮抗剂在特发性SRED中的功效应在未来的研究中进行测试。
    UNASSIGNED: Nocturnal eating behavior in patients with sleep-related eating disorder (SRED) is difficult to control and can become chronic, causing weight gain and psychological distress. Here, we report a case of SRED comorbid with major depressive disorder successfully treated by switching from brotizolam to suvorexant, that is, from a benzodiazepine to an orexin receptor antagonist.
    UNASSIGNED: A 25-year-old woman complained of night snacking with partial/complete amnesia and sleepwalking for 1 year. She had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder at age 20 and was on paroxetine and brotizolam for depression and insomnia. At 24 years of age, she experienced her second depressive episode, then her amnestic nocturnal eating became prominent. Even after improvement in depressive symptoms, she experienced uncontrollable nocturnal eating episodes every 2 days, resulting in weight gain of over 10 kg. After a partial amnestic eating episode following an awakening from stage N2 sleep was confirmed through video polysomnography, she was diagnosed with SRED. Considering her strong desire to resolve involuntary eating, we instructed her to discontinue brotizolam and start suvorexant. Subsequently, her nocturnal eating completely disappeared. She experienced rebound insomnia, which improved within 1 month. She was then continued on 10 mg of suvorexant and has not experienced nocturnal eating for 2 years.
    UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the importance of discontinuing benzodiazepines in the treatment of SRED, but also suggests the potential benefit of orexin receptor antagonists in the treatment of SRED. The efficacy of orexin receptor antagonists in idiopathic SRED should be tested in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号