adverse reaction

不良反应
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鸡肠球菌(EG)通常存在于鸟类和哺乳动物的胃肠道中。尽管它的菌株很少从临床标本中分离出来,EG可导致免疫受损个体的败血症。EG感染在家庭环境中并不常见,但是由于抗生素使用和侵入性治疗的增加,它们的发病率一直在上升,特别是在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。EG固有地表现出对万古霉素的抗性,但对利奈唑胺高度敏感。尽管显示了体外抗性,万古霉素已显示出治疗EG脑膜炎的临床疗效。
    方法:在血液和脑脊液培养中检测到EG后,将妊娠30+2周出生的新生儿送入新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。药敏试验表明,该菌株对万古霉素耐药,对利奈唑胺敏感。最初,选择万古霉素进行治疗。然而,由于血液和脑脊液中持续的EG培养物,治疗调整为利奈唑胺.这导致血小板(PLT)计数迅速减少,怀疑是不良反应。同时,患者出现反复发热和炎症标志物水平升高,提示停止利奈唑胺和恢复万古霉素。随后服用万古霉素稳定了患者的病情,正如C反应蛋白(CRP)改善所证明的那样,降钙素原(PCT),和脑脊液参数,最终导致8周治疗后出院。
    结论:本回顾性分析强调了万古霉素治疗EG感染的疗效,提示特定的遗传表型可能影响治疗敏感性。监测万古霉素血液水平对于确定治疗效果至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Enterococcus gallinarum (EG) is typically found in the gastrointestinal tracts of birds and mammals. Although its strains are rarely isolated from clinical specimens, EG can lead to septicemia in immunocompromised individuals. EG infections are uncommon in household settings, but their incidence has been rising due to increased antibiotic usage and invasive treatments, particularly in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). EG inherently exhibits resistance to vancomycin but is highly sensitive to linezolid. Despite showing in vitro resistance, vancomycin has shown clinical efficacy in treating EG meningitis.
    METHODS: A neonate born at 30 + 2 weeks gestation was admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) after EG was detected in blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures. Susceptibility testing indicated that the bacterial strain was resistant to vancomycin and sensitive to linezolid. Initially, vancomycin was selected for treatment. However, due to persistent EG cultures in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid, the treatment was adjusted to linezolid. This led to a rapid decrease in platelet (PLT) count, suspected to be an adverse reaction. Concurrently, the patient experienced recurrent fever and elevated inflammatory marker levels, prompting the discontinuation of linezolid and a return to vancomycin. Subsequent administration of vancomycin stabilized the patient\'s condition, as evidenced by improved C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and cerebrospinal fluid parameters, ultimately leading to discharge after an eight-week treatment period.
    CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis highlights the efficacy of vancomycin in treating EG infections, suggesting that specific genetic phenotypes may influence treatment sensitivity. Monitoring vancomycin blood levels is crucial for determining treatment effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:头孢菌素类药物是全球处方最多的抗生素之一,与多种超敏反应(HSR)有关。这篇综述总结了头孢菌素超敏反应的最新进展,重点是诊断测试。
    结果:报告的评估不同即时和延迟头孢菌素HSR的测试策略包括皮肤测试,体外试验,和诊断药物挑战。然而,体内和体外试验在不同超敏反应内型中的诊断性能仍不清楚;需要足够有力的研究来调查这些诊断方式的真阳性和阴性预测值,使用药物挑战的参考标准来定义头孢菌素超敏反应.诊断测试的完善应以我们对头孢菌素抗原决定因素的理解增长为指导。这种增长对于进一步澄清头孢菌素之间的交叉反应性至关重要,并可能描述简化的评估过程,从而减少不必要的抗生素回避。
    OBJECTIVE: Cephalosporins are one of the most prescribed antibiotics worldwide and are implicated in a wide range of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR). This review summarizes recent updates in cephalosporin hypersensitivity with a focus on diagnostic testing.
    RESULTS: Reported testing strategies to evaluate different immediate and delayed cephalosporin HSR have included skin testing, in vitro testing, and diagnostic drug challenges. However, the diagnostic performance of in vivo and in vitro tests remains unclear across different hypersensitivity endotypes; adequately powered studies investigating the true positive and negative predictive value of these diagnostic modalities are needed using the reference standard of drug challenges to define cephalosporin hypersensitivity. Refinement of diagnostic testing should be guided by growth in our understanding of cephalosporin antigenic determinants. This growth will be crucial in driving further clarification of cross-reactivity between cephalosporins, and potentially delineating streamlined evaluation processes resulting in reduced unnecessary antibiotic avoidance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物性肝损伤(DILI)是临床用药中最常见的不良反应之一。通常由药物或草药化合物引起。与其他人群相比,癌症患者更容易因原发性或继发性肝脏恶性肿瘤而出现肝功能异常,放射性肝损伤等原因,在临床治疗过程中,尤其引起关注的抗癌药物引起的肝损害的潜在不良反应。近年来,表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)的应用改变了一系列实体恶性肿瘤的治疗现状。不幸的是,肝毒性的增加限制了EGFR-TKIs的临床应用。EGFR-TKIs引起肝损伤的机制复杂。尽管进行了十多年的研究,细胞DNA合成受到抑制而导致肝细胞坏死,其他具体机制尚不清楚,和几个有效的解决方案是可用的。这篇综述集中在临床特征,EGFR-TKIs的发病率和肝毒性机制发现的最新进展,以及EGFR-TKIs肝毒性的再挑战和治疗策略。
    Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most frequently adverse reactions in clinical drug use, usually caused by drugs or herbal compounds. Compared with other populations, cancer patients are more prone to abnormal liver function due to primary or secondary liver malignant tumor, radiation-induced liver injury and other reasons, making potential adverse reactions from liver damage caused by anticancer drugs of particular concernduring clinical treatment process. In recent years, the application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has changed the treatment status of a series of solid malignant tumors. Unfortunately, the increasing incidence of hepatotoxicitylimits the clinical application of EGFR-TKIs. The mechanisms of liver injury caused by EGFR-TKIs were complex. Despite more than a decade of research, other than direct damage to hepatocytes caused by inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis and resulting in hepatocyte necrosis, the rest of the specific mechanisms remain unclear, and few effective solutions are available. This review focuses on the clinical feature, incidence rates and the recent advances on the discovery of mechanism of hepatotoxicity in EGFR-TKIs, as well as rechallenge and therapeutic strategies underlying hepatotoxicity of EGFR-TKIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的疫苗对于结束2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的大流行至关重要。目前,mRNA疫苗加强注射对不良事件的累积效应未得到充分表征.
    在第三剂辉瑞BNT162b2后,在日本一家医学研究所进行了一项基于疫苗不良事件的调查研究。不良事件使用网络分析进行分组,并建立了异方差概率模型来分析不良事件。
    有两个主要的不良事件,全身和局部注射部位相关事件。受试者背景和先前疫苗相关不良事件的经验与第三剂量后不良事件的发生和强度可变相关。在不良事件中,只有淋巴结病在第三次剂量后显著增加,而其他全身性不良事件的最大增加通常发生在第二剂之后。
    重复加强疫苗对不良事件的频率和强度的影响因不良事件的种类而异。
    UNASSIGNED: Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are crucial for ending the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Currently, the cumulative effect of booster shots of mRNA vaccines on adverse events is not sufficiently characterized.
    UNASSIGNED: A survey-based study on vaccine adverse events was conducted in a Japanese medical institute after the third dose of Pfizer BNT162b2. Adverse events were grouped using network analysis, and a heteroscedastic probit model was built to analyse adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: There were two main clusters of adverse events, systemic and local injection site-associated events. Subject background and the experience of previous vaccine-related adverse events were variably associated with the occurrence and intensity of adverse events following the third dose. Among adverse events, only lymphadenopathy increased prominently following the third dose, while the largest increase in other systemic adverse events occurred generally following the second dose.
    UNASSIGNED: The effect of repeated booster vaccines on the frequency and intensity of adverse events differs depending on the kind of adverse event.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胺碘酮是一种III类抗心律失常药物,在临床上常用于治疗室性心律失常和心房颤动。我们介绍了胺碘酮不良反应的病例报告,并回顾了其特征。
    一位73岁的亚裔女性,有阵发性心房颤动病史,接受胺碘酮治疗,良好控制的高血压,并且没有出现胃肠道不适和头晕的药物滥用,没有胸痛或心悸。尽管进行了正常的年度检查,她的肝脏和甲状腺功能检查异常,影像学显示肺和肝脏变化提示胺碘酮毒性。停用胺碘酮治疗索他洛尔可改善症状并使甲状腺和肝功能正常化,影像学显示间质纤维化恢复和肝脏密度降低。
    胺碘酮,广泛用于治疗室性和房性心律失常,在改善室颤患者的生存率方面具有显着的益处。然而,它的长期使用会带来严重的不良影响,包括甲状腺功能障碍,肝损伤,和肺毒性,需要仔细监测和管理。尽管它的功效,需要研究早期发现和管理胺碘酮的副作用是至关重要的,强调定期监测和可能调整治疗以减轻这些风险的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that is commonly used in the clinic to treat ventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation. We present a case report of the adverse effects of amiodarone and review its characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: A 73-year-old Asian female with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation managed with amiodarone, well-controlled hypertension, and no substance abuse presented with gastrointestinal distress and dizziness, without chest pain or palpitations. Despite normal annual check-ups, she developed abnormal liver and thyroid function tests, and imaging revealed lung and liver changes suggestive of amiodarone toxicity. Discontinuation of amiodarone for sotalol led to symptom improvement and normalization of thyroid and liver functions, with imaging indicating recovery from interstitial fibrosis and reduced liver density.
    UNASSIGNED: Amiodarone, a widely used for treating ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, and with significant benefits in improving patient survival in cases of ventricular fibrillation. However, its long-term use is associated with serious adverse effects, including thyroid dysfunction, liver injury, and pulmonary toxicity, necessitating careful monitoring and management. Despite its efficacy, the need for research on early detection and management of amiodarone\'s side effects is crucial, highlighting the importance of regular monitoring and possibly adjusting therapy to mitigate these risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是探索和分析FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,以识别与血管性水肿相关的药物不良反应信号。这些发现旨在为临床药物安全考虑提供有价值的见解。
    OpenVigil2.1数据平台用于收集2004年第一季度至2023年第四季度与血管性水肿相关的不良事件报告。采用报告比值比(ROR)和比例报告比(PRR)作为不相称性指标来检测与血管性水肿相关的药物的不良反应信号。
    共检索到38,921份报告,大多数是由医疗保健专业人员报告的。分析主要包括成年患者(≥18岁),与男性相比,女性的代表性略高。在与血管性水肿发生相关的前30种药物中,24种药物在风险分析中显示阳性信号。基于个体药物报告比值比(95%置信区间)作为风险信号强度的度量,前五名药物如下:赖诺普利[ROR(95%CI):46.43(42.59-50.62)],依那普利[ROR(95%CI):43.51(39.88-47.46)],培多普利[ROR(95%CI):31.17(27.5-35.32)],阿替普酶[ROR(95%CI):29.3(26.95-31.85)],雷米普利[ROR(95%CI):20.93(19.66-22.28)]。在对药物进行分类后,在抗血栓药物中观察到最强的阳性信号[ROR(95%CI):22.53(21.16-23.99)],之后,心血管药物[ROR(95%CI):9.17(8.87-9.48)],抗生素[ROR(95%CI):6.42(5.91-6.96)],免疫抑制剂[ROR(95%CI):5.95(5.55-6.39)],抗炎镇痛药[ROR(95%CI):4.65(4.45-4.86)],抗过敏药物[ROR(95%CI):4.47(3.99-5)],平喘药[ROR(95%CI):2.49(2.14-2.89)],血糖控制药物[ROR(95%CI):1.65(1.38-1.97)],和消化系统药物[ROR(95%CI):1.59(1.45-1.74)]显示出逐渐降低的ROR值。
    许多药物与血管性水肿的高风险相关。这些药物在控制血管性水肿的发生中起着至关重要的和潜在的可预防的作用。在临床实践中必须考虑药物性血管性水肿的风险水平,以优化药物治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to explore and analyze the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify drug adverse reaction signals associated with angioedema. The findings aim to provide valuable insights for clinical drug safety considerations.
    UNASSIGNED: The Open Vigil 2.1 data platform was utilized to collect adverse event reports related to angioedema from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were employed as disproportionality measures to detect adverse reaction signals Sof drugs associated with angioedema.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 38,921 reports were retrieved, with the majority being reported by healthcare professionals. The analysis included predominantly adult patients (≥18 years of age), with slightly higher representation of females compared to males. Among the top 30 drugs associated with the occurrence of angioedema, 24 drugs showed positive signals in the risk analysis. Based on the individual drug reporting odds ratio (95% confidence interval) as a measure of risk signal strength, the top five drugs are as follows: lisinopril [ROR (95% CI): 46.43 (42.59-50.62)], enalapril [ROR (95% CI): 43.51 (39.88-47.46)], perindopril [ROR (95% CI): 31.17 (27.5-35.32)], alteplase [ROR (95% CI): 29.3 (26.95-31.85)], ramipril [ROR (95% CI): 20.93 (19.66-22.28)]. After categorizing the drugs, the strongest positive signal was observed in the antithrombotic agents [ROR (95% CI): 22.53 (21.16-23.99)], following that, cardiovascular drugs [ROR (95% CI): 9.17 (8.87-9.48)], antibiotics [ROR (95% CI): 6.42 (5.91-6.96)], immunosuppressors [ROR (95% CI): 5.95 (5.55-6.39)], anti-inflammatory analgesics [ROR (95% CI): 4.65 (4.45-4.86)], antiallergic drugs [ROR (95% CI): 4.47 (3.99-5)], antiasthmatics [ROR (95% CI): 2.49 (2.14-2.89)], blood sugar control drugs [ROR (95% CI): 1.65 (1.38-1.97)], and digestive system drugs [ROR (95% CI): 1.59 (1.45-1.74)] exhibited progressively decreasing ROR values.
    UNASSIGNED: Many medications are associated with a high risk of angioedema. These medications play a crucial and potentially preventable role in controlling the occurrence of angioedema. It is essential to consider the risk level of drug-induced angioedema in clinical practice to optimize medication therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肾损伤(AKI)是临床恶化和肾毒性的标志。虽然有许多研究提供了早期检测AKI的预测模型,使用基于分布式研究网络(DRN)的时间序列数据预测AKI发生的研究很少见。
    在这项研究中,我们旨在通过将基于可解释长短期记忆(LSTM)的模型应用于使用DRN的肾毒性药物的患者的基于医院电子健康记录(EHR)的时间序列数据来检测AKI的早期发生.
    我们使用DRN对6家医院的数据进行了多机构回顾性队列研究。对于每个机构,使用5种用于AKI的药物构建了基于患者的数据集,并使用可解释的多变量LSTM(IMV-LSTM)模型进行训练。这项研究使用倾向评分匹配来减轻人口统计学和临床特征的差异。此外,证明了每个机构和药物的AKI预测模型贡献变量的时间注意力值,使用单向方差分析确认了病例和对照数据之间非常重要的特征分布差异。
    这项研究分析了8643例和31,012例有和没有AKI的患者,分别,6家医院在分析AKI发作的分布时,万古霉素显示起病较早(中位数12,IQR5-25天),与其他药物相比,阿昔洛韦最慢(中位数23,IQR10-41天)。我们用于AKI预测的时间深度学习模型对大多数药物表现良好。阿昔洛韦在每种药物的受试者工作特征曲线评分下的平均面积最高(0.94),其次是对乙酰氨基酚(0.93),万古霉素(0.92),萘普生(0.90),和塞来昔布(0.89)。根据AKI预测模型中变量的时间注意力值,已证实的淋巴细胞和钙万古霉素的关注度最高,而淋巴细胞,白蛋白,血红蛋白会随着时间的推移而减少,尿液pH值和凝血酶原时间有增加的趋势。
    可以通过基于EHR的DRN应用基于时间序列数据的IMV-LSTM来实现对AKI爆发的早期监测。这种方法可以帮助识别风险因素,并在AKI发生前开出引起肾毒性的药物时,早期发现药物不良反应。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a marker of clinical deterioration and renal toxicity. While there are many studies offering prediction models for the early detection of AKI, those predicting AKI occurrence using distributed research network (DRN)-based time series data are rare.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we aimed to detect the early occurrence of AKI by applying an interpretable long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model to hospital electronic health record (EHR)-based time series data in patients who took nephrotoxic drugs using a DRN.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of data from 6 hospitals using a DRN. For each institution, a patient-based data set was constructed using 5 drugs for AKI, and an interpretable multivariable LSTM (IMV-LSTM) model was used for training. This study used propensity score matching to mitigate differences in demographics and clinical characteristics. Additionally, the temporal attention values of the AKI prediction model\'s contribution variables were demonstrated for each institution and drug, with differences in highly important feature distributions between the case and control data confirmed using 1-way ANOVA.
    UNASSIGNED: This study analyzed 8643 and 31,012 patients with and without AKI, respectively, across 6 hospitals. When analyzing the distribution of AKI onset, vancomycin showed an earlier onset (median 12, IQR 5-25 days), and acyclovir was the slowest compared to the other drugs (median 23, IQR 10-41 days). Our temporal deep learning model for AKI prediction performed well for most drugs. Acyclovir had the highest average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score per drug (0.94), followed by acetaminophen (0.93), vancomycin (0.92), naproxen (0.90), and celecoxib (0.89). Based on the temporal attention values of the variables in the AKI prediction model, verified lymphocytes and calcvancomycin ium had the highest attention, whereas lymphocytes, albumin, and hemoglobin tended to decrease over time, and urine pH and prothrombin time tended to increase.
    UNASSIGNED: Early surveillance of AKI outbreaks can be achieved by applying an IMV-LSTM based on time series data through an EHR-based DRN. This approach can help identify risk factors and enable early detection of adverse drug reactions when prescribing drugs that cause renal toxicity before AKI occurs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳腺癌是全世界最普遍的癌症。随着乳腺癌诊断和治疗的进步,早期癌症患者的预后明显改善。提高抗肿瘤治疗后患者的长期生活质量,包括视觉质量,已成为一个重要的研究热点。本文旨在全面总结早期乳腺癌药物治疗引起的干眼症不良反应。通过查阅相关文献,这项研究探讨了病因,临床特征,药物诱导的干眼病在乳腺癌治疗中的潜在治疗策略。深入了解药物引起的干眼症不良反应有助于临床医生更有效地监测和管理患者的眼部健康,促进早期诊断和干预,预防并发症,并确保为接受乳腺癌治疗的患者提供最佳的视觉保护。
    Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide. With advancements in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis of patients with early-stage cancer has significantly improved. Enhancing the long-term quality of life of patients after antineoplastic therapy, including visual quality, has become a crucial research focus. This review aims to comprehensively summarize dry eye disease adverse reaction resulting from pharmacotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Through a review of the relevant literature, this study explored the etiology, clinical features, and potential therapeutic strategies for drug-induced dry eye disease in breast cancer treatment. A thorough understanding of the medication-induced dry eye disease adverse reaction aid clinicians in monitoring and managing patients\' ocular health more effectively, facilitating early diagnosis and intervention, preventing complications, and ensuring optimal visual protection for patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据一项观察性研究,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)相关的炎性关节炎(ICI-IA)发生在4-6%的ICI治疗患者中。我们使用行政索赔来确定ICI-IA的病例,以研究其在人群水平上的发病率和特征。
    方法:我们使用Medicare5%样本来识别启动ICIs的患者。癌症患者被确定为具有≥2个ICD-9/10-CM诊断代码来自肿瘤学家的肺癌,黑色素瘤,或肾/尿路上皮癌。ICI-IA被定义为两个医疗保险索赔间隔≥30天,ICD-9/10-CM诊断代码的组合有利于特异性。ICI-IA在ICI开始后诊断为肌肉骨骼的患者中被发现,I.)在ICI开始之前没有炎性关节炎或炎性风湿性疾病,和ii)在ICI之前的一年内没有肌肉骨骼投诉。我们检查了ICI-IA患者的DMARD利用率和风湿病就诊。构建了Landmark分析和随时间变化的Cox比例风险模型。
    结果:ICI-IA的发生率为7.2(6.1-8.4)/100患者年。ICI-IA患者平均(SD)年龄73.5(7.0)岁,48%的女性,91%白色。从ICI开始到首次ICI-IA诊断的中位数(IQR)时间为124(56,252)天。只有24人(16%)接受过风湿病专家的治疗,24人(16%)接受了DMARD(46%由风湿病学家).ICI-IA患者死亡率的HR为0.86(95%CI0.59-1.26,p=0.45)。
    结论:索赔数据中确定的ICI-IA的发生率与观察性研究中报告的相似,然而,很少有患者接受DMARD治疗或看风湿病专家。有和没有ICI-IA的ICI治疗患者的总生存期没有差异。
    OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA) occurs in 4-6% of ICI-treated patients based on one observational study. We identified cases of ICI-IA using administrative claims to study its incidence and characteristics at the population level.
    METHODS: We used the Medicare 5% sample to identify patients initiating ICIs. Cancer patients were identified by having ≥ 2 ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes from an oncologist for lung cancer, melanoma, or renal/urothelial cancer. ICI-IA was defined as having two Medicare claims ≥ 30 days apart with combinations of ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes that favored specificity. ICI-IA was identified in patients with a musculoskeletal diagnosis after ICI initiation, who had i.) no inflammatory arthritis or inflammatory rheumatic disease before ICI initiation ever, and ii) no musculoskeletal complaint in the one year prior to ICI. We examined DMARD utilization and visits to rheumatology in patients with ICI-IA. Landmark analysis and a time varying Cox proportional hazards model for overall survival was constructed.
    RESULTS: The incidence of ICI-IA was 7.2 (6.1-8.4) per 100 patient years. Patients with ICI-IA were mean (SD) age 73.5(7.0) years, 48% women, 91% white. Median(IQR) time from ICI initiation to first ICI-IA diagnosis was 124(56, 252) days. Only 24(16%) received care from a rheumatologist, and 24(16%) were prescribed a DMARD (46% by a rheumatologist). The HR for mortality in patients with ICI-IA was 0.86 (95% CI 0.59-1.26, p= 0.45).
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ICI-IA identified in claims data is similar to that reported in observational studies, however, few patients are treated with a DMARD or see a rheumatologist. There was no difference in overall survival between ICI-treated patients with and without ICI-IA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:管理对比反应至关重要,因为对比反应可能危及生命且不可预测。机构需要一个有效的系统来处理这些事件。目前,没有分配学员的标准做法,放射科医生,非放射科医师,或其他非医师提供者管理对比反应。
    方法:学术放射科医师协会(AAR)成立了一个工作组来解决这一差距。AAR工作队审查了现有做法,研究现有文献,并咨询了与对比反应管理相关的专家。学术放射科主席协会(SCARD)成员使用问卷进行了调查,问卷的重点是用于对比反应管理的人员配备策略。
    结果:专责小组发现各机构和医疗保健提供者在对比反应管理方面存在差异。缺乏分配人员进行对比反应管理的标准化协议。
    结论:AAR工作组建议制定标准化的对比反应管理方案。协议应概述参与这些事件的不同医疗保健提供者的明确角色。
    OBJECTIVE: Managing contrast reactions is critical as contrast reactions can be life-threatening and unpredictable. Institutions need an effective system to handle these events. Currently, there is no standard practice for assigning trainees, radiologists, non-radiologist physicians, or other non-physician providers for management of contrast reaction.
    METHODS: The Association of Academic Radiologists (AAR) created a task force to address this gap. The AAR task force reviewed existing practices, studied available literature, and consulted experts related to contrast reaction management. The Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) members were surveyed using a questionnaire focused on staffing strategies for contrast reaction management.
    RESULTS: The task force found disparities in contrast reactions management across institutions and healthcare providers. There is a lack of standardized protocols for assigning personnel for contrast reaction management.
    CONCLUSIONS: The AAR task force suggests developing standardized protocols for contrast reaction management. The protocols should outline clear roles for different healthcare providers involved in these events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号