Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Managing contrast reactions is critical as contrast reactions can be life-threatening and unpredictable. Institutions need an effective system to handle these events. Currently, there is no standard practice for assigning trainees, radiologists, non-radiologist physicians, or other non-physician providers for management of contrast reaction.
METHODS: The Association of Academic Radiologists (AAR) created a task force to address this gap. The AAR task force reviewed existing practices, studied available literature, and consulted experts related to contrast reaction management. The Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) members were surveyed using a questionnaire focused on staffing strategies for contrast reaction management.
RESULTS: The task force found disparities in contrast reactions management across institutions and healthcare providers. There is a lack of standardized protocols for assigning personnel for contrast reaction management.
CONCLUSIONS: The AAR task force suggests developing standardized protocols for contrast reaction management. The protocols should outline clear roles for different healthcare providers involved in these events.
METHODS: The Association of Academic Radiologists (AAR) created a task force to address this gap. The AAR task force reviewed existing practices, studied available literature, and consulted experts related to contrast reaction management. The Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) members were surveyed using a questionnaire focused on staffing strategies for contrast reaction management.
RESULTS: The task force found disparities in contrast reactions management across institutions and healthcare providers. There is a lack of standardized protocols for assigning personnel for contrast reaction management.
CONCLUSIONS: The AAR task force suggests developing standardized protocols for contrast reaction management. The protocols should outline clear roles for different healthcare providers involved in these events.
摘要：
目的：管理对比反应至关重要，因为对比反应可能危及生命且不可预测。机构需要一个有效的系统来处理这些事件。目前,没有分配学员的标准做法，放射科医生,非放射科医师,或其他非医师提供者管理对比反应。
方法：学术放射科医师协会（AAR）成立了一个工作组来解决这一差距。AAR工作队审查了现有做法，研究现有文献，并咨询了与对比反应管理相关的专家。学术放射科主席协会（SCARD）成员使用问卷进行了调查，问卷的重点是用于对比反应管理的人员配备策略。
结果：专责小组发现各机构和医疗保健提供者在对比反应管理方面存在差异。缺乏分配人员进行对比反应管理的标准化协议。
结论：AAR工作组建议制定标准化的对比反应管理方案。协议应概述参与这些事件的不同医疗保健提供者的明确角色。
方法：学术放射科医师协会（AAR）成立了一个工作组来解决这一差距。AAR工作队审查了现有做法，研究现有文献，并咨询了与对比反应管理相关的专家。学术放射科主席协会（SCARD）成员使用问卷进行了调查，问卷的重点是用于对比反应管理的人员配备策略。
结果：专责小组发现各机构和医疗保健提供者在对比反应管理方面存在差异。缺乏分配人员进行对比反应管理的标准化协议。
结论：AAR工作组建议制定标准化的对比反应管理方案。协议应概述参与这些事件的不同医疗保健提供者的明确角色。
