abdomen

腹部
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Despite available armored personal protection in troops, the incidence of abdominal wounds in modern wars is 6.6-9.0%. Of these, penetrating abdominal injuries comprise 75-80%. Thoracoabdominal injuries occupy a special place with incidence up to 88%. We present the first case of the \"Koblenz algorithm\" in the treatment of a patient with mine explosion wound, combined injury of the head, limbs, thoracoabdominal trauma, widespread peritonitis, small intestinal obstruction and septic shock in a military hospital. This algorithm was implemented under import substitution considering the peculiarities of abdominal adhesive process in a patient with thoracoabdominal wound. This case demonstrates the advantage of this algorithm for patients with severe combined wounds of the chest and abdomen complicated by diffuse purulent peritonitis. Clinical status of these patients does not allow not only open laparostomy, but also \"classical\" redo laparotomies.
    Несмотря на использование в войсках броневой индивидуальной защиты, частота ранений живота в современных войнах составляет 6,6—9,0%, 75—80% из них — проникающие в брюшную полость. Особое место занимают торакоабдоминальные ранения, частота которых достигает 88%. В статье представлено клиническое наблюдение первого случая применения «кобленцского алгоритма» в лечении пациента с минно-взрывным ранением, сочетанным ранением головы, конечностей, торакоабдоминальным ранением, с развившимся распространенным перитонитом, тонкокишечной непроходимостью и септическим шоком в условиях военного госпиталя. «Кобленцский алгоритм» был реализован в условиях импортозамещения и с учетом особенностей течения спаечного процесса в брюшной полости у пациента с торакоабдоминальным ранением. Этот случай демонстрирует преимущество «кобленцского алгоритма» ведения пациентов с тяжелыми сочетанными ранениями груди, живота, осложнившимися развитием разлитого гнойного перитонита, когда общее состояние пациента не позволяет не только вести лапаростому открыто, но и выполнять «классические» релапаротомии.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的管理中,结肠镜检查(CS)被认为对诊断至关重要;然而,它的侵入性提出了挑战。相反,超声诊断设备的最新进展提高了消化道的成像质量,使它们在UC管理中具有价值。因此,本研究旨在阐明腹部超声(AUS)与CS在评估UC活动中的相关性.使用AUS进行UC评估的指标如下:1)肠壁分层,2)肠壁厚度,3)能量多普勒时的肠壁血流,4)炎性脂肪亮度增加的存在,和5)存在大于5mm的肠系膜淋巴结肿大。随后,我们为UC开发了一个新的AUS指数,被称为UCUS得分,其中包括上述五个指数。最后,我们将UCUS评分与有代表性的内镜指标进行比较,梅奥内窥镜子评分,和溃疡性结肠炎的严重程度的内镜指数。结果表明,我们提出的UCUS评分比单独评估的单个项目更好地反映了疾病活动。ROC曲线分析显示UCUS评分截止值为3分。因此,UCUS评分≥3分表明需要进一步进行CS检查。相反,得分低于3分表明疾病活动性低,在评估治疗效果的情况下,AUS可能会替代CS。我们认为,UCUS评分是了解患者病情和激励患者进行内窥镜检查的重要信息来源。
    In the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), colonoscopy (CS) is considered essential for diagnosis;however, its invasiveness poses a challenge. Conversely, recent advancements in ultrasound diagnostic devices have improved imaging quality for the digestive tract, rendering them valuable in UC management. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the correlation between abdominal ultrasonography (AUS) and CS in assessing UC activity. The indices adopted for UC evaluation using AUS were as follows:1) bowel wall stratification, 2) bowel wall thickness, 3) bowel wall flow at power Doppler, 4) presence of increased brightness of inflammatory fat, and 5) presence of mesenteric lymph node swelling greater than 5mm. Subsequently, we developed a new AUS index for UC, termed the UCUS score, which comprises the aforementioned five indices. Finally, we compared the UCUS score with representative endoscopic indices, the Mayo endoscopic sub-score, and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity. The results demonstrated that our proposed UCUS score better reflected disease activity than individual items assessed separately. ROC curve analysis revealed a UCUS score cutoff of 3 points. Therefore, a UCUS score of ≥3 points indicates the need for further examination with CS. Conversely, a score below 3 points suggests low disease activity, and in situations when evaluating treatment effectiveness, AUS could potentially substitute for CS. We believe that the UCUS score is an important source of information to understand the patient\'s condition and to motivate the patient to undergo endoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在证明使用光子计数探测器CT(PCD-CT)在门静脉期(PVP)的常规腹部CT扫描中,碘对比剂(CM)与总重量相比减少(TBW)和在最新的能量积分探测器CT(EID-CT)上适应kV的CM注射方案,同时保持足够的图像质量(IQ)。
    方法:比较了EID-CT(2022年11月-2024年3月)和PCD-CT(2023年9月-2023年12月)的连续对比增强腹部PVPCT扫描。CM参数(总碘负荷(TIL),报告了碘递送率(IDR)和给药因子(DF)。基于TBW和kV的个性化采集和CM注入协议应用于EID-CT,并且TBW适应的CM注入协议用于PCD-CT。用平均衰减评估客观智商(Hounsfield单位,HU),信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR))。2位专家读者根据诊断信心通过5点Likert量表评估主观智商。
    结果:根据91次EID-CT扫描和102次PCD-CT扫描,观察到PCD-CT的TIL降低20.1%。PCD-CT显示出较高的SNR(9.9±1.7与9.1±1.8,p<0.001)和CNR(5.1±1.7vs.4.3±1.3,p<0.001)与EID-CT相比。主观智商评估显示,所有扫描均具有足够的诊断智商。
    结论:与EID-CT相比,PCD-CT可以降低CM,同时提供更高的SNR和CNR,使用临床个性化扫描和CM注射方案。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate reduced iodine contrast media (CM) in routine abdominal CT scans in portal venous phase (PVP) using a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) compared to total body weight (TBW) and kV-adapted CM injection protocols on a state-of-the-art energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) while maintaining sufficient image quality (IQ).
    METHODS: Consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominal PVP CT scans from an EID-CT (Nov 2022-March 2024) and a PCD-CT (Sep 2023-Dec 2023) were compared. CM parameters (total iodine load (TIL), iodine delivery rate (IDR) and dosing factor (DF)) were reported. An individualized acquisition and CM injection protocol based on TBW and kV was applied for the EID-CT and a TBW adapted CM injection protocol was used for the PCD-CT. Objective IQ was evaluated with mean attenuation (Hounsfield Units, HU), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)). Subjective IQ was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale by 2 expert readers based on diagnostic confidence.
    RESULTS: Based on 91 EID-CT scans and 102 PCD-CT scans a TIL reduction of 20.1 % was observed for PCD-CT. PCD-CT demonstrated significantly higher SNR (9.9 ± 1.7 vs. 9.1 ± 1.8, p < 0.001) and CNR (5.1 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) compared to EID-CT. Subjective IQ assessment showed that all scans had sufficient diagnostic IQ.
    CONCLUSIONS: PCD-CT allows for CM reduction while providing higher SNR and CNR compared to EID-CT, using clinical individualized scan and CM injection protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估肝脏中跨场强和具有不同梯度硬件的MR扫描仪的体素内不相干运动(IVIM)定量的可重复性和叶间一致性。
    方法:进行了Cramer-Rao下界优化,以确定优化的单极和运动鲁棒2D(b值和一阶运动矩[M1])IVIM-DWI采集。11名健康志愿者接受了肝脏扩散MRI检查,其中每个优化的采集在三个MRI扫描仪中获得五次。对于每个数据集,IVIM估计(扩散系数(D),伪扩散系数(d1*$${d}_1^{\\ast}$$和d2*$${d}_2^{\ast}$$),血流速度SDs(Vb1和Vb2),和灌注分数[f1和f2])使用两种信号模型(伪扩散和M1依赖性物理模型)在有和没有T2校正(fc1和fc2)和三种拟合技术(基于三指数感兴趣区域的完整和分段拟合以及血流速度SD分布拟合)。使用受试者内部和成对变异系数(CVw和CVp)比较了方法的可重复性和叶间一致性,配对样本t检验,和Bland-Altman分析.
    结果:使用运动鲁棒2D(b-M1)数据采集的组合,具有T2校正的M1相关物理信号建模,和血流速度SD分布拟合,多扫描仪再现性,CVw中位数=5.09%,11.3%,9.20%,14.2%,D为12.6%,分别为Vb1、Vb2、fc1和fc2,叶间一致性与CVp=8.14%,11.9%,8.50%,49.9%,和42.0%,分别,已实现。
    结论:最近提出了先进的IVIM收购,信号建模,和拟合技术可以促进肝脏中可重复的IVIM定量,根据建立用于检测的基于IVIM的定量生物标志物的需要,分期,和疾病的治疗监测。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reproducibility and interlobar agreement of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) quantification in the liver across field strengths and MR scanners with different gradient hardware.
    METHODS: Cramer-Rao lower bound optimization was performed to determine optimized monopolar and motion-robust 2D (b-value and first-order motion moment [M1]) IVIM-DWI acquisitions. Eleven healthy volunteers underwent diffusion MRI of the liver, where each optimized acquisition was obtained five times across three MRI scanners. For each data set, IVIM estimates (diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficients ( d 1 * $$ {d}_1^{\\ast } $$ and d 2 * $$ {d}_2^{\\ast } $$ ), blood velocity SDs (Vb1 and Vb2), and perfusion fractions [f1 and f2]) were obtained in the right and left liver lobes using two signal models (pseudo-diffusion and M1-dependent physical) with and without T2 correction (fc1 and fc2) and three fitting techniques (tri-exponential region of interest-based full and segmented fitting and blood velocity SD distribution fitting). Reproducibility and interlobar agreement were compared across methods using within-subject and pairwise coefficients of variation (CVw and CVp), paired sample t-tests, and Bland-Altman analysis.
    RESULTS: Using a combination of motion-robust 2D (b-M1) data acquisition, M1-dependent physical signal modeling with T2 correction, and blood velocity SD distribution fitting, multiscanner reproducibility with median CVw = 5.09%, 11.3%, 9.20%, 14.2%, and 12.6% for D, Vb1, Vb2, fc1, and fc2, respectively, and interlobar agreement with CVp = 8.14%, 11.9%, 8.50%, 49.9%, and 42.0%, respectively, was achieved.
    CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed advanced IVIM acquisition, signal modeling, and fitting techniques may facilitate reproducible IVIM quantification in the liver, as needed for establishment of IVIM-based quantitative biomarkers for detection, staging, and treatment monitoring of diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高剂量率近距离放射治疗是一种用于妇科癌症的治疗技术,其中腔内涂抹器放置在患者的盆腔内。为了确保准确的辐射输送,在插入时涂药器的定位是至关重要的。这项研究提出了一种新的获取方法,注册,并融合三维(3D)经腹和3D经直肠超声(US)图像,以在妇科近距离放射治疗期间可视化盆腔解剖结构和应用器。使用定制的多模态骨盆体对工作流程进行了验证,并在两个患者程序中进行了演示。对三种类型的腔内涂抹器进行了实验:环形和串联,与间质针环状串联,和串联和卵形。融合的3DUS图像与磁共振(MR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)图像进行配准以进行验证。计算目标配准误差(TRE)和基准定位误差(FLE)以量化我们的融合技术的准确性。对于幻影和患者图像,所有模态配准的TRE和FLE(3DUS与MR或CT)导致平均值±标准偏差为4.01±1.01mm和0.43±0.24mm,分别。这项工作表明了利用3DUS成像进行进一步临床研究的概念证明,可替代的先进的方式定位近距离放射治疗施药器。
    High dose-rate brachytherapy is a treatment technique for gynecologic cancers where intracavitary applicators are placed within the patient\'s pelvic cavity. To ensure accurate radiation delivery, localization of the applicator at the time of insertion is vital. This study proposes a novel method for acquiring, registering, and fusing three-dimensional (3D) trans-abdominal and 3D trans-rectal ultrasound (US) images for visualization of the pelvic anatomy and applicators during gynecologic brachytherapy. The workflow was validated using custom multi-modal pelvic phantoms and demonstrated during two patient procedures. Experiments were performed for three types of intracavitary applicators: ring-and-tandem, ring-and-tandem with interstitial needles, and tandem-and-ovoids. Fused 3D US images were registered to magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images for validation. The target registration error (TRE) and fiducial localization error (FLE) were calculated to quantify the accuracy of our fusion technique. For both phantom and patient images, TRE and FLE across all modality registrations (3D US versus MR or CT) resulted in mean ± standard deviation of 4.01 ± 1.01 mm and 0.43 ± 0.24 mm, respectively. This work indicates proof of concept for conducting further clinical studies leveraging 3D US imaging as an accurate, accessible alternative to advanced modalities for localizing brachytherapy applicators.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹部手术被认为是发生手术部位感染(SSI)的高风险程序。很少有研究评估手术部位感染危险因素在腹部手术一致性方面的相对重要性。因此,这篇全面的综述文章绘制并总结了旨在确定腹部手术中SSIs的危险因素和发生率的相对重要性的证据。
    使用电子数据库和诸如Scopus之类的搜索引擎进行了文献综述,PubMed,和WebofScience截至2023年3月16日。研究中的论文没有语言限制。使用JoannaBriggs研究所的方法测量和评估风险因素的相对一致性。如果包括所有类型的SSIs,则包括原始同行评审的队列和病例对照研究。进行荟萃分析以确定SSI发病率的汇总估计值。
    在14,237条确定的记录中,107篇文章被纳入审查。SSI的合并发生率为10.6%(95%CI:9.02-12.55%,χ2=12986.44,P<0.001)。手术时间和较高的伤口等级是SSI发生率的显著一致的危险因素。患者的教育状况,营养不良,功能状态,和神经/精神疾病的历史都是一致的危险因素的候选人,证据不足。
    本研究的结果表明,腹部手术中的SSI是一种多因素现象,具有相当大的风险,并且具有不同的相对重要性的危险因素。强烈建议确定危险因素对预防和控制SSI的相对重要性。该手稿已在研究广场上作为预印本发布:(https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3。rs-3219597/v1)。
    UNASSIGNED: Abdominal surgery is considered a high-risk procedure for the development of surgical site infection (SSI). Few studies have evaluated the relative importance of surgical site infection risk factors in terms of consistency in abdominal surgery. Therefore, this comprehensive review article mapped and summarized the evidence aimed to determine the relative importance of the risk factors and incidence of SSIs in abdominal surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature review was conducted using electronic databases and search engines such as Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science up to March 16, 2023. There was no language restriction for the papers to be included in the study. The relative consistency of the risk factors was measured and evaluated using the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Original peer-reviewed cohort and case-control studies were included if all types of SSIs were included. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled estimates of SSI incidences.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 14,237 identified records, 107 articles were included in the review. The pooled incidence of SSI was 10.6% (95% CI: 9.02-12.55%, χ2=12986.44, P<0.001). Operative time and higher wound class were both significant consistent risk factors for SSI incidence. Patients\' educational status, malnutrition, functional status, and history of neurological/psychiatric disorders were all candidates for consistent risk factors, with insufficient evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of the present study indicated that SSI in abdominal surgery was a multifactorial phenomenon with a considerable risk and had different risk factors with various relative importance. Determining the relative importance of the risk factors for the prevention and control of SSI is strongly recommended.This manuscript has been released as a preprint at the research square: (https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3219597/v1).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在检查前臂游离皮瓣(RFFF)的燕尾皮肤切口设计用于闭合前臂伤口和进行颌面部重建的可行性。
    共27例患者分为两组。在燕尾组(n=16)中,前臂伤口主要闭合,并通过燕尾RFFF重建颌面部缺损。在常规组中(n=11),前臂伤口通过腹部或床垫缝合的皮肤移植物闭合,通过常规RFFF重建颌面部缺损。关于前臂伤口愈合时间的信息,术后住院时间,美学评估,术后至少6个月收集与前臂伤口和颌面部相关的并发症。
    燕尾组皮瓣的平均尺寸小于常规组(p=0.134),燕尾组前臂创面平均愈合时间明显短于常规组(p=0.000)。与常规组相比,燕尾组的病例较多,显示敏感性下降(p=1.000).燕尾组前臂伤口和颌面重建的美学评估显着高于常规组(p=0.000)。
    使用燕尾设计封闭前臂伤口和颌面缺损被发现是常规设计的可行替代方案。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of the dovetailing skin incision design of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for closing forearm wounds and performing maxillofacial reconstruction.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 27 patients were divided into two groups. In the dovetail group (n = 16), forearm wounds were closed primarily and maxillofacial defects were reconstructed by dovetail RFFF. In the conventional group (n = 11), forearm wounds were closed by skin grafts from the abdomen or mattress suturing, and maxillofacial defects were reconstructed by conventional RFFF. Information on the healing time of the forearm wound, length of postsurgical hospitalization, esthetic assessments, and complications associated with the forearm wound and the maxillofacial region was collected at least 6 months postoperatively.
    UNASSIGNED: The average size of the flap in the dovetail group was smaller than that in the conventional group (p = 0.134), and average healing time of the forearm wound in dovetail group was significantly shorter than that in conventional group (p = 0.000). Comparing with the conventional group, there were more cases in the dovetail group demonstrating decreased sensitivity (p = 1.000). Esthetic assessments of forearm wound and maxillofacial reconstructions in the dovetail group were significantly higher than that in the conventional group (p = 0.000).
    UNASSIGNED: Closure of forearm wounds and maxillofacial defects using dovetail design was found to be a feasible alternative to the conventional design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在通过与并行成像(PI-DWI)的单次回波平面弥散加权成像(EPICS-DWI)进行比较,来评估单次回波平面弥散加权成像(EPICS-DWI)用于胰腺评估的可行性。
    方法:这项多中心前瞻性研究包括27名未经治疗的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的连续参与者(15名男性;平均年龄,67±10年),接受胰腺协议MRI,包括PI-DWI和EPICS-DWI。两名放射科医生独立且随机地审查了高b值DWI图像,并定性地分配了总体图像质量的置信度分数。图像噪声,胰腺显眼,和PDAC显著性使用5点刻度。一位放射科医生在高b值DWI图像上测量了PDAC与胰腺的对比噪声比(CNR)和PDAC的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较PI-DWI和EPICS-DWI之间的定性和定量参数。
    结果:EPICS-DWI的总体图像质量(两个放射科医师均P<0.001)和图像噪声(两个放射科医师均P<0.001)的置信度得分高于PI-DWI。在一位放射科医生中,EPICS-DWI的胰腺显着性优于PI-DWI(P=0.02和0.06)。PI-DWI和EPICS-DWI之间的PDAC显著性相当(两个放射科医师的P>0.99)。EPICS-DWI的PDAC-胰腺CNR高于PI-DWI(P=0.02),而PI-DWI中PDAC的ADC值与EPICS-DWI中的ADC值没有显着差异(P=0.48)。
    结论:与PI-DWI相比,EPICS-DWI的图像质量和PDAC-胰腺CNR得到改善。然而,PI-DWI和EPICS-DWI之间PDAC的显著性和ADC值具有可比性。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-shot echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for pancreas assessment by comparing with single-shot echo planar DWI with parallel imaging (PI-DWI).
    METHODS: This multicenter prospective study included 27 consecutive participants with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (15 men; mean age, 67 ± 10 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol MRI including both PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed the high b-value DWI images and qualitatively assigned confidence scores for overall image quality, image noise, pancreas conspicuity, and PDAC conspicuity using a 5-point scale. One radiologist measured the PDAC-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) on high b-value DWI images and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of PDAC. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    RESULTS: The confidence scores for overall image quality (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) and image noise (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) were higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. The pancreas conspicuity was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI in one of the radiologists (P = 0.02 and 0.06). The PDAC conspicuity was comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI (P > 0.99 in both radiologists). The PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = 0.02), while the ADC value of PDAC in PI-DWI was not significantly different compared to that in EPICS-DWI (P = 0.48).
    CONCLUSIONS: The image quality and PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was improved in EPICS-DWI compared to PI-DWI. However, the conspicuity and ADC value of PDAC were comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多发病率对医疗保健服务构成了全球性挑战。这项研究旨在描述多发病的患病率,在接受大型腹部手术的当代队列患者中,常见疾病组合和结局。
    方法:这是对前瞻性,多中心,在欧洲29个国家的446家医院进行的大型腹部手术后心血管并发症的国际研究。主要结果是术后30天死亡率。次要结果指标是手术后30天内并发症的发生率。
    结果:在24,227名患者中,7006(28.9%)患有一种长期疾病,而10,486(43.9%)患有多种疾病(两种或多种长期健康状况)。最常见的疾病是原发性癌症(39.6%);高血压(37.9%);慢性肾脏疾病(17.4%);和糖尿病(15.4%)。与长期健康状况≤1的患者相比,多症患者的虚弱发生率更高。有一种长期健康状况(调整后比值比1.93(95CI1.16-3.23))和多重性(调整后比值比2.22(95CI1.35-3.64))的患者死亡率较高。衰弱和ASA身体状态3-5在有一种长期健康状况的患者中30天死亡率估计为31.7%(调整后比值比1.30(95CI1.12-1.51)),在有多种疾病的患者中30天死亡率估计为36.9%(调整后比值比1.61(95CI1.36-1.91))。接受术前医学评估的多病患者30天死亡率没有改善。
    结论:在整个欧洲的手术患者中,多症是常见的,预后较差。解决选择性和急诊患者的多发病率需要创新的策略来解决虚弱和疾病控制。这些战略的发展,整合针对整个手术路径的护理以加强当前系统,是多病人迫切需要的。有必要进行干预试验,以确定针对多症手术患者的针对性管理的有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity poses a global challenge to healthcare delivery. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of multimorbidity, common disease combinations and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
    METHODS: This was a pre-planned analysis of a prospective, multicentre, international study investigating cardiovascular complications after major abdominal surgery conducted in 446 hospitals in 29 countries across Europe. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. The secondary outcome measure was the incidence of complications within 30 days of surgery.
    RESULTS: Of 24,227 patients, 7006 (28.9%) had one long-term condition and 10,486 (43.9%) had multimorbidity (two or more long-term health conditions). The most common conditions were primary cancer (39.6%); hypertension (37.9%); chronic kidney disease (17.4%); and diabetes (15.4%). Patients with multimorbidity had a higher incidence of frailty compared with patients ≤ 1 long-term health condition. Mortality was higher in patients with one long-term health condition (adjusted odds ratio 1.93 (95%CI 1.16-3.23)) and multimorbidity (adjusted odds ratio 2.22 (95%CI 1.35-3.64)). Frailty and ASA physical status 3-5 mediated an estimated 31.7% of the 30-day mortality in patients with one long-term health condition (adjusted odds ratio 1.30 (95%CI 1.12-1.51)) and an estimated 36.9% of the 30-day mortality in patients with multimorbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.61 (95%CI 1.36-1.91)). There was no improvement in 30-day mortality in patients with multimorbidity who received pre-operative medical assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity is common and outcomes are poor among surgical patients across Europe. Addressing multimorbidity in elective and emergency patients requires innovative strategies to account for frailty and disease control. The development of such strategies, that integrate care targeting whole surgical pathways to strengthen current systems, is urgently needed for multimorbid patients. Interventional trials are warranted to determine the effectiveness of targeted management for surgical patients with multimorbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目标是开发和评估基于深度学习的合成对比增强计算机断层扫描(DL-SynCCT)在指定为非增强CT(NECT)的患者中的临床可行性。我们提出了一种弱监督学习,利用虚拟非对比CT(VNC)来开发DL-SynCCT。使用2202对回顾性收集的对比增强CT(CECT)图像以及从双能CT获取的相应VNC图像进行训练和内部验证。使用外部验证集进行临床验证,包括398名指定为真正非增强CT(NECT)的患者,来自三个研究所的多个供应商。由三名放射科医师在第一疗程中仅使用NECT并在第二疗程中另外提供DL-SynCCT进行病变检测。与CECT相比,DL-SynCCT的平均峰值信噪比(PSNR)和结构相似性指数图(SSIM)分别为43.25±0.41和0.92±0.01。使用DL-SynCCT,病变检测的合并灵敏度(72.0%至76.4%,P<0.001)和诊断置信度(3.0至3.6,P<0.001)显着增加。总之,在指定进行非增强CT扫描的患者中,将弱监督学习产生的DL-SynCCT添加到NECT中,在检测异常发现的敏感性方面显示出明显的优势。
    Our objective was to develop and evaluate the clinical feasibility of deep-learning-based synthetic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DL-SynCCT) in patients designated for nonenhanced CT (NECT). We proposed a weakly supervised learning with the utilization of virtual non-contrast CT (VNC) for the development of DL-SynCCT. Training and internal validations were performed with 2202 pairs of retrospectively collected contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images with the corresponding VNC images acquired from dual-energy CT. Clinical validation was performed using an external validation set including 398 patients designated for true nonenhanced CT (NECT), from multiple vendors at three institutes. Detection of lesions was performed by three radiologists with only NECT in the first session and an additionally provided DL-SynCCT in the second session. The mean peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index map (SSIM) of the DL-SynCCT compared to CECT were 43.25 ± 0.41 and 0.92 ± 0.01, respectively. With DL-SynCCT, the pooled sensitivity for lesion detection (72.0% to 76.4%, P < 0.001) and level of diagnostic confidence (3.0 to 3.6, P < 0.001) significantly increased. In conclusion, DL-SynCCT generated by weakly supervised learning showed significant benefit in terms of sensitivity in detecting abnormal findings when added to NECT in patients designated for nonenhanced CT scans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号