%0 Journal Article
%T PCD-CT enables contrast media reduction in abdominal imaging compared to an individualized kV-adapted contrast media injection protocol on EID-CT.
%A Hoeijmakers EJI
%A Stammen L
%A Wildberger JE
%A Eijsvoogel NG
%A Hersbach JM
%A Pernot JCJG
%A Flohr TG
%A Martens B
%A Jeukens CRLPN
%J Eur J Radiol
%V 179
%N 0
%D 2024 Oct 10
%M 39133989
%F 4.531
%R 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111680
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This study aims to demonstrate reduced iodine contrast media (CM) in routine abdominal CT scans in portal venous phase (PVP) using a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) compared to total body weight (TBW) and kV-adapted CM injection protocols on a state-of-the-art energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) while maintaining sufficient image quality (IQ).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominal PVP CT scans from an EID-CT (Nov 2022-March 2024) and a PCD-CT (Sep 2023-Dec 2023) were compared. CM parameters (total iodine load (TIL), iodine delivery rate (IDR) and dosing factor (DF)) were reported. An individualized acquisition and CM injection protocol based on TBW and kV was applied for the EID-CT and a TBW adapted CM injection protocol was used for the PCD-CT. Objective IQ was evaluated with mean attenuation (Hounsfield Units, HU), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)). Subjective IQ was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale by 2 expert readers based on diagnostic confidence.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Based on 91 EID-CT scans and 102 PCD-CT scans a TIL reduction of 20.1 % was observed for PCD-CT. PCD-CT demonstrated significantly higher SNR (9.9 ± 1.7 vs. 9.1 ± 1.8, p < 0.001) and CNR (5.1 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) compared to EID-CT. Subjective IQ assessment showed that all scans had sufficient diagnostic IQ.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>PCD-CT allows for CM reduction while providing higher SNR and CNR compared to EID-CT, using clinical individualized scan and CM injection protocols.