The KOJI AWARENESS (KA) screening test assesses motor function in humans. We aimed to analyze the correlation between age and KA screening scores and to identify the specific age at which a significant decline occurs. A total of 793 healthy participants (234 females) were interviewed for basic information on age and sex and completed the KA screening test. In addition to calculating the total score from the KA test, the scores were calculated for the neck-scapula-upper extremity-complex (NSU), trunk, and lower extremity (LE) segments. Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the validity of the test. Additionally, Bayesian linear regression was employed to estimate the change point in KA scores, facilitating the identification of a critical age associated with a notable decline in motor function. KA screening total and separate body segment scores were negatively correlated with age in both gender (for female and male, KA total score, ρ = - 0.443, ρ = - 0.344; NSU segment, ρ = - 0.431, ρ = - 0.427; trunk segment, ρ = - 0.210, ρ = - 0.473; LE segment: ρ = - 0.43, ρ = - 0.507). Furthermore, a change-point analysis using linear regression analysis showed that KA screening total scores declined sharply at the age of 49.1(95% credible interval: 37.503, 68.366). The result show that total KA scores decrease - 0.196 (95% credible interval: - 0.335,  - 0.049) for every 1 year of age increase, and for ages over 49.1, total KA scores additionally decrease - 0.255 (95% credible interval: - 0.485, - 0.054) for every 1 year of age increase. In the NSU segment, females showed a more rapid decline than males from the age of 50 years. KA screening test total scores declined sharply at the age of 49.1. These results may be useful in setting treatment goals, exercise, and lifestyle programs for age-related decline in motor function.

UNASSIGNED: Insertion of electrode catheters into the coronary sinus (CS) through the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) carries risks of pneumothorax and severe hematoma formation. This study was performed to compare the safety and feasibility of catheterization through the left cubital superficial vein versus the RIJV.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective nonrandomized study involved consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation from September 2021 to February 2023. Blind puncture techniques were used in the left cubital vein group; ultrasound-guided insertion was performed in the RIJV group. The success rates of sheath insertion and CS catheterization, the procedure and fluoroscopy times of CS cannulation, and complications were compared between groups.
UNASSIGNED: The left cubital vein group comprised 152 patients, and the RIJV group comprised 58 patients. The sheath insertion success rate was significantly lower in the cubital vein group than in the RIJV group (84.9% vs 100%, respectively; p = .0008). In the cubital vein group, blind puncture attempts failed in 20 patients; three patients developed guidewire-induced venous injury. One arterial puncture occurred in the RIJV group. After successful sheath insertion, no significant differences were observed in the CS cannulation success rate (97% vs 100%, p = .55), procedure time (median [range], 93 [51-174] vs 74 [44-129] s; p = .19), or fluoroscopy time (median [range], 66 [36-134] vs 48 [30-92] s; p = .17). No serious complications requiring procedural discontinuation occurred.
UNASSIGNED: The left cubital vein approach is practical, offering a viable alternative to the RIJV approach.

UNASSIGNED: Research indicates that mechanics differ between athletes with and without upper extremity pain; however, it is unclear which modifiable risk factors exist for throwing-related pain in softball athletes.
UNASSIGNED: To determine whether sport specialization, throwing, practice, and strength and conditioning training volumes vary between youth softball athletes with and without upper extremity pain. It was hypothesized that youth softball athletes with upper extremity pain would participate in softball year-round and have greater throwing, practice, and strength and conditioning volumes compared with those without pain.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 232 youth softball athletes from travel ball, middle school, and high school leagues were invited to complete a survey to assess pain, sport specialization, throwing, practice, and strength and conditioning training volumes. Participants were classified into upper extremity pain and no pain groups based on their survey answers. The responses were compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 101 athletes-with a mean ± SD age of 13.3 ± 2.3 years, height of 161 ± 13.4 cm, and weight of 59.8 ± 14.8 kg-completed the survey and were included for analysis. The response rate was 43.53%, with 22 athletes in the upper extremity pain group and 79 athletes in the no pain group. A significant difference was observed between hours devoted per week to off-season softball practice (U, 626.6; Z =-2; P = .045), where those without upper extremity pain spent 4 fewer median hours (6 hours) practicing softball per week in the off-season compared with those with pain (10 hours). Also, a significant difference was found between the number of throws during an in-season game (U, 457; Z, -2.28; P = .022), where those without upper extremity pain reported 21 fewer median throws (70 throws) during an in-season game compared with those with pain (91 throws). Furthermore, 77% of those who reported upper extremity pain continued to play despite their pain. There were no other significant differences between demographic characteristics, specialization, injury history, and primary position, as well as throwing, practice, and strength and conditioning volumes.
UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrates that youth softball athletes with upper extremity pain had more throws during in-season games and increased hours per week devoted to off-season practice than athletes without upper extremity pain. Our findings support the need for softball stakeholders (eg, coaches, clinicians, parents, and administrators) to engage in further research and recommendations regarding in-season pitch counts and off-season rest.

BACKGROUND: This parallel, randomized controlled trial examined intrinsic motivation, adherence and motor function improvement demonstrated by two groups of subjects that performed a 12-week, home-based upper extremity rehabilitation program. Seventeen subjects played scaffolded games, presenting eight to twelve discrete levels of increasing difficulty. Sixteen subjects performed the same activities controlled by success algorithms that modify game difficulty incrementally.
METHODS: 33 persons 20-80 years of age, at least 6 months post stroke with moderate to mild hemiparesis were randomized using a random number generator into the two groups. They were tested using the Action Research Arm Test, Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment, Stroke Impact Scale and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory pre and post training. Adherence was measured using timestamps generated by the gaming system. Subjects had the Home Virtual Rehabilitation System (Qiu in J Neuroeng Rehabil 17: 1-10, 2020) placed in their homes and were taught to perform rehabilitation games using it. Subjects were instructed to train twenty minutes per day but were allowed to train as much as they chose. Subjects trained for 12 weeks without appointments and received intermittent support from study staff. Group outcomes were compared using ANOVA. Correlations between subject demographics and adherence, as well as motor outcome, were evaluated using Pearson Correlation Coefficients.
RESULTS: There were 5 dropouts and no adverse events. The main effect of time was statistically significant for four of the five clinical outcome measures. There were no significant training group by time interactions. Measures of adherence did not differ significantly between groups. The combined groups improved their UEFMA scores on average by 5.85 (95% CI 4.73-6.98). 21 subjects from both groups demonstrating improvements in UEFMA scores of at least 5 points, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 4.25. IMI scores were stable pre to post training.
CONCLUSIONS: Scaffolding challenges during game based rehabilitation did not elicit higher levels of adherence when compared to algorithm control of game difficulty. Both sparsely supervised programs of game-based treatment in the home were sufficient to elicit statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in motor function and activities of daily living.
BACKGROUND: Clinical Trials.gov-NCT03985761, Registered June 14, 2019.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) is an emerging technique gaining interest amongst emergency physicians that provides regional anaesthesia to the upper limb to tolerate painful procedures. It offers an alternative to the more traditional technique of a Bier block (BB). However, the effectiveness or safety of UGSCB when performed in the emergency department (ED) is unclear.
METHODS: SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with upper limb fracture and/or dislocation requiring closed reduction in ED were randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part was performed and immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.
RESULTS: Primary outcome analysis will be performed using both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group difference in maximum pain intensity will be assessed using linear regression modelling with trial group allocation (UGSCB vs BB) included as a main affect. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20 mm on the VAS scale will be used to establish non-inferiority of UGSCB compared to BB.
CONCLUSIONS: SUPERB is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The trial has the potential to demonstrate that UGSCB is an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is the second leading cause of death in Europe. In the case of stroke survival (almost 70%), only 25% of patients recover completely, while the remaining 75% will undergo a rehabilitation phase that varying from months to years. The primary outcomes of a stroke involve motor impairment in the upper limbs, resulting in a partial or complete inability to move the limb on the right or left side, depending on the affected hemisphere. Furthermore, the motor deficit distorts the proprioception of the body and the embodiment ability of the injured limb. This could be rehabilitated through the paradigm of body illusion that modulates the motor rehabilitation. The present protocol aims to investigate the effectiveness of a Virtual Reality system for sensorimotor and proprioception upper limb deficit compared to a traditional upper limb rehabilitation program.
METHODS: This study has a randomized and controlled design with control and experimental groups, and 4 measurement times: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and two follow-ups (at 6 and 12 months). The inclusion criteria are: (a) Being 18 to 85 years old, both males and females; (b) Suffering from ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke; (c) The stroke event must have occurred from two to eighteen months before recruitment; (d) Patients must have moderate to severe upper limb motor deficit, and the alteration of sensorimotor and proprioception abilities of the injury upper limb; (e) Patients must understand and sign the written consent for enrolment. The rehabilitation last four weeks with three sessions per week at Bellaria Hospital of Bologna (Italy). The VR protocol uses two types of technology: immersive and non-immersive, and the control group follow the traditional rehabilitation program.

We investigate the etiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a 35-year-old woman presenting with progressive weakness in her left upper limb. Prior to sequencing, a comprehensive neurological work-up was performed, including neurological examination, electrophysiology, biomarker assessment, and brain and spinal cord MRI. Six months before evaluation, the patient experienced weakness and atrophy in her left hand, accompanied by brisk reflexes and Hoffman sign in the same arm. Electroneuromyography revealed lower motor neuron involvement in three body regions. Neurofilament light chains were elevated in her cerebrospinal fluid. Brain imaging showed asymmetrical T2 hyperintensity of the corticospinal tracts and T2 linear hypointensity of the precentral gyri. Trio genome sequencing identified a likely pathogenic de novo variant in the KIF1A gene (NM_001244008.2): c.574A>G, p.(Ile192Val). Pathogenic variants in KIF1A have been associated with a wide range of neurological manifestations called KIF1A-associated neurological diseases (KAND). This report describes a likely pathogenic de novo variant in KIF1A associated with ALS, expanding the phenotypic spectrum of KAND and our understanding of the pathophysiology of ALS.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Patient access to body-powered and myoelectric upper limb prostheses in the United States is often restricted by a healthcare system that prioritizes prosthesis prescription based on cost and perceived value. Although this system operates on an underlying assumption that design differences between these prostheses leads to relative advantages and disadvantages of each device, there is limited empirical evidence to support this view.
METHODS: This commentary article will review a series of studies conducted by our research team with the goal of differentiating how prosthesis design might impact user performance on a variety of interrelated domains. Our central hypothesis is that the design and actuation method of body-powered and myoelectric prostheses might affect users\' ability to access sensory feedback and account for device properties when planning movements. Accordingly, other domains that depend on these abilities may also be affected. While our work demonstrated some differences in availability of sensory feedback based on prosthesis design, this did not result in consistent differences in prosthesis embodiment, movement accuracy, movement quality, and overall kinematic patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our findings suggest that performance may not necessarily depend on prosthesis design, allowing users to be successful with either device type depending on the circumstances. Prescription practices should rely more on individual needs and preferences than cost or prosthesis design. However, we acknowledge that there remains a dearth of evidence to inform decision-making and that an expanded research focus in this area will be beneficial.

Background: Current treatments with urate-lowering therapy (ULT) are effective for most patients with gout. However, approximately 10% of these patients do not respond well to ULT and develop chronic tophus lesions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery involving the shaver technique against chronic tophus lesions. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included 217 patients who had cumulatively undergone 303 shaver-assisted procedures between 2002 and 2018. Surgical outcomes were assessed in terms of the length of hospital stay (LOS) and wound healing time. Results: LOS and wound healing time were longer in patients with a preoperative tophus infection and lower extremity lesions than in those without infection and with upper extremity lesions (respectively, LOS: 12.7 vs. 8.6 days; wound healing time: 22.7 vs. 16.3 days). However, factors such as age, sex, body mass index, renal function, or uricemia level exerted no significant effect on surgical outcomes. Conclusion: Surgery involving the shaver technique should be performed before tophus infection. Clinical outcomes tend to be better for upper extremity lesions than for lower extremity lesions.