Tislelizumab

tislelizumab
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估低剂量吉西他滨和节拍卡培他滨联合tislelizumab治疗复发或转移性鼻咽癌(RM-NPC)患者的有效性和安全性。
    方法:本回顾性研究,观察性研究纳入了RM-NPC患者,这些患者在2019年3月至2023年8月期间曾接受过抗PD-1治疗,随后接受了tislelizumab以及低剂量吉西他滨和节拍卡培他滨治疗.使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计无进展生存期(PFS)。
    结果:在25名符合条件的患者中,8(20%)取得完整反响(CR)。客观反应率(ORR)为68%,疾病控制率(DCR)为80%。1年PFS率为78%。所有患者都经历了治疗相关的不良事件,都是1级或2级。
    结论:tislelizumab与低剂量吉西他滨和节拍卡培他滨的组合在先前抗PD-1治疗失败的RM-NPC患者中显示了有希望的抗肿瘤效果,具有可管理的安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine in combination with tislelizumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) who have previously received other anti-PD-1 therapies.
    METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included patients with RM-NPC who had prior treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy and subsequently received tislelizumab along with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine between March 2019 and August 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    RESULTS: Among 25 eligible patients, 8 (20%) achieved a complete response (CR). The objective response rate (ORR) was 68%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%. The 1-year PFS rate was 78%. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were all grade 1 or 2.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tislelizumab with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine demonstrated promising antitumor effectiveness in RM-NPC patients who had failed previous anti-PD-1 therapy, with a manageable safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:慢性非特异性唇炎是一种复杂的疾病,其特征是持续的嘴唇脱皮和不适。该病例报告探讨了患有舌鳞状细胞癌病史并随后进行Tislelizumab治疗的患者的临床进展。表现为持久的嘴唇脱皮。
    方法:患者有舌鳞状细胞癌(T2N0M0)病史,用化疗治疗,手术,和Tislelizumab,出现六个月的持续唇脱皮。临床检查显示慢性非特异性唇炎伴感染性角性唇炎(口腔念珠菌病)的明显特征。量身定制的治疗计划,强调口腔卫生习惯和局部治疗碳酸氢钠,他克莫司软膏,和金霉素软膏.后续访问显示持续改善,强调个性化方法的重要性。
    结论:该病例强调了识别和管理有癌症和免疫治疗史的患者口腔表现的重要性。患者对治疗的反应表明,采用多方面的方法,将局部治疗与生活方式的改变相结合,可以有效治疗与免疫治疗相关的慢性非特异性唇炎。例行随访预约,以个性化医疗原则为指导,有助于持续的患者福祉。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic nonspecific cheilitis is a complex condition characterized by persistent lip peeling and discomfort. This case report explores the clinical progression of a patient with history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma and subsequent Tislelizumab treatment, presenting with persistent lip peeling.
    METHODS: A patient with a history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (T2N0M0), treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and Tislelizumab, presented with six months of persistent lip peeling. Clinical examination revealed distinct features of chronic nonspecific cheilitis with infectious angular cheilitis (Oral Candidiasis). A tailored treatment plan, emphasizing oral hygiene practices and local treatments with Sodium Bicarbonate, Tacrolimus ointment, and Chlortetracycline ointment. Follow-up visits demonstrated sustained improvement, highlighting the significance of individualized approaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of recognizing and managing oral manifestations in patients with a history of cancer and immunotherapy. The patient\'s response to treatment suggests that a multifaceted approach, combining local therapy with lifestyle modifications, can be effective in managing chronic nonspecific cheilitis associated with immunotherapy. Routine follow-up appointments, guided by personalized medicine principles, contribute to sustained patient well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Tislelizumab是中国第一个在二线或三线治疗晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中表现出优异疗效的PD-1抑制剂。本研究旨在从中国医疗保健系统的角度评估tislelizumab与多西他赛的成本效益。
    开发了一种动态马尔可夫模型来评估tislelizumab与多西他赛在二线或三线治疗中的成本效益。模型中使用的疗效数据来自RATIONAL-303临床试验,而成本和效用值是从药物数据服务平台和已发表的研究中获得的。该模型的主要结果包括质量调整生命年(QALYs),成本,和增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析,以验证基本情况分析结果的鲁棒性。
    与多西他赛组相比,tislelizumab组的成本增加了117,473元,增加了0.58个QALY,导致每QALY获得202,927元人民币的ICER值。
    在晚期或转移性NSCLC患者中使用tislelizumab不仅延长了无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。此外,这种治疗在中国人群中表现出良好的成本效益.
    UNASSIGNED: Tislelizumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor in China to demonstrate superior efficacy in second-line or third-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab compared to docetaxel from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: A dynamic Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in comparison to docetaxel in second or third-line treatment. The efficacy data utilized in the model were derived from the RATIONALE-303 clinical trial, while cost and utility values were obtained from the drug data service platform and published studies. The primary outcomes of the model encompassed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to validate the robustness of the base case analysis results.
    UNASSIGNED: The tislelizumab group demonstrated a cost increase of CNY 117,473 and a gain of 0.58 QALYs compared to the docetaxel group, resulting in an ICER value of CNY 202,927 per QALY gained.
    UNASSIGNED: The administration of tislelizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC not only extends the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, this treatment demonstrates a favorable cost-effectiveness profile across the Chinese population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    RATIONALE-306研究表明,晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者可以从tisleizumab联合化疗治疗中受益。本研究旨在从中国医疗系统的角度评估tislelizumab联合化疗治疗OSCC的成本效益。分区生存模型使用RATIONAL-306数据评估了tislelizumab联合化疗与单独化疗治疗OSCC的成本效益。成本和公用事业是从当地数据库和已发表的研究中获得的。Costs,质量调整寿命年(QALYs),生命年,增量成本效益比(ICER),增量净健康福利(INHB),和增量净货币收益(INMB)是结果。价格模拟是在支付意愿(WTP)阈值下进行的。进行敏感性和亚组分析以评估模型的稳健性。与单纯化疗相比,tislelizumab加化疗的ICER为27,896美元/QALY,获得了额外的0.414QALY和0.751寿命年,并增加了11,560美元的费用。概率敏感性分析显示,在WTP为38,258美元/QALY时,tislelizumab联合化疗具有成本效益,概率为94.43%。当中国的价格低于3.714美元/毫克时,价格模拟结果表明,在38,258美元的WTP阈值下,tislelizumab联合化疗具有成本效益.Tislelizumab联合化疗产生的INHB为0.112QALYs和INMB为4,279美元,而WTP阈值为38,258美元的单独化疗。根据敏感性分析,以上结果稳定。对于具有更好的生存效益的亚组,观察到了总体趋势,这与成本效益的可能性更高有关。从中国医疗保健的角度来看,作为OSCC的一线治疗,tislelizumab联合化疗比单纯化疗更具成本效益.这些发现可以帮助临床医生做出最佳的临床决策,并帮助决策者评估tislelizumab在临床实践中的成本效益。
    The RATIONALE-306 study revealed that patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) could benefit from treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for treating OSCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Partitioned survival model estimated the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for treating OSCC using RATIONALE-306 data. Costs and utilities were obtained from local databases and published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) were outcomes. Price simulation were conducted at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Compared with chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an ICER of USD 27,896/QALY, gained an additional 0.414 QALYs and 0.751 life-years, and increased the cost by USD 11,560. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at the WTP of USD 38,258/QALY with probability of 94.43%. When the price in China was less than USD 3.714 per mg, the price simulation results indicated that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an INHB of 0.112 QALYs and an INMB of USD 4,279 compared with chemotherapy alone at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Based on the sensitivity analyses, the above results were stable. A general trend was observed for subgroups with better survival benefits related to a higher probability of cost-effectiveness. From the Chinese healthcare perspective, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy for OSCC. These findings can help clinicians make optimal clinical decisions and assist decision-makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫治疗联合新辅助化疗和同步放化疗(CCRT)治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌(LA-NPC)的疗效尚未见报道。这项研究回顾性比较了tislelizumab联合新辅助化疗和CCRT与新辅助化疗后CCRT的疗效。
    方法:2020年1月至2021年3月在广东医科大学附属医院确诊90例III-IVa期鼻咽癌患者。观察组(OG)43例患者接受替他利珠单抗联合纳米白蛋白-紫杉醇-顺铂(nab-TP)方案,其次是CCRT,而对照组(CG)的47例患者接受nab-TP方案,然后接受CCRT。
    结果:与CG相比,OG新辅助治疗后的完全缓解率明显更高(37.2%vs.12.8%)。OG的客观反应率为88.4%,CG为70.2%。OG和CG患者的3年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为93.0%和78.7%,分别为(P=0.04,HR=0.31)。OG和CG的总生存率(OS)分别为95.3%和87.2%,分别为(P=0.15,HR=0.36)。OG的局部无复发生存率(LRFS)为90.7%,CG为72.3%(P=0.04,HR=0.38),OG的无远处转移生存率(DMFS)为95.3%,CG为80.9%(P=0.04,HR=0.30)。对于PD-L1高表达和低表达率,3年PFS分别为89.2%和85.7%(P=0.77,HR=1.21),OS率分别为90.2%和89.2%(P=0.65,HR=1.36),分别。
    结论:Tislelizumab联合新辅助化疗和CCRT在LA-NPC患者中与标准治疗相比具有令人鼓舞的治疗效果和良好的耐受性。
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immunotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been reported. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CCRT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT.
    METHODS: Ninety patients with stages III-IVa NPC were identified between January 2020 and March 2021 at the Affiliate Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. Forty-three patients in the observation group (OG) received tislelizumab plus nano albumin-paclitaxel and cisplatin (nab-TP) regimen, followed by CCRT, while forty-seven patients in the control group (CG) received nab-TP regimen followed by CCRT.
    RESULTS: The complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the OG compared to the CG (37.2% vs. 12.8 %). The objective response rates were 88.4 % in the OG and 70.2 % in the CG. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for OG and CG patients were 93.0 % and 78.7 %, respectively (P = 0.04, HR = 0.31). The overall survival (OS) rates for the OG and the CG were 95.3 % and 87.2 %, respectively (P = 0.15, HR = 0.36). Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were 90.7 % for the OG and 72.3 % for the CG (P = 0.04, HR = 0.38), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 95.3 % for the OG, and 80.9 % for the CG (P = 0.04, HR = 0.30). For PD-L1 high-expression and low-expression rates, the 3-year PFS rates were 89.2 % and 85.7 % (P = 0.77, HR = 1.21), and the OS rates were 90.2 % and 89.2 % (P = 0.65, HR = 1.36), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CCRT showed encouraging therapeutic effects and good tolerability in patients with LA-NPC compared to the standard treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)的共感染发生在5-67%的HIV患者中。HIV会削弱人体免疫系统并导致各种肿瘤。不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)和HIV患者的治疗效果较差,生存期短。由于疾病的微妙发作,大约70%的HCC病例在晚期被诊断。因此,大多数病例不适合治愈性治疗。经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)是中晚期肝癌的一线治疗方法,在中国通常用于治疗不可切除的肝癌。系统治疗的最新进展显着提高了不可切除的HCC治疗的有效性。先前的几项研究表明,联合治疗联合治疗可以增强疗效。值得注意的是,研究表明,TACE联合靶向药物与免疫检查点抑制剂可获得较高的客观缓解率和总生存率.然而,这项研究的新颖之处在于其报告了在HIV和HCC合并主干门静脉肿瘤血栓的患者中使用三联疗法获得完全缓解。
    一名57岁的妇女被诊断为HCC,主要主干门静脉癌栓合并HIV感染,肝硬化,和慢性病毒性肝炎。她接受了TACE,并接受了多纳非尼和tislelizumab。根据基于对比增强计算机断层扫描的改良的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST),该三联疗法治疗方案可产生临床完全反应。
    我们首先将TACE联合多纳非尼和tislelizumab用于合并主干门静脉癌栓和HIV-HBV合并感染的HCC患者,并获得完全缓解。
    UNASSIGNED: Coinfection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) occurs in 5-67% of patients with HIV. HIV weakens the human immune system and leads to various tumors. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HIV experience poor treatment efficacy and have a short survival period. Approximately 70% of cases of HCC are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle onset of the disease. As a result, most cases are not suits for curative therapy. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC and is commonly used to treat unresectable HCC in China. Recent advancements in systemic treatments have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of unresectable HCC treatment. Several previous study showed that combination treatment combination therapy can enhance the efficacy. Notably, studies proposed that TACE combined targeted drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high objective response rate and overall survival. However, the novelty of this study lies in its report of a complete response using a triple combination in patients with HIV and HCC with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus.
    UNASSIGNED: A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with HCC with a main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus combined with HIV infection, cirrhosis, and chronic viral hepatitis. She underwent TACE and was administered donafenib and tislelizumab. This triple therapy treatment regimen resulted in a clinical complete response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    UNASSIGNED: We first used TACE combined with donafenib and tislelizumab for HCC patients with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus and HIV-HBV coinfection and achieved complete response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    鼻窦鳞状细胞癌(SNSCC)是最常见的,高侵袭性鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤在过去十年中保持相对稳定的不良结局.作为SNSCC的一线治疗,建议手术加辅助放疗。然而,由于鼻腔和鼻窦靠近眼眶或颅内等关键结构,因此可能不适合进行完整的手术切除。目前,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已被确立为许多不可切除阶段实体瘤的一线治疗方法之一.然而,关于ICIs在鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤中疗效的证据很少,目前尚无ICIs被批准用于SNSCC.在这份报告中,我们报告一例64岁的男性SNSCC患者通过多方案探查治疗.患者在接受两个周期的多西他赛和顺铂联合tislelizumab后达到病理完全缓解(pCR)。据我们所知,这是首例使用tislelizumab治疗的SNSCC获得pCR的病例.该病例提供了现实世界的证据,表明化学疗法加免疫疗法是SNSCC的有希望的治疗方法。
    Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is the most common, high-aggressive sinonasal malignancies that have remained relatively stable poor outcomes over the past decade. As a first-line treatment for SNSCC, surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended. However, complete surgical resection may not be appropriate due to the proximity of the nasal cavity and sinuses to key structures such as orbit or intracranial. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as one of the first-line therapies for many solid tumors with unresectable stage. However, evidence on the efficacy of ICIs in sinonasal malignancy is scarce and no ICIs are approved for use in SNSCC up to day. In this report, we report a case of a 64-year-old man with SNSCC treated by multi-protocol exploration. The patient achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after receiving two cycles of Docetaxel and cisplatin combined with tislelizumab. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SNSCC treated with tislelizumab that achieved pCR. This case offers real-world evidence that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy is a promising treatment for SNSCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    壶腹周围癌是一种起源于胰头的恶性胃肠道肿瘤,远端胆管,十二指肠,或者Vater的壶腹.目前,手术仍然是主要的治疗选择,然而术后复发率仍然很高。化疗是控制术后复发的主要方法。组织学上,壶腹周围癌分为两种类型:肠(IN)和胰胆管(PB)亚型。每种亚型都需要不同的治疗方法,PB型主要用吉西他滨治疗,IN型主要用5-FU治疗。尽管有这些选择,患者预后仍不令人满意.近年来,免疫治疗在肿瘤治疗中的可行性已日益得到证实,尽管其在壶腹周围癌治疗中的疗效研究仍然有限。在这份报告中,我们介绍了一例壶腹周围癌患者,该患者在接受根治性胰十二指肠切除术并在术后接受以吉西他滨为基础的化疗后出现复发和转移.通过下一代测序(NGS),我们鉴定了高表达水平的程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1),其联合阳性评分(CPS)为35,高肿瘤突变负荷(TMB-H),该患者的微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H)很高。因此,我们实施了使用Tislelizumab和化疗的联合治疗.根据最新的随访,肿瘤得到有效控制。我们使用免疫疗法结合化疗对壶腹周围癌的治疗具有重要意义。
    Periampullary carcinoma is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor originating from the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct, duodenum, or the ampulla of Vater. Currently, surgery remains the primary treatment option, yet the postoperative recurrence rate remains high. Chemotherapy is the main approach for controlling postoperative recurrence. Histologically, periampullary carcinoma is categorized into two types: intestinal (IN) and pancreaticobiliary (PB) subtype. Each subtype requires different therapeutic approaches, with the PB type primarily treated with gemcitabine and the IN type with 5-FU. Despite these options, patient outcomes are still unsatisfactory. In recent years, the feasibility of immunotherapy in tumor treatment has been increasingly evidenced, although research on its efficacy in periampullary carcinoma treatment is still limited. In this report, we present a case of a periampullary carcinoma patient who experienced recurrence and metastasis after undergoing radical pancreatoduodenectomy and receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy post-surgery. Through next-generation sequencing (NGS), we identified high expression levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with a combined positive score (CPS) of 35, high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H), and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in this patient. Therefore, we implemented a combination therapy using Tislelizumab and chemotherapy. According to the latest follow-up, the tumors are effectively controlled. Our utilization of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy holds significant implication for the treatment of periampullary carcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    组织细胞肉瘤(HS)是一种极为罕见但侵袭性的造血系统恶性肿瘤,据报道,预后相当不利,中位总生存期仅为6个月。我们介绍了一名58岁的女性患者,抱怨腹痛和发烧,他在2021年9月被我们的机构录取。氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)扫描显示广泛的多个淋巴结肿大。随后,行腹腔镜腹膜后病变活检和骨髓抽吸术。病理提示HS合并滤泡性淋巴瘤。肿瘤病变的免疫组织化学(IHC)染色显示CD38和PD-L1蛋白的高表达。此外,通过下一代测序鉴定KRAS基因突变。患者对一线和二线细胞毒性化疗均表现出较差的治疗反应。因此,她接受了六个周期的Daratumumab(抗CD38单克隆抗体),帕唑帕尼(多靶点受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)联合三线化疗,随后是受累部位放疗和PD-1抑制剂Tislelizumab维持治疗.经过多模式治疗,最终实现了长期部分缓解。缓解时间和总生存期达到22和32个月,分别。我们的病例表明,免疫靶向治疗与化疗和放疗相结合可能是HS的潜在治疗选择。
    Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare but aggressive hematopoietic malignancy, and the prognosis has been reported to be rather unfavorable with a median overall survival of merely 6 months. We presented a 58-year-old female patient complaining of abdominal pain and fever, who was admitted to our institution in September 2021. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scan showed enlargement of generalized multiple lymph nodes. Subsequently, laparoscopic retroperitoneal lesion biopsy and bone marrow aspiration were performed. The pathological findings indicated the diagnosis of HS concurrent with follicular lymphoma. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of the tumor lesion revealed a high expression of CD38 and PD-L1 proteins. Furthermore, KRAS gene mutation was identified by means of next-generation sequencing. The patient exhibited poor treatment response to both first- and second-line cytotoxic chemotherapies. Therefore, she underwent six cycles of Daratumumab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody), Pazopanib (multi-target receptor tyrosine kinases inhibitor) combined with third-line chemotherapy, followed by involved-site radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with the PD-1 inhibitor Tislelizumab. Long-term partial remission was finally achieved after multi-modality treatment. Duration of remission and overall survival reached 22 and 32 months, respectively. Our case indicated that immuno-targeted treatment coupled with chemotherapy and radiotherapy might constitute a potential therapeutic option for HS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管经尿道切除了膀胱肿瘤(TURBT),然后进行了膀胱内芽孢杆菌-卡介苗(BCG),高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(HR-NMIBC)与高复发率和进展率相关.免疫检查点抑制剂可以提高膀胱癌的抗肿瘤活性,但HR-NMIBC的相关证据有限。因此,我们评估了基于tislelizumab的联合方案在HR-NMIBC中的疗效和安全性.
    方法:一项回顾性研究包括2020年7月至2022年9月期间诊断为HR-NMIBC的21例患者。所有患者均接受TURBT,然后进行tislelizumab加BCG联合或不联合吉西他滨/顺铂(GC)化疗。关于人口统计学和特征的临床数据,治疗信息,结果,和安全性进行了收集和分析。
    结果:在21例HR-NMIBC患者中,中位年龄为63岁(范围39-85岁),大多数患者为T1期(16/21,76.19%)。tislelizumab的中位治疗为5个周期(范围1-12),BCG滴注的中位次数为12次(范围2-19)。在21名患者中,15人(71.43%)接受GC联合化疗,中位治疗2个周期(范围0-7);其他没有。总的来说,中位随访25个月(范围7-31)后,估计的2年无膀胱复发生存率为78.64%(95%置信区间[CI],50.79-91.83%),2年无膀胱切除术生存率为83.00%(95%CI53.53-94.59%),2年无病生存率为73.39%(95%CI46.14~88.36%)。16例T1期患者2年无远处转移生存率为95.45%(95%CI71.87-99.34%)。14例(66.67%)患者经历了至少一种治疗相关的AE(TRAEs),3-4级的9.52%(2/21)。≥3级的TRAEs分别为垂体炎(1/21,4.76%)和肌无力(1/21,4.76%)。没有观察到治疗相关的死亡。
    结论:该研究显示了基于tislelizumab的联合方案作为HR-NMIBC的膀胱保留治疗的有希望的临床益处和可控制的安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Despite adequate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical bacillus-calmette guérin (BCG), high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) is associated with high rates of recurrence and progression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve antitumor activity in bladder cancer, but relevant evidence in HR-NMIBC is limited. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the tislelizumab-based combination regimen in HR-NMIBC.
    METHODS: A retrospective study included 21 patients diagnosed with HR-NMIBC between July 2020 and September 2022. All patients underwent TURBT followed by combination regimens of tislelizumab plus BCG with or without gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. Clinical Data on demographics and characteristics, treatment information, outcomes, and safety were collected and analyzed.
    RESULTS: Among the 21 patients with HR-NMIBC, the median age was 63 years (range 39-85), with the majority of patients with stage T1 (16/21, 76.19%). The median treatment of tislelizumab was 5 cycles (range 1-12) and the median number of BCG instillations was 12 times (range 2-19). Of the 21 patients, 15 (71.43%) received combination chemotherapy with GC, with a median treatment of 2 cycles (range 0-7); others did not. Overall, after the median follow-up of 25 months (range 7-31), the estimated 2-year bladder recurrence-free survival rate was 78.64% (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 50.79-91.83%), 2-year cystectomy-free survival rate was 83.00% (95% CI 53.53-94.59%), and 2-year disease-free survival rate was 73.39% (95% CI 46.14-88.36%). Sixteen stage T1 patients achieved a distant metastasis-free survival rate of 95.45% (95% CI 71.87-99.34%) at 2 years. Fourteen (66.67%) patients experienced at least one treatment related-AEs (TRAEs), with 9.52% (2/21) of grade 3-4. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were hypophysitis (1/21, 4.76%) and myasthenia (1/21, 4.76%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated promising clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile of tislelizumab-based combination regimen as a bladder-sparing treatment of HR-NMIBC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号