UNASSIGNED: The prognosis of microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) following failure of multi-line therapy remains dismal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T treatment) for MSS-CRCLM which failed from multiple-line therapy.
UNASSIGNED: From February 2021 to June 2023, 45 patients with MSS-CRCLM after failure of multiple-line therapy who received HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T triple treatment) were enrolled. The combination therapy included HAIC regimens with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil on days 1-2, intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg) before HAIC on day 1, and oral fruquintinb (3 mg/d) on day 3-21, every 4 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
UNASSIGNED: The follow-up ended on June 22, 2024, with a median follow-up time of 17.5 months. The objective response rate was 42.2%, and the disease control rate was 82.2%. The median OS was 15.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:12.634-17.966), and the median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI:5.318-9.682). The independent risk factors related to worse OS were previous PD-1 immunotherapy (P = 0.021) and the number of HAIC-F-T triple treatment cycles of ≤ 2 (P = 0.007). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 20%, with the most frequent grade 3 or higher AEs being abdominal pain (3/45, 6.7%).
UNASSIGNED: HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab may be an alternative salvage treatment for patients with MSS-CRCLM following failure of multiple-line therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study evaluated the individual benefits of tislelizumab and surgery, as well as their synergistic effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
METHODS: From September 2019 to June 2022, all participants with potentially resectable NSCLC who received chemotherapy (C) or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (T) were included in the study. Participants were categorized into four groups based on surgery or not (S or NS) and the utilization of tislelizumab (T or C). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Compared to C, T was associated with significantly higher objective response rate (64.54% vs. 34.78%, p = 0.003), higher pathological complete response rate (40.00% vs. 14.06%, p = 0.007), and higher major pathological response rate (60.00% vs. 20.31%, p < 0.001). The T + S group exhibited a proportionately higher reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared to the sum of the T + NS group and C + S group. Regardless of C or T, surgery was associated with improved OS (p < 0.01). Without surgery, T did not show significant improvement in PFS or OS. However, with surgery, T significantly improved both PFS and OS (ps < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab with subsequent surgery synergistically improves the survival benefits in patients with NSCLC.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (TACE-Len-T) versus TACE plus lenvatinib (TACE-Len) as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included 136 uHCC patients treated with TACE-Len-T or TACE-Len from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. The risk factors affecting OS and PFS were also analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The median OS and PFS of the TACE-Len-T group were significantly longer than those of the TACE-Len group (Median OS: not reached vs 13.8 months, P<0.001; Median PFS: 13.0 months vs 2.7 months, P<0.001). The best overall objective response rate (ORR) was also better with TACE-Len-T treatment (ORR: 72.1% vs 29.4%, P<0.001), and the disease control rate (DCR) significantly increased in the TACE-Len-T group (88.2% vs 48.5%, P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that TACE-Len treatment, tumor number >3, and cTACE were independent risk factors for OS, whereas TACE-Len treatment was the only independent risk factor for PFS. The frequency and severity of AEs in the TACE-Len-T group were comparable to those in the TACE-Len group (any grade: 92.6% vs 91.2%, P=0.753; grade 3 or 4: 33.8% vs 32.3%, P=0.855).
UNASSIGNED: TACE-Len-T treatment significantly improved OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR over TACE-Len treatment, with a manageable safety profile in uHCC.

BACKGROUND: Chronic nonspecific cheilitis is a complex condition characterized by persistent lip peeling and discomfort. This case report explores the clinical progression of a patient with history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma and subsequent Tislelizumab treatment, presenting with persistent lip peeling.
METHODS: A patient with a history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (T2N0M0), treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and Tislelizumab, presented with six months of persistent lip peeling. Clinical examination revealed distinct features of chronic nonspecific cheilitis with infectious angular cheilitis (Oral Candidiasis). A tailored treatment plan, emphasizing oral hygiene practices and local treatments with Sodium Bicarbonate, Tacrolimus ointment, and Chlortetracycline ointment. Follow-up visits demonstrated sustained improvement, highlighting the significance of individualized approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of recognizing and managing oral manifestations in patients with a history of cancer and immunotherapy. The patient\'s response to treatment suggests that a multifaceted approach, combining local therapy with lifestyle modifications, can be effective in managing chronic nonspecific cheilitis associated with immunotherapy. Routine follow-up appointments, guided by personalized medicine principles, contribute to sustained patient well-being.

UNASSIGNED: Tislelizumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor in China to demonstrate superior efficacy in second-line or third-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab compared to docetaxel from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.
UNASSIGNED: A dynamic Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in comparison to docetaxel in second or third-line treatment. The efficacy data utilized in the model were derived from the RATIONALE-303 clinical trial, while cost and utility values were obtained from the drug data service platform and published studies. The primary outcomes of the model encompassed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to validate the robustness of the base case analysis results.
UNASSIGNED: The tislelizumab group demonstrated a cost increase of CNY 117,473 and a gain of 0.58 QALYs compared to the docetaxel group, resulting in an ICER value of CNY 202,927 per QALY gained.
UNASSIGNED: The administration of tislelizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC not only extends the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, this treatment demonstrates a favorable cost-effectiveness profile across the Chinese population.

The RATIONALE-306 study revealed that patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) could benefit from treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for treating OSCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Partitioned survival model estimated the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for treating OSCC using RATIONALE-306 data. Costs and utilities were obtained from local databases and published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) were outcomes. Price simulation were conducted at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Compared with chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an ICER of USD 27,896/QALY, gained an additional 0.414 QALYs and 0.751 life-years, and increased the cost by USD 11,560. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at the WTP of USD 38,258/QALY with probability of 94.43%. When the price in China was less than USD 3.714 per mg, the price simulation results indicated that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an INHB of 0.112 QALYs and an INMB of USD 4,279 compared with chemotherapy alone at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Based on the sensitivity analyses, the above results were stable. A general trend was observed for subgroups with better survival benefits related to a higher probability of cost-effectiveness. From the Chinese healthcare perspective, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy for OSCC. These findings can help clinicians make optimal clinical decisions and assist decision-makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immunotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been reported. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CCRT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT.
METHODS: Ninety patients with stages III-IVa NPC were identified between January 2020 and March 2021 at the Affiliate Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. Forty-three patients in the observation group (OG) received tislelizumab plus nano albumin-paclitaxel and cisplatin (nab-TP) regimen, followed by CCRT, while forty-seven patients in the control group (CG) received nab-TP regimen followed by CCRT.
RESULTS: The complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the OG compared to the CG (37.2% vs. 12.8 %). The objective response rates were 88.4 % in the OG and 70.2 % in the CG. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for OG and CG patients were 93.0 % and 78.7 %, respectively (P = 0.04, HR = 0.31). The overall survival (OS) rates for the OG and the CG were 95.3 % and 87.2 %, respectively (P = 0.15, HR = 0.36). Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were 90.7 % for the OG and 72.3 % for the CG (P = 0.04, HR = 0.38), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 95.3 % for the OG, and 80.9 % for the CG (P = 0.04, HR = 0.30). For PD-L1 high-expression and low-expression rates, the 3-year PFS rates were 89.2 % and 85.7 % (P = 0.77, HR = 1.21), and the OS rates were 90.2 % and 89.2 % (P = 0.65, HR = 1.36), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CCRT showed encouraging therapeutic effects and good tolerability in patients with LA-NPC compared to the standard treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Coinfection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) occurs in 5-67% of patients with HIV. HIV weakens the human immune system and leads to various tumors. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HIV experience poor treatment efficacy and have a short survival period. Approximately 70% of cases of HCC are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle onset of the disease. As a result, most cases are not suits for curative therapy. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC and is commonly used to treat unresectable HCC in China. Recent advancements in systemic treatments have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of unresectable HCC treatment. Several previous study showed that combination treatment combination therapy can enhance the efficacy. Notably, studies proposed that TACE combined targeted drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high objective response rate and overall survival. However, the novelty of this study lies in its report of a complete response using a triple combination in patients with HIV and HCC with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus.
UNASSIGNED: A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with HCC with a main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus combined with HIV infection, cirrhosis, and chronic viral hepatitis. She underwent TACE and was administered donafenib and tislelizumab. This triple therapy treatment regimen resulted in a clinical complete response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
UNASSIGNED: We first used TACE combined with donafenib and tislelizumab for HCC patients with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus and HIV-HBV coinfection and achieved complete response.

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is the most common, high-aggressive sinonasal malignancies that have remained relatively stable poor outcomes over the past decade. As a first-line treatment for SNSCC, surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended. However, complete surgical resection may not be appropriate due to the proximity of the nasal cavity and sinuses to key structures such as orbit or intracranial. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as one of the first-line therapies for many solid tumors with unresectable stage. However, evidence on the efficacy of ICIs in sinonasal malignancy is scarce and no ICIs are approved for use in SNSCC up to day. In this report, we report a case of a 64-year-old man with SNSCC treated by multi-protocol exploration. The patient achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after receiving two cycles of Docetaxel and cisplatin combined with tislelizumab. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SNSCC treated with tislelizumab that achieved pCR. This case offers real-world evidence that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy is a promising treatment for SNSCC.

Periampullary carcinoma is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor originating from the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct, duodenum, or the ampulla of Vater. Currently, surgery remains the primary treatment option, yet the postoperative recurrence rate remains high. Chemotherapy is the main approach for controlling postoperative recurrence. Histologically, periampullary carcinoma is categorized into two types: intestinal (IN) and pancreaticobiliary (PB) subtype. Each subtype requires different therapeutic approaches, with the PB type primarily treated with gemcitabine and the IN type with 5-FU. Despite these options, patient outcomes are still unsatisfactory. In recent years, the feasibility of immunotherapy in tumor treatment has been increasingly evidenced, although research on its efficacy in periampullary carcinoma treatment is still limited. In this report, we present a case of a periampullary carcinoma patient who experienced recurrence and metastasis after undergoing radical pancreatoduodenectomy and receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy post-surgery. Through next-generation sequencing (NGS), we identified high expression levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with a combined positive score (CPS) of 35, high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H), and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in this patient. Therefore, we implemented a combination therapy using Tislelizumab and chemotherapy. According to the latest follow-up, the tumors are effectively controlled. Our utilization of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy holds significant implication for the treatment of periampullary carcinoma.