我们分析了峰值1-,在丹麦超级联赛连续三个赛季的比赛中,2分钟和5分钟以及相关的5分钟恢复期。使用半自动多摄像机系统收集高速运行距离(≥5.5m/s;HSRD),冲刺距离(≥7.0m/s;SpD)和剧烈加速时的距离(≥3m/s2;AccD)。使用滚动平均值进行分析,包括479名球员和6042至9671名比赛观察。高峰时段每分钟覆盖的距离明显高于比赛平均值:HSRD(207-772%),SpD(447-1793%),和应计(383-1096%)。在1分钟恢复期内,每分钟覆盖的距离低于峰值1-之后的HSRD的匹配平均值,2-和5-min周期(29%,6%,3%,2%,2%;35%,11%,0%,2%,3%;和45%,29%,13%,8%,4%;p<0.05),对于SpD(20%,3%,7%,3%(第5分钟高出4%);24%,12%,3%,0%,7%;和39%,29%,18%,17%,12%;p<0.05)。相反,AccD在峰值1-之后的随后1分钟恢复期中增加,2-和5-min周期(68%,89%,94%,88%,90%;47%,86%,93%,90%,88%;23%,56%,76%,85%,87%;p<0.05)与匹配平均值相比。在较短的时期内强度较高,而HSRD和SpD的性能下降在较长的高峰时段后最大,而AccD中没有观察到下降。
We analysed peak 1-, 2- and 5-min periods and the associated 5-min recovery period in matches from three consecutive seasons in the Danish Superliga. A semi-automatic multicamera system was used to collect high-speed running distance (≥5.5 m/s; HSRD), sprint distance (≥7.0 m/s; SpD) and distance covered during intense acceleration (≥3 m/s2; AccD). Analysis included 479 players and 6042 to 9671 match observations using rolling average. Distances covered per minute during the peak periods were significantly higher than match averages: HSRD (207-772%), SpD (447-1793%), and AccD (383-1096%). Distances covered per min were lower during 1-min recovery periods than match average for HSRD following peak 1-, 2- and 5-min period (29%, 6%, 3%, 2%, 2%; 35%, 11%, 0%, 2%, 3%; and 45%, 29%, 13%, 8%, 4%; p < 0.05, respectively), and for SpD (20%, 3%, 7%, 3% (4% higher in the 5th min); 24%, 12%, 3%, 0%, 7%; and 39%, 29%, 18%, 17%, 12%; p < 0.05, respectively). Opposite, AccD increased in the following 1-min recovery periods following peak 1-, 2- and 5-min periods (68%, 89%, 94%, 88%, 90%; 47%, 86%, 93%, 90%, 88%; 23%, 56%, 76%, 85%, 87%; p < 0.05) compared to match averages. Intensity was higher during shorter periods, whereas performance decrements were largest after longer peak periods for HSRD and SpD, whereas no decrement was observed in AccD.