BACKGROUND: Since 2016, staging laparoscopy has been implemented in the diagnostic workup of patients with gastric cancer. Staging laparoscopy aims to detect incurable disease (peritoneal metastases and irresectable tumors) and to prevent futile laparotomies.
METHODS: In this population-based nationwide study, we sought patient- and tumor characteristics associated with undergoing a staging laparoscopy. Additionally, we analyzed the prevalence of synchronous peritoneal metastases, the outcome of the staging laparoscopy and its clinical impact on treatment decisions. All patients diagnosed with non-cardia gastric cancer from the Netherlands Cancer Registry between 2016 and 2021 were included.
RESULTS: Alongside tumor characteristics, patient characteristics such as younger age, absence of comorbidities and lower WHO performance status were associated with performing a staging laparoscopy. In the study period, an increase in the proportion of patients who underwent a staging laparoscopy was observed, from 19.6% in 2016 to 32.3% in 2021 (p-value<0.001). In the same period, the prevalence of synchronous peritoneal metastases increased from 25% to 31%. In 37.6% of the patients who had the outcome of their staging laparoscopy reported, had incurable disease diagnosed during staging laparoscopy. Significantly less of these patients were treated with triplet regimens as compared to patients with a negative staging laparoscopy (18.5 vs. 76.3%; p-value<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients paralleled the increase in diagnosis of incurable disease and a decrease in the application of triplet systemic therapies in these patients.

Pleomorphic carcinoma (PC) is an uncommon and high-grade form of breast carcinoma characterized by the presence of distinctive pleomorphic giant tumor cells exhibiting bizarre nuclei and atypical mitosis. In this study, we report three patients who presented with lesions composed of a proliferation of large pleomorphic cells with a predominance of multinucleated giant cells on a microscope. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed distinct immunologic profiles within the respective malignant components. Notably, this report aims to contribute valuable insights, adding to the understanding of this uncommon tumor, accompanied by a literature review. Despite its rarity, PC in the breast remains clinically relevant due to its distinctive morphological and pathological features. These unique attributes require specific considerations in both clinical presentation and management.

UNASSIGNED: Secondary treatment of recurrent colorectal peritoneal metastases after previous cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is poorly investigated.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the overall survival outcome of secondary (repeat) CRS + HIPEC compared to palliative treatment in recurrent peritoneal disease.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with an index CRS + HIPEC and subsequently having recurrent peritoneal disease were identified from the prospective Swedish national HIPEC registry. Patients were divided into interventional group (secondary CRS + HIPEC) or palliative group. Multivariable logistic regression, propensity-score matching, and survival outcomes were calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Among 575 patients who underwent complete CRS between 2010 and 2021, 208 (36 %) were diagnosed with a subsequent recurrent peritoneal disease. Forty-two patients (20 %) were offered secondary CRS + HIPEC. Propensity-score matching of secondary interventional cases with palliative cases succeeded in 88 % (n = 37) in which female sex, lower peritoneal cancer index at index surgery, longer disease-free interval, and absence of extra-peritoneal metastases were identified as the most relevant matching covariates. Median OS from date of recurrence was 38 months (95%CI 30-58) in the interventional group and 19 months (95%CI: 15-24) in the palliative group (HR 0.35 95%CI: 0.20-0.63, p = 0.0004). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results. As reference, the median OS from index CRS + HIPEC in the whole colorectal registry (n = 575) was 41 months (95%CI: 38-45).
UNASSIGNED: After matching for relevant factors, the hazard ratio for death was significantly reduced in patients who were offered a secondary CRS + HIPEC procedure for recurrent peritoneal disease. Selection bias is inherent, but survival outcomes were comparable to those achieved after the initial procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Limited treatment options exist for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with systemic chemotherapy (SC) serving as the primary approach. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of first-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (HLP) compared to SC combined with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (SCP) or SC alone in treating unresectable ICC.
METHODS: Patient with unresectable ICC who underwent first-line treatment with HLP, SCP or SC from January 2016 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated and compared efficacy and safety outcomes across the three treatment groups.
RESULTS: The study comprised 42, 49, and 50 patients in the HLP, SCP, and SC groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 30.0, 10.2, and 6.5 months for HLP, SCP, and SC groups. While the SC group had a median overall survival (OS) time of 21.8 months, the HLP and SCP groups hadn\'t reached median OS. The HLP group demonstrated significantly superior PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.014) compared to the others. Moreover, the HLP group exhibited the highest objective response rate (ORR) at 50.0% and the highest disease control rate (DCR) at 88.1%, surpassing the SC group (ORR, 6.0%; DCR, 52.0%) and SCP group (ORR, 18.4%; DCR, 73.5%) (p < 0.05). Generally, the HLP group reported fewer grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) compared with others.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to systemic chemotherapy with or without PD-(L)1 inhibitors, the triple combination therapy incorporating HAIC, lenvatinib, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors showcased favorable survival benefits and manageable adverse events for unresectable ICC.

In addition to morphology and tissue perfusion, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is the third pillar of multiparametric diagnostics in oncology. Due to the strong correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cell count in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it can be used as a surrogate marker for tumor cell quantity. Therefore, ADC effectively reflects the effects of cytoreductive treatment, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and systemic chemotherapy and becomes an important clinical marker for treatment response. The DWI should remain an integral part of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in primary HCC diagnostics and treatment monitoring but is of secondary clinical importance compared to contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion sequences and the use of liver-specific contrast agents. For the future, standardization of DWI sequences for better comparability of various study protocols would be desirable.
UNASSIGNED: Neben Morphologie und Gewebeperfusion ist die Diffusionsbildgebung („diffusion-weighted imaging“, DWI) die dritte Säule der multiparametrischen Diagnostik in der Onkologie. Aufgrund der starken Korrelation zwischen apparentem Diffusionskoeffizienten (ADC) und Zellzahl beim hepatozellulären Karzinom (HCC) kann dieser als Surrogatmarker für die Tumorzellmenge dienen. Daher spiegelt der ADC effektiv die Auswirkungen zytoreduzierender Behandlungen wie transarterielle Chemoembolisation und systemische Chemotherapie wider und wird zu einem wichtigen klinischen Marker des Therapieansprechens. Die DWI sollte in HCC-Primärdiagnostik und Therapieverlaufskontrolle ein fester Bestandteil eines MRT(Magnetresonanztomographie)-Protokolls bleiben, ist jedoch in der klinischen Bedeutung nachrangig gegenüber kontrastmittelgestützten MRT-Perfusionssequenzen und dem Einsatz leberspezifischer Kontrastmittel. Für die Zukunft wäre eine Standardisierung von DWI-Sequenzen zur besseren Vergleichbarkeit verschiedener Studienprotokolle wünschenswert.

Testicular myeloid sarcoma (TMS) is a challenging pathology often posing diagnostic difficulties due to the poorly differentiated nature of tumor cells at the initial presentation. The delay in diagnosis significantly impacts patient life expectancy, emphasizing the need for prompt identification and treatment initiation. In certain cases, the presence of the Fms-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) mutation adds complexity to the disease, requiring tailored therapeutic approaches. In this report, we present a unique case of bilateral TMS with FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutation. The patient exhibited an aggressive clinical course, initially misdiagnosed with orchitis during the initial evaluation. Subsequent reevaluation of the testicular biopsy at a second center led to an accurate diagnosis, highlighting the importance of thorough examination in challenging cases. Given the emerging significance of FLT3 mutations in myeloid sarcomas, comprehensive testing for all FLT3 variants is crucial to determine the appropriate treatment modality. This case underscores the need for increased awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the diagnostic nuances and potential genetic variations associated with TMS. Furthermore, the inclusion of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as midostaurin or gilteritinib, especially in the presence of FLT3 mutations, may significantly impact treatment outcomes. This report contributes to the growing body of literature on TMS and highlights the importance of considering FLT3 mutations in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process for improved patient care.

Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone (LMSoB) is extremely rare, comprising only <0.7% of primary malignant bone tumors, and is therefore considered an ultra-rare tumor entity. There is currently no consensus as to whether therapeutic strategies should be based on the biological characteristics of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma or on primary tumor localization in the bone. The use of perioperative chemotherapy and its effectiveness in this rare tumor entity remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different treatment approaches in a multicenter setting with a total of 35 patients included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74%. Patients with localized disease undergoing surgery had a significantly higher 5-year OS compared to patients who did not undergo surgical treatment (82% vs. 0%, p = 0.0015). Axial tumor localization was associated with worse event-free survival (EFS) probability (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.0082). A high proportion of our patients developed secondary metastases. Furthermore, the perioperative chemotherapy protocols applied to our patients were not associated with an improved EFS or OS. Therefore, the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in LMSoB needs to be further investigated, and the choice of agents still needs to be clarified.

UNASSIGNED: Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited response to chemotherapy. This research aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) with conventional systemic chemotherapy in treating advanced stages of pancreatic cancer.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies assessing the comparative outcomes of RIAC and systemic chemotherapy were included. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed independently by two researchers. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA16 software, calculating odds ratios (OR), risk differences (RD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies, comprising a total of 627 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The findings showed that patients undergoing RIAC had significantly higher rates of partial remission (PR) compared to those receiving systemic chemotherapy (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.57, 3.15, I2= 0%). Additionally, the rate of complications was lower in the RIAC group (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.63, I2= 0%). Moreover, patients treated with RIAC had notably longer median survival times.
UNASSIGNED: The results of this research indicate that RIAC is associated with a higher rate of partial remission, improved clinical benefits, and fewer complications compared to systemic chemotherapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer. These findings suggest that RIAC may be a more effective and safer treatment option for patients with advanced stages of pancreatic cancer.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023404637.

UNASSIGNED: The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA) is rising around the world. The disease is becoming a major global health issue. Conventionally, most patients with cholangiocarcinoma present with advanced disease and systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment. This review discusses recent advances in systemic treatments for patients with IHCCA.
UNASSIGNED: The addition of durvalumab to a gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen has significantly improved overall survival in the phase 3 TOPAZ-1 trial and is currently recommended as a standard first-line treatment. The phase 3 ABC-06 and phase 2b NIFTY trials have shown the benefit of second-line fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine plus nanoliposomal irinotecan, respectively. They have provided a treatment option for patients without actionable alterations who progressed to first-line therapy. For patients with actionable genomic alterations, including FGFR2 rearrangement, IDH1 mutation, BRAF mutation, and ERBB2 amplification, targeted agents have shown encouraging efficacy in several phase 2-3 trials, and are recommended as subsequent treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being investigated for the treatment of previously treated patients, although only a small proportion of patients showed durable responses.
UNASSIGNED: Recent advances in systemic treatments have improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced IHCCA. However, most patients eventually show resistance to the treatment, and tumor progression occurs within a year. Indeed, there should be further efforts to improve the outcomes of patients with advanced IHCCA.

UNASSIGNED: Numerous agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, are now available for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. Most trials involving systemic chemotherapy have included patients with Child-Pugh class A, while excluding or minimally enrolling those with Child-Pugh class B, due to liver dysfunction-related mortality. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival in Child-Pugh class B patients receiving sorafenib (SOR), lenvatinib (LEN), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ+BEV), or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).
UNASSIGNED: From December 2003 to June 2023, 137 patients with advanced HCC receiving systemic chemotherapies (SOR: n=43, LEN: n=16, ATZ+BEV: n=18, HAIC: n=60) were enrolled.
UNASSIGNED: Overall survival (OS) and response rates did not differ significantly across treatments (SOR: 8.3 months, LEN: 10.2 months, ATZ+BEV: 8.5 months, HAIC: 7.3 months). Patients on HAIC and LEN had a lower rate of discontinuing treatment within three months compared to those on ATZ+BEV and SOR. HAIC was associated with fewer changes in ALBI score and better preservation of liver function. Multivariate logistic regression identified serum α-fetoprotein >400 ng/ml [hazard ratio (HR)=1.94; p=0.001], tumor count >5 (HR=1.55; p=0.043), and Child-Pugh score (HR=2.53; p=0.002) as independent predictors of OS.
UNASSIGNED: OS and response rates were similar across systemic chemotherapies. Prognosis for HCC in Child-Pugh class B patients was associated with liver function, necessitating further research for optimal treatment.