BACKGROUND: Locally advanced colon cancer is a high-risk condition for tumour recurrence with poor survival. The current treatment is surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin. This approach has improved the oncological outcomes on this population, however the mucinous condition has not been studied in depth and although the evidence is weak, it is thought to have a worse response to systemic chemotherapy. The CHEMUCCA study aims to answer this question.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy using the disease-free survival for stage II and III mucinous colon cancer who underwent surgical resection plus systemic adjuvant chemotherapy vs. surgery alone.
METHODS: Retrospective analytical study including patients diagnosed with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer, treated between 2010 and 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Demographic variables and tumour features were analysed. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Log rank test and Cox regression were used.
RESULTS: Of 1134 patients with high-risk stage II and III colon cancer disease, 206 (18,17 %) had mucinous histology and 928 (81,83 %) had non-mucinous histology. 708 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 129 (62,62 %) in mucinous group and 579 (62,39 %) in the non-mucinous group. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in stage II and III mucinous colon cancer improved the DFS (HR = 0.58 [95 % CI 0.37-0.91]; p = 0,017). However, in a stratified analysis, patients with high-risk stage II mucinous colon cancer showed no benefit with this approach (HR = 0.4541 [95 % CI 0.19-1.03]; p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated to be effective in locally advanced mucinous colorectal cancer improving the oncological outcomes. However, this benefit could be diminished in high-risk stage II mucinous colon cancer patients. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy on this patient\'s sub-group must be balanced according to risk versus benefits.

Unresectable, metastatic, advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) is an aggressive disease and is treated with platinum-containing first-line chemotherapy, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. Response to first-line chemotherapy is a vital priority in sequential treatment strategies because a better response to first-line chemotherapy is associated with a better response to subsequent therapies. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin chemotherapy is conventionally recommended for cisplatin-ineligible patients. This multicenter, single-arm prospective trial will investigate whether dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and carboplatin (DD-MVACarbo) chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin chemotherapy in terms of efficacy in platinum-naïve, cisplatin-ineligible patients with aUC. After screening and registration, a total of 46 patients will be treated with this novel chemotherapy regimen. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate. The secondary endpoints include disease control rate, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. No evidence of this novel intervention is available as of July 2024. The results are expected to change the standard of care and improve the management of patients with aUC.

BACKGROUND: Since 2016, staging laparoscopy has been implemented in the diagnostic workup of patients with gastric cancer. Staging laparoscopy aims to detect incurable disease (peritoneal metastases and irresectable tumors) and to prevent futile laparotomies.
METHODS: In this population-based nationwide study, we sought patient- and tumor characteristics associated with undergoing a staging laparoscopy. Additionally, we analyzed the prevalence of synchronous peritoneal metastases, the outcome of the staging laparoscopy and its clinical impact on treatment decisions. All patients diagnosed with non-cardia gastric cancer from the Netherlands Cancer Registry between 2016 and 2021 were included.
RESULTS: Alongside tumor characteristics, patient characteristics such as younger age, absence of comorbidities and lower WHO performance status were associated with performing a staging laparoscopy. In the study period, an increase in the proportion of patients who underwent a staging laparoscopy was observed, from 19.6% in 2016 to 32.3% in 2021 (p-value<0.001). In the same period, the prevalence of synchronous peritoneal metastases increased from 25% to 31%. In 37.6% of the patients who had the outcome of their staging laparoscopy reported, had incurable disease diagnosed during staging laparoscopy. Significantly less of these patients were treated with triplet regimens as compared to patients with a negative staging laparoscopy (18.5 vs. 76.3%; p-value<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients paralleled the increase in diagnosis of incurable disease and a decrease in the application of triplet systemic therapies in these patients.

Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone (LMSoB) is extremely rare, comprising only <0.7% of primary malignant bone tumors, and is therefore considered an ultra-rare tumor entity. There is currently no consensus as to whether therapeutic strategies should be based on the biological characteristics of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma or on primary tumor localization in the bone. The use of perioperative chemotherapy and its effectiveness in this rare tumor entity remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different treatment approaches in a multicenter setting with a total of 35 patients included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74%. Patients with localized disease undergoing surgery had a significantly higher 5-year OS compared to patients who did not undergo surgical treatment (82% vs. 0%, p = 0.0015). Axial tumor localization was associated with worse event-free survival (EFS) probability (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.0082). A high proportion of our patients developed secondary metastases. Furthermore, the perioperative chemotherapy protocols applied to our patients were not associated with an improved EFS or OS. Therefore, the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in LMSoB needs to be further investigated, and the choice of agents still needs to be clarified.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic chemotherapy (SYS) is the first-line treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the survival benefit of SYS is still limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of patients with unresectable ICC treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus SYS to SYS alone.
METHODS: The multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years old with pathologically diagnosed ICC. Patients with unmeasurable lesions, not receiving SYS treatment, Child-Pugh grade C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 3 or higher, prior liver resection, incomplete medical information, or discontinuation of the first SYS treatment were excluded. Data collection was mainly from the hospital system, and the survival outcome of patients was obtained through follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbor matching algorithm was performed to reduce selection bias between the TACE plus SYS and SYS alone groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors associated with OS and to estimate their hazard ratios. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria were utilized to evaluate the response of tumors to therapy.
RESULTS: Between June 2016 and February 2023, 118 unresectable ICC patients from three hospitals were included in this study. Of them, 37 were in the TACE plus SYS group and 81 were in the SYS alone group. The median OS in the combination group was 11.3 months, longer than the 6.4 months in the SYS alone group (P = 0.011). A greater objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were observed in the combination group than in the SYS alone group (ORR, 48.65 vs. 6.17%, P < 0.001; DCR, 89.19 vs. 62.96%, P = 0.004). There were 16 patients in each group after matching, and the matched results remained consistent regarding OS and tumor response. Adverse events (AEs) were similar in the two groups after matching.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SYS alone, the combination treatment of TACE plus SYS was more effective than SYS alone in improving OS, ORR, and DCR without any significant increase in AEs. TACE plus SYS may be a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable ICC.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to explore whether a community nursing intervention for outpatients receiving systemic therapy reduced unplanned hospital presentations and improved physical and psychosocial health outcomes over the first three cycles of treatment compared to a control group receiving standard care.
METHODS: The number of and reasons for unplanned presentations were obtained for 170 intervention and 176 control group adult patients with solid tumours starting outpatient chemotherapy. Poisson regression was used to compare the number of presentations between the intervention and control groups. Patients self-completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Cancer Behavior Inventory and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at the start of the first four cycles. Linear regression techniques were used to compare quality of life outcomes.
RESULTS: The reduction in unplanned presentations in the intervention group relative to the control group was 12% (95% CI, - 25%, 37%; P = 0.48). At the start of cycle 4, there was no difference in anxiety (difference = 0.47 (95% CI, - 0.28, 1.22; P = 0.22)), depression (difference = 0.57 (95% CI, - 0.18, 1.31; P = 0.13)) or EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score (difference = 0.16 (95% CI, - 2.67, 3.00; P = 0.91)). Scores for self-efficacy as measured by the Cancer Behavior Inventory were higher in the intervention group (difference = 4.3 (95% CI, 0.7, 7.9; P = 0.02)).
CONCLUSIONS: This RCT did not demonstrate a benefit in reducing unplanned presentations to hospital. The trial identified improved cancer-based self-efficacy in patients receiving the intervention.
BACKGROUND: Registered at Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614001113640, registered 21/10/2014.

Solid evidence of the safety and effectiveness of retinoblastoma (RB) conservative treatment using thermotherapy and systemic chemotherapy with long-term follow-up is scarce, especially in low-resource countries.
This study examined the outcomes of this treatment and associated predictors in Vietnam to strengthen the current RB treatment protocol focusing on preserving eye and vision in low-resource settings.
A prospective cohort study was conducted at Ho Chi Minh City Eye Hospital in Vietnam from 2005 to 2019. All eligible patients with bilateral RB (one eye already removed and another eye classified as group A or B) and without previous treatment were recruited. All patients received thermotherapy and six cycles of systemic three-agent chemotherapy repeated every 4 weeks. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect information on study participants\' age, symptoms, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Among 50 eyes of all 50 patients with a median age of 9 (4-20) months, 34 eyes were in group B (68%). The median follow-up time was 60 (60-84) months. All 139 preserved tumors regressed mostly to type 4 (70.4%) and type 3 (23.7%) scars. Kaplan-Meier analysis found the overall globe-salvage rate at 5 years of 91.9% (95% CI: 80.1%-97.7%). Most eyes (41/50, 82%, 95% CI: 69.2%-90.2%) had a final visual acuity ≥0.1. The visual acuity is higher when tumors regressed to a type 4 scar (p = .007, AOR = 8.098, 95% CI: 1.79-36.53) which also shows less enucleation than a type 3 scar (p = .002, AOR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.37%). Gender effect on visual acuity after treatment was significant and may be due to discrimination. No major complications were recorded.
Conservative treatment of early-stage RB is safe and effective. Long-term, thorough follow-ups of patients post-treatment are needed. The regression patterns of scars could be a useful indicator of treatment failure.

UNASSIGNED: Most patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) are treated with systemic chemotherapy and many factors have remarkable impacts on their prognosis. However, the importance of psychological status in the prognosis of advanced GC patients is still unclear. This prospective study was performed to analyze the impact of negative emotions on GC patients treated with systemic chemotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: Advanced GC patients admitted to our hospital between January 2017 and March 2019 were prospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected, as were any adverse events (AEs) related to systemic chemotherapy. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to assess negative emotions. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was the quality of life which was assessed by The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the effects of negative emotions on prognosis, and logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors related to negative emotions.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 178 advanced GC patients were enrolled in this study. A total of 83 patients were divided into a negative emotion group and 95 patients were divided into normal emotion group. 72 patients experienced AEs during treatment. Many more patients experienced AEs in the negative emotion group than in the normal emotion group (62.7% vs. 21.1%, P<0.001). Enrolled patients were followed up for at least 3 years. It was found both PFS and OS were much lower in the negative emotion group than in the normal emotion group (P=0.0186 and 0.0387, respectively). Participants in negative emotion group had lower health status and more severe symptoms. Negative emotions, lower body mass index (BMI), and IV tumor stage were identified as risk factors. In addition, higher BMI and marital status were identified as protective factors of negative emotions.
UNASSIGNED: Negative emotions have a significant adverse effect on the prognosis of GC patients. The main risk factor of negative emotions is AEs during treatment. It is necessary to closely monitor the treatment process and improve the psychological status of patients.

Introduction The geriatric patient population diagnosed with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is underrepresented in clinical studies. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment patterns and treatment outcomes of patients aged 65 years or older with extensive stage SCLC. Material and methods In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC, between January 2009 and December 2021 were included. Patients who were under 65 years of age at the time of diagnosis and did not develop progression after curative treatment and patients with a second malignancy were excluded from the study. The clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment patterns and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 132 patients were included in the study. The median age was 70 years (range:65-91), and 118 (89.4%) patients were male. There were 77 (58.3%) patients with eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1. There were 26 (19.7%) patients in the limited stage disease and 106 (80.3%) patients in the extensive stage disease at the time of diagnosis. First-line chemotherapy was given to 86 (65.2%) patients. Of the patients who could not receive treatment, 18 patients (13.6%) due to patient refusal, and 28 patients (21.2%) due to comorbid diseases and poor performance status with organ dysfunctions. The most common treatment regimen used as first-line treatment was cisplatin+etoposide (n=47, 54.7%), and followed by carboplatin+etoposide (n=39, 45.3%). First-line chemotherapy responses were complete response in 4 (4.7%) patients, partial response in 35 (40.7%) patients, stable disease in 13 (15.1%) patients, and progressive disease in 34 (39.5%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia in 33 (38.4%) patients. Forty nine patients (57.0%) completed the planned first-line treatment. The mPFS was 6.1 months and the mOS was 8.2 months with first-line treatment. We found that ECOG PS status was the most important negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. There was no difference between carboplatin+etoposide and cisplatin+etoposide regimens in terms of PFS, OS, adverse events and treatment compliance. Conclusion Thus, it may be an appropriate approach not to give up chemotherapy treatment easily in elderly patients with a diagnosis of extensive stage SCLC. It should be kept in mind that finding factors that might affect the prognosis and tailoring the tretment precisely on case-by-case basis in geriatric cancer patients have an impact on survival.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and cisplatin is the standard first-line systemic treatment in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, a substantial number of patients do not qualify for cisplatin due to comorbidities or poor performance status. The phase II pilot study NACHO evaluated the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks as first-line therapy in patients with advanced CCA ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
METHODS: Patients with any comorbidity precluding cisplatin therapy, such as renal impairment, impaired hearing, increased risk or history for thromboembolic events, intolerance of extensive hydration, or significant cardiovascular disease were eligible. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient reported outcome.
RESULTS: From December 2016 to July 2017, 10 patients were prospectively enrolled and treated. The ORR with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine was 50%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 90%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.3-6.1), and median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.4-10.2). In total, 13 SAEs were documented without any new safety signals. There were 14 grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in 10 patients of the ITT population. Exploratory subgroup analyses including known prognostic markers were performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The NACHO trial supports safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced CCA ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy and should be further evaluated in a larger prospective trial.