Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) comprises 20% of cases of nonmelanoma skin cancers in the United States. In total, 3% to 5% of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are metastatic at the time of presentation, associated with significant mortality due to a lack of standardized treatment options. In total, 95% of these tumors are amenable to the initial standard of treatment, which is surgical resection. However, a small percentage of them require systemic therapy as they are either locally advanced to regional lymph nodes or have distant metastasis. The common sites of presentation of cSCC are the scalp and the face with predictable spread to the intra-parotid, upper jugular, and perifacial lymph nodes. In our case report, however, our patient had a large lump lesion on the upper back, an unusual site of presentation of cSCC, with locally advanced metastasis to the left axillary lymph nodes. Subsequently, the tumor marker study revealed a positive SMARCA4 variant (the essential ATPase subunit of the Switch (SWI)/Sucrose Nonfermenting (SNF) chromatin-remodeling complex) that is even rarer in the context of cSCC. Furthermore, abnormalities in SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex subunits have shown promising results as a target therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We present an atypical presentation site of locally advanced rare variant SMARCA4-positive cSCC in a patient who received treatment with chemoradiation and systemic therapy with ICI after primary surgical resection. To date, only 2 cases of SMARCA4-positive cSCC were found in the literature with no details of the treatment received. Our case is unique in its atypical site of presentation as well as showing partial response to radiotherapy (RT) and systemic therapy with ICI.

UNASSIGNED: Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited response to chemotherapy. This research aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) with conventional systemic chemotherapy in treating advanced stages of pancreatic cancer.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies assessing the comparative outcomes of RIAC and systemic chemotherapy were included. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed independently by two researchers. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA16 software, calculating odds ratios (OR), risk differences (RD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies, comprising a total of 627 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The findings showed that patients undergoing RIAC had significantly higher rates of partial remission (PR) compared to those receiving systemic chemotherapy (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.57, 3.15, I2= 0%). Additionally, the rate of complications was lower in the RIAC group (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.63, I2= 0%). Moreover, patients treated with RIAC had notably longer median survival times.
UNASSIGNED: The results of this research indicate that RIAC is associated with a higher rate of partial remission, improved clinical benefits, and fewer complications compared to systemic chemotherapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer. These findings suggest that RIAC may be a more effective and safer treatment option for patients with advanced stages of pancreatic cancer.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023404637.

Patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer require treatment upfront because of the aggressive nature of this type of cancer. Patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer are usually treated with neoadjuvant therapy. This neoadjuvant therapy comprises targeted therapy and chemotherapy. Targeted therapy is given with trastuzumab. Pertuzumab is either administered or not with trastuzumab as a targeted therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to find out and compare the benefit achieved in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR) by adding pertuzumab to the neoadjuvant treatment regimen for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Various databases were searched to find out relevant clinical trials. After going through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, three clinical trials were shortlisted for this systematic review and meta-analysis. These three clinical trials were double-armed. Pertuzumab was present in one arm while being absent in one arm to assess the benefit of adding pertuzumab in terms of pCR achieved. Data were analyzed using RevMan Web (Cochrane, London, UK). The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated for the outcome. The Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect model were used for analysis. The risk of bias in studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (ROB2). The summary statistics showed that the incidence of pCR was more in the experimental group (having pertuzumab) as compared to the control group (without pertuzumab) with an odds ratio of 2.10 (95% CI: 1.56-2.83) with I2 = 0%. In three double-arm trials, there were 840 participants, 445 in the experimental group and 395 in the control group. A total of 203 (45%) patients out of 445 in the experimental group achieved pCR, whereas 127 (32%) patients out of 395 in the control group achieved pCR. Through the results of this study, it can be concluded that the rate of pCR achieved was higher in that arm in which pertuzumab was present compared to the study arm in which only trastuzumab was given as targeted therapy. Thus, it can be suggested that pertuzumab be added to the neoadjuvant regimen for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients. This would result in achieving a better pCR. And by improving pCR rates, the survival outcomes of patients can be significantly improved.

OBJECTIVE: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive primary hepatic malignancy, which has increased in incidence over the past decades. While surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with early-staged disease, many patients present with locally advanced and unresectable tumors. Given the importance of locoregional control and the potential for downstaging to resectability, knowledge of advances in the management of locally advanced ICC is critical for optimizing outcomes.
METHODS: This is a narrative review providing an up-to-date summary of the current literature regarding contemporary management of locally advanced ICC including systemic and liver-directed therapies.
UNASSIGNED: Along with systemic chemotherapy, several liver-directed therapies including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, and hepatic artery infusion pumps, targeted therapies, and chemoradiation therapy have demonstrated promising results for improving local disease control and possibly extending survival. Unfortunately, successful downstaging to resection remains uncommon with no single treatment strategy established as standard of care. Although additional randomized controlled data are needed, multidisciplinary management using contemporary systemic and locoregional therapies improves outcomes for patients with locally advanced ICC.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal management of locally advanced ICC remains uncertain. Despite this, novel treatment options and ongoing clinical trials are currently contributing to more effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. Future advancements are likely to explore further novel therapies in addition to elucidating optimal patient selection and sequencing of multidisciplinary therapy.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILCs) are typically endocrine responsive breast cancers which respond poorly to chemotherapy. The long-term survival advantage of prescribing chemotherapy in such cases remains unclear. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing, the impact of prescribing chemotherapy in such patients on long-term disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival outcomes.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Ten-year DFS and OS were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Time-to-effect modelling was performed using the generic inverse variance method.
Overall, 9 studies including 28,218 patients were included. The mean follow-up was 74 months (range: 0-150 months) and mean age was 60 years (range: 22-90 years). Of these, 34.7% received chemotherapy (9,797/28,218) and 66.3% did not receive chemotherapy (18,421/28,218). Chemotherapy prescription failed to improve 10-year DFS (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.23) and OS (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.18). When using time-to-effect modelling, chemotherapy prescription failed to improve DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.01, 95% CI: 0.78-1.31) and OS (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.89-1.27, I2= 67%).
This meta-analysis illustrates no long-term survival advantage associated with chemotherapy prescription in the setting of early-stage ILC. In the absence of well-designed, prospective clinical trials evaluating the impact of chemotherapy on long-term outcomes in ILC, these results should be considered by the multidisciplinary team when deciding on the value of systemic chemotherapy prescription in ILC.

It has been reported that extramammary malignant tumors metastasize to the breast, but cervical cancer metastasis to the breast is very rare. At present, there are only dozens of reports about cervical cancer metastasis to breast in the world. It is difficult to distinguish between primary breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer. We report a 44-year-old woman who underwent surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for cervical cancer 5 years ago. Then, she was hospitalized for finding a left breast mass measured 2.9 × 2.7 cm in chest CT. Pathological examination combined with immunohistochemical staining showed that the mass came from the cervix. Then, the patient received systematic chemotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy (IB) for the breast mass and got a great result. Cervical cancer rarely metastasizes to the breast. In this case, we confirmed the diagnosis of breast mass by histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry. IB achieved a good result in the treatment of the breast mass. We hope to provide reference of prognosis and treatment when facing this situation by presenting this case.

A 54-year-old female presented with shortness of breath and cyanosis. Work up with chest X-ray and subsequent echocardiogram revealed an intracardiac bi-atrial mass leading to emergent cardiothoracic resection. Pathology was consistent with a primary cardiac high-grade osteosarcoma. Post-resection staging positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) showed hypermetabolic mixed lytic and sclerotic lesion of T10 concerning for metastasis. She received five cycles of adriamycin and ifosfamide chemotherapy before discontinuation due to systolic dysfunction. Nine months later, she developed a high tumor burden with progressive disease and was treated with second-line gemcitabine/docetaxel with disappointing results. She is currently on treatment with cyclophosphamide and topotecan as third-line treatment with an excellent clinico-radiographic response. Osteosarcomas are aggressive with a high incidence of recurrence and metastasis. Fewer than 50 cases of primary cardiac osteosarcomas have been reported in the literature. Even though complete resection can be achieved in some cases, long-term results are usually poor. No standard therapy has been established.

Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are the most commonly used cellular immunotherapy for multiple tumors. To further confirm whether chemotherapy with CIK cells improves clinical effectiveness and to reveal its optimal use in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we systematically reevaluated all relevant studies.
We collected all studies about chemotherapy with CIK cells for NSCLC from the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Full-Text Database (VIP), Wanfang Data, China Biological Medicine Database (CBM), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Chinese clinical trial registry (Chi-CTR), World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and U.S. clinical trials. We evaluated their quality according to the Cochrane evaluation handbook of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (version 5.1.0), extracted the data using a standard data extraction form, synthesized the data using meta-analysis and finally rated the evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Thirty-two RCTs with 2250 patients were included, and most trials had unclear risk of bias. The merged risk ratios values and their 95% confidence intervals of meta-analysis for objective response rate, disease control rate, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates, 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were as following: 1.45 (1.31-1.61), 1.26 (1.16-.37), 1.42 (1.23-1.63), 2.06 (1.36-3.12), 1.93 (1.38-2.69) and 3.30 (1.13-9.67). Compared with chemotherapy alone, all differences were statistically significant. CIK cells could increase the CD3+ T cells, CD3+ CD4+ T cells, NK cells and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells. The chemotherapy with CIK cells had a lower risk of hematotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, liver injury and a higher fever than that of chemotherapy alone. The evidence quality was \"moderate\" to \"very low.\"
The available moderate evidences indicate that chemotherapy with CIK cells, especially autologous CIK cells, can significantly improve the tumor responses, 1- and 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates in patients with advanced NSCLC. This treatment does have a high risk of fever. The optimal use may be treatment with one or two cycles and in combination with vinorelbine and cisplatin, paclitaxel and cisplatin, or docetaxel and cisplatin.

Sorafenib, a multiple kinase inhibitor, has been established as first-line standard systemic chemotherapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We encountered a patient with combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) who achieved complete remission in response to sorafenib treatment. A 58-year old man with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced liver cirrhosis was diagnosed with CHC in segments 6th and 7th of the liver and underwent partial surgical resection. Three months later, CHC recurred as metastases at multiple intrahepatic sites, lymph nodes, and bones, making surgery impossible. Treatment with sorafenib was initiated at 400 mg b.i.d., later reduced to 400 mg/day. After 6 months of sorafenib administration, he no longer showed abnormal uptake on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. He was continued on sorafenib for 2.5 years, but later discontinued due to adverse events. He has shown no evidence of tumor recurrence more than 1 year after sorafenib discontinuation. His HCV was eradicated by direct-acting antivirals, and he remains in good health.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as compared to systemic chemotherapy and partial hepatectomy (PH) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies with multivariate analysis and/or matching were included. Guidelines from National Guideline Clearinghouse and Guidelines International Network were assessed using the AGREE II instrument.
RESULTS: The search revealed 3530 records; 328 were selected for full-text review; 48 were included: 8 systematic reviews, 2 randomized studies, 26 comparative observational studies, 2 guideline-articles and 10 case series; in addition 13 guidelines were evaluated. Literature to assess the effectiveness of ablation was limited. RFA + systemic chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone. PH was superior to RFA alone but not to RFA + PH or to MWA. Compared to PH, RFA showed fewer complications, MWA did not. Outcomes were subject to residual confounding since ablation was only employed for unresectable disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from the EORTC-CLOCC trial, the comparable survival for ablation + PH versus PH alone, the potential to induce long-term disease control and the low complication rate argue in favour of ablation over chemotherapy alone. Further randomized comparisons of ablation to current-day chemotherapy alone should therefore be considered unethical. Hence, the highest achievable level of evidence for unresectable CRLM seems reached. The apparent selection bias from previous studies and the superior safety profile mandate the setup of randomized controlled trials comparing ablation to surgery.