Suivi

suivi
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    背景:胎膜早破(PPROM)是早产的主要原因,使所有怀孕的1-3%复杂化。常规住院(CH)是最常见的随访方式,但家庭护理(HC)似乎是一种选择。
    目的:研究监测模式对潜伏期持续时间和PPROM后潜伏期比率的影响,并分析修改这一比率的风险因素。
    方法:这是一项双中心回顾性队列研究,包括2016年至2018年妊娠24至36周出现PPROM的患者。根据两种不同的随访方案,患者在里尔大学医院中心(UHC)的HC和南特UHC的CH中进行了随访。延迟比对应于实际延迟周期除以理论项的延迟周期。
    结果:我们纳入了154例患者:102例HC和52例CH。HC的平均潜伏期明显较高:36.9±21.8天,对应于85.5±23.7%的延迟率与20.2±12天,对应于CH的66.9±29.8%的延迟率(p<0.001)。CH的潜伏期比率与PPROM时的足月相关(p=0.001)。
    结论:在选定人群中,PPROM和HC管理的潜伏期持续时间似乎延长,而不是CH。这项研究表明,对稳定患者的HC有益。
    BACKGROUND: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the main cause of premature delivery, complicating 1-3% of all pregnancies. Conventional hospitalization (CH) is the most frequent mode of follow-up, but homecare (HC) seems to be an alternative.
    OBJECTIVE: Study of the impact of the monitoring mode on the duration of the latency period and on the latency ratio after PPROM, and analysis of the risk factors modifying this ratio.
    METHODS: This was a bicentric retrospective cohort study here-abouts including patients who presented a PPROM between 24 and 36weeks of gestation from 2016 to 2018. Patients had a follow-up in HC at Lille University Hospital center (UHC) and in CH at Nantes UHC according to two different follow-up protocols. The latency ratio corresponded to the real latency period divided by the latency period to theoretical term.
    RESULTS: We included 154 patients: 102 in HC and 52 in CH. The mean latency period was significantly higher in HC: 36.9±21.8 days, corresponding to an 85.5±23.7% latency ratio versus 20.2±12 days, corresponding to an 66.9±29.8% latency ratio in CH (P<0.001). The latency ratio in CH was correlated with term at PPROM (P=0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The duration of the latency period seems prolonged for PPROM followed by HC management versus CH in selected populations. This study suggests a benefit to HC in stable patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    新生儿住院后,我们的医疗保健系统在出生后的第一年为早产儿及其家庭提供多学科护理。然而,有差距和差距,特别是在中等早产的情况下。孕产妇和儿童保护,早期预防和家庭随访的主要参与者,是一个合作伙伴可能能够部署医院后的支持观点,有利于儿童发展和育儿支持。
    After neonatal hospitalization, our healthcare system offers multidisciplinary care for premature babies and their families during the first years of life. However, there are disparities and gaps, particularly in the case of medium prematurity. Maternal and child protection, a major player in early prevention and family follow-up, is a partner likely to be able to deploy post-hospital support perspectives in favor of child development and parenting support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的许多不良结局与胎儿过度生长有关,这是由母体血糖控制的充分性介导的。COVID-19大流行导致虚拟护理模式的迅速采用。我们的目的是比较血糖控制,胎儿生长,和COVID-19大流行之前和期间的围产期结局。
    方法:2017年至2020年进行了一项回顾性队列研究。合并GDM的单胎妊娠被纳入研究。将队列分为“之前”和“期间”COVID-19亚组,以2020年3月11日为分界时间点。从2020年3月11日开始GDM随访的女性,此后被分配到COVID-19时代,而在分界点之前分娩的女性则是前COVID-19时代。主要结局是大胎龄(LGA)新生儿的发生率。次要结局包括选择的产妇和新生儿不良结局。
    结果:775名妇女被纳入分析,其中187例(24.13%)在COVID-19时代随访,588例(75.87%)在COVID-19时代之前随访。在COVID-19期间,187名女性(91.44%)接受了至少1次虚拟随访。在COVID-19时代之前没有虚拟随访。两组单变量的LGA新生儿发生率无差异(5.90%vs7.30%,p=0.5)和多变量分析,控制年龄,种族,奇偶校验,身体质量指数,妊娠期体重增加,慢性高血压,吸烟,和妊娠期高血压疾病(校正比值比[aOR]1.11,95%置信区间[CI]0.49~2.51,p=0.80).在多变量分析中,两组间复合新生儿结局无差异(GDM饮食:aOR1.40,95%CI0.81~2.43,p=0.23;GDM药物治疗:aOR1.20,95%CI0.63~2.43,p=0.5)。
    结论:调整基线变量的差异后,在GDM女性患者中,复合虚拟护理模式与较高的LGA新生儿发生率或其他不良围产期结局无关.需要更大规模的研究来更好地了解虚拟护理对GDM妊娠中较不常见结局的具体影响。
    BACKGROUND: Many of the adverse outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are linked to excessive fetal growth, which is strongly mediated by the adequacy of maternal glycemic management. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a rapid adoption of virtual care models. We aimed to compare glycemic management, fetal growth, and perinatal outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2017 and 2020. Singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM were included in the study. The cohort was stratified into \"before\" and \"during\" COVID-19 subgroups, using March 11, 2020, as the demarcation time point. Women who began their GDM follow-up starting March 11, 2020, and thereafter were allocated to the COVID-19 era, whereas women who delivered before the demarcation point served as the pre-COVID-19 era. The primary outcome was the rate of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates. Secondary outcomes included select maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.
    RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-five women were included in the analysis, of which 187 (24.13%) were followed during the COVID-19 era and 588 (75.87%) before the COVID-19 era. One hundred seventy-one of the 187 women (91.44%) followed during COVID-19 had at least 1 virtual follow-up visit. No virtual follow-up visits occurred before the COVID-19 era. There was no difference in the rate of LGA neonates between groups on both univariate (5.90% vs 7.30%, p=0.5) and multivariate analyses, controlling for age, ethnicity, parity, body mass index, gestational weight gain, chronic hypertension, smoking, and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 2.51, p=0.80). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in composite neonatal outcome between groups (GDM diet: aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.43, p=0.23; GDM medical treatment: aOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.43, p=0.5).
    CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, the combined virtual mode of care was not associated with a higher rate of LGA neonates or other adverse perinatal outcomes in women with GDM. Larger studies are needed to better understand the specific impact of virtual care on less common outcomes in pregnancies with GDM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤是罕见的神经内分泌肿瘤,分别在肾上腺髓质和肾上腺外位置发展。它们的恶性由远处转移的存在定义。其中40%是遗传的,可能是不同遗传综合征的一部分。他们的管理在法国由ENDOCAN-COMETE国家网络“肾上腺癌”的多学科专家中心确保,由国家癌症研究所认证,并在多学科小组会议上讨论。诊断和治疗工作必须标准化,根据专家对临床症状的分析,荷尔蒙生物分泌物,遗传学,形态学和特异性代谢成像。在异质生存的背景下,有时超过七到十年,治疗干预必须是合理的。这是多学科的,依赖于手术,介入放射学,外部或内部放疗和药物治疗,如舒尼替尼或达卡巴嗪和temodal化疗。尽管这种疾病极为罕见,但基于功能成像固定状态和遗传学的个性化方法仍在进步。
    Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors, developed respectively in the adrenal medulla and in extra-adrenal locations. Their malignancy is defined by the presence of distant metastases. Forty percent of them are inherited and can be part of different hereditary syndromes. Their management is ensured in France by the multidisciplinary expert centers of the ENDOCAN-COMETE national network \"Cancers of the Adrenal gland\", certified by the National Cancer Institute and discussed within multidisciplinary team meetings. The diagnostic and therapeutic work-up must be standardized, based on an expert analysis of clinical symptoms, hormonal biological secretions, genetics, morphological and specific metabolic imaging. In the context of a heterogeneous survival sometimes beyond seven to ten years, therapeutic intervention must be justified. This is multidisciplinary and relies on surgery, interventional radiology, external or internal radiotherapy and medical treatments such as sunitinib or dacarbazine and temodal chemotherapy. The personalized approach based on functional imaging fixation status and genetics is progressing despite the extreme rarity of this disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    肾功能衰竭的并发症可能对血液透析患者的生活质量产生影响,这就是为什么特定的随访是由肾脏病学家组织的。高级执业护士(APN)可以与医生一起解决这个问题。SantélysBourgogneFranche-Comté协会进行的一项调查显示,专业人士赞成与APN合作,并且后续行动是由医疗和辅助医疗团队进行的,没有标准化的做法。RPN的干预可以改善不同行为者之间的协调。
    The complications of renal failure are likely to have an impact on the quality of life of hemodialysis patients, which is why specific follow-ups are organized by the nephrologist. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) could take care of this alongside physicians. A survey conducted by the Santélys Bourgogne Franche-Comté association shows that professionals are in favor of working with APNs and that follow-up is carried out by medical and paramedical teams without standardized practices. The intervention of an RPN could improve coordination between the different actors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    川崎病(KD)是一种急性血管炎,对冠状动脉具有特殊的嗜性。KD主要影响6个月至5岁的男性儿童。诊断是临床的,根据国际美国心脏协会的标准。应该系统地考虑发烧的儿童,5天或更长时间,如果所有其他标准都存在,则为3天。重要的是要注意,大多数儿童表现出明显的易怒,并可能有消化迹象。虽然生物炎症反应不是特异性的,这对诊断有很大的价值。由于难以识别不完整或非典型形式的KD,以及紧急治疗的需要,一旦怀疑诊断,孩子应该被转诊到儿科医院。如果出现心力衰竭的迹象(苍白,心动过速,呼吸息肉,出汗,肝肿大,血压不稳定),医疗转移到重症监护病房(ICU)是必不可少的。标准治疗是输注IVIG联合阿司匹林(在发烧10天之前,和至少6周),这降低了冠状动脉瘤的风险。在冠状动脉受累的情况下,抗血小板治疗可以维持终身。如果是巨大的动脉瘤,抗血小板剂中加入抗凝治疗。KD的预后总体良好,大多数儿童恢复无后遗症。初次冠状动脉受累儿童的预后取决于心脏异常的进展,在仔细的专业心脏病随访期间进行监测。
    Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute vasculitis with a particular tropism for the coronary arteries. KD mainly affects male children between 6 months and 5 years of age. The diagnosis is clinical, based on the international American Heart Association criteria. It should be systematically considered in children with a fever, either of 5 days or more, or of 3 days if all other criteria are present. It is important to note that most children present with marked irritability and may have digestive signs. Although the biological inflammatory response is not specific, it is of great value for the diagnosis. Because of the difficulty of recognising incomplete or atypical forms of KD, and the need for urgent treatment, the child should be referred to a paediatric hospital as soon as the diagnosis is suspected. In the event of signs of heart failure (pallor, tachycardia, polypnea, sweating, hepatomegaly, unstable blood pressure), medical transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU) is essential. The standard treatment is an infusion of IVIG combined with aspirin (before 10 days of fever, and for a minimum of 6 weeks), which reduces the risk of coronary aneurysms. In case of coronary involvement, antiplatelet therapy can be maintained for life. In case of a giant aneurysm, anticoagulant treatment is added to the antiplatelet agent. The prognosis of KD is generally good and most children recover without sequelae. The prognosis in children with initial coronary involvement depends on the progression of the cardiac anomalies, which are monitored during careful specialised cardiological follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,膀胱癌的检测是基于细胞学和膀胱镜检查。白光膀胱镜检查(WLC)是一种侵入性手术,可能对扁平病变的检测不足。蓝光膀胱镜检查(BLC)和窄带成像(NBI)膀胱镜检查是可以改善非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)及其复发或进展为肌层浸润性膀胱癌的新方法。我们对BLC和NBI膀胱镜检查在膀胱癌诊断和NMIBC随访中的应用进行了系统评价。
    方法:确定并审查了2010年5月至2021年3月在PubMed®上发表的所有关于膀胱镜检查的系统评价和荟萃分析。主要终点是膀胱癌诊断和NMIBC随访期间复发或进展检测的临床表现,以及与细胞学和/或WLC相比的附加价值。
    结果:发表的大多数荟萃分析和系统评价表明,与WLC相比,BLC和NBI膀胱镜检查的敏感性更好,特别是对于扁平病变(CIS)的检测。NBI和BLC引导的TURBT可降低复发率。然而,它们在降低进展率和增加生存率方面的临床效用尚不清楚.
    结论:BLC和NBI膀胱镜检查是膀胱癌诊断和NMIBC随访的有效技术。然而,其临床获益仍有待证实。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, bladder cancer detection is based on cytology and cystoscopy. White light cystoscopy (WLC) is an invasive procedure and may under-detect flat lesions. Blue light cystoscopy (BLC) and narrow band imaging (NBI) cystoscopy are new modalities that could improve the detection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and its recurrence or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer. We present a systematic review on BLC and NBI cystoscopy for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up.
    METHODS: All available systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cystoscopy published in PubMed® between May 2010 and March 2021 were identified and reviewed. The main endpoints were clinical performance for bladder cancer diagnosis and for recurrence or progression detection during NMIBC follow-up, and additional value compared with cytology and/or WLC.
    RESULTS: Most of the meta-analyses and systematic reviews published suggest a better sensitivity of BLC and NBI cystoscopy compared to WLC, particularly for the detection of flat lesions (CIS). NBI- and BLC-guided TURBT could decrease the recurrence rates. However, their clinical utility to reduce progression rate and increase survival is still unclear.
    CONCLUSIONS: BLC and NBI cystoscopy are efficient techniques for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up. However, their clinical benefit remains to be confirmed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    肾上腺皮质癌(ACC)是由肾上腺皮质发展而来的原发性恶性肿瘤,由Weiss评分≥3定义。其预后较差,主要取决于诊断时的疾病阶段。护理在法国由国家ENDOCAN-COMETE“肾上腺癌”网络的多学科专家中心组织,由国家癌症研究所认证。本文件根据文献中最可靠的数据更新了成人ACC管理指南。它分为11章:(1)发现情况;(2)治疗前评估;(3)ACC的诊断;(4)肿瘤遗传学;(5)预后分类;(6)激素分泌过多的治疗;(7)局部形式的治疗;(8)复发的治疗;(9)晚期形式的治疗;(10)随访;(11)ACC和妊娠的特殊情况。所有局部ACC的R0切除仍未满足需求,必须在专家中心进行。局部ACC的治疗管理流程图,提供复发或晚期ACC。它是由来自国家ENDOCAN-COMETE网络的专家撰写的,并由所有参与这些患者管理的法国协会(内分泌学,医学肿瘤学,内分泌手术,泌尿科,病理学,遗传学,核医学,放射学,介入放射学)。
    The adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a primary malignant tumor developed from the adrenal cortex, defined by a Weiss score≥3. Its prognosis is poor and depends mainly on the stage of the disease at diagnosis. Care is organized in France by the multidisciplinary expert centers of the national ENDOCAN-COMETE \"Adrenal Cancers\" network, certified by the National Cancer Institute. This document updates the guidelines for the management of ACC in adults based on the most robust data in the literature. It\'s divided into 11 chapters: (1) circumstances of discovery; (2) pre-therapeutic assessment; (3) diagnosis of ACC; (4) oncogenetics; (5) prognostic classifications; (6) treatment of hormonal hypersecretion; (7) treatment of localized forms; (8) treatment of relapses; (9) treatment of advanced forms; (10) follow-up; (11) the particular case of ACC and pregnancy. R0 resection of all localized ACC remains an unmet need and it must be performed in expert centers. Flow-charts for the therapeutic management of localized ACC, relapse or advanced ACC are provided. It was written by the experts from the national ENDOCAN-COMETE network and validated by all French Societies involved in the management of these patients (endocrinology, medical oncology, endocrine surgery, urology, pathology, genetics, nuclear medicine, radiology, interventional radiology).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    背景:肺移植(LT)需要对经常发生的多病理状况进行持续护理。随访集中在三个主要问题上:1/呼吸功能的稳定性;2/合并症管理;3/预防医学。法国约有3000名LT患者在11个LT中心接受治疗。鉴于LT接受者队列的规模增加,随访可能部分与外围中心共享.
    方法:本文介绍了SPLF(法语呼吸医学学会)工作组对共享随访的可能方式的建议。
    结果:虽然主要LT中心的任务是集中随访,特别是最佳免疫抑制的选择,确定的外围中心(PC)可以作为处理急性事件的替代方案,合并症和常规评估。不同中心之间的交流应该是自由流动的。从术后第3年开始,可以对稳定且同意的患者进行共享随访。而不稳定和未观察到的患者是较差的候选人。
    结论:这些指南可以作为任何希望有效促进随访的肺炎学家的参考,甚至尤其是在肺移植之后。
    BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LT) requires sustained care for a frequently polypathological condition. Follow-up is focused on three main issues: 1/stability of respiratory function; 2/comorbidity management; 3/preventive medicine. About 3000 LT patients in France are treated in 11 LT centers. Given the increased size of the LT recipient cohort, follow-up might be partially shared with peripheral centers.
    METHODS: This paper presents the suggestions of a working group of the SPLF (French-speaking respiratory medicine society) on possible modalities of shared follow-up.
    RESULTS: While the main LT center is tasked with centralizing follow-up, particularly the choice of optimal immunosuppression, an identified peripheral center (PC) may serve as an alternative to deal with acute events, comorbidities and routine assessment. Communication between the different centers should be free-flowing. Shared follow-up may be offered from the 3rd postoperative year to stable and consenting patients, whereas unstable and non-observant patients are poor candidates.
    CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines may serve as a reference for any pneumologist wishing to effectively contribute to follow-up, even and especially subsequent to lung transplant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号