OBJECTIVE: Suicide rates in older adults are often the highest of any age group, particularly among high income countries. However, there is a limited understanding of the factors that could protect against suicidality in older age. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the psychological factors that protect against suicidality in older age.
METHODS: An a priori protocol was established and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022343694). EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus were searched. Papers were quality assessed using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADSs) tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Seventeen papers were included and narratively synthesised.
RESULTS: The initial searches identified 10,673 records, resulting in the screening of 5441 records after the removal of duplicates. The protective factors identified were (1) meaning/purpose in life, (2) reasons for living, (3) coping styles, (4) psychological wellbeing, (5) life satisfaction, (6) personality factors, (7) cognitive functioning, and (8) sense of belonging. The factors with the most empirical support were meaning in life, followed by psychological wellbeing and coping responses, such as primary control strategies, and personality traits, such as positive affect and agency. There was also evidence to suggest that the influence of some protective factors, for example meaning in life, may depend upon stage in older life and gender.
CONCLUSIONS: This review identified several psychological factors that have been found to protect against suicidal ideation in older adults, representing potential treatment targets for reducing suicide in older adults. Recommendations for future research includes greater use of longitudinal and case-control designs, measuring outcomes across the continuum of suicidality and using samples that allow comparison between younger and older adults and within the spectrum of old age.

UNASSIGNED: Standardized definitions of suicidality phenotypes, including suicidal ideation (SI), attempt (SA), and death (SD) are a critical step towards improving understanding and comparison of results in suicide research. The complexity of suicidality contributes to heterogeneity in phenotype definitions, impeding evaluation of clinical and genetic risk factors across studies and efforts to combine samples within consortia. Here, we present expert and data-supported recommendations for defining suicidality and control phenotypes to facilitate merging current/legacy samples with definition variability and aid future sample creation.
UNASSIGNED: A subgroup of clinician researchers and experts from the Suicide Workgroup of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) reviewed existing PGC definitions for SI, SA, SD, and control groups and generated preliminary consensus guidelines for instrument-derived and international classification of disease (ICD) data. ICD lists were validated in two independent datasets (N = 9,151 and 12,394).
UNASSIGNED: Recommendations are provided for evaluated instruments for SA and SI, emphasizing selection of lifetime measures phenotype-specific wording. Recommendations are also provided for defining SI and SD from ICD data. As the SA ICD definition is complex, SA code list recommendations were validated against instrument results with sensitivity (range = 15.4% to 80.6%), specificity (range = 67.6% to 97.4%), and positive predictive values (range = 0.59-0.93) reported.
UNASSIGNED: Best-practice guidelines are presented for the use of existing information to define SI/SA/SD in consortia research. These proposed definitions are expected to facilitate more homogeneous data aggregation for genetic and multisite studies. Future research should involve refinement, improved generalizability, and validation in diverse populations.

UNASSIGNED: Suicide is a leading cause of death in males aged 25-44 years, an age which often coincides with becoming a father. This review aims to synthesise the evidence of the prevalence of suicidal and self-harm ideation in fathers during the perinatal, postnatal and early parenting period.
UNASSIGNED: Five databases were searched (PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) to identify papers published between 1 January 2000 and 9 March 2023. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of suicidality and self-harm ideation across the included studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 4215 articles were identified, with 14 studies included in the review. The combined pooled prevalence of suicidal and self-harm ideation was 4.2% (95% CI [2.6%, 6.2%]). Prevalence estimates were higher for self-harm ideation at 5.1% (95% CI [2.6%, 6.2%]) than for suicidality at 3% (95% CI [0.9%, 6.1%]).
UNASSIGNED: This review found that a considerable proportion of fathers experience suicidal and self-harm ideation during the early years of parenting. However, the paucity of rigorous prevalence studies indicates that further research in this area is needed urgently.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined as patients diagnosed with depression having a history of failure with different antidepressants with an adequate dosage and treatment duration. The NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine rapidly reduces depressive symptoms in TRD. We examined neural correlates of treatment response to ketamine in TRD through a systematic review of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. A comprehensive search in PubMed was performed using \"ketamine AND depression AND magnetic resonance.\" The time span for the database queries was \"Start date: 2018/01/01; End date: 2024/05/31.\" Total 41 original articles comprising 1,396 TRD and 587 healthy controls (HC) were included. Diagnosis of depression was made using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID), the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and/or the clinical assessment by psychiatrists. Patients with affective psychotic disorders were excluded. Most studies applied ketamine [0.5mg/kg racemic ketamine and/or 0.25mg/kg S-ketamine] diluted in 60cc of normal saline via intravenous infusion over 40 min one time, four times, or six times spaced 2-3 days apart over 2 weeks. Clinical outcome was defined as either remission, response, and/or percentage changes of depressive symptoms. Brain MRI of the T2*-weighted imaging (resting-state or task performance), arterial spin labeling, diffusion weighted imaging, and T1-weighted imaging were acquired at baseline and mainly 1-3days after the ketamine administration. Only the study results replicated by ≥ 2 studies and were included in the default-mode, salience, fronto-parietal, subcortical, and limbic networks were regarded as meaningful. Putative brain-based markers of treatment response to ketamine in TRD were found in the structural/functional features of limbic (subgenual ACC, hippocampus, cingulum bundle-hippocampal portion; anhedonia/suicidal ideation), salience (dorsal ACC, insula, cingulum bundle-cingulate gyrus portion; thought rumination/suicidal ideation), fronto-parietal (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, superior longitudinal fasciculus; anhedonia/suicidal ideation), default-mode (posterior cingulate cortex; thought rumination), and subcortical (striatum; anhedonia/thought rumination) networks. Brain features of limbic, salience, and fronto-parietal networks could be useful in predicting the TRD with better response to ketamine in relief of anhedonia, thought rumination, and suicidal ideation.

To date, although several studies have investigated the circulating levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), only a few authors have addressed their evaluation in adults. Furthermore, an important limitation of these studies lies in the fact that circulating BDNF is stored in platelets and released into the circulation when needed. To the best of our knowledge, a very limited number of studies have related peripheral BDNF values to platelet counts, and yet no study has evaluated intra-platelet BDNF levels in adults with ASD. In this framework, the aim of the present work is to pave the way in this field and evaluate platelet BNDF levels in adult ASD patients, as well as their correlation with autistic symptoms and related psychopathological dimensions. We recruited 22 ASD and 22 healthy controls, evaluated with the Adult autism subthreshold spectrum (AdAS Spectrum), the Social Anxiety Spectrum-self report (SHY-SR), the Trauma and loss spectrum-self report (TALS-SR), the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and the Mood Spectrum-self report for suicidality. Intra-platelet BDNF levels were also assessed. The results highlighted lower BDNF levels in the ASD group; moreover, AdAS Spectrum and WSAS total score as well as AdAS Spectrum Restricted interest and rumination, WSAS Private leisure activities, TALS-SR Arousal, and SHY-SR Childhood domains were significant negative predictors of platelet BDNF levels.

BACKGROUND: Suicidality is a complex clinical phenomenon reflecting vulnerability to suicidal behavior which can be explained via the biopsychosocial paradigm and in relationship with a variety of country-specific factors. Data on suicides within the Russian population are inconsistent (from 11.7 up to 25.1 per 100.000), whereas the population\'s suicidality risks have not been investigated in detail. Suicidality estimates during the multifactorial influence of the COVID-19 pandemic could serve as a basis to learn more about this mental health indicator.
METHODS: The current study is a part of the COMET-G international project (40 countries, n=55.589), which represents an analysis of data collected from Russia\'s general population (n=7714, 33±12 y.o., 61% female) to estimate suicidality using the Risk Assessment Suicidality Scale (RASS) and its relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and life-habit characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic. The evaluation of the statistical data (descriptive statistics, ANOVA, LASSO linear regression, significant at α=0.05) was undertaken using TIBCO Statistica.
RESULTS: According to the RASS, at least 20.68%, and up to 29.15%, of the general population in Russia demonstrated increased risk of suicidality during the pandemic. Modelling these risks pointed to the key vulnerabilities related to mental and behavioral disorders, such as (i) current severe depression and a history of mental disorders, (ii) bipolar disorder, (iii) use of illicit drugs surprisingly outranking the alcohol misuse, and psychiatric compounds (hypnotics), highlighting sleep quality deterioration, (iv) a history of suicide attempts and self-harm - though not self-reported changes in depression - in response were predictors of the risk of suicidality, which can be explained by the phenomenon of \"learned suicidality\", a habitual behavioral suicidality pattern completion accumulated over the background. Such (v) socio-demographic indicators as younger age (disregarding the gender factor), a marital status of single, having no children, living with fewer people in the household, a recent increase in family conflicts, increased need for emotional support, decreased need for communication, and not believing in precautionary measures against COVID-19, contributed to the increase of suicidality risk in the context of the pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study revealed new suicide risk factors that should be taken into account in suicidality risk assessments for the Russian population and in the implementation of suicide prevention programs in the region.
UNASSIGNED: Суицидальность — сложный клинический феномен, отражающий уязвимость к суицидальному поведению, который следует объяснять с позиций биопсихосоциальной парадигмы и во взаимосвязи с целым рядом специфических для каждой конкретной страны факторов. Данные о суицидах в российской популяции противоречивы (от 11,7 до 25,1 на 100 000), а популяционные риски суицидальности детально не изучались. Изменения суицидальности в ответ на многофакторное влияние пандемии COVID-19 дают основание для более глубокого изучения этого показателя психического здоровья на национальном уровне.
UNASSIGNED: Настоящее исследование является частью международного проекта COMET-G (40 стран, n=55 589). В нем изучались собранные в общей российской популяции (n=7714, 33±12 лет, 61% женщин) данные оценки суицидальных тенденций с помощью шкалы оценки риска суицидальности (RASS) и анализировались взаимосвязи данного показателя с социально-демографическими, клиническими, жизненными характеристиками в период пандемии COVID-19. Статистическая обработка данных (описательная статистика, ANOVA, регрессия LASSO, линейная регрессия, значимость при α=0,05) проводилась с помощью программы TIBCO Statistica.
UNASSIGNED: В период пандемии повышенный суицидальный риск, оцененный по шкале RASS выявлен у от 20,68% до 29,15% населения России. По результатам линейной регрессии суицидального риска со стороны психических и поведенческих расстройств выявлены ключевые факторы, ассоциированные с высоким риском: (i) текущая тяжелая депрессия и психические расстройства в анамнезе, (ii) биполярное расстройство, (iii) употребление наркотиков, значимость которых превышала таковую для фактора употребления алкоголя, и прием гипнотиков, сопряженный с ухудшением качества сна. (iv) Суицидальные попытки и эпизоды самоповреждающего поведения, но не усиление депрессии, предсказывали связанное с пандемией увеличение суицидальных мыслей и высокий риск суицидальности, что можно объяснить феноменом “выученной суицидальности” — паттерном привычной реализации суицидального поведения, , выработанным в течение прошлого опыта. (v) Такие социально-демографические показатели, как более молодой возраст (вне зависимости от гендерного фактора), одинокое проживание вне семьи, отсутствие детей, общее небольшое число членов семьи, недавнее увеличение семейных конфликтов, повышенная потребность в эмоциональной поддержке, сниженная потребность в общении, неверие в меры предосторожности против COVID-19, также ассоциировались с увеличением суицидального риска в условиях пандемии.
UNASSIGNED: Результаты данного исследования выявили новые факторы суицидального риска, которые следует учитывать при оценке риска суицидальности для российского населения и при реализации национальных программ предотвращения суицидов.

Planetary health influences mental health and a better management of climate, biodiversity and pollution has co-benefits of improving mental health outcomes. The recognition and treatment of mental health, however, has been marginalized within environmental and climate change sciences and a greater understanding of the complex underlying processes and societal costs is required to appropriately manage and motivate policy responses. The paper provides seven recommendations underscoring that public policy developers and implementors need to be aware of the combined costs of inaction - that might accrue from neglecting mental health and environmental sciences- two areas that have been historically marginalized. Improved methodologies in conducting studies on the nature and mental health nexus are needed. The trajectories and models of adaptation and mitigation of climate change and environmental damage can be strengthened through adoption of mental and behavioral sciences approach.

Suicidality disproportionately affects Veterans, and in 2020 the Military Health and Well-Being Project was conducted in part to study the link between risk and protective constructs with suicidality among Veterans. In the present study, we investigate the relative contribution of risk (i.e., military self-stigma, daily stress, combat exposure, substance use, traumatic brain injury, and moral injury) and protective constructs (i.e., social integration, social contribution, public service motivation, purpose and meaning, and help-seeking) with suicidality. Using cross-sectional Pearson correlation and linear regression models, we studied the independent and relative contribution of risk and protective correlates in a sample of 1469 Veterans (male: n = 985, 67.1 %; female: n = 476, 32.4 %; transgender, non-binary, prefer not to say: n = 8, 0.5 %). When we investigated protective constructs individually as well as simultaneously, social contribution (β = -0.39, t = -15.59, p < 0.001) was the strongest protective construct against suicidality. Social integration (β = -0.13, t = -4.88, p < 0.001) additionally accounted for significant reduction in suicidality when all protective constructs were considered together. When we investigated the contribution of risk constructs towards suicidality, moral injury was most strongly associated with suicidality (r = 0.519, p < 0.001), yet when studied simultaneously for their relative contribution none of the constructs accounted for a significant amount of the variance in suicidality (|t|s ≤ 1.98, ps ≥ 0.07). These findings suggest that among Veterans it is possible that social contribution is protective against suicidality and could be a possible treatment target for the prevention or reduction of suicidality among Veterans.

Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. Methods: Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (n = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (n = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. Results: TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). Conclusion: Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.

暂无摘要。