Stress-related disorder

应激相关障碍
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,早期和慢性压力会改变下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴的功能,从而调节皮质醇的分泌。然而,很少有研究主要集中在特定的研究人群(例如青少年,孕妇,和精神病患者),并研究了垂体体积和单一应激标记的相互作用关系。本研究使用了波美拉尼亚健康研究的两个成人普通人群的垂体体积(SHIP-START-2:N=1026,54%男性,30-90岁;SHIP-TREND-0:N=1868,男性53%,21-82岁)。在线性回归模型中,使用抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表-II)估计垂体体积的主要影响以及与儿童虐待和忽视(儿童创伤问卷)的相互作用影响,和血清皮质醇浓度作为结果变量。两个队列的结果通过荟萃分析进行整合。未观察到垂体体积与抑郁症状之间的主要影响(START-2:β=-0.004[-0.082;0.075],p=.929;趋势-0:β=0.020[-0.033;0.073],p=.466;荟萃分析:β=0.012[-0.031;0.056],p=.580)。然而,更大的垂体体积与更严重的儿童忽视参与者的抑郁症状相关(START-2:β=0.051[-0.024;0.126],p=.183;趋势-0:β=0.083[0.006;0.159],p=.034;荟萃分析:β=0.066[0.013;0.120],p=.015)。Further,在患有更严重的抑郁症状的参与者中,更大的垂体体积与更低的血清皮质醇浓度相关(START-2:β=-0.087[-0.145;-0.030],p=.003;趋势-0:β=-0.053[-0.091;-0.015],p=.006;荟萃分析:β=-0.063[-0.095;-0.032],p=8.39e-05)。总结,更大的垂体体积与更严重的精神病理症状有关,特别是在报告早期生活压力的参与者中。这得到了更严重的抑郁症状参与者的垂体体积和皮质醇浓度之间更强的关联的支持。未来的研究需要将这些结果转化为高荷尔蒙变化和患者样本的发育阶段。
    Early and chronic stress was reported to alter the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning which regulates the secretion of cortisol. Nevertheless, few studies mainly focused on specific study populations (e.g. adolescents, pregnant women, and psychiatric patients), and researched interactive associations of pituitary volumes and single stress markers. The present study used pituitary volumes of two adult general-population cohorts of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-START-2: N = 1026, 54% Men, 30-90 years; SHIP-TREND-0: N = 1868, 53% Men, 21-82 years). In linear regression models, main effects of the pituitary volumes as well as interaction effects with childhood abuse and neglect (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire) were estimated using depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II), and serum cortisol concentrations as outcome variables. The results of both cohorts were integrated via meta-analyses. No main effect between pituitary volumes and depressive symptoms was observed (START-2: β = -0.004 [-0.082; 0.075], p = .929; TREND-0: β = 0.020 [-0.033; 0.073], p = .466; Meta-analysis: β = 0.012 [-0.031; 0.056], p = .580). However, larger pituitary volumes were associated with more depressive symptoms in participants with more severe childhood neglect (START-2: β = 0.051 [-0.024; 0.126], p = .183; TREND-0: β = 0.083 [0.006; 0.159], p = .034; Meta-analysis: β = 0.066 [0.013; 0.120], p = .015). Further, larger pituitary volumes were associated with lower serum cortisol concentrations in participants with more severe depressive symptoms (START-2: β = -0.087 [-0.145; -0.030], p = .003; TREND-0: β = -0.053 [-0.091; -0.015], p = .006; Meta-analysis: β = -0.063 [-0.095; -0.032], p = 8.39e-05). Summarizing, larger pituitary volumes were associated with more severe psychopathological symptoms, particularly in participants reporting early life stress. This was supported by stronger associations between pituitary volumes and cortisol concentrations in participants with more severe depressive symptoms. Future studies are needed to transfer these results into developmental stages of high hormonal changes and patient samples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性应激和抑郁是轻度认知障碍和痴呆的潜在危险因素,包括阿尔茨海默病。目的是调查是否有任何此类风险是累加的。
    方法:队列研究包括1.362.548人(665997名女性,696.551名男性),记录在斯德哥尔摩地区行政医疗数据库(VAL)中。暴露是记录的ICD-10慢性应激的诊断,抑郁症,或者两者兼而有之,记录在2012年或2013年。结果是阿尔茨海默病的诊断,其他痴呆症,或从2014年到2022年记录的轻度认知障碍。根据年龄调整的99%置信区间(CI)的赔率,性别,邻里社会经济地位,糖尿病,并计算了心血管疾病。
    结果:在暴露期间,4.346例患者被诊断为慢性应激,40.101患有抑郁症,两者都有1.898。所有组的基线平均年龄约为40岁。在完全调整的模型中,慢性应激患者患阿尔茨海默病的比值比为2.45(99%CI1.22-4.91),抑郁症患者的2.32(99%CI1.85-2.90),和4.00(99%CI1.67-9.58)在慢性应激和抑郁症患者。慢性应激患者轻度认知障碍的比值比为1.87(99%CI1.20-2.91),抑郁症患者的2.85(99%CI2.53-3.22),和3.87(99%CI2.39-6.27)的患者。当分析其他痴呆症时,比值比仅在抑郁症患者中显著,2.39(99%CI1.92-2.96)。
    结论:记录的慢性应激增加了轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的风险。抑郁症也是如此。新发现是慢性压力对抑郁症的潜在累加效应,MCI和AD的风险。
    Chronic stress and depression are potential risk factors for mild cognitive impairment and dementia, including Alzheimer disease. The aim was to investigate whether any such risk is additive.
    Cohort study including 1 362 548 people (665 997 women, 696 551 men) with records in the Region Stockholm administrative healthcare database (VAL). Exposure was a recorded ICD-10 diagnosis of chronic stress, depression, or both, recorded in 2012 or 2013. Outcome was a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, other dementia, or mild cognitive impairment recorded from 2014 through 2022. Odds ratios with 99% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, sex, neighborhood socioeconomic status, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders were calculated.
    During the exposure period, 4 346 patients were diagnosed with chronic stress, 40 101 with depression, and 1 898 with both. The average age at baseline was around 40 years in all groups. In the fully adjusted model, the odds ratio of Alzheimer disease was 2.45 (99% CI 1.22-4.91) in patients with chronic stress, 2.32 (99% CI 1.85-2.90) in patients with depression, and 4.00 (99% CI 1.67-9.58) in patients with chronic stress and depression. The odds ratio of mild cognitive impairment was 1.87 (99% CI 1.20-2.91) in patients with chronic stress, 2.85 (99% CI 2.53-3.22) in patients with depression, and 3.87 (99% CI 2.39-6.27) in patients with both. When other dementia was analyzed, the odds ratio was significant only in patients with depression, 2.39 (99% CI 1.92-2.96).
    Documented chronic stress increased the risk of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. The same was seen with depression. The novel finding is the potential additive effect of chronic stress to depression, on risk of MCI and AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:在医学研究中的随机对照试验(RCT)中,将应用的干预措施与常规治疗(TAU)作为对照条件进行比较。当前研究的目的是研究如何将TAU的概念描述为评估抑郁症治疗的RCT中的对照条件。焦虑综合征,和初级保健中与压力相关的精神障碍。
    方法:对符合PRISMA标准的RCT中使用TAU作为对照组的RCT进行系统评价。我们使用了一个多学科数据库(Scopus),一个数据库专注于护理(Cinahl),和一个医疗数据库(PubMed)。搜索于2021年11月和2022年5月进行。
    结果:纳入的32项研究包括7803名参与者。TAU的内容分类如下:1)TAU的基本描述缺乏详细说明以及对当地或国家指南的参考,2)TAU的适度描述,包括对国家或地方指南的参考或详细描述3)TAU的高级描述,包括对国家指南的参考和包含五个关键概念的详细描述:早期评估,可访问性,心理治疗,药物,体格检查.18项研究有基础,11中度,以及TAU的3种高级描述。
    结论:限制是仅包括以英文发表的研究。
    结论:本研究为TAU提供了一种具有三种分类水平的评估工具。在初级保健中进行的RCT研究中,对TAU的描述仍然不足,这可能会影响结果的解释。在未来的研究中,建议对TAU进行详细描述。
    In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) within medical research, applied interventions are compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU) as the control condition. The aim of the current study was to examine how the concept of TAU is described when used as control condition in RCTs evaluating treatments for depression, anxiety syndromes, and stress-related mental disorders in primary care.
    A systematic review of RCTs utilizing TAU as control group in the RCT in accordance with PRISMA standards was conducted. We used one multidisciplinary database (Scopus), one database focused on nursing (Cinahl), and one medical database (PubMed). The searches were conducted in November 2021 and May 2022.
    The included 32 studies comprised of 7803 participants. The content of TAU was classified as follows: 1) Basic descriptions of TAU lacking a detailed account as well as reference to local or national guidelines, 2) Moderate description of TAU including reference to national or local guidelines or a detailed description 3) Advanced description of TAU including references to national guidelines and a detailed description containing five key concepts: early assessment, accessibility, psychological treatment, medication, somatic examination. 18 studies had basic, 11 moderate, and 3 advanced descriptions of TAU.
    The limitations were that only studies published in English were included.
    The current study provides an assessment tool with three classification levels for TAU. The description of TAU is still insufficient in RCT studies conducted in primary care, which may affect the interpretation of results. In future research a detailed description of TAU is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    由于COVID-19大流行和相关的COVID后综合征,“疲劳”这一概念已经变得非常重要。然而,根据所讨论的疾病模式,疲劳的定义和原因都不同。此外,在日常临床环境中描述他们的症状的人似乎几乎普遍使用术语疲劳,疲劳和疲惫同义。2007年,奥尔森将这三个术语描述为她认为的不同状态,但是它们可以被放置在一个连续体上。考虑到这一点,概述了当前的研究。为此,搜索了最近两年出版的文献中的术语“疲倦”,“疲劳”和“疲惫”。可以找到一些常见的诊断仪器。然而,用来捕捉这三个术语的各种各样的乐器令人震惊。尽管有这些不同的诊断和定义可能性,可以针对三种症状中的每一种得出不同的治疗措施。这是至关重要的,特别是关于进一步的治疗,把疲劳这三个术语分开,彼此疲劳和疲惫,并在共同的连续体上分别考虑它们。这是建立准确诊断和成功的个体治疗的唯一方法。
    Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated post-COVID syndrome, the concept \"fatigue\" has gained significant importance. However, both the definition and the causes of fatigue differ depending on the disease pattern in question. Moreover, individuals who describe their symptoms in everyday clinical settings seem almost universally to use the terms tiredness, fatigue and exhaustion synonymously. In 2007, Olson described these three terms as being distinct states in her view, but that they can be placed in relation to each other on a continuum. Taking up this consideration, an overview of current research is provided. For this purpose, the published literature of the last 2 years was searched for the terms \"tiredness\", \"fatigue\" and \"exhaustion\". Some common diagnostic instruments can be found. However, the great variety of instruments used to capture the three terms is striking. Despite these different diagnostic and definition possibilities, different therapeutic measures can be derived for each of the three symptoms. It is crucial, especially with regard to further therapy, to separate the three terms tiredness, fatigue and exhaustion from each other and to consider each of them separately on the common continuum. This is the only way to establish both an accurate diagnosis and the successful individual therapy that goes along with it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管对COVID-19对医护人员的影响进行了广泛的研究,很少有研究针对精神卫生工作者(MHW),也没有一项研究调查过以前的创伤事件.我们调查了意大利首次封锁后MHW的心理困扰,以了解哪些COVID-19,社会人口统计学,专业变量代表了更大的影响,以及先前创伤的作用。调查包括社会人口统计学和专业问题,COVID-19变量,和DSM-5(LEC-5)生活事件检查表,事件量表修订(IES-R)的影响,和抑郁焦虑压力量表21(DASS-21)。在完成调查的271名MHW(73.1%为女性;平均年龄45.37岁)中,我们对传染病恐惧获得了显著的影响,病人死亡的经验,工作量增加,在第一波中更糟糕的团队关系。护士受到的影响更大,并表现出更多的创伤后应激症状,由IES-R评估,更抑郁,焦虑,和压力症状,通过DASS-21评估。最大的危险因素是年龄较大,专业角色,工作量增加,更糟糕的团队关系,与家庭成员分离。先前的严重人类痛苦经历和不想要的性经历对IES-R和DASS-21评分产生负面影响。成为精神科医生或心理学家/心理治疗师以及良好的团队关系是保护因素。最近但以前的严重压力事件可能代表相关的危险因素,降低弹性技能。确定脆弱因素和专业类别可能有助于制定专门措施,以防止情绪负担和支持心理健康。亮点:在COVID-19大流行中,精神卫生工作者的心理困扰在护士中更为常见,经历更多抑郁的人,焦虑,和创伤后应激症状。以前和最近的压力事件是困扰的危险因素,应指导干预策略。
    Despite extensive research on COVID-19\'s impact on healthcare workers, few studies have targeted mental health workers (MHWs) and none have investigated previous traumatic events. We investigated psychological distress in MHWs after the first lockdown in Italy to understand which COVID-19, sociodemographic, and professional variables represented greater effects, and the role of previous trauma. The survey included sociodemographic and professional questions, COVID-19 variables, and the questionnaires Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 (DASS-21). On the 271 MHWs who completed the survey (73.1% female; mean age 45.37), we obtained significant effects for contagion fear, experience of patients\' death, increased workload, and worse team relationship during the first wave. Nurses were more affected and showed more post-traumatic stress symptoms, assessed by IES-R, and more depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms, assessed by DASS-21. The strongest risk factors for distress were greater age, professional role, increased workload, worse team relationship, and separation from family members. Previous experience of severe human suffering and unwanted sexual experiences negatively impacted IES-R and DASS-21 scores. Being a psychiatrist or psychologist/psychotherapist and good team relationships were protective factors. Recent but also previous severe stressful events might represent relevant risk factors for distress, reducing resilience skills. Identifying vulnerable factors and professional categories may help in the development of dedicated measures to prevent emotional burden and support psychological health. Highlights: Psychological distress in mental health workers in the COVID-19 pandemic is more frequent in nurses, who experience more depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Previous and recent stressful events are risk factors for distress and should guide intervention strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Major depressive disorders (MDDs) and anxiety and stress-related disorders (ASRDs) have overlapping symptoms and high rates of comorbidity. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we aimed to examine whether MDD and ASRD share genetic risk factors utilizing recent large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs). To examine the genetic overlap between MDD and ASRD, we applied genetic correlation analysis to analyze GWAS summary statistics for MDD (16,823 cases and 25,632 controls) and ASRD (12,665 cases and 19,225 controls). We found positive and significant genetic correlations between MDD and ASRD (GNOVA: rho = 0.59, se = 0.01, P = 5.32 × 10-45). Our latent causal variable (LCV) analysis indicated the genetic correlation result from pleiotropic effects (gcp = -0.56, se = 0.31, Pgcp = 0.1). Based on pleiotropic enrichment, we performed a cross-trait meta-analysis of MDD and ASRD GWAS and fine-mapped the identified loci. In total, we identified 5 pleiotropic loci simultaneously associated with MDD and ASRD at P < 5 × 10-8. At the gene level, we further demonstrated that MDD- and ASRD-inferred gene expression overlapped across 48 tissues and highlighted the NUP210L gene as a potential mediator of the genetic correlation. Our study highlights a shared underlying genetic risk for MDD and ASRD, which may help to improve the understanding of high comorbidity and overlapping genetic mechanisms between the two traits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疲劳在人群中普遍存在,特别是在劳动人民中。排气障碍(ED),倦怠的临床表现,是常见的,但是,治疗后,大约三分之一的人仍然会出现疲劳和其他身体症状。我们建议在某些情况下,疲劳作为一种持续的身体症状(PPS)可能是ED患者疲劳问题的更合适的表述,我们建议符合疲劳PPS标准的ED患者在心理困扰方面与其他ED患者不同,非疲劳PPSs和功能障碍。问卷已发送给工会的10,956名成员,其中2479名(22.6%)回答。在1090名符合ED标准的参与者中,106(9.7%)符合PPS的疲劳标准。符合疲劳PPS标准的参与者在抑郁方面的平均得分更高,焦虑和功能障碍,更有可能有临床意义的评分。此外,他们遇到其他PPS亚型的几率高27倍,并且报告了更多的非疲劳PPS亚型,暗示了一个更复杂的健康问题。具体的循证干预措施适用于ED和PPSs,因此,准确制定患者报告的疲劳问题以提供适当的治疗至关重要。
    Fatigue is widespread in the population, particularly among working people. Exhaustion disorder (ED), a clinical manifestation of burnout, is common, but, after treatment, about one-third still experience fatigue and other physical symptoms. We propose that in some instances, fatigue as a persistent physical symptom (PPS) might be a more appropriate formulation of ED patients\' fatigue problems, and we suggest that ED patients who meet fatigue PPS criteria will differ from other ED patients in terms of psychological distress, non-fatigue PPSs and functional impairment. Questionnaires were sent to 10,956 members of a trade union of which 2479 (22.6%) responded. Of 1090 participants who met criteria for ED, 106 (9.7%) met criteria for fatigue as a PPS. Participants who met fatigue PPS criteria scored on average higher on measures of depression, anxiety and functional impairment and were more likely to have clinically significant scores. Moreover, they had 27 times higher odds of meeting other PPS subtypes and reported more non-fatigue PPS subtypes, suggesting a more complex health problem. Specific evidence-based interventions are available for both ED and PPSs, and therefore, it is crucial to accurately formulate the fatigue problem reported by patients to provide appropriate treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Non-selective α2-adrenoreceptor (AR) stimulation delivers favourable sedative, analgesic, muscle relaxant and anxiolytic actions in companion animals, but is associated with cardiovascular and respiratory side effects. Anxiety conditions underscore monoamine disturbances amenable to α2-AR modulation. We investigated sub-chronic (14 day s.c.) treatment with the selective α2C-AR antagonist, ORM-10921 (0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg/d) on hippocampal noradrenaline (NA), dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and their turnover levels in stress sensitive Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL) rats versus Flinders Resistant Line (FRL) controls, using high performance liquid chromatography. The effects of ORM-10921 were compared to the non-selective α2-AR antagonist, idazoxan (IDAZ; 3 mg/kg/d), and to imipramine (IMI; 15 mg/kg/d), a reference antidepressant in this model. FSL rats displayed significantly reduced 5-HT (p = 0.03) and DA (p = 0.02) levels vs. FRL controls, while NA levels showed a similar trend. ORM-10921 significantly increased NA (all doses p ≤ 0.02), 5-HT (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg p ≤ 0.03) and DA levels (all doses p ≤ 0.03), which correlated with decreased monoamine turnover. In contrast, IDAZ significantly elevated NA (p < 0.005) and DA (p < 0.004) but not 5-HT levels. IMI also significantly increased 5-HT (p < 0.009), with a tendency to increase NA (p = 0.09) but not DA. ORM-10921 exerts similar albeit broader effects on hippocampal monoamines than IDAZ, explaining earlier established efficacy associated with α2C-AR antagonism in animal models of depression and cognitive dysfunction. These and the current studies encourage application of ORM-10921 in depression in humans, as well as raise the intriguing possibility that selective α2C-AR antagonists may be beneficial in anxiety and stress-related disorders in companion animals. Both warrant further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Chronic stress is a major cause of mental health problems and primary medical issues. Milk has been studied for its stress-reducing effects. Tryptophan, which is abundant in milk, is a precursor of the neuroactive compounds serotonin and melatonin. This study investigated the preventive effects of milk casein on brain dysfunction and anxiety-like behavior induced by chronic stress. Mice were exposed to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) and milk casein was administered for 10 weeks. Milk casein significantly reduced stress-induced changes in serum corticosterone and serotonin levels. The negative effects of UCMS on the expression of proteins associated with neuroendocrine function, neurodegeneration, neuronal inflammation, and barrier function of the blood-brain barrier were statistically normalized by casein treatment. Pretreatment with casein significantly prevented anxiety-like behavior induced by UCMS. These results suggest that milk casein has the potential to prevent stress-induced brain dysfunction and anxiety-like behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:与先前的人际关系创伤有关的痛苦在精神保健患者中很常见。诊断标签可能有所不同,但是临床表现通常具有长期和复杂的心理和躯体症状,主观痛苦和健康和生活质量下降。相当比例的患者在普通的专业精神卫生保健机构进行单独治疗后无法康复,尽管个人创伤特异性治疗已被证明是有用的。在群体环境中出现的治疗因素,比如规范化,减少羞耻和纠正关系经验,可能对创伤幸存者特别有用。然而,支持创伤幸存者团体治疗的证据很少.这项研究旨在测试在普通的社区精神卫生医院中将新型团体干预与个体治疗相结合是否优于常规的个体门诊治疗。
    方法:在单站点中,非致盲,随机对照试验(RCT),将单独治疗中添加的基于群体的稳定和技能训练(SST)干预措施的效果与常规治疗(照常治疗,TAU)独自一人。将在圣奥拉夫大学医院社区精神卫生中心的普通门诊诊所招募与过去已知的不良生活事件相关的持续和持久反应的参与者(N=160),特隆赫姆,挪威。基线评估和随机化后,参与者将在基线后4,8,13和19个月完成随访措施.主要结果是个人康复(关于康复过程的问卷,QPR)。次要结果包括(1)自我报告的创伤后应激症状,一般精神和躯体健康症状,幸福,功能障碍和客户满意度,(2)在血液样本中测量的免疫和内分泌反应以及(3)有关职业状况的国家注册数据,使用精神卫生服务和药物治疗。此外,通过创伤后认知的变化机制将被检查。
    结论:在创伤幸存者的个体治疗中增加基于小组的干预措施可能被证明是一种有效的方法,可以满足大量患者的长期高强度治疗需求。精神保健患者,从而减少他们的痛苦,增加他们的社会心理功能。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03887559。2019年3月25日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Suffering linked to previous interpersonal trauma is common among patients in mental health care. Diagnostic labels may vary, but the clinical picture is often characterized by long-lasting and complex psychological and somatic symptoms, subjective distress and reduced quality of health and life. A substantial proportion of patients do not recover after individual treatment in ordinary specialized mental healthcare settings, despite the proven usefulness of individual trauma-specific treatments. The therapeutic factors that arise in group settings, such as normalization, shame reduction and corrective relational experiences, may be particularly useful for trauma survivors. However, evidence in support of group treatment for trauma survivors is scarce. This study aims to test whether combining a novel group intervention to individual treatment is superior to conventional individual out-patient treatment in an ordinary community mental health hospital.
    METHODS: In a single-site, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT), the effect of a combined group-based stabilization and skill-training (SST) intervention added to individual treatment will be compared to conventional treatment (treatment as usual, TAU) alone. Participants (N = 160) with ongoing and long-lasting reactions related to known adverse life events from the past will be recruited among patients at general outpatient clinics in a community mental health centre at St. Olav\'s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. Following baseline assessment and randomization, participants will complete follow-up measures at 4, 8, 13 and 19 months post-baseline. The primary outcome is personal recovery (The questionnaire about the process of recovery , QPR). Secondary outcomes include (1) self-reported symptoms of posttraumatic stress, general mental and somatic health symptoms, well-being, functional impairment and client satisfaction, (2) immunological and endocrine response measured in blood samples and (3) national registry data on occupational status, use of mental health services and pharmacological treatment. Additionally, mechanisms of change via posttraumatic cognitions will be examined.
    CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a group-based intervention to individual treatment for trauma survivors might prove to be an efficient way to meet the need of long-lasting high-intensity treatment in a large group of patients in mental health care, thereby reducing their suffering and increasing their psychosocial functioning.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03887559. Registered on 25 March 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号