暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Determine if superior canal dehiscence (SCD) found on flat-panel CT increases the risk for other defects in the otic capsule.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Tertiary care center.
METHODS: One hundred ears (50 with SCD and 50 matched controls without SCD).
METHODS: Flat-panel CT imaging.
METHODS: (1) Prevalence of other dehiscences in SCD ears, (2) dehiscences in controls, and (3) otic capsule thickness in other reported dehiscence locations (cochlea-carotid, lateral semicircular canal [SCC] and mastoid, facial nerve-lateral SCC, vestibular aqueduct, posterior SCC-jugular bulb, posterior SCC-posterior fossa). Between-group comparisons were considered significant at p < 0.007 after applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Not including the SCD, there was a mean of 0.04 additional dehiscences in the SCD group (n = 2/50, 4%) and 0.04 non-SCD dehiscences in the controls (n = 2/50, 4%, p > 0.007). In the SCD group, there was one dehiscence between the cochlea and carotid artery and one between the posterior SCC and posterior fossa. The control group had one enlarged vestibular aqueduct and one dehiscence between the facial nerve and lateral SCC. As a group, SCD ears had wider vestibular aqueducts (0.68 ± 0.20 vs 0.51 ± 0.30 mm, p < 0.007) and thinner bone between the posterior SCC and posterior fossa (3.12 ± 1.43 vs 4.34 ± 1.67 mm, p < 0.007). The bone between the facial nerve and lateral SCC was thicker in SCD ears (0.77 ± 0.23 vs 0.55 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.007) and no different for cochlea-carotid, and lateral SCC and mastoid (p > 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: SCD does not increase the likelihood of a second dehiscence in the same otic capsule. SCD patients may have congenitally thinner otic capsule bones compared to controls, particularly near the posterior SCC, where the vestibular aqueduct may be enlarged.

暂无摘要。

The superior canal dehiscence syndrome is a pathology that affects the arcuate eminence creating a \"third window\" between the inner ear and the middle fossa. This condition can lead to symptoms such as hearing loss, autophony, or sound-induced vertigo. Traditionally, surgical treatment has been performed by microscope-assisted temporal craniotomy, but when the dehiscence is in the medial part of the arcuate eminence the bone defect may not be seen. We present case series treated at our institution diagnosed of superior canal dehiscence syndrome involving the medial slope of the arcuate eminence. During surgery, the bone defect could not be visible with traditional microscopic techniques. Nonetheless, by introducing the endoscope with the 0º and 30º optics, the dehiscence could be clearly observed and treated correctly. Our results show a clinical improvement without side effects or complications in the patients undergoing this technique. Endoscope-assisted surgery is a safe procedure and provides a better visualization of medial defects.

BACKGROUND: Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) is a dehiscence of the otic capsule which normally lies over the superior semicircular canal. This database constitutes the largest series of SSCD patients to date.
OBJECTIVE: To determine what preoperative factors, if any, contribute to postoperative outcomes and evaluate symptom resolution in a large SSCD patient cohort.
METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective chart review collected patient demographics, intraoperative findings, and pre-and postoperative symptoms. Fisher\'s exact t-test was performed for unpaired categorical variables, with a significance level of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: 350 SSCD repairs were performed. The median age was 52 years (range: 17-86 years, ± 6.4 years), and the median follow-up duration was 4.6 months (range: 0.03-59.5 months, ± 6.8 months). Preoperative hearing loss was significantly associated with female sex (p = 0.0028). The most reported preoperative symptoms were tinnitus (77.4%), dizziness (74.0%), autophony (66.3%), amplification (63.7%), and disequilibrium (62.6%). Between patients who received unilateral versus bilateral SSCD repair, the greatest postoperative symptomatic resolution was seen in autophony (74.9%, p < 0.001), amplification (77.3%, p = 0.00027), hyperacusis (77.4%, p = 0.023), hearing (62.9%, p = 0.0063), and dizziness (54.6%, p < 0.001) for patients with unilateral SSCD repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair via the middle cranial fossa approach can significantly resolve auditory, vestibular, and neurological symptoms of patients with SSCD. Although this is one of the largest single-institution SSCD studies to date, future multi-institutional, prospective studies would be beneficial to validate these results.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis and management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SCDS) with concomitant otosclerosis can be a challenge. Otosclerosis can mask SCDS symptoms and stapes surgery may reveal or exacerbate vestibular symptoms. Our aim is to present four cases of SCDS with concomitant otosclerosis and thereby informing the reader about the possibility of this dual occurrence and its implications for treatment.
METHODS: Four patients with SCDS and concomitant otosclerosis are presented. Two patients underwent surgical treatment for both SCDS and otosclerosis and two patients opted for conservative management.
RESULTS: The main differences between surgically and non-surgically treated cases are the presence of autophony and pressure-induced vertigo and a more severe experience of symptoms in surgically treated cases. Surgically treated cases achieved a sizeable reduction in postoperative air-bone gap and resolution of vestibular symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The subjective severity of symptoms in combination with shared decision-making is key in determining the appropriate treatment plan for SCDS and concomitant otosclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Tegmen and superior semicircular canal defects have been well studied, yet the factors contributing to their onset and progression are widely debated. The clinical utility of intraoperative intracranial pressure measurements has yet to be tested. This report aims to use intraoperative opening pressure and concurrent superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) to analyze factors influencing disease course and clinical outcomes in patients with tegmen dehiscence.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent tegmen defect repair was performed. Multiple variables of interest including body mass index (BMI), presence of SSCD, presence of dural venous sinus stenosis, opening pressure, and acetazolamide therapy use were recorded. The cohort was divided into those with or without concurrent SSCD and those presenting with or without cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak for analysis.
RESULTS: A linear relationship between opening pressure and BMI (p = 0.009) was noted; however, intraoperative opening pressure was not associated with disease outcome. Concurrent SSCD was present in 25 % of patients, while 62 % presented with CSF leak. The concurrent SSCD group exhibited higher opening pressure, higher likelihood of having dural sinus stenosis, and higher likelihood of being discharged on acetazolamide. The CSF leak group had higher likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea and persistent symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing tegmen defect repair, concurrent SSCD suggests increased disease severity. The presence of preoperative CSF leak predicts persistent symptoms following repair. BMI is linearly correlated with intracranial pressure in these patients.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the diagnostic yield of patients undergoing evaluation for superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS), and identify alternative conditions diagnosed in patients suspected of, but not ultimately diagnosed with, SCDS.
METHODS: Diagnostically undifferentiated adult patients suspected of having SCDS were identified between 2016 and 2021 at a tertiary academic medical system. Patients were categorized by diagnostic testing, radiographic superior semicircular canal (SSC) abnormality, symptoms, evaluating clinician specialty, operative intervention, and diagnosis. Differences among groups were assessed for statistical significance.
RESULTS: Of 1242 candidate patients, 477 met inclusion criteria-evaluation by a clinician with SCDS on their differential diagnosis prior to diagnostic imaging. The mean (SD) age was 53.0 (15.0) years and 70.6% were female. A total of 364 patients underwent subsequent diagnostic imaging, and among these, 164 (45.1%) had a radiographic SSC abnormality with 99 (27.2%) receiving a diagnosis of SCDS (two cases of \"near dehiscence syndrome\"). One third (33.3%) of patients with SCDS underwent operative repair. Most clinicians with the initial suspicion for SCDS were otolaryngologists (90.6%), who had greater diagnostic yield than clinicians from other specialties (22.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.012). Patients not diagnosed with SCDS alternatively received 21 unique diagnoses and 52.1% (138/265) were not definitively diagnosed with any condition.
CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes the diagnostic incidence, or yield, of newly identified radiographic SSC abnormalities (45.1%) and SCDS (27.2%) among people suspected of having SCDS. Considerable overlap in presentation between SCDS and other conditions exists, and there is need for improvement in efficiently diagnosing patients with SCDS and audio-vestibular complaints in general.
METHODS: III Laryngoscope, 134:4095-4100, 2024.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether adult cochlear implant users with radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence experience clinically significant differences in audiological outcomes when compared to cochlear implant users with normal temporal bone anatomy.
METHODS: Retrospective, single institution review. Adult, post-lingual deaf patients implanted between 2010 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years or older, available preoperative computed tomography imaging, and preoperative and postoperative AzBio audiological data for at least 6 months of cochlear implant use. Preoperative and postoperative AzBio Sentence Test scores were compared between patients with normal temporal bone anatomy and those with radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence or near dehiscence.
RESULTS: 110 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean AzBio score for normal temporal bone anatomy group improved from 35.2 % (SD 28.2) preoperatively to 70.3 % (SD 25.7) postoperatively, an improvement of 35.1 % (SD 28.6). Mean AzBio score for near dehiscent temporal bone anatomy group improved from 26.6 % (SD 28.9) preoperatively to 64.5 % (SD 30.6) postoperatively, an improvement of 37.9 % (SD 27.9). Mean AzBio score for dehiscent temporal bone anatomy group improved from 26.3 % (SD 20.4) preoperatively to 65.1 % (SD 27.6) postoperatively, an improvement of 38.7 % (SD 26.9). Utilizing the one-way analysis of variance test, there was no significant difference in audiologic outcomes between the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with complete or near complete radiographic superior canal dehiscence at the time of cochlear implantation achieve similar improvements in speech perception scores compared to normal anatomy adult cochlear implant users.

暂无摘要。