目的:本研究评估了土耳其中心使用的各种颅脊照射(CSI)技术,以了解其优势,缺点和整体有效性,重点是增强剂量分布。
方法:成人和儿童患者的匿名CT扫描,除了目标体积和危险器官(OAR)结构之外,与25个当地放疗中心共享。他们的任务是制定最佳的治疗计划,以95%的PTV覆盖率在20个部分中提供36Gy,同时最小化OAR曝光。将相同的CT数据发送到美国质子治疗中心进行比较。各种规划系统和治疗技术(3D适形RT,IMRT,VMAT,断层疗法)被利用。ElektaProknow软件用于分析参数,评估剂量分布,平均剂量,合格指数(CI),以及目标体积和OAR的均匀性指数(HI)。与质子治疗进行了比较。
结果:所有技术在成人和儿科患者中始终实现了出色的PTV覆盖率(V95>98%)。对于所有PTV,断层治疗都接近理想的Dmean剂量,而3D-CRT对PTV_brain有较高的Dmean。断层治疗在PTV的CI和HI方面表现出色。IMRT导致小儿心脏降低,肾,腮腺,和眼睛剂量,而3D-CRT实现了最低的成人肺剂量。断层治疗接近成人肾脏和甲状腺的质子治疗剂量,虽然IMRT擅长成人心脏,肾,腮腺,食道,和眼睛。
结论:现代放射治疗技术提供了改善的靶覆盖和OAR保护。然而,3D技术继续用于CSI。值得注意的是,质子治疗是最有效的方法,在实现卓越的目标覆盖和OAR保护方面,紧随其后的是Tomtherapy。
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates various craniospinal irradiation (CSI) techniques used in Turkish centers to understand their advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness, with a focus on enhancing dose distribution.
METHODS: Anonymized CT scans of adult and pediatric patients, alongside target volumes and organ-at-risk (OAR) structures, were shared with 25 local radiotherapy centers. They were tasked to develop optimal treatment plans delivering 36 Gy in 20 fractions with 95% PTV coverage, while minimizing OAR exposure. The same CT data was sent to a US proton therapy center for comparison. Various planning systems and treatment techniques (3D conformal RT, IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy) were utilized. Elekta Proknow software was used to analyze parameters, assess dose distributions, mean doses, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for both target volumes and OARs. Comparisons were made against proton therapy.
RESULTS: All techniques consistently achieved excellent PTV coverage (V95 > 98%) for both adult and pediatric patients. Tomotherapy closely approached ideal Dmean doses for all PTVs, while 3D-CRT had higher Dmean for PTV_brain. Tomotherapy excelled in CI and HI for PTVs. IMRT resulted in lower pediatric heart, kidney, parotid, and eye doses, while 3D-CRT achieved the lowest adult lung doses. Tomotherapy approached proton therapy doses for adult kidneys and thyroid, while IMRT excelled for adult heart, kidney, parotid, esophagus, and eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Modern radiotherapy techniques offer improved target coverage and OAR protection. However, 3D techniques are continued to be used for CSI. Notably, proton therapy stands out as the most efficient approach, closely followed by Tomotherapy in terms of achieving superior target coverage and OAR protection.