Portal Hypertension

门脉高压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较以N-丁基氰基丙烯酸酯胶(EIS-CYA)和EIS-CYA联合放射介入治疗(经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPSS)或球囊闭塞逆行静脉闭塞术(BRTO))预防因急性心底静脉曲张破裂出血(AVB)而继发的肝硬化患者的疗效。主要结果指标是1年时的胃静脉曲张(GV)再出血率。
    方法:在通过EIS-CYA进行初次止血后,将来自心底静脉曲张的AVB连续肝硬化患者随机分为两组(每组45例)。在“内窥镜介入”(EI)臂中,定期(1、3、6和12个月)重复EIS-CYA,在“放射性干预”(RI)领域,患者接受TIPSS或BRTO,然后进行内镜监测.
    结果:与RI组相比,EI组1年的GV再出血率较高:11(24·4%;95%CI:12·9%-39·5%)对1(2·2%;95%CI:0·1%-11·8%);(p=0·004)[ARD:22.2%(95%CI:6.6%-8.4%)EI组的GV再出血相关死亡率[8(17·8%;95%CI:8·0%-32·1%)]显着高于RI组[1(2·2%;0·1%-11·8%)](p=0.030)[ARD:15.6(95%CI:2.9%-29.2%)],然而,两组间全因死亡率无差异(12[26·7%;95%CI:14·6~41·9]与7[15·6%;95%CI:6·5~29·5]).1年预防一次GV相关性再出血所需治疗(NNT)的数量为4.5。
    结论:二级预防的放射干预可降低胃底静脉曲张再出血和GV再出血相关死亡率。(CTRI/2021/02/031396)。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue (EIS-CYA) vs EIS-CYA plus a radiologic intervention (either transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) or balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO)) for secondary prophylaxis in patients with liver cirrhosis who presented with acute variceal bleeding (AVB) from cardiofundal varices. Primary outcome measure was gastric varix (GV) rebleed rates at 1 year.
    METHODS: Consecutive cirrhosis patients with AVB from cardiofundal varices were randomized into two arms (45 in each) after primary hemostasis by EIS-CYA. In the \'endoscopic intervention\' (EI) arm, EIS-CYA was repeated at regular intervals (1, 3, 6 and 12 months), while in the \'radiological intervention\' (RI) arm, patients underwent TIPSS or BRTO followed by endoscopic surveillance.
    RESULTS: GV rebleed rates at 1 year were higher in the EI arm compared to the RI arm: 11 (24·4%; 95% CI: 12·9%-39·5%) versus 1 (2·2%; 95% CI: 0·1%-11·8%); (p=0·004) [ARD: 22.2% (95% CI: 8.4%-36.6%)]. GV rebleed related mortality in the EI arm [8 (17·8%; 95% CI: 8·0%-32·1%)] was significantly higher than in the RI arm [1 (2·2%; 0·1%-11·8%)] (p=0.030) [ARD: 15.6 (95% CI: 2.9%-29.2%)], however, there was no difference in all-cause mortality between the two groups (12 [26·7%; 95% CI: 14·6 to 41·9] versus 7 [15·6%; 95% CI: 6·5 to 29·5]). Numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one GV-related rebleed at 1 year was 4.5.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiological intervention for secondary prophylaxis reduces rebleeding from gastric varices and GV rebleeding related mortality in patients with gastric variceal hemorrhage. (CTRI/2021/02/031396).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门脉高压影响肝脏,内脏和门体侧支系统。虽然酒精是众所周知的肝硬化的危险因素,它也影响血管收缩性。然而,对门脉高压的相关影响尚未在非酒精性肝硬化中进行评估.本研究旨在探讨低剂量酒精对非酒精性肝硬化大鼠门静脉高压相关紊乱的影响。 方法:Sprague-Dawley大鼠接受胆管结扎以诱导肝硬化或假手术作为对照。低剂量酒精的慢性或急性影响(2.4g/kg/天,口服灌胃,评估了人类约1.3杯/天)。

    &#160;结果:长期服用低剂量酒精不会在假手术或肝硬化大鼠中沉淀肝纤维化,然而,它显著增加内脏血液流入(P=0.034)和门体侧支(P=0.001)。肠系膜血管生成和促血管生成蛋白在酒精处理的肝硬化大鼠中上调,对血管收缩剂的侧支血管反应性较差(P<0.001).始终如一,急性酒精给药减少脾肾分流阻力。对血管收缩剂的侧支血管反应性也显著降低(P=0.003)。

    &#160;结论:在非酒精性肝硬化大鼠中,由于血管扩张,单剂量酒精对门体侧支血管产生不利影响。长期饮酒导致内脏高动力循环,其中肠系膜血管生成发挥作用。需要进一步的研究来评估非酒精性肝硬化患者避免低剂量饮酒的益处。
    BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension affects hepatic, splanchnic and portosystemic collateral systems. Although alcohol is a well-known risk factor for liver cirrhosis, it also affects vascular contractility. However, the relevant effects on portal hypertension have not been evaluated in non-alcoholic cirrhosis. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of low-dose alcohol on portal hypertension-related derangements in non-alcoholic cirrhotic rats.  Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats received bile duct ligation to induce cirrhosis or sham operation as controls. The chronic or acute effects of low-dose alcohol (2.4 g/kg/day, oral gavage, approximately 1.3 drinks/day in humans) were evaluated.

     Results: The chronic administration of low-dose alcohol did not precipitate liver fibrosis in the sham or cirrhotic rats, however it significantly increased splanchnic blood inflow (P=0.034) and portosystemic collaterals (P=0.001). Mesenteric angiogenesis and pro-angiogenic proteins were upregulated in the alcohol-treated cirrhotic rats, and poorer collateral vasoresponsiveness to vasoconstrictors (P<0.001) was noted. Consistently, acute alcohol administration reduced splenorenal shunt resistance. Collateral vasoresponsiveness to vasoconstrictors also significantly decreased (P=0.003).

     Conclusions: In non-alcoholic cirrhosis rats, a single dose of alcohol adversely affected portosystemic collateral vessels due to vasodilatation. Long-term alcohol use precipitated splanchnic hyperdynamic circulation, in which mesenteric angiogenesis played a role. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the benefits of avoiding low-dose alcohol consumption in patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    为了避免反复的静脉曲张出血,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)联合静脉曲张栓塞术被认为是一种有效的策略。然而,由于条件的变化和患者状态的变化,接受TIPS治疗的个体在手术过程中可能面临挑战和限制.在这种情况下,由于门静脉阻塞和先前的脾切除术,经颈静脉技术和经脾门静脉再通(PVR)联合TIPS无效。腹部切口,我们成功穿刺了肠系膜静脉系统,并通过肠系膜入路导航了门静脉的闭塞段。然后在气球引导下进行TIPS。本研究旨在探讨外科手术中的风险和并发症的管理,并提出多种术前手术技术,以提高手术成功率。
    To avoid recurrent variceal bleeding, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in conjunction with variceal embolization is considered to be an effective strategy. However, due to changes in conditions and variations in the patient\'s state, individuals undergoing TIPS may face challenges and limitations during procedures. The transjugular technique and combined transsplenic portal venous recanalization (PVR) with TIPS were not effective in this case due to a blocked portal vein and a previous splenectomy. With an abdominal incision, we successfully punctured the mesenteric venous system and navigated the occluded segment of the portal vein through the mesenteric approach. TIPS was then performed under balloon guidance. This study aims to explore the management of risks and complications during surgical operations and propose multiple preoperative surgical techniques to improve the success rate of the procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术是一种新兴的介入手术,具有多种适应症和很高的技术成功率,但有胆道损伤的风险。被低估的情况。我们介绍了一名11岁的胆道损伤并伴有渗漏的患者,biloma形成,和经皮手术引起的胆道梗阻。介入放射学引流通过解决泄漏和胆汁瘤来解决这些并发症。这些经皮手术中的胆道并发症及其处理在医学文献中很少报道。使他们的管理不规范。我们强调引流管理以及分享引流管理的重要性,以增加这种临床情况的经验,并鼓励分享具有类似诊断的病例。
    The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a rising interventional procedure with multiple indications and high technical success but with risks of biliary injuries, an underreported scenario. We present an 11-year-old patient with biliary injury with a leak, biloma formation, and biliary obstruction caused by the percutaneous procedure. Interventional radiology drainages addressed these complications by resolving the leak and biloma. These biliary complications in percutaneous procedures and their management are rarely reported in the medical literature, making their management not standard. We highlight drainage management and the importance of sharing it to add experience to this clinical scenario and encourage sharing cases with similar diagnoses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    这篇社论描述了优化经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)技术的里程碑,已成为世界范围内治疗门静脉高压并发症的主要方法之一。创新理念,随后的实验研究和在肝硬化患者中使用TIPS的初步经验有助于将TIPS引入临床实践。此刻,优化TIPS技术的主要成果是提高支架的定性特性。从裸露的金属支架过渡到延长的聚四氟乙烯覆盖的支架移植物,可以显着防止分流功能障碍。然而,其首选直径的问题,这有助于门静脉压力的最佳降低,而不会发生TIPS后肝性脑病的风险,仍然相关。目前,肝性脑病是TIPS最常见的并发症之一,显着影响其有效性和预后。根据认知指标仔细选择患者,营养状况,肝功能评估,等。,将降低TIPS后肝性脑病的发生率,提高治疗效果。TIPS技术的优化大大扩展了其使用的适应证,使其成为治疗门脉高压并发症的主要方法之一。同时,有许多局限性和未解决的问题,需要进一步纳入大量患者队列的随机对照试验.
    This editorial describes the milestones to optimize of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) technique, which have made it one of the main methods for the treatment of portal hypertension complications worldwide. Innovative ideas, subsequent experimental studies and preliminary experience of use in cirrhotic patients contributed to the introduction of TIPS into clinical practice. At the moment, the main achievement in optimize of TIPS technique is progress in the qualitative characteristics of stents. The transition from bare metal stents to extended polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts made it possible to significantly prevent shunt dysfunction. However, the question of its preferred diameter, which contributes to an optimal reduction of portal pressure without the risk of developing post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy, remains relevant. Currently, hepatic encephalopathy is one of the most common complications of TIPS, significantly affecting its effectiveness and prognosis. Careful selection of patients based on cognitive indicators, nutritional status, assessment of liver function, etc., will reduce the incidence of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy and improve treatment results. Optimize of TIPS technique has significantly expanded the indications for its use and made it one of the main methods for the treatment of portal hypertension complications. At the same time, there are a number of limitations and unresolved issues that require further randomized controlled trials involving a large cohort of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门静脉动脉化(PVA)已用于肝移植(LT),以在动脉循环受损时最大化氧气输送,或已用作复杂门静脉血栓形成(PVT)的替代再灌注技术。尚未评估PVA对门静脉灌注和原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)的影响。
    目的:检查需要PVA的患者的结局与LT手术的相关性。
    方法:对2011年至2022年在圣达菲波哥大基金会接受PVA和LT的所有患者进行分析。考虑到移植物灌注的时间敏感效应,患者分为两组:再灌注前(pre-PVA),如果在移植物血运重建之前进行了动静脉吻合术,和灌注后(PVA后),如果随后进行PVA。PVA之前的基本原理考虑了门静脉血流动力学不良,严重的血管盗血,或PVT。如果移植物灌注不足变得明显,则考虑PVA后。在PVA之前尝试保守干预。
    结果:共25例:移植再灌注前15例,移植后10例。Pre-PVA患者受糖尿病的影响更大,失代偿期肝硬化,门静脉(PV)血流动力学受损,PVT。pre-PVA后PGD较少见(20.0%vs60.0%)(P=0.041)。发生PGD的患者动脉化后PV速度(25.00cm/svs73.42cm/s)(P=0.036)和流量(1.31L/minvs3.34L/min)(P=0.136)的增加较小。9例患者需要PVA闭合(中位时间:62d)。Pre-PVA和非PGD病例的生存率优于其同行(56.09个月比22.77个月和54.15个月比31.91个月,分别)。
    结论:这是LT中最大的PVA报告。结果表明,pre-PVA比post-PVA提供更好的移植物灌注。移植物高灌注对PGD有保护作用。
    BACKGROUND: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.
    METHODS: All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.
    RESULTS: A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在门脉高压中,已知胃静脉曲张相关出血有更高的输血需求,不受控制的出血,再出血,重症监护病房的要求,和死亡。在胃静脉曲张的情况下,EUS引导的线圈插入现在是内窥镜治疗的可接受方式。通过这项研究,我们讨论了在胃静脉曲张中使用EUS进行线圈和胶水注射的大型单中心经验。我们还研究了与使用这种方式作为初级预防和抢救治疗相关的不良事件和可能性。
    该研究是在印度的三级护理中心进行的。共有86名患者被纳入研究。EUS引导线圈和胶水的适应症分为3种临床情况,即,重新流血,救援,和主要。技术上的成功和临床上的成功,也就是说,控制患者的出血,通过EUS上没有多普勒信号证实,内窥镜视图,稳定血红蛋白,不需要输血维持血红蛋白。
    平均Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分和终末期肝病模型-Na评分分别为9.2和14.6。胃静脉曲张的平均大小为18.9mm。使用的线圈的平均数为2.9,并且所需的胶的平均量为1.6mL。整个患者组的技术成功率为100%。在90%的患者组中观察到临床成功。平均随访时间为175.2天。
    EUS引导的线圈和胶水疗法在不同的临床设置中都有作用,作为主要治疗,重新流血,和抢救治疗。它具有显著的技术和临床成功。它在治疗算法中的作用需要在前瞻性研究中进一步研究。与介入放射学主导的干预相比,它可以提供成本优势。
    UNASSIGNED: In portal hypertension, gastric varix-associated bleeding is known to have higher transfusion requirements, uncontrolled bleeding, rebleeding, intensive care unit requirements, and death. EUS-guided coil insertion is now an acceptable modality for endoscopic management in cases of gastric varices. With this study, we discuss our large single-center experience in the use of EUS for coil and glue injection in gastric varices. We also look into adverse events associated with and possibilities of using this modality as both primary prophylaxis and a rescue therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was conducted in a tertiary care center in India. A total of 86 patients were included in the study. The indication for EUS-guided coil and glue was divided into 3 clinical situations, namely, rebleed, rescue, and primary. The technical success and clinical success, that is, control of bleed in patients, were confirmed by absence of Doppler signal on EUS, endoscopic view, and stabilized hemoglobin with no need of blood product transfusion to maintain hemoglobin.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Na score were 9.2 and 14.6, respectively. The mean size of the gastric varices was 18.9 mm. The mean number of coils used was 2.9, and the average quantity of glue required was 1.6 mL. The technical success was 100% across the patient group. Clinical success was seen in 90% of the patient group. Mean follow-up was seen for 175.2 days.
    UNASSIGNED: EUS-guided coil and glue therapy has a role in different clinical settings, as primary therapy, rebleed, and rescue therapy. It has significant technical and clinical success. Its role in treatment algorithms needs to be further studied in prospective studies. It may offer a cost advantage in comparison to interventional radiology-led interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    BavenoVII标准重新定义了失代偿期肝硬化的管理,引入肝脏再补偿的概念标志着与传统的不可逆转的观点大相径庭。这个概念的核心是通过量身定制的疗法解决肝硬化的根本原因,包括抗病毒药物和生活方式的改变。关于酒精的研究,丙型肝炎病毒,和乙型肝炎病毒相关性肝硬化证明了这些干预措施在改善肝功能和患者预后方面的有效性。经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一种有希望的干预措施,有效解决门静脉高压症并发症,促进再补偿。然而,TIPS的最佳时机和患者选择仍未解决。尽管面临挑战,TIPS为肝脏恢复提供了新的希望,标志着肝硬化管理的显著进步。需要进一步的研究来完善其实施并最大化其利益。总之,TIPS是在BavenoVII标准框架内改善失代偿期肝硬化的肝功能和患者预后的有希望的途径。
    The Baveno VII criteria redefine the management of decompensated liver cirrhosis, introducing the concept of hepatic recompensation marking a significant departure from the conventional view of irreversible decline. Central to this concept is addressing the underlying cause of cirrhosis through tailored therapies, including antivirals and lifestyle modifications. Studies on alcohol, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis demonstrate the efficacy of these interventions in improving liver function and patient outcomes. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) emerges as a promising intervention, effectively resolving complications of portal hypertension and facilitating recompensation. However, optimal timing and patient selection for TIPS remain unresolved. Despite challenges, TIPS offers renewed hope for hepatic recompensation, marking a significant advancement in cirrhosis management. Further research is needed to refine its implementation and maximize its benefits. In conclusion, TIPS stands as a promising avenue for improving hepatic function and patient outcomes in decompensated liver cirrhosis within the framework of the Baveno VII criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述提供了对门静脉高压症(PH)及其在各种外科手术中的意义的深入探索。临床上显着的PH的患病率在代偿性肝硬化中为50%至60%,在失代偿性肝硬化中为100%。已经证明了PH患者肝和非肝外科手术的可行性和安全性。充分的术前风险评估和PH的优化是患者评估的组成部分。在这一特定人群中,手术后不良结局的发生随着时间的推移而减少,由于技术的发展和围手术期多学科护理的改进。
    This review provides an in-depth exploration of portal hypertension (PH) and its implications in various surgical procedures. The prevalence of clinically significant PH is 50% to 60% in compensated cirrhosis and 100% in decompensated cirrhosis. The feasibility and safety of hepatic and nonhepatic surgical procedures in patients with PH has been shown. Adequate preoperative risk assessment and optimization of PH are integral parts of patient assessment. The occurrence of adverse outcomes after surgery has decreased over time in this specific population, due to the development of techniques and improved perioperative multidisciplinary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    门脉高压通过其原因和并发症有脑部后果,即肝性脑病(HE),由肝功能不全和门体分流引起的一种常见的破坏性脑紊乱。发病机制涉及高氨血症和全身性炎症。症状是人格紊乱和注意力减少。他是最低或I至IV级(昏迷)。HE的发作是偶发的,并且经常复发。初始治疗是指导致发作和排除非肝原因的事件。具体的抗HE治疗是乳果糖。通过复发,利福昔明是附加的。抗HE治疗对预防也有效,但是HE的出现标志着晚期肝病和预后不良。
    Portal hypertension has cerebral consequences via its causes and complications, namely hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a common and devastating brain disturbance caused by liver insufficiency and portosystemic shunting. The pathogenesis involves hyperammonemia and systemic inflammation. Symptoms are disturbed personality and reduced attention. HE is minimal or grades I to IV (coma). Bouts of HE are episodic and often recurrent. Initial treatment is of events that precipitated the episode and exclusion of nonhepatic causes. Specific anti-HE treatment is lactulose. By recurrence, rifaximin is add-on. Anti-HE treatment is efficacious also for prophylaxis, but emergence of HE marks advanced liver disease and a dismal prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号