Personality Inventory

个性盘点
  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    背景:自杀是一个严重的公共卫生问题。童年创伤的影响,不安全的成人依恋风格和人格特质被认为是自杀未遂的可能危险因素。这个横截面的目的,病例对照研究是调查儿童创伤的影响,成人依恋风格和人格特质对自杀未遂的影响。
    方法:样本包括一方面企图自杀的精神病患者(n=101)和另一方面没有企图自杀的精神病患者(n=114)。使用的问卷是匈牙利验证版本的成人依恋量表(AAS),童年创伤问卷(CTQ),气质和性格量表(TCI)和人口统计问卷。
    结果:结果表明,寻求新颖性(NS)气质特征[EH=1.043;95%C.I.=(0.950-1.145)]p=0.376;情感虐待[EH=1.034;95%C.I.=(0.966-1.107)]p=0.336;情感忽视[EH=1.022;95%C.I.=1.0.659而安全连接方式[EH=0.908;95%C.I.=(0.842-0.980)]p=0.013似乎是一个显着的保护因素(c2(1)=6.515p=0.011)。此外,在研究童年创伤与成人依恋风格之间的联系时,发现焦虑依恋风格与情感虐待呈正相关(rs(197)=0.293)p<0.001,回避依恋风格与情感忽视呈正相关(rs(197)=0.273)p<0.001。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,具有回避型依恋风格和童年创伤的个体可能表现出更高的自杀风险。但是,安全的依恋方式可能会降低自杀风险。
    BACKGROUND: Suicide is a severe public health problem. Impacts of childhood traumas, unsecure adult attachment styles and personality traits have been suggested as possible risk factors for suicide attempts. The aim of this cross-sectional, case-controlled study is to investigate the impact of childhood traumas, adult attachment styles and personality traits on suicide attempt.
    METHODS: The sample consisted of psychiatric patients who attempted suicide (n=101) on the one hand and those who did not attempt suicide (n=114) on the other. The questionnaires used were the Hungarian validated versions of Adult Attachment Scale (AAS), Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and a demographic questionnaire.
    RESULTS: Results indicated that Novelty Seeking (NS) temperament trait [EH=1.043; 95% C.I.=(0.950-1.145)] p=0.376; emotional abuse [EH=1.034; 95% C.I.=(0.966-1.107)] p=0.336; emotional neglect [EH=1.022; 95% C.I.=(0.936-1.116)] p=0.626; and sexual abuse [EH=1.047; 95% C.I.=(0.959-1.142)] p=0.305 were associated with nonsignificant increases in the odds of suicide attempts. Whereas secure attachment style [EH=0.908; 95% C.I.=(0.842-0.980)] p=0.013 appeared to be a significantly protective factor (c2(1)=6.515 p=0.011). Furthermore, when examining the connection between childhood traumas and adult attachment styles it was found that the anxious attachment style had a positive significant correlation with emotional abuse (rs(197)=0.293) p<0.001, avoidant attachment style with emotional neglect (rs(197)= 0.273) p<0.001.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that individuals with avoidant attachment style and childhood traumas are likely to present a higher suicide risk. However secure attachment style likely to present a lower risk for suicide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在本研究中,我们调查了有认知选择的老年人与功能正常的老年人相比,淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)负担和人格特质的差异.责任心,特别是,与阿尔茨海默病(AD)病理有关,我们假设认知高的成年人会表现出更高的责任心。另外感兴趣的是达拉斯终身大脑研究中的高功能老年人是否会证明AD病理减少。
    方法:我们测试了285名认知正常的参与者(年龄55-90岁),并使用修订的NEO人格量表(NEO-PI-R)收集了自觉性得分。参与者还接受了放射性示踪剂AV-45,18F-Florbetapir的PET成像,一种放射性示踪剂,用于测量大脑中的Aβ蛋白。计算了8个感兴趣的皮质区域的平均皮质SUVR,标准化为小脑灰质。此外,参与者完成了一个认知电池,做了核磁共振扫描,并完成抑郁和健康的自我报告。我们指定那些参与者得分等于或高于中年(35-54岁)参考组的平均情景记忆,作为“认知选择”(N=69),那些得分低于平均水平的人,如“认知正常”(N=216)。感兴趣的因变量包括全球和区域淀粉样蛋白(Aβ),皮质形态学,抑郁症,健身,尽责,和各种认知措施。
    结果:认知选择的参与者更年轻(p=.043),受过更多的教育(p=.021),并且具有更高的积极人格特质,包括自律(p=0.01),对思想的开放(p=.013),和能力(p=.015),与认知正常相比。尽管各组在总体Aβ病理负荷方面没有差异(p=0.083),认知选择在包括颞侧区在内的特定区域表现出较少的病理(p=.049)。回归分析控制性别,年龄,教育,MMSE,通过全局Aβ相互作用对流体能力的影响揭示了一个显著的群体(p=.034),其中较大的Aβ负荷仅在认知正常的老年人中预测较低的得分。
    结论:这些发现提供了证据,表明认知特权的成年人在许多领域表现出对衰退的抵抗力,并表现出对淀粉样蛋白病理学的抵抗力。讨论将集中在淀粉样蛋白积累的纵向变化,皮质变薄,和认知能力下降,以及储备的概念。
    BACKGROUND: In the present study, we investigated differences in amyloid (Aβ) burden and personality traits in cognitively-select older adults compared to average-functioning older adults. Conscientiousness, in particular, has been linked to Alzheimer\'s Disease (AD) pathology, and we hypothesized that adults who were high in cognition would exhibit enhanced conscientiousness. Of additional interest was whether high functioning older adults in the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study would evidence reduced AD pathology.
    METHODS: We tested 285 cognitively-normal participants (ages 55-90) and collected conscientiousness scores using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Participants also underwent PET imaging with radiotracer AV-45, 18F-Florbetapir, a radiotracer that is used to measure Aβ protein in the brain. Mean cortical SUVR was computed across 8 cortical regions of interest, normalized to cerebellar gray matter. In addition, participants completed a cognitive battery, underwent an MRI scan, and completed self-reports for depression and fitness. We designated those participants scoring at or above the mean episodic memory of a middle-aged (ages 35-54) reference group, as \"cognitively-select\" (N = 69), and those scoring below the mean, as \"cognitively-normal\" (N = 216). Dependent variables of interest included global and regional amyloid (Aβ), cortical morphometry, depression, fitness, conscientiousness, and various cognitive measures.
    RESULTS: Cognitively select participants were younger (p = .043), more educated (p = .021), and had higher positive personality traits, including self-discipline (p = .01), openness to ideas (p = .013), and competence (p = .015), compared to cognitively-normal. Although the groups did not differ in global Aβ pathology load (p = .083), cognitively select exhibited less pathology in specific regions including lateral temporal areas (p = .049). Regression analysis controlling for sex, age, education, and MMSE, revealed a significant group by global Aβ interaction on fluid ability (p = .034), where greater Aβ load predicted lower scores in cognitively normal older adults only.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that cognitively privileged adults show resistance to decline across many domains and demonstrate resilience to amyloid pathology. Discussion will focus on longitudinal change in amyloid accumulation, cortical thinning, and cognitive decline, as well as the concept of reserve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定安达卢西亚(西班牙)手术区护士的倦怠水平,确定每个参与者的倦怠阶段,并考虑其与社会人口统计学的关系,考虑职业变量和人格因素。
    数据是通过提问法收集的。在数据收集之日在手术区工作的所有护士都参与了研究。问卷中涉及社会人口统计学和与工作变量相关的变量。使用教育临床问卷:焦虑和抑郁(CECAD)测量焦虑和抑郁症状。使用NEO五因素量表(NEO-FFI)评估心理人格变量,适应西班牙人口。使用Maslach倦怠量表(MBI)测量倦怠。
    多中心,横截面,定量研究于2021年8月至10月进行。
    描述性分析,独立样本的学生t检验,采用SPSS25.0进行Pearson相关和多元线性回归。
    研究样本包括安达卢西亚(西班牙)23家医院的214名手术区护士。社会人口统计学,使用Maslach职业倦怠量表研究了职业和人格变量,NEO五因素量表(NEO-FFI)和教育临床问卷:焦虑和抑郁。应用了STROBE语句指南。
    样本中29.4%的护士表现出高度的情绪疲惫,25.7%的人患有人格解体,而28%的人的个人成就水平较低。这三个维度与NEO-FFI分量表(神经质,令人愉快,开放性,尽责和外向),考虑到所有的焦虑和抑郁项目。对于所有三个维度的倦怠,一致性是具有统计学意义的预测因子(p<0.001)。
    手术区的护士表现出高度的倦怠。有证据表明,倦怠与人格因素和社会人口统计学变量有关。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine levels of burnout among surgical area nurses in Andalusia (Spain), to identify the phase of burnout in each participant and to consider its relationship with sociodemographic, occupational variables and personality factors considered.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were collected by means of questionary. All nurses working in the surgical area on the date of data collection participated in the study. Sociodemographic and related to work variables were addressed in the questionnaire. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured using the Educational-Clinical Questionnaire: Anxiety and Depression (CECAD). Psychological personality variables were assessed using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), adapted for a Spanish population. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI).
    UNASSIGNED: Multicentre, cross-sectional, quantitative study carried out from August to October 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: Descriptive analysis, Student\'s t-test for independent samples, Pearson\'s correlation and multiple linear regression were performed with SPSS 25.0.
    UNASSIGNED: The study sample consisted of 214 surgical area nurses at 23 hospitals in Andalusia (Spain). Sociodemographic, occupational and personality variables were studied using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and the Educational-Clinical Questionnaire: Anxiety and Depression. The STROBE statement guidelines were applied.
    UNASSIGNED: 29.4% of the nurses in the sample presented high levels of emotional exhaustion, 25.7% suffered from depersonalization and 28% had low levels of personal accomplishment. These three dimensions were significantly correlated with the NEO-FFI subscales (neuroticism, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness and extraversion), and with all the anxiety and depression items considered. Agreeableness was a statistically significant predictor (p < 0.001) for all three dimensions of burnout.
    UNASSIGNED: Nurses in the surgical area present high levels of Burnout. There is evidence that relates Burnout to personality factors and socio-demographic variables.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    围产期抑郁症(PPD)是一个重要的公共卫生问题,往往受到心理和人格因素的影响。这项研究调查了人格特质的影响,尤其是神经质,强迫症(OCD)症状对PPD的严重程度。主要目的是量化这些因素对PPD风险和严重程度的贡献,以加强早期干预策略。在蒂米什瓦拉的“PiusBrinzeu”县急诊医院,根据DSM-5标准,共有47名孕妇患有抑郁症状,罗马尼亚,参加了这项横断面研究,以及49名没有抑郁症状的女性作为对照。使用NEO五因素量表(NEO-FFI)评估人格特征,和强迫症症状使用强迫症量表(OCI)进行测量。使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评估抑郁的严重程度。这组问卷分别在产前和产后进行。逻辑回归分析强调神经质是PPD严重程度的重要预测因子,神经质的增加与PPD的高风险相关(系数=0.24,p<0.001)。相反,开放性显示出保护作用(系数=-0.13,p=0.009)。较高的强迫症症状,特别是订购和囤积,与抑郁评分增加有关。具体来说,OCI总分显著预测EPDS评分(系数=0.03,p=0.003).此外,在围产期观察到EPDS焦虑和抑郁评分显着增加,表明症状恶化(焦虑系数=0.51;p<0.001)。研究结果表明,神经质和强迫症症状等人格特质显着影响了PPD的严重程度。针对这些特定特征的干预措施可能会减轻围产期抑郁症的风险和严重程度。强调需要考虑这些心理维度的个性化治疗计划。
    Perinatal depression (PPD) presents a significant public health concern, often influenced by psychological and personality factors. This study investigated the impact of personality traits, particularly neuroticism, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms on the severity of PPD. The primary aim was to quantify the contributions of these factors to the risk and severity of PPD to enhance early intervention strategies. A total of 47 pregnant women with depressive symptoms per DSM-5 criteria at \"Pius Brinzeu\" County Emergency Hospital in Timisoara, Romania, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study, as well as 49 women without depressive symptoms as controls. Personality traits were assessed using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), and OCD symptoms were measured using the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI). Depression severity was evaluated using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). This set of questionnaires were administered antepartum and postpartum. The logistic regression analysis highlighted neuroticism as a significant predictor of PPD severity, with an increase in neuroticism associated with a higher risk of PPD (coefficient = 0.24, p < 0.001). Conversely, openness showed a protective effect (coefficient = -0.13, p = 0.009). Higher OCD symptomatology, particularly ordering and hoarding, were linked with increased depression scores. Specifically, the total OCI score significantly predicted the EPDS score (coefficient = 0.03, p = 0.003). Furthermore, significant increases in EPDS anxiety and depression scores were observed in the perinatal period, indicating worsening of symptoms (anxiety coefficient = 0.51; p < 0.001). The findings suggest that personality traits like neuroticism and OCD symptoms significantly contribute to the severity of PPD. Interventions targeting these specific traits could potentially mitigate the risk and severity of perinatal depression, underscoring the need for personalized treatment plans that consider these psychological dimensions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人格的五因素模型,使用五大库存等工具进行量化,由广泛的人格域组成,包括外向,宜人,责任心,神经质(情绪不稳定),和开放。这样的仪器通常包括>40个项目。然而,在对多个量表进行测序的临床和队列研究中,具有许多项目的仪器可能是笨拙的,并且是测量误差的原因。相反,建立的5项和10项版本的五大清单可靠性较差。这里,我们开发并验证了一个简化的18项五大库存,它平衡了效率,可靠性和灵敏度。
    方法:我们分析了三个数据集(N=59,797,N=21,177和N=87,983),这些数据来自参与在线英国大智力测验(GBIT)研究的个人,与BBC2Horizon合作的公民科学项目。我们应用了因子分析(FA),预测性规范建模,和单样本t检验,以验证大五的18项版本,并调查其与精神和神经系统疾病的关联。
    结果:与文献中其他先前缩短的版本相比,大五清单的18项版本具有更高的有效性和重测可靠性,与完整的五大清单具有可比的人口关联。它与精神疾病表现出强烈的(即大效应大小)关联,与神经系统疾病的中度(中小)关联。神经质(情绪不稳定)在所有精神疾病中都高得多,而责任心,开放性和外向性显示了不同条件下的不同关联。
    结论:新验证的18项版本的“大五”提供了一种测量人格特征的便捷方法,适合在一系列研究中进行应用。它保留了心理测量结构,重测信度和临床组敏感度,与完整的原始规模相比。
    BACKGROUND: The five-factor model of personality, as quantified using instruments such as the Big Five Inventory, consists of broad personality domains including Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism (emotional instability), and Openness. Such instruments typically include >40 items. However, instruments with many items can be unwieldly and a cause of measurement error in clinical and cohort studies where multiple scales are sequenced. Conversely, established 5- and 10-item versions of the Big Five Inventory have poor reliability. Here, we developed and validated an abbreviated 18-item Big Five Inventory that balances efficiency, reliability and sensitivity.
    METHODS: We analysed three datasets (N = 59,797, N = 21,177, and N = 87,983) from individuals who participated in the online Great British Intelligence Test (GBIT) study, a collaborative citizen science project with BBC2 Horizon. We applied factor analyses (FA), predictive normative modelling, and one-sample t-tests to validate the 18-item version of the Big Five and to investigate its associations with psychiatric and neurological conditions.
    RESULTS: The 18-item version of the Big Five Inventory had higher validity and retest reliability compared to the other previously shortened versions in the literature, with comparable demographic associations to the full Big Five Inventory. It exhibited strong (i.e. large effect size) associations with psychiatric conditions, and moderate (small-medium) associations with neurological conditions. Neuroticism (emotional instability) was substantially higher in all psychiatric conditions, whereas Conscientiousness, Openness and Extraversion showed differential associations across conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The newly validated 18-item version of the Big Five provides a convenient means of measuring personality traits that is suitable for deployment in a range of studies. It retains psychometric structure, retest reliability and clinical-group sensitivity, as compared to the full original scale.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人格是心理学中表征和区分个体的核心概念和跨域解释因素。令人惊讶的是,在许多关于动眼行为的研究中,只有少数人研究了人格如何影响对视觉刺激的探索。由于现有研究数量有限,在各种探索环境下的眼球运动中,是否总是可以观察到眼球运动中的人格标记仍然不确定。这里,引入了基于凝视的个性签名的新概念,我们使用视觉探索指标在91名参与者的各种探索环境(视觉搜索和图像和网页的自由观看)中检测人格特征.人格数据的收集与验证法语版“五大清单”的参考文件一样。线性回归分析表明,虽然经验的外向性和开放性与任何特定的勘探指标都不相关,其他三个特征-责任心,宜人,和神经质与不同视觉探索环境中的所有探索指标密切相关。我们的研究为从非常简短的眼动记录中捕获基于凝视的人格特征提供了证据。
    Personality is a central concept and a cross-domain explanatory factor in psychology to characterize and differentiate individuals. Surprisingly, among the many studies on oculomotor behavior, only a few have investigated how personality influences the exploration of a visual stimulus. Due to the limited number of existing studies, it is still uncertain if markers of personality in eye movements are always observable in eye movements across various exploration contexts. Here, introducing a novel concept of gaze-based signatures of personality, we used visual exploration metrics to detect personality signatures across various exploration contexts (visual search and free-viewing on images and webpages) in 91 participants. Personality data were collected as in the reference paper that validated the French version of the Big Five Inventory. Linear regression analyses demonstrated that while Extraversion and Openness to Experience did not correlate with any particular exploration metric, the other three traits-Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism-correlated robustly with all exploration metrics in different visual exploration contexts. Our study provides evidence for the capture of the gaze-based signature of personality from very brief eye movement recordings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三元模型认为大胆的独特特征构造,卑鄙,抑制是精神病的基础。三元模型特征被概念化为生物行为维度,可以使用来自替代测量模式的不同指标集进行评估;因此,三元模型将假设这些特征不限于任何一个项目集。本研究测试了三元模型维度是否会从元素精神病评估(EPA)的分面尺度的层次结构分析中出现,旨在根据五因素人格模型对精神病进行综合索引的清单。研究参与者(Ns=811,170)完成了EPA和三个不同的量表集,评估了三元特征以及反社会/外部化行为的标准度量。EPA方面尺度的Bass-ackwards建模揭示了一个四级结构,第三层次的因素似乎与三军特征维度相似。一项分析将3级EPA因子的得分回归到使用不同的三元量表集定义的相应潜在性状维度上,该分析显示出极高的收敛性(βs=.84-.91)。三级EPA因素也证明了与相关标准相关的有效性,接近并有时超过4级EPA因素的明显水平。一起,这些结果表明,三权制特征结构被嵌入到一个精神病清单中,该清单旨在与一般人格模型相一致,并有效预测相关的外部标准.(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    The triarchic model posits that distinct trait constructs of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition underlie psychopathy. The triarchic model traits are conceptualized as biobehavioral dimensions that can be assessed using different sets of indicators from alternative measurement modalities; as such, the triarchic model would hypothesize that these traits are not confined to any one item set. The present study tested whether the triarchic model dimensions would emerge from a hierarchical-structural analysis of the facet scales of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment (EPA), an inventory designed to comprehensively index psychopathy according to the five-factor personality model. Study participants (Ns = 811, 170) completed the EPA and three different scale sets assessing the triarchic traits along with criterion measures of antisocial/externalizing behaviors. Bass-ackwards modeling of the EPA facet scales revealed a four-level structure, with factors at the third level appearing similar to the triarchic trait dimensions. An analysis in which scores for the Level-3 EPA factors were regressed onto corresponding latent-trait dimensions defined using the different triarchic scale sets revealed extremely high convergence (βs = .84-.91). The Level-3 EPA factors also evidenced validity in relation to relevant criteria, approximating and sometimes exceeding that evident for the Level-4 EPA factors. Together, these results indicate that the triarchic trait constructs are embedded in a psychopathy inventory designed to align with a general personality model and effectively predict pertinent external criteria. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中,照顾者的负担受各种因素的影响,包括疾病进展阶段和神经精神症状(NPS)。迄今为止,关于患者病前人格如何影响这种负担的研究有限。这项研究的目的是调查前驱至轻度AD患者病前人格和NPS对其照顾者负担的影响。
    方法:纳入了来自PACO(法语:PersonnalitéAlzheimerComportement)队列的180名前驱或轻度AD淹死的参与者。通过修订的NEO人格量表(NEO-PI-R)评估人格。神经精神症状用简短版本的神经精神量表(NPI-Q)进行测量,护理者负担采用Zarit负担量表进行评估。人格之间的关系,神经精神病量表(NPI)得分,和照顾者负担是使用年龄控制的多元线性回归来确定的,性别,教育水平,和迷你精神状态检查。
    结果:NPI总分与负担增加有关(β=0.45;p<0.001)。高水平的神经质(β=0.254;p=0.003)和低水平的尽责(β=-0.233;p=0.005)与较高的负担有关。外向性(β=-0.185;p=0.027)和尽责性(β=-0.35;p=0.006)与负担呈负相关。相比之下,神经质,开放性和宜人性与负担无关。当根据NPI总分进行调整时,外向性和尽责性之间的关系并没有持续下去。
    结论:我们的结果表明,前驱至轻度阿尔茨海默症患者的病前人格影响照顾者的负担,具有高水平的外向性和责任心的保护作用。
    OBJECTIVE: In Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), the burden on caregivers is influenced by various factors, including the stage of disease progression and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). To date, there has been limited research examining how patient\'s premorbid personality could affect this burden. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of both premorbid personality and NPS in individuals with prodromal to mild AD on their caregivers\' burden.
    METHODS: One hundred eighty participants with prodromal or mild AD drown from the PACO (in French: Personnalité Alzheimer COmportement) cohort were included. Personality was assessed by the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were measured with the short version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q), and caregiver burden was evaluated with the Zarit burden scale. Relationships between personality, Neuro-Psychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores, and caregiver burden were determined using multivariate linear regressions controlled for age, sex, educational level, and Mini Mental State Examination.
    RESULTS: The total NPI score was related to increased burden (beta = 0.45; p < 0.001). High level of neuroticism (beta = 0.254; p = 0.003) et low level of conscientiousness (beta = - 0.233; p = 0.005) were associated higher burden. Extraversion (beta = -0.185; p = 0.027) and conscientiousness (beta = -0.35; p = 0.006) were negatively associated with burden. In contrast, neuroticism, openness and agreeableness were not correlated with burden. When adjusted on total NPI score, the relationship between extraversion and conscientiousness didn\'t persist.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that premorbid personality of patients with prodromal to mild Alzheimer influence caregivers\'s burden, with a protective effect of a high level of extraversion and conscientiousness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究使用儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)和NEO五因素量表(NEO-FFI)比较了边缘性人格障碍(BPD)和双相情感障碍2(BP2障碍)在报告的儿童创伤和五因素人格特质方面。参与者是50名男性和女性,年龄18-45岁,患有DSM-5诊断的BPD,同一年龄段的50名男性和女性患有DSM-5诊断的BP2疾病。参与者不能同时满足BPD和BP2障碍的标准。边缘参与者在NEO-FFI的神经质子量表上的得分明显较高,在同意性子量表上的得分明显较低。校正多重比较后,CTQ评分无组间差异.研究结果表明,BPD和BP2障碍主要在潜在的气质/遗传结构方面有所不同,而环境因素在这两种疾病的不同病因中的作用有限。
    This study compared borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar 2 disorder (BP 2 disorder) with respect to reported childhood trauma and Five-Factor personality traits using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Participants were 50 men and women, aged 18-45, with DSM-5-diagnosed BPD and 50 men and women in the same age group with DSM-5-diagnosed BP 2 disorder. Participants could not meet criteria for both BPD and BP 2 disorder. Borderline participants had significantly higher scores on the neuroticism subscale and significantly lower scores on the agreeableness subscale of the NEO-FFI. After correction for multiple comparisons, there were no between-group differences on CTQ scores. Study results suggest that BPD and BP 2 disorder differ primarily with respect to underlying temperament/genetic architecture and that environmental factors have only a limited role in the differential etiologies of the two disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机构稳定性被认为是一种潜在的性状标记,可以预测患者在面对生活需求时将坚定不移地坚持下去并采取一致的行动。作为人格的持久表达,这项研究调查了成人社交媒体受访者(n=511)中的激励稳定性与气质和性格的关系,如Cloninger的心理生物学人格模型所示。
    方法:通过社交媒体平台上的滚雪球抽样招募的参与者,应用了27项机构稳定指数(ASI)和240项气质和性格清单(TCI-R-240)。
    结果:自我指导(β=0.634)在统计学上预测了机构的稳定性,自我超越(β=0.119),危害规避(β=-0.142)和奖励依赖(β=0.071)量表,在一个逐步回归模型中占方差的63.3%。在另一个TCI-R-240分量表的逐步模型中,有目的的(β=0.359),预期担忧(β=-0.353),责任量表(β=0.259)分别占56.8%,ASI评分方差的11.2%和2.8%。
    结论:结果仅限于愿意参与的成人社交媒体受访者。
    结论:机构的稳定性可以作为幸福感和良好的预后关联的特征标记,已经建立了高自我指导,低伤害避免,以及韧性,和性格优势。可以在临床上进行评估,以预测患者在面对生活和逆境的需求时会坚定不移地坚持下去并采取一致行动的程度。
    BACKGROUND: Agentive steadfastness was identified as a potential trait marker with which to anticipate prognostically that a patient will persevere steadfastly and take congruent action in facing the demands of living. Taken as an enduring expression of personality, this study investigated agentive steadfastness among adult social media respondents (n = 511) in relation to temperament and character as captured in Cloninger\'s psychobiological model of personality.
    METHODS: Participants recruited though snowball sampling on social media platforms, applied the 27-item Agentive Steadfastness Index (ASI) and the 240-item Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-R-240).
    RESULTS: Agentive steadfastness was statistically predicted by the Self-directedness (β = 0.634), Self-transcendence (β = 0.119), Harm Avoidance (β = -0.142) and the Reward Dependence (β = 0.071) scales, accounting for 63.3 % of the variance in one stepwise regression model. In another stepwise model for the TCI-R-240 subscales, the Purposeful (β = 0.359), Anticipatory Worry (β = -0.353), and the Responsibility (β = 0.259) subscales accounted for respectively 56.8 %, 11.2 % and 2.8 % of the variance in ASI scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results are limited to adult social media respondents who were willing to participate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Agentive steadfastness may serve as a trait marker of well-being and the good prognostic associations that have been established for high self-directedness, low harm avoidance, as well as resilience, and character strengths. It may be assessed clinically to anticipate prognostically the extent to which a patient will persevere steadfastly and take congruent action in facing the demands of living and adversity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号